INTRODUCTION Choosing an appropriate journal to publish their research becomes increasingly difficult for all the authors because of the significant number of journals Rison, Shepphird,
Trang 1Manuscript Matcher: A Tool for Finding the Best Journal
NAM Nguyen Danh
Thai Nguyen University Thai Nguyen, 250000, Vietnam
TRUNG Tran
Vietnam Academy for Ethnic Minorities Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam
TRUNG Nguyen Tien
Vietnam Journal of Education Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam
THAO Trinh Phuong Thi
Thai Nguyen University of Education Thai Nguyen, 250000, Vietnam
ABSTRACT
One of the critical reasons for the rejections of a paper is that the
topic and content of the submitted article are not relevant to the
aims and scope of the journal Traditionally, the authors select
the journal based on personal experiences, specialist
recommendations, and searching engines However, with an
exponentially increasing number of papers published every year,
the authors could use supportive tools in finding which journal is
most appropriate for posting their research as well as determining
readers for their work The authors need to take the crucial
decision of choosing the journal for their prospective manuscript
before even starting to write it The paper introduces some
popular manuscript matchers and using these tools in
recommending journals in the Vietnamese research community
The research results have shown that journal choice decisions
influenced by many factors such as time-bound review process,
journal’s visibility, indexation in databases, the regularity of
publication, acceptance rate, and publication fee
Keywords: Manuscript matcher, journal matcher, journal
suggester, journal recommender, journal selector, finding
journal
1 INTRODUCTION
Choosing an appropriate journal to publish their research
becomes increasingly difficult for all the authors because of the
significant number of journals (Rison, Shepphird, & Kidd, 2017;
Bahadoran, Mirmiran, Kashfi & Ghasemi, 2020) Moreover,
many journals deal with a wide diversity of topics,
multidisciplinary, open access, and reviewers from many
countries all over the world The number of authors publishing
one or more papers every year does increase rapidly Typically,
the authors have to read the aims and scope of the journal on the
website or download a guide for authors to know the format and
standard of the journal (Kang, 2015; Tullu & Karande, 2018) In
particular, the authors could check if the journal is
invitation-only This journal only accepts the paper after inviting the author
to write about a specific topic However, if the authors need to
publish open access to get more readers, they should know that most journals have open access options explained on the journal homepage The authors should also submit the paper to only one journal at the time and check the information about the review and publication timelines (Beall, 2016)
Additionally, before publishing the paper, the authors should think about how their research to reach their target audience as much as possible Therefore, firstly, the authors take into consideration the type of article to publish, such as full length, letter, review, or research results It should be checked the references in the paper and then to indicate possible journals of interest In general, many factors are influencing the choice of journal for manuscript submission (Schuemie & Kors, 2008; Prieto-gutiérrez, 2019) There are many factors involved include the focus of the journal, the visibility of the journal, the topic of the manuscript, the impact factor, the timeliness of the editorial office process and whether the feedback is constructive, journal accessibility, author costs, and the governance of the journal (Brandsma et al., 2013; Tullu & Karande, 2018; Beshyah, 2019) Among these, the impact factor plays a particularly significant role in choosing a journal A manuscript matcher recommends a list of more than ten journals based on the following factors: scope of the study, target journal type, time to publish, accessibility, the field of research Hence, this study aims to investigate some journal matcher applications and the real situation of using these services in the Vietnamese research community
2 METHODS
To find the best journal, we have analyzed the source of journals and papers We randomly selected 10 to 100 (depending on the number of papers published in each journal) already published papers from each Springer/Elsevier journal as the input documents and removed these input documents from the source database If the top three or top ten recommended journals contained the journal in which the input paper published, then this is counted as a correct recommendation; otherwise, it counted as a false recommendation We tested how well journal matchers predict the journal in which a paper published,
50 https://doi.org/10.54808/IMCIC2022.01.50
ISBN: 978-1-950492-60-2
ISSN: 2771-5914
Trang 2assuming that this journal was the most appropriate one This test
may not always be the case since many journals overlap
considerably, and many factors may influence journal choice
The goal of using this research method is to evaluate the
suitability of published articles compared with the
recommendations of journal matcher softwares, from which to
draw some conclusions about the use of these applications for
researchers
We also used a depth interview of 15 researchers about how to
choose the best journal for the paper Some questions were given
to these researchers such as: Which manuscript matcher to use to
determine a journal? Which journal is appropriate for their
papers? How to discover the latest papers in the journal? How to
identify and contact the publisher? Does the journal use a precise
type of peer review? Does the journal site require publication fees
and payment methods? Does the journal publicize the members
of the editorial board on their websites? Is the journal open access
and in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)? The
results of the interview were analyzed and posed some
problematic issues in the findings and discussion section
Finding the right journal to submit a paper is one of the most
critical steps during the process of paper publishing A new
journal information service that makes finding and accessing
journal articles more accessible and more effective than
traditional methods Smart search technology and
field-of-research specific vocabularies used to match the paper to
scientific journals The authors enter the title and abstract of the
paper to find journals that could be best suited for publishing
quickly Manuscript matchers take all of the data in one place to
provide authors with an easy way to select the appropriate journal
for their publication It is easy to compare relevant journals to
find the best place for publication In other words, journal
matchers help give the authors ideas for where to publish their
paper, based on the keywords, abstract, and title the authors write
The authors insert keywords from their manuscript abstract into
a search engine, which then compares the words to many online
publications The authors must analyze each of the results
critically to see if they are relevant to their article (Bavdekar &
Save, 2015; Tullu & Karande, 2018) It is significant to note that
many of these sites or applications are promoting their journals
and will likely not give the authors results from other publishers
In this paper, we present the seven popular manuscript matchers
that help the authors efficiently to find relevant journals for their
papers
Elsevier Journal Finder
This tool is a freely available online application
(https://journalfinder.elsevier.com), which is one of the most
comprehensive journal recommender systems, covering all
scientific domains and more than 2,900 peer-reviewed Elsevier
journals It uses semantic search technology and field-of-research
specific vocabularies to match the abstract to relevant Elsevier
journals This application compares the abstract with all journal
articles in Scopus and recommends up to 50 of the most relevant
journals to consider Keywords allow the authors to focus their
search Upon entering keywords, the autofill function helps the
authors to identify which keywords are available in the index,
both for single and combined keywords This service
recommends if it has published articles that are highly similar to
the article A list of relevant articles generated, and the tool can
filter on the authors’ preferred criteria, such as open access
options, journal metrics, review time, acceptance rate, and production time
Springer Journal Suggester
This machine (https://journalsuggester.springer.com) searches over 2,600 journals of Springer and BioMed Central to find the most suitable journal for the document It is easy to compare relevant journals to find the best place for publication The authors need to copy in their abstract or a description of the research The authors can then sift through results based on Impact Factor or whether a journal is open access
IEEE Journal Recommender
This machine (http://publication-recommender.ieee.org) searches over 170 periodicals and 1500 conferences of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers It compares critical points such as Impact Factor and Submission-To-Publication Time It gets all the critical data about IEEE publications at a glance No results mean that IEEE is not for the article This link also provides the authors IEEE conferences going to be held all over the world
Edanz Journal Selector
A Japanese company that offers support to researchers has
(https://www.edanzediting.com/journal-selector) that can match the abstract of over 28,000 journals from publishers such as Springer, Elsevier, John Wiley & Sons, Taylor & Francis, Nature Publishing Group and more The authors can also select only journals indexed in Web of Science, to those that are open access
or offers open access possibilities Any Impact Factors (Web of Science) displayed in the search results Edanz Journal Selector ranges a broad set of journals The online tool also offers a journal selection service in which specialists use their experience
to categorize up to four of the best journals for a given paper
Enago Open Access Journal Finder
This machine (https://www.enago.com/academy/journal-finder) enables the authors to find quality open access journals that are pre-vetted to protect the authors from predatory publishers This free application resolves shared problems on journal authenticity, predacious journals, and article processing fees by using a validated journal index provided by The Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) Enago’s proprietary search algorithm helps the authors shortlist journals that are most relevant to their manuscript and research objectives, thus giving the authors the best chance of publication After sending the criteria, the authors receive the top 3-5 journals best suited to their manuscript and preferences Additionally, Enago provides the authors with vital feedback for their manuscript, including suggestions on how to improve their paper
Journal/Author Name Estimator (JANE)
This tool is a freely available web-based application (http://jane.biosemantics.org) that, based on a sample text (e.g., the title and abstract of a manuscript), can suggest journals and experts who have published similar articles BioSemantics Group manages JANE at the Erasmus University Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands JANE depends on the data in PubMed, which can contain papers from predatory journals, and therefore these journals can appear in JANE’s results To help
51
Trang 3identify high-quality journals JANE now tags journals that
currently indexed in Medline and open access journals approved
by the DOAJ It is also limited to journals included in Medline, a
database published by the United States National Library of
Medicine Thus, it restricted to biomedical sciences journals
This one offers an alternative search method for entering the
article’s title and abstract, in which the authors can enter
keywords in a simple search box
JournalGuide
This application is a free tool (https://www.journalguide.com)
designed by a group of former researchers, software developers,
and scholarly publishing veterans at Research Square A growing
journal database across all academic fields that search, filter, sort,
and compare journals from more than 46,000 titles Searching by
journal name, publisher, or category, the authors can use the title
and abstract of a paper to discover journals that have already
published articles on similar topics By matching journals to a
paper’s content, researchers can see which journals would be
most likely to have an interest in their story
3 RESULTS
We selected some critical functions of these applications and
compared the benefits for authors during the process of choosing
a suitable journal The authors must enter the title, abstract, and
keywords of the manuscript to the input box of the manuscript
matchers Some optional features the author should be chosen are
a field of research and the reader’s accessibility
All of these applications could introduce the list of journals if the
author provides title and abstract Most of them require more
information like keyword, the field of research, and paper
accessibility We also realized that each application has its
strengths Enago is one of the non-free applications that it found
the open access journals only, and it usually introduces free open access journals with high impact factors, more significant readers, and reputable in the field of research JANE could give the author similar papers from all of the journals in the proposed list based on the title, abstract, and keywords The author provided more information about the references and other new findings related to the paper JournalGuide is more helpful for authors because it could find many documents that match the content of the manuscript from ten years ago The author could use these papers for looking back literature review and revise the draft before sending the document to the most suitable journal Table 1 Some essential functions of the manuscript matchers Manuscript
Matchers
Title and Abstract
Keyword Field of
Research
Open Access Elsevier Journal
Springer Journal
IEEE Journal
Edanz Journal
Enago Open Access Journal Finder
Journal/Author Name Estimator Yes Yes No Yes
Table 2 Some optional functions of the manuscript matchers Manuscript Matchers Acceptance Rate CiteScore Impact Factor Publication Time Database
(2,900) Springer Journal
Springer, BioMed (2,600) IEEE Journal
Enago Open Access
Web of Science, Scopus (10,700) Journal/Author Name
Beside some obligatory inputs, most applications have more
options like acceptance rate or confidence index, CiteScore,
impact factor, publication/review time, and databases Based on
the publication need, the authors could choose a suitable journal
that satisfying all their requirements In Vietnam, most
publications are supported by the universities, institutes,
ministries, and Nafosted (abbreviation for National Foundation
for Science and Technology Development) during researching at
ministerial level as well as university level (Tran et al., 2019)
For that reason, the time for requiring publication is about six
months to one year The papers typically are the output or product
of the research Therefore, choosing the journal that guarantees the publication time plays a significant role in the author’s decision
We have found that some applications of the publishers tend to introduce the journals that the publishers are responsible for publishing and almost do not recommend the article from other publishers Such requests are from Springer, Elsevier, IEEE, and all the databases also from these publishers Some independent non-free tools could recommend journals from different
52
Trang 4databases like Enago, Edanz, JANE, or JournalGuide However,
all of these tools require the authors to pay a fee for providing
their utilities This requirement is one of the financial barriers for
most researchers in Vietnam - a developing country
Moreover, these tools offer more services for authors like
statistical analysis, English revision, paper review, publication
counseling But non-experience authors could use these services
for improving paper writing skills as well as publishing skills
The independent non-free tools use big databases to find the most
appropriate journal so that the author could choose the journal
with huge readers all over the world As a result, it could help the
authors to increase the numbers of followers, impact index, and
cite index (Bavdekar & Save, 2015)
Table 3 Some priority criteria for choosing the journal
Priority Criteria Percentage Order
ISI/Scopus list of journal 7% 5
Acceptance rate or confidence
index
Publication time of publication
speed
Impact factor, cite score 5% 6
Accessibility (open access), the
number of readers
Field of research, database 5% 6
Results from Table 3 show that the essential factor that the
authors refer to choose the best journal is the acceptance rate or
confidence index In other words, the authors may want to
consider the acceptance rate as one of the criteria for choosing a
journal for submission In this study, the authors would submit
the manuscript to the journal if the acceptance rate is more than
50 percent The second important factor is publication time or
publication speed Usually, the authors choose the journal that its
review process is around six months Other factors that may
impact the author’s decision are publication fee, accessibility, the
reputation of the journal (ISI/Scopus list), databases, impact
factor, or cite score The research has also revealed that
non-experienced authors choose the acceptance rate as the priority;
experienced authors choose the impact factor or cite score in the
ISI/Scopus list is a decisive factor Some authors were interested
in other factors like editorial board, language, publication
country, the review process Finally, it is also possible that
journals that do not consider as prestigious have a better
acceptance rate
The research shows the real situation of using journal matchers
in the researcher community in Vietnam Surprisingly, 45 percent
of researchers choose the journal based on personal experiences
and 30 percent from specialist recommendation
Through our interview, a lecturer of a university shared his
opinion as follows:
“We often choose journals in the list recommended by Nafosted
or through the recommendation of colleagues in the same
research field, this is also because we have not known these
search engines However, there are also scientists who believe
that the wide accessibility of publication determines the selection
of journals”
Another scientist at a research institute insisted that:
“We only choose to publish articles in open scientific journals
that are accessible to many scientists, so it is easier for us to improve the article ’s citation index and own citation index In addition, publication of international articles may be a mandatory requirement of scientific research projects with limited publication time, so we often choose journals with a limited time to publish articles so that it is consistent with the plan of the research projects”
Figure 1 Information for submitting a paper on the journal Besides, only 10 percent of researchers used manuscript matchers
to recommend the journal for publishing their manuscript It means that there is only some researchers know how to use these manuscript matchers in finding publication places for their research The other 15 percent of researchers used information from their colleagues, search engines, books or papers’ references, conferences, forums Some authors agree to charge fees for publishing their papers more efficiently The cost also could be one of the factors considered while the authors are selecting the journal However, some journals routinely do not charge fees for publication unless the number of pages exceeds a prescribed limit of a volume
Figure 2 Percentage of using manuscript matchers tools for
choosing a journal Figure 2 shows that 70 percent of researchers in Vietnam do not use any manuscript matchers in recommending the journal, and only 17 percent of authors using seven popular search tools This result also fits very few numbers of papers that publish on ISI/Scopus journals Recently, Web of Science provides an invaluable tool named The Master Journal List (https://mjl.clarivate.com/home) to help the authors to find the right journal which hosted on the Web of Science platform This application only introduces journals that demonstrate high levels
10%
30%
45%
15%
Using journal finder application Specialist recommendation Personal experiences Other sources
5%
3%
2% 1%
1%
3%
2%
13%
70%
Elsevier Journal Finder
Springer Journal Suggester
IEEE Journal Recommender
53
Trang 5of editorial rigor and best practice For that reason, there are only
some researchers using this tool for recommending journal (Tran
et al., 2019)
In Vietnam, some universities and research institutes encourage
lecturers and researchers to publish their papers in prestigious
international journals Publishers and their journals would like to
invite reviewers from different countries as well as receive papers
of authors from different nationalities so that they could create an
international readership community Hence, they like to publish
articles in journals that are highly visible and easily accessible to
potential readers Through the interview, we also found that some
authors believe that the chances of acceptance are generally
higher in journals publishing several issues in a year and have
more pages printed Assurance of a timely and fair review
process, high visibility, and regular publication of the journal
could consider as some of the other essential features that may
guide the authors’ choice These results would be appropriate for
a developing country where there are lots of novice researchers
trying to publish their papers on the international journals
However, this situation would be changed in developed countries
since the differences in publication opportunities for researchers
as well as their leading role in sciences and technologies
development
5 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
It is necessary to realize that every author has different goals for
publication at a specific time Some authors want to publish a
journal in which their papers could have the most significant
impact on the research community Therefore, the authors could
use journal matcher tools to analyze every recommended journal
carefully to see if its options help the authors to achieve goals
Gradually, the reputation of the chronicle plays an increasingly
important part in the decision to choose a journal
All manuscript matchers with different databases and
publishers/companies, but they have some similar vital functions
such as matching score, impact factor, open access, editorial
times, acceptance rate, and production times This information
can help the authors to decide which is the best journal to submit
their papers and may reduce the probability of rejection There
are many other important factors to consider when selecting a
journal The authors face a problem that it has a low acceptance
rate if they publish their work on a high impact index journal
The impact factor and acceptance rate usually correlate (the
higher the impact factor, the lower the acceptance rate) (Errami,
Wren, Hicks, & Garner, 2014) However, the authors could use
manuscript matchers to determine other journals with a higher
acceptance rate to increase the chances of being published Using
journal matchers is a primary method for non-experienced
authors to find and send their manuscripts to the high-ranking
journals For some researchers, paper submission time is also a
significant factor in choosing the journal In Vietnam, some
scientific projects (ministerial level and university level) were
deployed in one year or two years and can extend more than six
months Therefore, some researchers tend to choose a journal that
the submission time is around six months, and usually, the
journal should name in the list of ISI/Scopus journals This
requirement is a challenge for researchers, especially in the
educational research field
There are multiple databases that index journals based on various
factors related to quality, the regularity of publication,
professional standing, and review process, among others Therefore, journals that include in these databases are considered
to be quality journals and thought to be more prestigious There are also many different opinions about choosing multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, or single disciplinary journals In this study, we have found that the authors in the field
of research, such as mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology would publish their papers on narrowly specialized journals, and even they are loyal followers of a specific journal The authors in the field of research, such as education, social and humanities, economics, anthropology, tend to submit their papers on multidisciplinary journals However, some researchers think that interdisciplinary journals are not prestigious Therefore, using manuscript matchers to determine the best journal plays a vital role for authors who want to improve the confidence index as well as the impact of their papers in the research community
REFERENCES
Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Kashfi K, Ghasemi A Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: How to Choose a Journal? International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism,
2020 Nov 25;19(1):e108417 doi: 10.5812/ijem.108417 Beall J Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons
of England, 98(2), 77-79, 2016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2016.0056
Beshyah SA Authors’ Selection of Target Journals and Their Attitudes to Emerging Journals: A survey from two developing regions Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, 2019 Feb;19(1):e51-e57 doi: 10.18295/squmj.2019.19.01.010
Errami, M et al eTBLAST: A webserver to identify expert reviewers, appropriate journals, and similar publications Nucleic Acids Research, 35(2), 12-15, 2007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm221
Juan José Prieto-Gutiérrez, Ten years of research on ResearchGate: a scoping review using Google Scholar (2008-2017) European Science Editing, 45(3), 60-64, 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20316/ESE.2019.45.18023
Ning Kang, Marius Doornenbal, Bob Schijvenaars Elsevier Journal Finder: Recommending journals for your paper, Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, 261-264, 2015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2792838.2799663
Richard A Rison, Jennifer Kelly Shepphird, Michael R Kidd How to choose the best journal for your case report Journal
of Medical Case Reports, 11(198), 1-9, 2017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-017-1351-y
Sandeep B Bavdekar, Sushma Save Choosing the right journal for a scientific paper Journal of The Association of Physicians of India, 63, 56-59, 2015
Schuemie, M.J and Kors, J.A Jane: Suggesting journals, finding experts Bioinformatics, 24, 727-728, 2008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn006
Terry W Brandsma, Elizabeth R Bernhardt, Dana M Sally Journal Finder: A solution for comprehensive and unmediated access to journal articles, Serials Review, 28(1),
https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2002.10764702
54
Trang 6Trung Tran, et al Compliance of education journals in Vietnam
with the minimum criteria to be indexed in the ASEAN
Citation Index and Scopus Science Editing, 6(2), 142-147,
2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.175
Tullu MS, Karande S Success in Publishing: Selecting an
Appropriate Journal and Braving the Peer-review Process
Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 2018 Jan-Mar;64(1):1-4
doi: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_618_17
55