Introduction
Fishing has been a fundamental practice for thousands of years, providing a vital food source for human populations, especially as ancient civilizations emerged near water bodies With the global population reaching around 6 billion, the demand for fish has surged, prompting the evolution of advanced fishing techniques that enable larger catches However, this increased efficiency has resulted in the depletion of various fish species, highlighting the importance of microeconomic analysis in addressing issues of scarcity in marine resources.
Numerous global agencies focus on the conservation of flora and fauna, with the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) being one of the most significant CITES has identified 86 fish species as endangered due to international trade, yet the highly controversial Bluefin Tuna is notably absent from this list This popular fish has experienced a dramatic decline in population, with estimates indicating that Atlantic and Mediterranean Tuna stocks have decreased by 70-80% over the past forty years.
Excessive and indiscriminate fishing is severely threatening Bluefin Tuna populations worldwide, driven by high demand for sushi and sashimi In response, Monaco proposed a global ban on Bluefin Tuna trade at the CITES meeting in March 2010, gaining support from the USA and the EU Despite this backing, the motion was ultimately rejected, with 72 out of 129 CITES members voting against the ban.
The ban on tuna fishing faces significant challenges due to high demand in several countries, particularly Japan, where a Bluefin Tuna fetched a record price of $104,700 in 2009 This extraordinary price highlights the premium value placed on Bluefin Tuna, illustrating Japan's reluctance to fully endorse a complete ban on its fishing.
The ongoing debate raises the critical question of whether a complete ban is the most effective solution for addressing the issue of overfishing Bluefin Tuna While countries may continue to implement such bans, it is essential to explore other viable economic alternatives This dilemma leads to the central research question of this paper: “What is the most economically effective way to tackle the problem of overfishing Bluefin Tuna?”
This paper addresses the issue of overfishing Bluefin Tuna through the lens of economic theory, specifically the 'Tragedy of the Commons.' It explores three potential solutions: a complete fishing and trade ban, a global tax on Bluefin Tuna, and a cap-and-trade system akin to carbon markets The analysis emphasizes the cap-and-trade approach, as an existing quota system in the Bluefin Tuna market suggests it could be the most feasible solution with minor adjustments Ultimately, the paper aims to recommend the most effective strategy for mitigating this economic challenge.
Theoretical Framework
Overfishing has rendered Bluefin Tuna an endangered species, highlighting the urgent need for sustainable practices This situation exemplifies the 'Tragedy of the Commons,' a well-documented economic phenomenon where shared resources are overexploited, leading to their depletion The consumption of Bluefin Tuna directly impacts its population in the ocean, emphasizing the critical importance of conservation efforts to protect this valuable marine resource.
The 'Tragedy of the Commons' concept, initially introduced by mathematician William Forster Lloyd in 1833, gained significant academic attention after Garrett Hardin's 1968 article on the same topic Hardin expanded upon Lloyd's framework, incorporating contemporary examples to illustrate the ongoing relevance of the dilemma.
The Tragedy of the Commons occurs in an open pasture with no ownership or entry restrictions, allowing grazers to bring unlimited cattle without costs In a socially sustainable world, where issues like poaching and conflicts are minimized, each grazer aims to maximize their utility by increasing their herd size While the benefits of each cow benefit the owner, the depletion of shared resources, such as grass, is a collective burden This situation mirrors a classic Prisoners’ Dilemma, where individual optimization harms the collective good, leading to overgrazing and eventual pasture depletion Consequently, the pursuit of individual interests, as highlighted by Adam Smith’s Invisible Hand, results in a detrimental outcome for all grazers involved.
Bluefin Tuna fishing exemplifies the challenges of managing a shared resource, as this valuable species is classified as a 'Commons'—accessible to everyone Consequently, the actions of individual fishermen or nations, acting independently, can lead to the overexploitation and depletion of the tuna population, mirroring the historical scenario of grazers exhausting a pasture.
Gibbons (1992) analyzes the problem of the Commons through game theory, enhancing the mathematical understanding of Hardin's example In this model, each farmer owns a certain number of goats (gi), contributing to a total of G goats, which generates a value v(G) per goat when grazing on a common pasture The pasture can sustain a maximum number of goats, Gmax, while still providing a positive value; however, exceeding this limit results in a sub-optimal value Additionally, Gibbons highlights the concept of decreasing marginal productivity, indicating that as the goat population approaches Gmax, their food intake diminishes, ultimately leading to a point where the goats barely survive.
When farmers independently select the number of goats to graze, they tend to prioritize strategies that maximize their individual payoffs According to Gibbons (1992), this behavior results in a Nash equilibrium where the total number of goats grazed surpasses the socially optimal level, exceeding Gmax and ultimately resulting in a value of zero.
Because each farmer only considers his optimality, the socially optimal level cannot be attained
2.2) Theoretical Approach to Problem Solving
Hardin's scenario highlights a situation where agents operate under externally imposed rules, such as government regulations, without negotiating for optimal outcomes However, researchers like Faysee (2005) argue that within these constraints, a "tragedy" is not the only possible outcome Each agent will pursue their own dominant strategy, necessitating a slight adaptation of the game to ensure that the dominant strategy leads to a more favorable collective result, avoiding the destruction of common resources.
Implementing a Pigouvian tax is one of the most effective strategies for addressing resource management issues, particularly in the case of public goods This approach does not necessitate redefining property rights or changing the resource's classification as a commons By imposing a tax, individuals can still pursue their optimal strategies, but they face an additional cost for consuming the scarce resource Consequently, a higher tax burden creates a stronger incentive for underinvestment or overexploitation of the resource Specifically, in the context of Bluefin Tuna, such a tax would deter both consumers and fishermen from excessive consumption and production, ultimately promoting sustainable practices.
According to a 2005 study, the implementation of an appropriately designed tax can encourage individual agents to adopt strategies that collectively benefit fish stocks, preventing detrimental outcomes However, this strategy relies on certain underlying conditions being met.
‘government’ or authority of supranational nature which does not require the active collaboration of the same agents who use the common resources
An alternative approach to managing international resources involves multiple governments collaborating without a central authority This scenario emphasizes the importance of negotiation among nation-states to establish new regulations According to Ostrom (1999), such bargaining between individual agents proves to be more effective than a government-imposed top-down strategy A minimal group of stakeholders is sufficient, provided that the advantages of creating new rules surpass the associated costs.
Faysee (2005) explores various modeling techniques for cooperative games through a game theoretic lens, referencing prior research However, the intricate nature of designing cooperative games where agents collaboratively establish new rules exceeds the scope of this paper Historical figures such as Shapley and Nash have employed diverse models, leading to significantly different conclusions about the Tragedy of the Commons (Faysee, 2005) Consequently, this paper will concentrate on non-cooperative approaches among agents.
The Coase Theorem offers a balanced approach to managing common pooled resources, positioning itself between Hardin's central authority model and Ostrom's negotiation-based framework Coase highlights the reciprocal nature of harm between two agents, where preventing harm to one can inadvertently harm the other In the context of Bluefin Tuna fishing, restricting fishing practices may benefit conservationists but negatively impact fishermen's livelihoods Coase advocates for granting private property rights over fishing waters, enabling both parties to negotiate mutually beneficial agreements This solution combines elements of Hardin's approach with Ostrom's emphasis on decentralized negotiation, ultimately empowering private agents to find resolutions.
The cap-and-trade system represents a significant shift from traditional command and control methods of resource management, as introduced by Baumol and Oates in 1971 This innovative approach allows for the trading of emission allowances, promoting economic efficiency while addressing environmental concerns.
The 'environmental pricing and standards procedure' allows companies to trade surplus permits after establishing standards, incentivizing firms to reduce consumption and manage common pooled resources effectively (Baumol and Oates, 1971) Montgomery (1972) further argued that the initial allocation of permits is irrelevant, as they will ultimately be held by those who value them most This has significant implications for Bluefin Tuna fishing; if a cap is set by countries or a supranational authority, individual agents can trade permits in an economically efficient manner Although Baumol and Oates (1971) noted that this approach may not achieve a Pareto-efficient allocation, it aligns with Pigou’s objectives while minimizing efficiency costs to the broader economy.
Analysis of Solutions
This section will individually analyze four proposed solutions to the overfishing of Bluefin Tuna, including a complete trade embargo, a Pigouvian tax, and a Cap-and-Trade system Each solution will be examined through the lens of economic theory, followed by an evaluation of its potential impacts on the Bluefin Tuna population and the fishing industry.
A trade embargo is a government-imposed trade barrier, often enacted for political reasons Historically, countries have sanctioned embargoes against others, such as the EU's arms embargo on North Korea, deemed a hostile state Additionally, international embargoes can restrict the trade of sensitive goods, exemplified by the prohibition on nuclear fuel and technology transactions with non-signatories of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
The international community has the option of implementing concerted trade bans, as demonstrated by Monaco's motion for a complete ban on Bluefin Tuna trade, which received support from the E.U in March 2010, alongside backing from the U.S However, for the ban to be enforced globally, it required approval at the CITES meeting, where it was ultimately blocked by countries reliant on the Bluefin industry for their economies This situation raises questions about the potential impact of such a ban, as efforts to impose it continue.
Development and application of the model
Estimating the effects of a trade embargo is challenging due to the lack of natural experiments, making it impractical for researchers to impose a trade ban on a specific good and measure its impacts Consequently, academic literature in this area is limited, with scholars primarily offering frameworks for assessing potential effects This paper acknowledges that while precise calculations of the consequences of a trade ban are not feasible, it will provide a basic estimation of such an action.
Douglas Irwin (2005) analyzed the impact of a self-imposed trade embargo in the early 19th century U.S by adapting a general equilibrium model from Grinols and Wong (1991) This paper will utilize his methodology to evaluate the change in welfare (NW) before and after the embargo was implemented.
1 and 2 Then, the equation to measure NW can be shown as:
The formula for net welfare (NW) during an embargo is given by NW = {(p1 – pw1) x m1} – (p1 x m0) + sc + sp In this equation, 'p' denotes local prices of the embargoed good, 'pw' indicates the world price, and 'm' represents the trade function, which is the difference between consumption and production Additionally, 'sc' and 'sp' reflect the substitution effects on consumption and production following the embargo, with '1' and '0' signifying the respective time periods.
Monaco's proposal to entirely ban Bluefin Tuna necessitates a slight modification to the model, as the absence of trade results in m1 having a value of zero Consequently, each country’s consumption is limited to its own production or catch, leading to a revised formulation of equation (1).
If a complete embargo is placed on Bluefin Tuna trade, any individual country will experience a change in welfare NW A diagrammatic representation of the change in utility is presented below:
Before the embargo, the market for Bluefin Tuna was characterized by a lower price (P) and a higher quantity (Q) However, the introduction of the embargo restricted supply to locally produced goods, shifting the supply curve to S1 This limitation arises from fixed fishing quotas imposed on each Bluefin Tuna fishing country, capping the available supply Consequently, consumers are left with a reduced quantity (Q1) at a significantly higher price (P1).
This paper examines the welfare effects of Bluefin tuna imports in Japan, the largest importer of this species According to a CITES report, Japan imported 32,356 tonnes of Atlantic Bluefin in 2007, while its domestic catch for that year was significantly lower, at just 2,365 tonnes, highlighting the disparity between import levels and local fishing efforts.
2010) Thus, its total consumption will be the sum of these two, 34,721 tonnes of Atlantic Bluefin Tuna The average price has been estimated to be approximately
$90,000 per tonne (Answers.com, 2010) Some of the economic information is presented in the table below: m0 p0 sp sc
Assumed 0, because of fishing territorial sovereignty
Assume 0, because it is a luxury (low price elasticity)
The missing expression in equation (2) is p1, but estimating it accurately is challenging due to the lack of precise data on the demand curve's shape A unit increase in p1 relative to p0 leads to a welfare loss of -32,356 However, if we account for a more significant price increase and consider additional factors such as the strong preference for Bluefin tuna and its status symbol in Japanese society, the resulting welfare loss would be considerably greater.
A complete ban on Atlantic Bluefin tuna trade will result in significant welfare loss, particularly affecting poorer exporting nations like Libya, where fishing is vital for subsistence While the conservation of the species may improve, the potential for black markets and smuggling could arise, leading to further complications Economically, such an embargo would be costly and inefficient, highlighting the need for a balanced approach to conservation and trade.
A.C Pigou, an English economist, suggests that addressing overfishing requires recognizing it as an activity that generates a negative externality, which is a social impact resulting from private actions Specifically, the overfishing of Atlantic Bluefin Tuna creates a negative externality by risking extinction, depriving the public of this species This environmental cost is not adequately considered in the producer's private costs or the consumer's private benefits, leading to a misrepresentation of the true cost in pricing.
The working of a Pigouvian tax can be observed in the diagram below:
Free market operations at the 'original output' lead to significantly high marginal social costs However, implementing a tax reduces output to the 'new output,' aligning marginal private cost, marginal social cost, and price, which represents the socially optimal output Additionally, the government benefits from tax revenue represented by the shaded area in the diagram.
Development and application of the model
This paper utilizes William Baumol's 1972 interpretation of Pigouvian taxes, applying a neo-classical approach to analyze Pigou's theories Baumol examines these concepts through the lens of Coase and other late 20th-century economists, providing a contemporary perspective on the implications of Pigouvian taxation.
The Atlantic Bluefin Tuna faces significant challenges, and to address this issue, we can envision a scenario involving a supranational authority that functions like a government Unlike traditional international organizations where nations negotiate agreements, this entity operates with a more centralized approach to manage and protect the species effectively.
‘government’ that can dictate policies to member states Now let the countries be the ‘fishing nations’, which either favour production or consumption of tuna, and the
Summary of Findings
In the previous chapter, three distinct solutions to the Atlantic Bluefin Tuna 'commons' problem were examined This section offers a concise summary of these solutions and assesses which method is the most effective in addressing the issue.
A trade embargo may be the most environmentally beneficial option for protecting Bluefin Tuna by allowing fish stocks to replenish, but it poses significant economic challenges and is scientifically debated Completely banning trade, despite the potential for 8,000 tonnes to be legally traded annually, could lead to considerable efficiency losses Historical examples, such as the U.S alcohol prohibition from 1920 to 1933, show that demand can drive supply to the black market, which is more detrimental than a regulated market due to the lack of tax revenue and increased difficulty in monitoring fishing activities Therefore, a total embargo is unlikely to effectively resolve the issue.
The implementation of a Pigouvian tax on Atlantic Bluefin Tuna presents an economically sound approach by establishing clear targets while allowing market dynamics to operate efficiently This taxation not only generates government revenue but also offers a means to compensate those impacted by the tax, promoting equitable outcomes However, the challenge lies in determining the appropriate tax level, as setting it too high may lead to insufficient fish catches, while a tax set too low could result in overfishing Despite its merits, the Pigouvian tax is not deemed the optimal solution and will not be recommended in this paper.
The cap and trade system imposes quotas on nations that can be traded on a global market, targeting a scientifically identified limit of 8,000 tonnes for Atlantic Bluefin Tuna conservation This approach alleviates concerns over tax ambiguity, appealing to environmentalists focused on species preservation By enabling the industry to operate like a free market, less efficient fishermen can sell their permits to more efficient ones, enhancing overall system efficiency Despite challenges in market regulation and transaction cost minimization, the cap and trade system remains the most effective solution for conserving the Atlantic Bluefin Tuna while maintaining market efficiency.
Transitioning to the Cap and Trade System
When proposing a solution, it's crucial to examine the practical implementation of the new system Transitioning from the current order to a new one entails various costs and challenges that must be considered This section will address some of these key aspects.
The initial allocation of tradable fishing permits for Bluefin Tuna has sparked significant controversy due to their financial value (Tietenberg, 2006) However, existing quotas agreed upon by member countries can facilitate a proportional reduction to a total of 8000 tonnes, mitigating concerns over fairness This pre-existing framework helps to address potential accusations of inequity, while the ability to trade permits ensures that efficiency is maintained in achieving an eventual equilibrium.
The tradable permits system for Atlantic Bluefin Tuna fishing allows for the trading of individual quotas once allocated, a departure from the current lack of an international market for these permits Although there is no global market, a 1999 OECD survey identified 75 fisheries worldwide utilizing similar systems Each country distributes its quota among domestic fishermen or companies, but the system's efficiency hinges on enabling global trading among these agents in a competitive market with accurate price signals While technology exists to facilitate this trading, it will not reach the scale of major stock exchanges Continuous regulation and oversight are essential to maintain costless and efficient trading Additionally, a significant concern is that participants may lack the financial expertise to accurately assess future fishing rents, potentially causing inefficiencies within the system.
The ability of individual fishermen to estimate and plan their catch in advance is a critical aspect of fishing management Due to the unpredictable nature of fishing, it is impossible to accurately determine the exact amount of a particular fish species that will be caught Variations in fish weight and daily catch numbers necessitate frequent adjustments to individual targets to comply with quota restrictions However, some researchers, such as Copes (1986), argue that this process is overly complex in practice.
Transitioning to a cap and trade system presents various challenges, yet as Copes (1986) noted, alternative fishery management approaches also face their own issues, indicating that even the most effective solutions will have inherent flaws.
Conclusion
This research paper examines the critical issue of declining Atlantic Bluefin Tuna stocks due to overfishing, highlighting the urgent need for action While protecting this species is essential, it is important to consider the impact on the livelihoods of those in the tuna industry The paper approaches the problem from an economic standpoint, aiming to propose the most effective solutions to balance conservation efforts with the economic realities faced by stakeholders.
The overfishing of Atlantic Bluefin Tuna exemplifies the 'tragedy of the commons,' where individual fishermen struggle to adopt sustainable practices without collective action, often leading to personal loss After examining various solutions, including a trade embargo, a Pigouvian tax, and a cap and trade system with tradable fishing permits, the cap and trade approach emerged as the most economically efficient and practical option The article further explores the necessary steps to transition from the current overfishing crisis to an effective cap and trade solution.
Despite thorough research, this paper has notable weaknesses, particularly regarding the reliance on ICCAT-reported fishing catch data A significant issue is the prevalence of illegal fishing, which skews the findings if not considered (BBC News, 2010) Additionally, a cap and trade system may fall short as it lacks measures to regulate the black market To enhance the accuracy of the results, a comprehensive investigation into the annual illegal catch of Atlantic Bluefin Tuna is essential Exploring alternative solutions, such as the Coase Theorem, could also be beneficial This approach involves granting private property rights over fishing waters to either fishermen or conservationists, enabling them to negotiate mutually beneficial agreements, thus aligning the interests of both parties and leading to more efficient outcomes.
To prevent the extinction of the Atlantic Bluefin Tuna, immediate action is crucial While discussions on the best solutions will continue, effective regulatory leadership is essential to protect the species while also considering the interests of fishermen.
Sr No Country Catch in 2008 (tonnes) New ITQ (tonnes)
1 http://www.iccat.int/en/accesingdb.htm
ABC News, 19 th March 2010 ‘Bluefin Tuna Trade Ban Blocked’ Accessed on 13 th May
2010 Available at: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/03/19/2850104.htm
About.com, 2010 ‘Prohibition’ Accessed on 8 th June 2010 Available at: http://history1900s.about.com/od/1920s/p/prohibition.htm
Answers.com, 2010 ‘Atlantic Bluefin Tuna’ Accessed on 14 th May 2010 Available at: http://www.answers.com/topic/atlantic-bluefin-tuna
AsiaNews, 27 th May 2010 ‘Activist against Whaling Risks 15 Years in Prison’ Accessed on
29 th May 2010 Available at: http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Activist-against-whaling-risks-15-years-in-prison-
Baumol, W.J., June 1972 ‘On Taxation and the Control of Externalities’ Published in: The
American Economic Review, Vol 62, No 3, pg 307 – 322 Available at: http://www.jstor.org/pss/1803378
Baumol and Oates (1971) explore the significance of implementing standards and pricing mechanisms as effective tools for environmental protection Their work, published in The Swedish Journal of Economics, emphasizes the role of economic incentives in promoting sustainable practices The authors argue that establishing clear standards and appropriate pricing can help mitigate environmental degradation, fostering a balance between economic growth and ecological preservation This foundational research contributes to the ongoing discourse on environmental economics and policy-making **Reference**Baumol, W.J., & Oates, W.E (1971) The Use of Standards and Prices for Protection of the Environment The Swedish Journal of Economics, 73, 42-54 Available at: [JSTOR](http://www.jstor.org/pss/3439132)
BBC News, 10 th March 2010 ‘Bluefin tuna trade ban gains European Union backing’. Accessed on 6 th May 2010 Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8560896.stm
In October 2009, a proposal was submitted to include the Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) on Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) This proposal highlights the urgent need for international protection of the species due to its declining populations The document can be accessed at the CITES website for further details and insights into the implications of this listing.
CITES Website ‘Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora Appendices’ Accessed on 6 th May 2010 Available at: http://www.cites.org/eng/disc/species.shtml
Coase, R., October 1960 ‘The Problem of Social Cost’ Published in: Journal of Law and
Economics, pg 1 – 44 Available at: http://www.econ.washington.edu/user/yoramb/SOCIALCOST.PDF
Copes, P., August 1986 ‘A Critical Review of the Individual Quota as a Device in Fisheries Management’ Published in: Land Economics, Vol 62, No 3, pg 278 – 291 Available at: http://www.jstor.org/pss/3146392
On November 17, 2009, the Environment News Service reported a significant reduction in the quota for Atlantic Bluefin tuna Conservationists are advocating for a complete trade ban to protect this endangered species from overfishing For more information, visit the original article at Illegal Fishing.
Faysee, N., 2005 ‘Coping with the Tragedy of the Commons: Game Structure and Design of Rules’ Published in: Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol 19, No 2
Gibbons, R., 13 th July 1992 ‘Game Theory for Applied Economists’ Published by: Princeton
Hardin, G., 13 th December 1968 ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’ Published in: Science, Vol.
162, No 3859, pg 1243 – 1248 Available at: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content12894579
ICCAT Database ‘ICCAT Statistical Database – Nominal Catch Information’ Accessed on
14 th May 2010 Available at: http://www.iccat.int/en/t1results.asp? lspeciesT&lyearf 07&lyeart 07&lflag=Japan&lgear=blank&lorder=SpeciesCode& lregion=blank&btsearch=Search
Irwin, D., 2005 ‘The Welfare Cost of Autarky: Evidence from the Jeffersonian Trade Embargo, 1807 – 09’ Published in: Review of International Economics, 13 (4), pg 631 – 645. Available at: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dirwin/docs/Embargo.pdf
Kerr, S., Newell, R.G., Sanchirico, J.N., August 2002 ‘Fishing Quota Markets’ Published in:
Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper 02 – 20 Available at: http://www.rff.org/rff/documents/rff-event-fishing-quota.pdf
Montgomery, W.D (1972) "Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs." Journal of Economic Theory, 5(3), 395-418 **Overview** This article discusses the concept of markets in licenses as a means to achieve efficient pollution control It examines how economic theory can inform policy design for environmental regulation, emphasizing the role of market mechanisms in promoting efficiency The findings suggest that implementing market-based approaches can lead to better environmental outcomes while minimizing costs **Key Points** - The paper explores the intersection of market dynamics and environmental regulation - It highlights the efficiency of license markets in controlling pollution - The author presents theoretical frameworks that support market-based solutions for environmental issues - The study underscores the importance of economic incentives in achieving regulatory goals.
PD&_userI9884&_coverDate%2F31%2F1972&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search& _sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct0024499&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid 499884&md5&9861aeb79efa0f5c4080e7c569ccfd
Ostrom, E., June 1999 ‘Coping with Tragedies of the Commons’ Published in: Annual
Review of Political Science, Vol 2, pg 493 – 535 Available at: ttp://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.493? amp;searchHistoryKey=%24{searchHistoryKey}
In 2010, the Pew Centre on Global Climate Change released an executive summary outlining a mandatory greenhouse gas reduction program for the United States This comprehensive report emphasizes the need for structured policies to effectively mitigate climate change impacts The document is accessible online for those interested in understanding the proposed strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S.
Princeton Wordnet, 2010 ‘Definition of Trade Embargo’ Accessed on 12 th May 2010. Available at: http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=trade%20embargo
Stavins, R.N discusses the implementation of a U.S cap-and-trade system aimed at addressing global climate change in his October 2007 paper This work, published as KSG Working Paper No RWP07-052 and Hamilton Project Discussion Paper No 2007-13, explores effective strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions The full paper can be accessed at [SSRN](http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id26353).
Tietenberg, T., 2006 ‘Tradable Permits in Principle and Practice’ Published in: Penn State
Environmental Law Review, No 251 Available at: http://web.mit.edu/ckolstad/www/TT_SBW.pdf
Tietenberg (2002) explores the tradable permits approach as a strategy for protecting common resources, summarizing key lessons learned from its implementation The paper, published in FEEM Working Paper No 36, emphasizes the effectiveness of tradable permits in managing environmental resources and highlights the importance of regulatory frameworks in achieving sustainability For further details, the full text is available at SSRN.
U.K Government Archives, 2010 ‘Strategic Export Control/Sanctions-Embargoes – March
04 2010’ Accessed on 12 th May 2010 Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/*/http://www.berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/ europeandtrade/strategic-export-control/sanctions-embargoes/by-country/democratic
%20people%20republic%20of%20korea/index.html
Wall Street Journal, 5 th June 2009 ‘It’s Not Too Late to Save the Tuna’ Accessed on 16 th May 2010 Available at: