1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Báo cáo khoa học: Characterization of a high-affinity binding site for the pea albumin 1b entomotoxin in the weevil Sitophilus ppt

7 607 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 7
Dung lượng 201,56 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Characterization of a high-affinity binding site for the pea albumin 1bFre´de´ric Gressent, Isabelle Rahioui and Yvan Rahbe´ UMR 0203 INRA/INSA de Lyon, BF2I Biologie Fonctionnelle, Inse

Trang 1

Characterization of a high-affinity binding site for the pea albumin 1b

Fre´de´ric Gressent, Isabelle Rahioui and Yvan Rahbe´

UMR 0203 INRA/INSA de Lyon, BF2I (Biologie Fonctionnelle, Insectes et Interactions), INSA Baˆtiment Louis Pasteur,

Villeurbanne, France

The toxicity of the pea albumin 1b (PA1b), a 37 amino-acid

peptide extracted from pea seeds, for cereal weevils

(Sito-philus oryzae, Sito(Sito-philus granarius and Sito(Sito-philus zeamais)

was recently discovered.The mechanism of action of this

new entomotoxin is still unknown and potentially involves a

target protein in the insect tissues.This work describes the

characterization of a high-affinity binding site for PA1b in

a microsomal fraction of Sitophilus spp.extracts.Purified

PA1b was labeled to a high specific radioactivity

(c.900 CiÆmmol)1) using125I, and the iodinated ligand was

found to be biologically active.Binding of this ligand to the

microsomal fraction of S oryzae extract was found to be

saturable and reversible, with an affinity (Kd) of 2 6 nM, and

a high maximal binding capacity (Bmax) of 40 pmolÆmg)1of protein.A binding site displaying similar characteristics was detectable in the five susceptible weevils strains tested, as well

as in the pea aphid or in the fruit fly.However, no binding activity was detectable in extracts from four S oryzae strains previously shown to be resistant to the toxin through a recessive monogenic mechanism.Therefore, we suggest that this binding site might be involved in the mechanism

of action of PA1b

Keywords: binding site; pea albumin 1b; Sitophilus; cystine-knot; leginsulin

The cereal weevils (Sitophilus oryzae, Sitophilus granarius

and Sitophilus zeamais) are major pests of stored grains.At

present, the use of chemical insecticides is the main answer

to the damage caused by stored product pests, inducing

ecotoxicity problems and the occurrence of resistance within

insect populations.An alternative for controlling insects is

physical methods, such as cooling or the use of nitrogen or

carbon dioxide atmosphere.However, these methods are

expensive and not always applicable.Plant protection also

takes advantage of the genetic resources residing in crop

plants to create resistant varieties, and of the use of

biological toxins to build up transgenic plants tolerant to

different insect species.The Bacillus thuringiensis toxins [1],

proteins belonging to the lectin family [2], or enzymes

inhibitors [3], are in use or being tested, but to date these

molecules are not adapted to grain protection against

weevils

Therefore, the recent finding of a plant peptide lethal for

these insects has enlarged the possibilities for cereal grain

protection [4].This peptide was purified and sequenced

from Pisumsativumseeds and, being previously known as a

seed albumin [5], it was named PA1b for pea albumin 1b PA1b is the result of the post-translational cleavage of the albumin proprotein PA1, also releasing a second peptide (PA1a).PA1b consists of 37 amino acids, with six cysteines involved in three disulfide bonds which confer the toxin its high stability.Biological activity is conserved when boiled, and the peptide is resistant to digestion by trypsin [6] or by bovine rumen fluid [7]

Although no primary sequence homologies could be found with other proteins in the available databases, it was recently established by NMR studies and molecular modeling that PA1b belongs to the cystine-knot family [8] Characterized only recently as a structural family [9], cystine-knot peptides have now been identified from a variety of sources (plants, fungi, animal venoms, insects), and show very diverse biological activities (elicitor AVR9, trypsin inhibitor, antimicrobial, antiviral or antifungal activities, and many channel blockers [10]).A subfamily of these, the cyclic cystine-knot peptides, also named cyclo-tides, were investigated for their potential as new anti-biotics or anti-HIV properties.PA1b was the first entomotoxic cystine-knot peptide identified (peptidic sequence and disulfide bridges are shown in Fig.1), and the interest of this structural family for insect targets was reinforced by identifying the cyclotide kalata B1 as a peptide active on larval growth of the Lepidoptera Helicoverpa punctigera [11].Moreover, PA1b might belong to a multigenic family, as at least five isoforms

of the peptide exist in a single pea genotype and it seems

to be widespread in legumes [4,5]

Many cystine-knot peptides have inhibitory effects, against channels, proteases, or a-amylase [10].However,

to date, in vitro assays using PA1b failed to reveal any

Correspondence to F.Gressent, UMR 0203 INRA/INSA de Lyon,

BF2I (Biologie Fonctionnelle, Insectes et Interactions), INSA

Baˆtiment Louis Pasteur, 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex, France.

Fax: + 33 4 72438534, Tel.:+ 33 4 72437982,

E-mail: gressent@jouy.inra.fr

Abbreviations: PA1b, pea albumin 1b; BBI, soybean Bowman–Birk

inhibitor; E-64, trans-epoxysuccinyl- L

-leucylamido(4-guanidino)-butane.

(Received 21 February 2003, revised 24 March 2003,

accepted 8 April 2003)

Trang 2

enzyme inhibitory effect [4].Therefore, the aim of the

present work was to investigate the mode of action of the

toxin, as part of a wider study to determine whether PA1b

could be a valuable tool for insect control.An important

point is to understand the molecular mechanisms of the

sensitivity to the toxin, since resistant strains do exist

naturally: the screening of up to 90 Sitophilus spp.strains for

the susceptibility to PA1b has revealed that three strains, all

belonging to the S oryzae species, contained individuals

able to feed on pea seeds [12] and resistant to the purified

toxin.Other pest insects (the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum

and the flour moth Ephestia kuehniella) were found to be

susceptible to the toxin, but the fruit fly Drosophila

melano-gasterwas shown to be resistant [4].Within the S oryzae

species, a genetic analysis of the resistance demonstrated

that this trait was driven by a single recessive autosomal

gene [12].This result suggested that a single weevil gene

product could be responsible for the susceptibility or

resistance towards the toxin.On this basis, the mechanism

of action of the peptide was likely to involve a discrete

molecular target at the insect side.Therefore our work

focused on the characterization of a PA1b binding site in

Sitophilusspp.extracts, using a125I labeled 3741 Da isoform

of the toxin (peptide sequence in Fig.1 [4]).Given the

biological features presented here, this binding site could

potentially be regarded as the molecular target of the PA1b

toxicity in weevils

Experimental procedures

Biological material

Cereal weevils (S oryzae, zeamais and granarius,

Coleoptera, Curculionidae) were reared on wheat seeds at

27.5C 70% relative humidity.Nine strains were used,

differing in their genetic ability to thrive on pea seeds and

resist the toxic activity of pea albumin PA1b: five susceptible

strains S oryzae WAA42, Benin, and Bouriz, S zeamais

LS, and S granarius Brayard and four fully resistant

S oryzaestrains ISOR3, Mex1, China and GV harboring

a recessive pea-resistance allele [12].The fruit fly D

mel-anogaster(Diptera) larvae were provided by R Allemand

(UMR 5558 CNRS-UCBL, Lyon, France)

Tests of toxicity

The toxicity assays for PA1b or modified PA1b were

performed on the S oryzae susceptible strain WAA42 and

on its partially isogenic resistant strain ISOR3 (three

backcross of a resistant China genotype over the

suscepti-ble WAA42 genotype), according to the protocol described

by Delobel et al.[4].Briefly, in all described experiments,

30 insects were fed with the toxin to be assayed (100 lgÆg)1

of food), and mortality was then monitored daily up to

14 days after the beginning of the treatment

Isolation of membranes All the operations were performed at 4C.Insects (0.5–1 g) were ground with a mortar and pestle in liquid nitrogen The resulting powder was resuspended in 10–20 mL of extraction buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl pH 8; 0.25M sucrose;

2 mMMgCl2; 10 lME-64), and extracted six times for 5 s using an UltraTurrax blender.The slurry was centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 g.The supernatant was further centri-fuged to give a second pellet at 10 000 g (10 min) and a third one at 45 000 g for 45 min (microsomal fraction).The resulting fractions, sedimenting at 3000, 10 000 or 45 000 g, were resuspended in binding buffer (20 mM Tris buffer

pH 7.0 containing 10 lM E-64) with 30% glycerol and stored at)80 C until use

Purification of the toxin One batch of purified toxin isoform, showing a molecular mass of 3741 Da by mass spectrometry, and a pea albumin extract (named SRA1) were provided by J.Gueguen and E.Ferrasson (Laboratoire de Biochimie et Technologie des Prote´ines, Nantes, France).From SRA1, a mixture of PA1b isoforms was obtained by a 45-min incubation at)20 C in acetone/water (80 : 20) followed by a 10-min centrifugation

at 12 000 g.The supernatant was dried under vacuum, and more than 95% of the resulting powder consisted of a mixture of PA1b isoforms (as checked by HPLC analysis) PA1b or modified PA1b were purified or analyzed by reverse phase C18HPLC column eluted at 1 mLÆmin)1with

a gradient of water; trifluoroacetic acid 0.1%/acetonitrile; trifluoroacetic acid 0.1% (80 : 20 for 2 min, then to 40 : 60

in 20 min).PA1b peptide isoforms were detected by their absorbance at 210 nm (DAD 440, KONTRON, France), quantified by the measurement of the peak area and referred

to known quantities of pure peptides used as standards Labeling of the toxin

The labeling was carried out in 37 lL of 400 mMTris/HCl buffer pH 7.5, 60% methanol with 1.66 lg of the purified

3741 Da PA1b and 1 mCi of carrier free Na125I (Amer-sham).Chloramine-T (1.2 lg) in 3 lL of 50 mMTris/HCl buffer pH 7.5, 60% methanol was added at t¼ 0, 1, 2, and

3 min.After 10 min of incubation the reaction was stopped

by adding 10 lg of tyrosine in 140 lL of water The radiolabeled peptide was separated from non-incorporated iodine by reverse-phase HPLC.In these conditions, incor-poration of iodine ranged from 40 to 50%, and the specific radioactivity of the125I-labelled PA1b ligand on labeling day ranged from 890 to 1120 CiÆmmol)1.The labeled toxin was stored in 60% methanol at)20 C and used within a month after labeling

For iodination of the peptide using nonlabeled iodine, the protocol was as described above, except that 200 lg of the

3741 Da isoform, 0.3 mg of nonlabeled NaI and four times

50 lg of chloramine-T were used in a 100-lL volume Reduction and alkylation of the toxin

Reduction of the 3741 Da toxin (2 mgÆmL)1) was carried out in Tris/HCl buffer (pH 8, 0.1 ) in the presence of

Fig 1 Peptide sequence [4] and disulfide bridges [8] of the 3741 Da

PA1b isoform.

Trang 3

20 mMdithiothreitol.The mixture was boiled for 10 min,

allowing a complete reduction of the peptide.After cooling

at room temperature, one volume of 0.2Miodoacetamide

was added and the mixture was incubated in the dark for

1 h.Alkylation of the cysteine residues was quantitative,

and the alkylated peptide was then purified by reverse-phase

HPLC

Binding assays

Microsomal proteins (1–3 lg) were incubated in the

pres-ence of 0.4 nM125I-labelled PA1b in binding buffer

supple-mented with 0.2% CHAPS in a total volume of 204 lL.The

nonspecific binding component was determined in the

presence of 1 lMnonlabeled mixture of the PA1b isoforms

Incubations were performed for 2 h at room temperature in

96-well microtiter plates, then assays were transferred onto

MultiScreen filter plates containing GF/B filters and

vacuum drained using the MultiScreen system (Millipore,

USA).Filters were washed with 200 lL of cold washing

buffer (10 mMTris/HCl buffer pH 7, methanol 60%) and

transferred on gamma counter tubes.The radioactivity was

counted on a gamma counter (Riastar, Packard Instrument,

USA), and each point was the mean of triplicates.Binding

data were analyzed using the RADLIG 4 software

(BIO-SOFT, Cambridge, UK), and plots were drawn using the

ORIGIN 5 software (Microcal, USA)

Protein determination

Protein content was measured by the bicinchoninic acid

procedure developed by PIERCE (Rockford, USA) with

bovine serum albumin as reference

Results

The iodinated toxin displays a high specific

radioactivity and is biologically active

The 3741 Da isoform of PA1b contains a single tyrosine

residue in position 31.Assays of iodination were performed

using IodoBeads and chloramine-T.The yield of 125I

incorporated on the toxin was rather low (less than 5%)

with IodoBeads, while a 40–50% incorporation was

achieved using chloramine-T.The need for a high specific

radioactivity for binding studies, and the fact that native

PA1b and labeled PA1b cannot be separated by HPLC, led

us to use stoichiometric amount of toxin and iodine.Under

these conditions, the specific radioactivity of the125I-labelled

PA1b, calculated by the ratio of the radioactivity measured

by gamma counting and the amount of peptide evaluated by

absorbance at 210 nm during HPLC analysis, was about

942 CiÆmmol)1.This value is similar to the theoretical value

of 890 CiÆmmol)1 for a 40%125I incorporation (40% of

the 2220 CiÆmmol)1 125I initial activity)

We next analyzed by HPLC the stability of the

radio-ligand.When stored at )20 C in 60% methanol, the

125I-labelled PA1b showed a moderate but significant

radiolysis, since about 25% of the toxin was degraded after

one month, and less than 20% of radioligand remained

intact after 6 months.Then, the radioligand was used only

during the month following its labeling

The biological activity of the iodinated peptide was verified.For this purpose, a nonradioactive iodinated ligand was synthesized as described in the Experimental procedures section.The mass spectrometry analysis of the product revealed that more than 95% of the peptide incorporated two127I atoms.Toxicity assays on S oryzae showed that the mortality on susceptible strains WAA42 was similar to that of the control (100 lg of native 3741 Da peptide) for comparable toxin amounts, and that the resistant strain ISOR3 was not affected (data not shown)

125 I-Labelled PA1b binds specifically to a proteinaceous component of aS oryzae extract

The results presented in Table 1 show that the three subfractions obtained by differential centrifugation of a crude extract of S oryzae strain WAA42 (susceptible strain) were able to bind specifically the125I-labelled PA1b ligand The specific binding activity was the highest in the 45 000 g fraction (microsomal fraction), which presented an enrich-ment of threefold on a protein basis.However, in terms of total activities, the binding was found with similar values in the 10 000 and 45 000 g fractions.The nonspecific binding component was about 20% of the total binding activity in all three fractions.The specific binding value increases with the increase of microsomal proteins, until it reaches a plateau for 25–30% of the radioligand bound (about 10–15 lg of microsomal proteins, Fig.2).The microsomal

Table 1 Binding activities of 1.1 n M125I-labelled PA1b to particulate fractions prepared by differential centrifugation of S oryzae WAA42 extracts (5 lg of proteins).

Particulate fraction

3000 g 10 000 g 45 000 g Total protein (mg) 18.1 12.4 6.9 Total binding activity (c.p.m · 10 6 ) 24.5 45.2 49.9 Non-specific binding activity

(% of total binding)

22.3 18.9 18.3 Specific binding activity

(c.p.m.Ælg protein)1)

1355 3643 7243

Fig 2 Dose dependence of 125 I-labelled PA1b specific binding to microsomal proteins from S oryzae extract Different amounts (0.8–

30 lg) of proteins of the microsomal fraction of S oryzae extract were incubated in the presence of 0.4 n 125 I-labelled PA1b.

Trang 4

fraction of S oryzae WAA42 was then used for further

characterization, with 1–3 lg of protein loaded per assay,

in order to work in the linear part of the curve

The proteinaceous origin of the binding activity was

determined by its sensitivity to proteinase K and to

heat-denaturation.The results reported in Table 2 show that the

binding activity decreased strongly in the presence of

proteinase K, which in control experiments displayed no

activity towards the peptide ligand itself in the conditions of

the binding experiment (data not shown).Adding an

antiprotease cocktail (leupeptin, phenylmethanesulfonyl

fluoride and E-64), or heat-denaturing of the proteinase K

before the incubation with microsomal fraction proteins,

totally prevented the loss of binding activity.Furthermore,

the microsomal fraction proteins were incubated 15 min in

binding buffer at temperatures ranging from 20 to 70C

before performing the binding experiment.The results show

that the binding activity began to decrease when proteins

were preincubated at 40C and was practically

undetect-able at 60C (respectively 95 and 7% as compared to the

control, data not shown)

The binding of theS oryzae microsomal fraction

to125I-labelled PA1b is reversible, saturable,

and displays a high affinity

Binding of the125I-labelled PA1b to the microsomal fraction

proceeded in a time-dependent manner and an apparent

equilibrium was reached after a 90-min incubation at room

temperature.Addition of excess unlabeled ligand after

equilibrium had been reached led to the loss of specifically

bound radioligand, and this displacement was complete

within 60 min (Fig.3).The rate constants for association

(kon) was 2.03· 105

M )1Æs)1, and for dissociation (koff) was 8.77· 10)4s)1.The calculated equilibrium dissociation

constant (Kd¼ koff/kon) was then of about 4.3 nM

A saturation experiment, using a freshly synthesized125

I-labelled PA1b, was performed with labeled ligand ranging

from 0.35 to 3.2 nM.The saturation plot showed that the

specific binding was saturable, and the deduced Scatchard

plot revealed a Kd of 2.6 nM and a maximal binding

capacity (Bmax) of 36 pmol per mg of microsomal protein

(Fig.4).The Hill number was 0.98, suggesting the presence

of a single class of binding site.Moreover, a competition

experiment using the homologous nonradioactive 127I2 -labelled PA1b as competitor confirmed the results obtained

by the saturation experiment on the 45 000 g fraction (Ki¼ 2.8 nM, Bmax¼ 39 pmol per mg of protein)

A single PA1b binding site is detectable in membrane fractions of theS oryzae extract, and is specific for the native peptide

Competition experiments were performed on the three subfractions of S oryzae extracts using the 3741 Da PA1b

as the competitor.The results showed that the native peptide displayed the same affinity as the iodinated toxin on the 45 000 g fraction (Ki¼ 2.2 nM; Bmax¼ 40 pmolÆmg of protein).Similar affinities were found on the 3000 and

10 000 g fractions with lower Bmax(a single class of binding site displaying Ki of 2 and 3.5 nM, and Bmax of 7.4 and 15.6 pmol per mg of protein, respectively, data not shown)

Fig 4 Saturation plot and deduced Scatchard plot (inset) of the binding

of 125 I-labelled PA1b to the microsomal fraction of S oryzae extract Experiments were performed using 1 lg of proteins and increasing concentrations of 125 I-labelled PA1b (0.35–3.2 n M ).

Table 2 Effect of proteinase K on the 125I-labelled PA1b binding

activity on the microsomal fraction of S oryzae WAA42 extract.

Treatmenta Binding activity (%)

Proteinase K (0.2 lg) 24

Proteinase K (2 lg) 7

Denaturated proteinase K (0.2 lg)c 107

Proteinase K (0.2 lg) + antiproteases d 104

a

Microsomal fraction aliquots (2 lg of proteins) were incubated

with effectors for 10 min at 37 C before measuring the binding

activity using 0.4 n M of 125 I-labelled PA1b b Incubation in binding

buffer without antiproteases only c Protease was denaturated by

boiling for 10 min.dPhenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (1 m M ) , 4 l M

leupeptin, and 10 l M E-64.

Fig 3 Association and dissociation kinetics of 125 I-labelled PA1b to the microsomal fraction of S oryzae extract Binding experiments were performed using 2 lg of proteins and 0 4 n M125I-labelled PA1b.Solid squares (j) and circles (d) indicate total binding and non-specific binding during association, respectively, whereas triangles (.) indicate total binding during dissociation.The dissociation process was initi-ated by the addition of 1 l M nonlabeled 3741 Da PA1b (arrow).

Trang 5

Next, the selectivity of the binding site was examined by

competition experiments as well: the results showed that

neither a 7-kDa peptide (a Bowman–Birk serine protease

inhibitor), nor the bovine insulin used as competitors were

able to compete with the 125I-labelled PA1b.Moreover,

when the 3741 Da PA1b was reduced and the cysteine

residues alkylated, the modified peptide completely lost its

binding activity.Biological tests performed on S oryzae

showed that the alkylated peptide was not toxic for the

susceptible or resistant weevil strains (data not shown)

The binding activity correlates with the susceptibility

or resistance of theSitophilus spp strains

The specific binding activity of the microsomal fraction of

different weevil strains, of the pea aphid A pisum and of the

fruit fly D melanogaster was determined.Figure 5 shows

that the five susceptible weevil strains tested (S oryzae

WAA42, Be´nin and Bouriz, S granarius Brayard and

S zeamais LS) displayed a high specific binding activity,

between 1700 and 2200 c.p.m per lg of protein By

contrast, no binding activity could be detected when

incubating the 125I-labelled PA1b with the microsomal

fraction proteins of extracts of the four strains of S oryzae

resistant to the toxin (China, Mex1, ISOR3 and GV), even

when increasing 25-fold the amount of microsomal proteins

The pea aphid (susceptible to the toxin) was able to bind the

125I-labelled PA1b, to a lesser extent than the susceptible

weevil strains.Surprisingly, the microsomal fraction of an

extract of the resistant insect D melanogaster also displayed

a strong binding capacity

The determination of the characteristics of the binding

site of these different strains or species is presented in

Table 3.The binding activities of extracts from the five

weevil strains of the three species showed very similar

affinities (Ki between 2 and 9 nM) and maximal binding

capacities (Bmaxbetween 33 and 40 pmol per mg of protein) The D melanogaster, but principally the A pisum micro-somal fractions displayed lower affinities (Ki¼ 16 and

58 nM, respectively), but similar Bmax (40 pmol per mg protein) compared to the values obtained on weevil extracts

The radioligand is stable in the presence

of the microsomal fraction ofSitophilus extract

In order to determine the fate of the labeled toxin during the binding test, the125I-labelled PA1b ligand was incubated for

5 h with 5 lg of proteins of the microsomal fraction from

S oryzae WAA42 (susceptible strain) or from S oryzae ISOR3 (resistant strain) in the conditions used for binding experiments.Following incubation, the radioactivity was dissociated from the binding site and recovered at more than 98% by a 60% methanol extraction.The HPLC analysis of this fraction revealed a single radioactive peak at

a retention time corresponding to PA1b (data not shown) Thus, the radioligand was not degraded during incubation with extracts from either the susceptible or the resistant strain

Discussion

The recent finding of the insecticidal properties of the PA1b peptide(s) [4] has opened new possibilities for cereal grain protection against weevils.However, the occurrence

of naturally resistant strains of S oryzae is an important problem, and could limit the usefulness of this peptide for plant protection.Although the mechanism of action of the toxin is still totally unknown, genetical analysis of the resistance within the S oryzae species, implicating a single recessive gene [12], suggested that the toxicity might involve

a specific receptor on the insect side.On this basis, the search for a PA1b binding protein may be the first step towards the cloning of a potential receptor in susceptible insects

In this work, we characterized the binding of PA1b to a proteinaceous component of a particulate fraction of

S oryzaeextracts.The binding was saturable and reversible, and the binding site exhibits a high affinity for the native

3741 Da toxin (Kd¼ 2.4 nM), an affinity compatible with a role in the toxicity mechanism.Furthermore, the binding site showed an unusually high maximal binding capacity (B ¼ 40 pmol per mg of proteins, assuming that the

Table 3 Affinities (K i ) and maximal binding capacity (B max ) of PA1b on different species and strains of insects measured by competitive inhibition

of the 125 I-labelled PA1b binding.

Insects species and strains

K i ± SEM (n M )

B max (pmolÆmg protein)

S oryzae WAA42 2.6 ± 0.3 40

S oryzae Be´nin 6 ± 1.8 39

S oryzae Bouriz 4.5 ± 0.72 33

S granarius Brayard 6.3 ± 1.6 40

S zeamais LS 9 ± 1.6 34

A pisum 58 ± 10 40

D melanogaster 16 ± 3.3 40

Fig 5 Specific binding of the 125 I-labelled PA1b ligand on the

micro-somal fraction extracts from different insect species or strains Bars

indicate specific binding of the 125 I-labelled PA1b (0.4 n M ) (± SEM)

to 2 lg proteins from the microsomal fraction of S oryzae strain

WAA42 (1), Be´nin (2), Bouriz (3), GV (4), Mex1 (6), ISOR3 (8) and

China (10), S zeamais LS (12), S granarius Brayard (13), A pisum

(14) and D melanogaster (15).Bars labeled 5, 7, 9 and 11 correspond to

specific binding displayed by 50 lg of microsomal proteins extracted

from the resistant S oryzae strains GV, Mex1, ISOR3 and China,

respectively.

Trang 6

binding implicated only one toxin molecule per binding

site).PA1b seems to bind to a single protein, as only one

binding site is detectable in the microsomal fraction, and the

binding activity in the 3000 and 10 000 g fractions is

probably due to the same protein as the binding in the three

subfractions displayed the same characteristics.In terms of

ligand specificity, we presently do not have available site

directed mutants of the toxin, and a single isoform was

purified from pea seeds to homogeneity, thus restricting the

possibilities to identify the PA1b amino acids involved in

ligand recognition.However, the fact that the iodinated

ligand is still biologically active and displays an affinity

comparable with the affinity of the native peptide indicates

that the tyrosine residue is probably not implicated in ligand

binding.On the contrary, the reduced, alkylated peptide

looses its binding capacity, as its activity on weevils,

suggesting that the tertiary structure of PA1b is critical

This is not surprising, as this is a common feature of many

biologically active sulfur-rich peptides.This result, together

with the absence of recognition of a BBI peptide or the

bovine insulin, confirms that the binding site is probably

highly specific for the PA1b tertiary structure.It was

suggested that PA1b could have a low sequence similarity

with the BBI peptide [5], and Watanabe et al.[13] showed

that the soybean homologue of PA1b (named leginsulin in

this paper) is able to compete with bovine insulin for

binding to a soybean globulin exhibiting functional

simi-larity to the rat insulin receptor.In our case, neither bovine

insulin nor BBI were able to displace PA1b from its binding

site, suggesting that the potential binding capacity of PA1b

to an insulin binding protein, or a putative similarity with

BBI, were not implicated in the toxicity mechanism in

weevils

Within the Sitophilus genus, the presence of the binding

activity fully correlates with the susceptibility to the toxin

All susceptible strains of the three species display similar

affinities, whereas no binding activity could be detected in

the four S oryzae resistant strains, including ISOR3, a

three generation backcross isoline to WAA42 [12].This

result strongly suggests that the high-affinity binding site

is the molecular target of the peptide in Sitophilus, and

that it may play a major role in the toxicity process.As

the labeled ligand was not degraded during the binding

experiment, the absence of binding activity on the

resistant strains demonstrates that the resistance

mechan-ism within the Sitophilus genus involves either a

modifi-cation or the absence of the molecular target.Indeed, the

absence of binding in resistant strains could be due to

the absence of the target protein, or to a mutation within

the site of the binding to PA1b.Actually, target mutation

resistance is widely used by insects to resist a wide range

of toxins, and was reported for different insecticide

targets, as for the GABA receptor, the sodium channels

or the acetylcholinesterases [14]

The presence and density of the binding site in all insect

species tested, and among three insect orders (e.g

Coleoptera, Diptera and Hemiptera) suggests that this

protein is widely represented and conserved in insects, and

that PA1b could share a similar mechanism of action in

all susceptible species.However, the presence of the

binding site in the resistant species D melanogaster, with

characteristics roughly similar to those of the Sitophilus

susceptible strains, suggests that a different mechanism of insensitivity exists in this species.This mechanism seems not to implicate the binding site, and could take place either upstream or downstream of the perception step.We could for example speculate that certain insects are able to enzymatically degrade the peptide in a nonactive form, which is one reported way of resistance of insects against

Bt toxins [15], and proteinase inhibitors [16], or that a protein in a putative signal transduction cascade may differ in Drosophila.Also, the possibility that the PA1b target may be very common in insects will require further biological assays to test side-effects of a PA1b-based biocontrol strategy, in particular on useful insects (e.g ladybird beetle, trichogramma, bee)

In conclusion, this work allowed the first in vitro biochemical characterization of a high-affinity binding site for the product of a plant resistance gene in insects, with binding characteristics fully correlated to the genetical analysis [12], and thus falling in the gene for gene paradigm The occurrence of the binding site in different susceptible insect species indicated that this binding site is probably the molecular target of the toxin, and that resistance within the

S oryzae species potentially involves a variation in this protein.However, the role of the binding protein in insects, and therefore the overall molecular mechanism of toxicity is still unknown.To date, the cystine-knot peptides comprised mainly ion channel blockers and enzyme inhibitors.How-ever, ion channel effectors were only found in animal venoms, with the exception of a unique sulfur-rich plant peptide (the CSab-type c-zeathionin) which has been found recently to be a Na+channel blocker [17].However, all cystine-knot plant peptides with known targets at the present time are enzyme inhibitors (including for example trypsin, a-amylase and carboxypeptidase) [18].PA1b is of plant source, but all inhibitory assays conducted until now has failed to detect any effect on enzymatic activities, including papain, trypsin and chymotrypsin-like activities [4].Although PA1b could have some low similarity with BBI peptides, the absence of consensus residues in the active site results in probable lack of any antiprotease activity [5] Then, the purification of the binding site, and the cloning of the corresponding gene in susceptible and resistant strains will probably help to answer these questions, and will provide us with the molecular tools to monitor the outburst

of resistant populations, and eventually to engineer a pea-related toxin into a peptide active on both resistant and susceptible weevils

Acknowledgements

We thank Francesca Cardinale for carefully reviewing this manuscript.

We thank J.Gueguen and E.Ferrasson for providing us the 3741 Da toxin isoform and the PA1b isoform mixture.

References

1 Schnepf, E., Crickmore, N., Van Rie, J., Lereclus, D., Baum, J., Feitelson, J., Zeigler, D.R & Dean, D.H (1998) Bacillus thur-ingiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62, 775–806.

2 Peumans, W.J & Vandamme, E.J.M (1995) Lectins as plant defense proteins Plant Physiol 109, 347–352.

Trang 7

3 Gatehouse, A.M.R & Gatehouse, J.A (1998) Identifying proteins

with insecticidal activity: use of encoding genes to produce

insect-resistant transgenic crops Pestic Sci 52, 165–175.

4 Delobel, B., Grenier, A., Gueguen, J., Ferrasson, E & Mbailao,

M.(1998) Utilisation D’un Polypeptide De´rive´ D’une Albumine

PA1b de Le´gumineuse Comme Insecticide.French Patent 98

05877.

5 Higgins, T.J.V., Chandler, P.M., Randall, P.J., Spencer, D.,

Beach, L R , Blagrove, R J , Kortt, A A & Inglis, A S.

(1986) Gene structure, protein structure and regulation of the

synthesis of a sulfur-rich protein in pea seeds J Biol Chem 261,

11124–11130.

6 Hancock, K.R., Ealing, P.M & White, D.W (1994) Identification

of sulfur-rich proteins which resist rumen degradation and

are hydrolysed rapidly by intestinal proteases Br J Nutr 72,

855–863.

7 Spencer, D., Higgins, T.J.V., Freer, M., Dove, H & Coombe, J.B.

(1988) Monitoring the fate of dietary proteins in rumen fluid using

gel electrophoresis Br J Nutr 60, 241–247.

8 Jouvensal, L., Louis, S., Quillien, L., Gue´guen, J , Rahbe´, Y &

Vovelle, F.(2002) PA1b, an insecticidal peptide extracted from the

seed of the pea Pisumsativum: 1H )2D-NMR study and molecular

modelling.In Proceedings of the XXth International Conference

on Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, p.232.Toronto,

Canada.

9.McDonald, N Q.& Hendrickson, W A.(1993) A structural

superfamily of growth factors containing a cystine-knot motif.

Cell 73, 421–424.

10 Craik, D.J., Daly, N.L & Waine, C (2001) The cystine knot motif

in toxins and implications for drug design Toxicon 39, 43–60.

11 Jennings, C , West, J , Waine, C , Craik, D & Anderson, M (2001) Biosynthesis and insecticidal properties of plant cyclotides: the cyclic knotted proteins from Oldenlandia affinis Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 10614–10619.

12 Grenier, A.M., Mbauguinam, M.& Delobel, B.(1997) Genetical analysis of the ability of the rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) to breed on split peas Heredity 79, 15–23.

13 Watanabe, Y., Barbashov, S.F., Komatsu, S., Hemmings, A.M., Miyagi, M., Tsunasawa, S & Hirano, H (1994) A peptide that stimulates phosphorylation of the plant insulin-binding protein Eur J Biochem 224, 167–172.

14 Hemingway, J.& Ranson, H.(2000) Insecticide resistance in insect vectors of human disease Annu Rev Entomol 45, 371–391.

15 Keller, M , Sneh, B , Strizhov, N , Prudovsky, E , Regev, A , Koncz, C , Schell, J.& Zilberstein, A.(1996) Digestion of d-endotoxins by gut proteases may explain reduced sensitivity of advanced instar larvae of Spodoptera littoralis to CryIC Insect Biochem Mol Biol 26, 365–373.

16.Girard, C , Le Me´tayer, M., Bonade´-Bottino, M., Pham-Dele`gue, M.H.& Jouanin, L.(1998) High level of resistance to proteinase inhibitors may be conferred by proteolytic cleavage in beetle larvae Insect Biochem Mol Biol 28, 229–237.

17 Kushmerick, C , de Sousa Castro, M , Santos Cruz, J , Bloch, C Jr

& Beirao, P.S.L (1998) Functional and structural features of c-zeathionins, a new class of sodium channel blockers FEBS Lett.

440, 302–306.

18 Norton, R.S & Pallaghy, P.K (1998) The cystine-knot struc-ture of ion channel toxins and related polypeptides Toxicon 11, 1573–1583.

Ngày đăng: 08/03/2014, 02:21

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm