1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Báo cáo khoa học: Monomeric molten globule intermediate involved in the equilibrium unfolding of tetrameric duck d2-crystallin pdf

8 426 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề Monomeric molten globule intermediate involved in the equilibrium unfolding of tetrameric duck d2-crystallin
Tác giả Hwei-Jen Lee, Shang-Way Lu, Gu-Gang Chang
Trường học National Defense Medical Center
Chuyên ngành Biochemistry
Thể loại báo cáo khoa học
Năm xuất bản 2003
Thành phố Taipei
Định dạng
Số trang 8
Dung lượng 508,49 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Monomeric molten globule intermediate involved in the equilibriumHwei-Jen Lee1, Shang-Way Lu1and Gu-Gang Chang2 1 Department of Biochemistry, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Tai

Trang 1

Monomeric molten globule intermediate involved in the equilibrium

Hwei-Jen Lee1, Shang-Way Lu1and Gu-Gang Chang2

1

Department of Biochemistry, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan;2Faculty of Life Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan

Duck d2-crystallin is a soluble tetrameric lens protein In

the presence of guanidinium hydrochloride (GdnHCl),it

undergoes stepwise dissociation and unfolding

Gel-filtra-tion chromatography and sedimentaGel-filtra-tion velocity analysis

has demonstrated the dissociation of the tetramer protein to

a monomeric intermediate with a dissociation constant of

0.34 lM3 Dimers were also detected during the dissociation

and refolding processes The sharp enhancement of 1-anilino

naphthalene-8-sulfonic acid (ANS) fluorescence at 1M

GdnHCl strongly suggested that the dissociated monomers

were in a molten globule state under these conditions The

similar binding affinity ( 60 lM) of ANS to protein in the

presence or absence of GdnHCl suggested the potential assembly of crystallins via hydrophobic interactions,which might also produce off-pathway aggregates in higher protein concentrations The dynamic quenching constant corres-ponding to GdnHCl concentration followed a multistate unfolding model implying that the solvent accessibility of tryptophans was a sensitive probe for analyzing d2-crystallin unfolding

Keywords: d-crystallin; lens protein; unfolding; dissociation; argininosuccinate lyase

d2-Crystallin,a highly concentrated yet soluble protein in

avian and reptile eye lens,acts as an important structural

protein for light refraction [1–3] Thermodynamic stability

for crystallins is essential in maintaining lens transparency

[4] Determining the mechanism of folding and assembly of

these proteins is important for understanding how they can

form stable transparent structures at high concentrations

The d2-crystallin in lens was recruited during evolution

from argininosuccinate lyase,an enzyme involved in

arginine biosynthesis derived from the urea cycle These

two proteins shared over 90% sequence homology and thus

have similar tertiary structures [5–7] d2-Crystallin has a high

helical content and constitutes a unique liquid-like region in

the center of the duck lens [8] The central 20-helix core

contributes to the major interactions between subunits,and

is crucial for subunit association The active site is located at

a boundary composed of three subunits [8–11]

Identifying and characterizing of possible conformational

states in the pathways leading to folding and unfolding are

important For d2-crystallin,characterization of the

inter-molecular association of the helix bundles and the partial

unfolded intermediate with exposed hydrophobic region

leading to polymerization remains to be elucidated [12]

Most of the established models of reversible unfolding

of proteins are based on experiments exploring the effect

of chemical denaturants or temperature These models, although providing useful information on the unfolding mechanism,are limited to small,monomeric proteins For multimeric proteins,detection of partially unfolded inter-mediate is always complicated by the dissociation step [13,14] Only in limited cases can dissociation and unfolding

be clearly distinguished [15–19] In previous studies we have demonstrated that duck d2-crystallin can be reversibly dissociated and unfolded by GdnHCl [15] The dissociation

of tetrameric d2-crystallin is accompanied by loss of argininosuccinate lyase activity at around 0.9M GdnHCl, which produces monomeric d2-crystallin as judged by gel-filtration chromatography [15] At higher GdnHCl concen-trations,the monomer unfolds via a partially unfolded intermediate before denaturation Structural information has revealed that tetrameric d2-crystallin possesses a double dimer structure [10] The dimeric form of d2-crystallin can be observed under acidic conditions [20]

In this report,we investigate the detailed dissociation process for d2-crystallin during chemical denaturation by GdnHCl Gel-filtration chromatography and analytical ultracentrifugation were used to identify the dissociation intermediate Unfolding of the dissociated monomers was investigated using 1-anilino-8-naphthalene sulfonate (ANS) binding,fluorescence studies and circular dichroism (CD)

Materials and methods

Materials Ultra-pure guanidine hydrochloride and acrylamide was purchased from Baker (Phillipsburg,NJ,USA) Tris (base), EDTA and NaCl were obtained from Merck AG

Correspondence to H.-J Lee,Department of Biochemistry,National

Defense Medical Center,no 161,Sec 6,Minchuan East Road,

Neihu 114,Taipei,Taiwan.

Fax: + 88 62 87923106,Tel.: + 88 62 87910832,

E-mail: hjlee@ndmctsgh.edu.tw

Abbreviations: ANS,1-anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonic acid; GdnHCl,

guanidinium hydrochloride; CD,circular dichroism.

(Received 12 May 2003,revised 14 July 2003,

accepted 7 August 2003)

Trang 2

(Darmstadt,Germany),and argininosuccinic acid

(diso-dium salt) from Sigma Chemical Co

1-Anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonic acid (ANS) was obtained from Molecular Probe

(Eugene,OR,USA) All other chemicals were of analytical

grade and used without further purification

Purification of duck lens d2-crystallin

Duck d2-crystallin was purified as described previously

[6,15] except that 50 mMTris/HCl,0.5 mMEDTA,pH 7.5

was used to equilibrate the column and d2-crystallin was

eluted in the same buffer containing 0.12 M NaCl The

pooled d2-crystallin showed one major band upon SDS/

PAGE analysis The purity of the protein was further

analyzed by gel filtration chromatography using Superdex

200 HR (10/30) column equilibrated in 100 mMTris/HCl

buffer,pH 7.5 The relative area of the major peak

accounted for around 85% of the total protein Protein

concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically as

described previously [15]

Equilibrium unfolding and refolding studies

A GdnHCl stock solution (7M) was prepared in 50 mM

Tris/HCl buffer (pH 7.5),and the pH of the stock

solution was readjusted to pH 7.5 Equilibrium unfolding

and refolding experiments were performed according to

the methods described previously [15] The endogenous

argininosuccinate lyase activity of d2-crystallin was

moni-tored as a function of the appearance of fumarate at

240 nm Tryptophan fluorescence was measured by the

emission spectra at an excitation wavelength of 295 nm

Far-ultraviolet (200–250 nm) CD data were obtained in a Jasco 810 spectropolarimeter equipped with a thermo-statically controlled cell holder with a 10-mm path length cell

Fluorescence quenching measurements Fluorescence quenching experiments were performed by adding aliquots of stock acrylamide or KI solution into the GdnHCl denatured proteins The fluorescence emission spectra with excitation wavelength at 295 nm were moni-tored The concentrations of quencher added were less than 0.3M Sodium thiosulfate (0.1 mM) was added to the KI stock solution to prevent I–formation The inner filter effect due to the absorption of acrylamide or KI at 295 nm was corrected for by multiplying the fluorescence intensity by

10A/2,where A is the absorbance of the solution at 295 nm Fluorescence quenching data were fitted to a modified Stern–Volmer equation [21]:

F0=DF¼ 1=ðfaKSV½QÞ þ 1=fa where DF¼ F0– F,where KSVis the dynamic quenching constant and fawas the fractional maximum accessible protein fluorescence

ANS binding assay The exposed hydrophobic surfaces of the protein were assayed by incubating the GdnHCl-denatured protein in the dark with ANS (50 lM) for 4 h at 25C The fluorescence emission spectra of the protein solution at an excitation wavelength of 370 nm were monitored Appropriate blank

Fig 1 Gel-filtration profiles of the

equili-brium-unfolded duck d-crystallin in GdnHCl.

d-Crystallin 0.6 l M (A),or 2.4 l M (B),was in

equilibrium unfolded in 0–5 M GdnHCl The

M r markers (.) were (from left to right):

thyroglobulin (669 kDa),ferritin (440 kDa),

catalase (232 kDa),albumin (67 kDa),and

ovalbumin (43 kDa) The elution positions

corresponding to monomers (M),dimers (D),

tetramers (T),unfolding (U) and polymers (P)

forms are also labeled Refolding of the

unfolded duck d-crystallin (2.4 l M ) in

GdnHCl was examined by a 10-fold dilution

of equilibrium unfolded d-crystallins at 1,2

and 5 M GdnHCl to 0.1,0.2 and 0.5 M ,

respectively,and analysis by gel filtration

chromatography (dashed lines).

Trang 3

spectra of ANS in the corresponding GdnHCl solutions

were subtracted from the observed values

Gel-filtration chromatography

Gel-filtration chromatography was performed with an

Amersham Biosciences A¨KTA FPLC system using a

Superdex 200 HR 10/30 column d2-Crystallin (0.6 and

2.4 lM,100 lL) equilibrated in buffer and 1M GdnHCl

was loaded onto the column pre-equilibrated with 50 mM

Tris/HCl buffer containing the same concentration of

GdnHCl,pH 7.5 Calibrated standards were measured

under the same conditions

The partition coefficient (Kav) of the eluted component

was calculated by the following equation:

Kav¼ ðVe V0Þ=ðVt V0Þ where, Veis the elution volume of the protein elution peak and Vtand V0 are the total volume and the void volume of the column,respectively

Analytical ultracentrifugation All analyses were performed at 20C using a Beckman Optima XL-A analytical ultracentrifuge and an An-60 Ti rotor For sedimentation velocity experiments,a sample volume of 0.45 mL was used,and the radial scans were recorded at 5-min intervals at rotor speed of 50 000 r.p.m for 2.5 h TheSEDFITsoftware was used for data analysis [22] Sedimentation equilibrium measurements were per-formed at two speeds,18 000 r.p.m and 20 000 r.p.m ORIGIN software was used for data analysis Protein partial specific volumes in GdnHCl solution were calcu-lated from amino acid composition [23] The solvent density was estimated as described [24] For each set of experiments,a single species model was used to estimate the apparent weight–average molecular mass (MW,app) of the protein The data were further fitted to a T–M association system A molar extinction coefficient of

Fig 2 Time-dependent unfolding of duck d 2 -crystallin analyzed by

gel-filtration chromatography (A) Traces a–c correspond to d 2 -crystallin

(2.4 l M ) incubated with 1 M GdnHCl for 0,10 and 60

min,respect-ively The M r markers (.) were (from left to right): thyroglobulin

(669 kDa),ferritin (440 kDa),catalase (232 kDa),albumin (67 kDa),

and ovalbumin (43 kDa) (B) Relative amount of monomers measured

from the peak height.

Fig 3 Continuous sedimentation coefficient (A) and molecular mass (B) distributions of duck d 2 -crystallin in GdnHCl d 2 -Crystallin (1.3 l M ) was equilibrated in 0 (d),0.6 (s),0.8 (m),1 (n) and 2 M (j) GdnHCl solution.

Trang 4

1.1· 105M )1Æcm)1 for d2-crystallin was used in

calcula-tion of dissociacalcula-tion constant [5] The fit quality of the

models was examined by the residuals and by

minimiza-tion of the fit variance

Results

Dissociation of tetrameric d2-crystallin in GdnHCl

A complex unfolding process is observed when tetrameric

duck d2-crystallin is equilibrated in GdnHCl solutions [15]

The protein appears to dissociate into monomers before

further unfolding occurs The detailed

dissociation/unfold-ing mechanism of the protein remains to be determined

In this study,we examined the Mr of the protein after

equilibration in various denaturing concentrations of

GndHCl Figure 1 shows the distribution of various species

under different GdnHCl at two different protein

concen-trations [0.6 lMfor (A) and 2.4 lMfor (B)] Dissociation of

the protein at 1M GdnHCl and the unfolding at higher

GdnHCl concentrations are observed The unfolded forms

easily polymerize and finally aggregated This process can

be reversed simply by dilution

The time course of the dissociation process of the protein

at 1MGdnHCl was also determined (Fig 2) Dissociation

takes place a few minutes after addition of 1M GdnHCl

(Fig 2A) More than one protein form was resolved,

including a form eluting earlier than the native tetramer and

a form of intermediate size between the tetramer and

monomer,which was ascribed to a dimeric form also

observed during refolding (Fig 1) Dissociation of the

tetrameric form reached equilibrium after 30 min (Fig 2B)

The peak that eluted earlier than native protein could represent a partially unfolded tetrameric form,which is probably a molten-globule state with exposed hydrophobic patches as detected by ANS binding (Fig 6A) This partially unfolded form is easily polymerized as demonstra-ted by chromatography with lower Kavand was dependent

on the protein concentration Upon dilution of the GdnHCl concentration aggregates redissolved (Fig 1)

Sedimentation experiments Dissociation of d2-crystallin in 1M GdnHCl was further examined by analytical ultracentrifugation Native tetra-mers apparently sedimented as a single species with a sedimentation coefficient (velocity of sedimentation divided

by the acceleration of the force field) of 9.14 s (Fig 3) Incubation of the protein in 0.2M or 0.4M GdnHCl resulted in a decrease in the s-value to 8.87 s and 8.51 s, respectively This result confirmed that the change in Kav observed by gel-filtration chromatography was due to protein unfolding Two components appeared at 0.6M GdnHCl (Fig 3) At 0.8MGdnHCl,two components were observed with sedimentation coefficients of 7.8 and 3.8 s, respectively,consistent with the species observed by gel-filtration chromatography (Fig 1) In 1M GdnHCl solution,only one component was detected with a sedi-mentation coefficient of 3.76 s (Fig 3) The predominant component detected by sedimentation coefficient distribu-tion had a molecular mass corresponded to that of a monomer However, Mr of the component with larger s-value at 0.8M GdnHCl was determined to about

130 kDa,which is consistent with it being a dissociated

Fig 4 Gel-filtration chromatography and

sedimentation equilibrium ultracentrifugation

analysis of duck d 2 -crystallin (0.6 l M )

equili-brated with 1 M (A,B) and 2 M (C,D) GdnHCl.

(A) and (C) Gel-filtration chromatography

analysis The M r markers used () were (from

left to right): thyroglobulin (669 kDa),ferritin

(440 kDa),catalase (232 kDa),albumin

(67 kDa),and ovalbumin (43 kDa) The

dashed line in (C) is the elution profile of

native d 2 -crystallin (B,D) Sedimentation

equilibrium analysis of the same samples s

(bottom panel) show absorbance at 280 nm.

The solid line indicates best fit to a

self-asso-ciating system The upper panel shows the

residuals for the best fit.

Trang 5

dimer (Fig 3B) The dissociated monomers possessed

significant amount of secondary and tertiary structure as

judged by the CD and fluorescence changes (Fig 5A)

Under the same conditions,the Mr of the major

component was further analyzed by equilibrium

sedimen-tation As d2-crystallin is apparently polydispersed in a 1M

GdnHCl solution,a monomer–tetramer self-association

model was adopted in data analysis [25] An equilibrium

constant (Kd) of 0.34 lM3was obtained which predicted that

76% of the protein existed as monomers,consistent with the

results obtained from gel-filtration chromatography

ana-lyses (Fig 4A) Analysis of behavior at different protein

concentrations allowed the apparent molecular weight to be

estimated as 59 490 ± 210 Da by extrapolation The value

averaged from two rotation speeds has about a 15%

discrepancy compared to the calculated molecular weight of

monomeric d2-crystallin

Multistep unfolding of monomeric d2-crystallin

Further increases in GdnHCl concentration induced

unfold-ing of the dissociated monomers This unfoldunfold-ing process

was investigated by quenching of intrinsic protein

fluorescence by KI and acrylamide The solvent accessibility

of tryptophan residues in protein was subject to the conformational fluctuations KI is ionic in nature and can selectively quench exposed tryptophan residues,while the nonionic quencher acrylamide can nonselectively quench both buried and exposed tryptophan residues

The GdnHCl concentration-dependent changes of the dynamic quenching constant were apparently a multistate process as it did not conform to the smooth two-state transition observed for simple protein molecules (Fig 6) The dynamic quenching constants for the individual quencher interacting with d2-crystallin in native and 6M GdnHCl solution were 1.8 ± 0.1 and 9.4 ± 0.3 for acrylamide,and 0.4 ± 0.02 and 4.1 ± 0.07 for KI, respectively The fa value for KI was only 12% implying the low solvent accessibility of tryptophan residues of

d2-crystallin in the native form

ANS binding ANS is a sensitive probe commonly utilized to detect conformational changes of proteins especially in the molten globule state [26] Binding of ANS to the hydrophobic surface of proteins will lead to fluorescence enhancement as well as a blue shift in its emission maximum Native

d2-crystallin binds to ANS with maximum emission at

480 nm and slightly enhanced fluorescence intensity (Fig 5A) Denaturation of d2-crystallin results in complete loss of ANS binding The fluorescence intensity at 470 nm increases sharply at GdnHCl concentrations exceeding 0.5M and reaches a maximum at around 1M The fluorescence intensity gradually decreased as GdnHCl concentrations were further increased The unfolding curve using the ANS fluorescence probe suggested a multistate process,consistent with the results obtained by protein intrinsic fluorescence and CD The binding affinity (Kd)

of ANS to d2-crystallin in 0,0.84M and 2M GdnHCl solution was determined to be 53 ± 3.1,63 ± 3.6 and

72 ± 3.5 lM,respectively

Discussion

We have previously proposed a minimum model for the dissociation/unfolding of the tetrameric duck d2-crystallin

in the presence of GdnHCl The dissociation step involves dissociation of tetramer to monomers However,our present results demonstrate the formation of dimers during the dissociation step (Fig 1) These results are in agreement with the double dimer structure of the tetra-meric d2-crystallin The crystal structure of the protein indicated that dimers were bound together by the interaction of three helices,one of which is involved in tetramer formation [10]

The close contact interface between two tightly bound dimers of duck d2-crystallin structure is clearly shown by the surface model (Fig 6) The two subunits are structurally complementary to each other Area a of subunit A has a perfectly structural complementarily with area b from subunit B in a head-to-tail manner (high light in circle) (Fig 6B) The two b-sheets (label c) at subunit A and C stack together in a face-to-face manner forming another type of subunit association (Fig 6C) This association is not

Fig 5 Equilibrium unfolding of duck d-crystallin in GdnHCl (A)

Unfolding monitored by changes in tryptophan fluorescence at

340 nm (d),CD (s),or ANS fluorescence at 470 nm (m) All

experiments were measured at 25 C at 0.24 l M protein concentration.

(B) The dynamic quenching constant (K SV ) and the fractional

maxi-mum accessible protein fluorescence (f a ) verses GdnHCl The intrinsic

fluorescence of duck d-crystallin (0.24 l M ) in GdnHCl was quenched

by acrylamide (closed symbols) and KI (open symbols).

Trang 6

as close and may be weaker than that shown in Fig 6B The

structural and biochemical data are compatible with a

T-D-M model for the dissociation process Dynamic exposure of

tryptophan residues in duck d2-crystallin revealed

conform-ational changes at different concentrations of GdnHCl

(Fig 5B) The results implied a more complicated process

for further unfolding of the dissociated monomer

Substantial tertiary structural changes occur in the presence of 1MGdnHCl but secondary structural changes are minimal The drastic increase of hydrophobic patches strongly suggests that there is a molten globule intermediate [26] This may be the reason why an off-pathway inter-mediate with an exposed hydrophobic core was detected under the present conditions (Fig 6) However,disturbance

Fig 6 Diagram of the surface of duck d-crystallin (1AUWÆpdb) (A) Each subunit of the tetrameric d-crystallin shows a surface with several convex and concave areas as indicated by a, b and c,which participate in subunit association Two neighboring subunits (A and B) associated in a tail-to-head manner to form a compact and tightly bound dimer (B) The top region of the structure (C) participates in another major region of subunit interaction (A and C) This figure was produced using VIEWERPRO (http://www.accelrys.com/viewer).

Trang 7

of electrostatic interactions by GdnHCl may contribute to

the promotion of hydrophobic interactions [27] Incorrect

subunit interactions giving rise to aggregate formation

appears to be a competitive kinetic process with respect to

stable monomer [28] More aggregates accumulate at higher

protein concentration (Fig 3) Soluble polymerization is a

reversible process but aggregation at high protein

concen-tration is irreversible At 5M GdnHCl the aggregates are

dissolved,presumably due to the stronger ionic salt effect,

which disrupts interactions between protein molecules and

the polypeptide is in an unfolded state

Chakraborty et al [29] have reported similar GdnHCl

concentration-dependent reversible unfolding of

recombin-ant duck d2-crystallin based on CD experiments,and

proposed a tetramer-dimer-unfolded monomer mechanism

The total free energy change of the process was as high as

64.5 kcalÆmol)1 We have investigated this process with

multiple biophysical probes An elaborate model has been

derived (Scheme 1) based on the following observation:

First,our results revealed that the fluorescence signal was

more sensitive probe than CD for monitoring the

dissoci-ation transition Dissocidissoci-ation reflected a 50% intensity

decrease in tryptophan fluorescence and an 80%

enhance-ment in ANS fluorescence compared to only a 10%

decrease in ellipticity (Fig 5) A CD probe for oligomeric

protein unfolding may be relatively insensitive and miss

some important information

The shoulder at 0.6MGdnHCl in the ANS fluorescence

trace (Fig 5A) and Mr observed with sedimentation

velocity at 0.8 M GdnHCl could represent a dimeric

intermediate (Fig 3B) Thus,the proposed dimeric form

for human argininosuccinate lyase at  2.5 M GdnHCl

could be an artifact Our analytical ultracentrifugation

results indicated that d2-crystallin existed as monomer at

this concentration of GdnHCl (Fig 4) It is unlikely that

recombinant duck d2-crystallin has a grossly different

behavior from protein isolated from duck eyes We believe

that the mechanism shown in Scheme 1 more accurately

describes the dissociation/unfolding process of d2-crystallin

Another possible origin of the discrepancy between the

results of Sampaleanu et al [30] may be the denaturation

time used in these protocols We have performed

time-dependent denaturation of d2-crystallin experiments and

confirmed that the dimers separated upon mixing protein

with GdnHCl and their abundance decrease as incubation

time increased Monomer was the predominant species at

equilibrium (Figs 1 and 2) Sufficient incubation time is

therefore essential for allowing the denaturation reaction to

reach equilibrium [31]

Acknowledgements

We thank Matthew D Lloyd (University of Bath) for reading this

manuscript before publication and Yu-Chin Pon for technical

assistance This work was supported financially by the National

Science Council,Republic of China.

References

1 Wistow,G.J & Piatigorsky,J (1988) Lens crystallins: the evolu-tion and expression of proteins for a highly specialized tissue Annu Rev Biochem 57,479–504.

2 De Jong,W.W.,Hendriks,W.,Mulders,J.W.M & Bloemendal,

H (1989) Evolution of eye lens crystallins: the stress connection Trends Biochem Sci 14,365–368.

3 Wistow,G.J (1993) Lens crystallins: gene recruitment and evo-lutionary dynamism Trends Biochem Sci 18,301–306.

4 Slingsby,C.,Simpson,A.,Ferszt,A.,Bateman,O.A & Nalini,V (1991) Molecular interactions in the eye lens Biochem Soc Trans 19,853–858.

5 Lee,H.J.,Chiou,S.H & Chang,G.G (1992) Biochemical char-acterization and kinetic analysis of duck delta-crystallin with endogenous argininosuccinate lyase activity Biochem J 283, 597–603.

6 Lee,H.J.,Lin,C.C.,Chiou,S.H & Chang,G.G (1994) Char-acterization of the multiple forms of duck lens d-crystallin with endogenous argininosuccinate lyase activity Arch Biochem Biophys 314,31–38.

7 Piatigorsky,J & Horwitz,J (1996) Characterization and enzyme activity of argininosuccinate lyase/delta-crystallin of the embryo-nic duck lens Biochim Biophys Acta 1295,158–164.

8 Simpson,A.,Bateman,O.,Driessen,H.,Lindley,P.,Moss,D., Mylvaganam,S.,Narebor,E & Slingsby,C (1994) The structure

of avian eye lens d-crystallin reveals a new fold for a superfamily of oligomeric enzymes Nat Struct Biol 1,724–734.

9 Simpson,A.,Moss,D & Slingsby,C (1995) The avian eye lens protein d-crystallin shows a novel packing arrangement of tetra-mers in a supramolecular helix Structure 3,403–412.

10 Abu-Abed,M.,Turner,M.A.,Vallee,F.,Simpson,A.,Slingsby,

C & Howell,P.L (1997) Structural comparison of the enzy-matically active and inactive forms of delta crystallin and the role

of histidine 91 Biochemistry 36,14012–14022.

11 Vallee,F.,Turner,M.A.,Lindley,P.L & Howell,P.L (1999) Crystal structure of an inactive duck delta II crystallin mutant with bound argininosuccinate Biochemistry 38,2425–2434.

12 Radford,S.E (2000) Protein folding: progress made and promised ahead Trends Biochem Sci 25,611–618.

13 Clark,A.C.,Sinclair,J.F & Baldwin,T.O (1993) Folding of bacterial luciferase involves a non-native heterodimeric inter-mediate in equilibrium with the native enzyme and the unfolded subunits J Biol Chem 268,10773–10779.

14 Gokhale,R.S.,Agarwalla,S.,Santi,D.V & Balaram,P (1996) Covalent reinforcement of a fragile region in the dimeric enzyme thymidylate synthase stabilizes the protein against chaotrope-induced unfolding Biochemistry 35,7150–7158.

15 Lee,H.J & Chang,G.G (2000) Guanidinium chloride induced reversible dissociation and denaturation of duck delta2-crystallin Eur J Biochem 267,3979–3985.

16 Higurashi,T.,Nosaka,K.,Mizobata,T.,Nagai,J & Kawata,Y (1999) Unfolding and refolding of Escherichia coli chaperonin GroES is expressed by a three-state model J Mol Biol 291, 703–713.

17 Kishimoto,K.,Yasuda,C & Manning,J.M (2000) Reversible dissociation/association of amino acid transaminase subunits: properties of isolated active dimers and inactive monomers Biochemistry 39,381–387.

18 Hornby,J.A.T.,Luo,J.K.,Stevens,J.M.,Wallace,L.A.,Kaplan, W.,Armstrong,R.N & Dirr,H.W (2000) Equilibrium folding of dimeric class l glutathione transferases involves a stable mono-meric intermediate Biochemistry 39,12336–12344.

19 Park,Y.C & Bedouelle,H (1998) Dimeric tyrosyl-tRNA syn-thetase from Bacillus stearothemophilus unfolds through a monomeric intermediate J Biol Chem 273,18052–18059.

T 2D 4M 4I 4U (Scheme I)

Scheme 1 Reversible dissociation and unfolding mechanism of duck d 2

-crystallin in GdnHCl T,tetramer; D,dimer; M,molten globule

monomer; I,partially folded intermediate; U,unfolded monomer.

Trang 8

20 Chang,G.G.,Lee,H.J & Chou,R.H (1997) pH-induced

reversible dissociation of tetrameric duck lens delta-crystallin.

Exp Eye Res 65,653–659.

21 Lehrer,S.S & Leavis,P.C (1978) Solute quenching of protein

fluorescence Methods Enzymol 49,222–236.

22 Schuck,P (2000) Size-distribution analysis of macromolecules by

sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation and lamm equation

modeling Biophys J 78,1606–1619.

23 Lee,J.C & Timasheff,S.N (1974) The calculation of partial

specific volumes of proteins in guanidine hydrochloride Arch.

Biochem Biophys 165,268–273.

24 Kawahara,K & Tanford,C (1966) Viscosity and density of

aqueous solutions of urea and guanidine hydrochloride J Biol.

Chem 241,3228–3232.

25 MacRorie,D.K & Voelker,P.J (1993) Self-Associating Systems in

the Analytical Ultracentrifuge,Beckman Instruments,California.

26 Chamberlain,A.K & Marqusee,S (2000) Comparison of

equi-librium and kinetic approaches for determining protein folding

mechanisms Adv Prot Chem 53,283–327.

27 Monera,O.D.,Kay,C.M & Hodges,R.S (1994) Protein denaturation with guanidine hydrochloride or urea provides a different estimate of stability depending on the contributions of electrostatic interactions Protein Sci 3,1984–1991.

28 Jaenicke,R & Lilie,H (2000) Folding and association of oligomeric and multimeric proteins Adv Prot Chem 53,329–401.

29 Chakraborty,A.R.,Davidson,A & Howell,P.L (1999) Mutational analysis of amino acid residues involved in arginino-succinate lyase activity in duck dII-crystallin Biochemistry 38, 2435–2443.

30 Sampaleanu,L.M.,Davidson,A.R.,Graham,C.,Wistow,G.J & Howell,P.L (1999) Domain exchange experiments in duck delta-crystallins: functional and evolutionary implications Protein Sci 8,529–537.

31 Pace,C.K (1986) Determination and analysis of urea and guanidine hydrochloride denaturation curve Methods Enzymol 131,266–280.

Ngày đăng: 08/03/2014, 08:20

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm