The evolution of the structure and function of the transthyretin homolog [referred to as transthyretin-like protein TLP] has been the focus of recent studies by several research groups..
Trang 1Evolutionary changes to transthyretin: structure and
function of a transthyretin-like ancestral protein
Sarah C Hennebry
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bio21 Institute, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Introduction
The evolution of the structure and the function of the
thyroid hormone (TH) distributor, transthyretin, has
been well researched The primary, secondary, tertiary
and quaternary structures of this vertebrate protein are
highly conserved It was therefore hypothesized that
the transthyretin gene may have evolved in a
nonverte-brate organism Searches for a transthyretin progenitor
led to the identification of a transthyretin homolog,
which was found initially in nonvertebrate genomes and subsequently in all major kingdoms The evolution
of the structure and function of the transthyretin homolog [referred to as transthyretin-like protein (TLP)] has been the focus of recent studies by several research groups TLPs from various organisms have been demonstrated to share remarkable structural similarities to vertebrate transthyretins Despite this
Keywords
evolution; purines; structure; transthyretin;
transthyretin-like protein
Correspondence
S C Hennebry, Human Neurotransmitters
Laboratory, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes
Institute, P.O Box 6492, St Kilda Road
Central Melbourne, Victoria 3008, Australia
Fax: +61 3 8532 1100
Tel: +61 3 8532 1734
E-mail: sarah.hennebry@bakeridi.edu.au
(Received 2 February 2009, revised 8 June
2009, accepted 8 July 2009)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07246.x
The structure of the thyroid hormone distributor protein, transthyretin, has been highly conserved during the evolution of vertebrates Over the last decade, studies into the evolution of transthyretin have revealed the exis-tence of a transthyretin homolog, transthyretin-like protein, in all king-doms Phylogenetic studies have suggested that the transthyretin gene in fact arose as a result of a duplication of the transthyretin-like protein gene
in early protochordate evolution Structural studies of transthyretin-like proteins from various organisms have revealed the remarkable conservation
of the transthyretin-like protein⁄ transthyretin fold The only significant differences between the structures of transthyretin-like protein and transthyretin were localized to the dimer–dimer interface and indicated that thyroid hormones could not be bound by transthyretin-like protein All transthyretin-like proteins studied to date have been demonstrated to function in purine metabolism by hydrolysing the oxidative product of uric acid, 5-hydroxyisourate The residues characterizing the catalytic site in transthyretin-like proteins are 100% conserved in all transthyretin-like protein sequences but are absent in transthyretins Therefore, it was proposed that following duplication of the transthyretin-like protein gene, loss of these catalytic residues resulted in the formation of a deep, negatively charged channel that runs through the centre of the transthy-retin tetramer The results thus demonstrate the remarkable evolution of the transthyretin-like protein⁄ transthyretin protein from a hydrolytic enzyme to a thyroid hormone distributor protein
Abbreviations
5-HIU, 5-hydroxyisourate; COG, cluster of orthologous groups; OHCU, hydroxy-4-carboxy-5-ureidoimidazoline; PTS2, type-two peroxisomal sequence; RNAi, RNA interference; TH, thyroid hormone; TLP, transthyretin-like protein.
Trang 2structural similarity, TLP and transthyretin have
dif-ferent functions TLP is an enzyme functioning in the
purine catabolism pathway, where it hydrolyses
5-hy-droxyisourate (5-HIU), the oxidation product of uric
acid Phylogenetic analyses have revealed that it is
likely that the transthyretin gene arose as a result of a
duplication of the TLP gene in early vertebrate
evolu-tion Thus, the evolution of TLP and transthyretin
rep-resents a remarkable case of the divergent evolution
from an enzyme to a hormone distributor
This minireview will present and discuss recent
find-ings regarding the identification and distribution of
TLP genes in nature, the structural and functional
characterization of the TLP from various organisms,
and the evolution of TLP and transthyretin
The identification of TLPs and
transthyretins in nature
The evolution of transthyretin and its distribution in
nature have been well researched [1,2] Several studies
have demonstrated that all vertebrates synthesize
transthyretin at some stage during their development
[2–4] and this synthesis is primarily localized to the
liver, choroid plexus and retinal pigment epithelium
The expression of the transthyretin gene in vertebrates
occurs independently in these tissues [5,6] There is
considerable sequence identity and similarity between
the amino acid sequences of transthyretin from various
vertebrate organisms The most divergent transthyretin
sequences (for example, human and sea bream
trans-thyretin) still retain 67% similarity (48% identity)
This consensus of primary structure is also reflected in
the highly conserved secondary, tertiary and
quater-nary structures of transthyretin from vertebrates
Together, these data suggest that the transthyretin
gene may have evolved before the divergence of
verte-brates from inverteverte-brates
The genomics era has been characterized by the
increasingly rapid sequencing of multiple genomes
alongside the development of sophisticated pairwise
sequence-alignment search tools These were the
cata-lysts enabling the search for a transthyretin homolog
among nonvertebrate organisms The first evidence
for such a homolog was published in 2000 [7], when
blastsearches [8] revealed the existence of ORFs with
the potential to encode a protein of similar length
and sequence composition to transthyretin These
ORFs were initially identified in the enteric bacteria
Escherichia coli and Salmonella dublin, in the yeast
Schizosaccharomyces pombe and in the nematode
Caenorhabditis elegans[7] The predicted protein
homo-log of transthyretin was termed TLP because the name
transthyretin implied a role in the transport of thyroid hormones and retinol binding protein [9] Such a func-tion could not be assumed for the nonvertebrate trans-thyretin homolog
Sequence characteristics of TLP and transthyretin
With the availability of an increasing number of genomes to mine, Eneqvist et al [10] used blast searches
to identify a further 49 putative TLP sequences in the genomes of bacteria, plants and invertebrate animals The TLP genes they identified typically encoded a pro-tein of 114 amino acid residues compared with, on average, 125 residues in transthyretin (the number of residues was species dependent) Furthermore, Eneq-vist et al [10] observed that all TLP sequences possessed a consensus C-terminal tetrapeptide: Tyr-Arg-Gly-Ser Alignment of TLP and transthyretin sequences revealed that the regions of greatest similar-ity between the two families of proteins were in the N-terminal and C-terminal regions [11] In order to distinguish between the two protein families in greater detail, a comparative analysis of TLP and transthy-retin sequences was performed [11] In this study, a set
of bacterial TLP and vertebrate transthyretin sequences was probed for motifs that might be con-served in each group The study revealed that the transthyretin sequences in this set were so similar that
a single motif spanned the entire length of each protein sequence However, in the set of TLP sequences, five specific motifs were identified, namely motifs A–E (with motif A being the most highly conserved) The motifs in the TLP sequences were found in the follow-ing arrangement (from N-terminal to C-terminal): (E)-B-D-C-A (see Fig 1A) Motif E was only found in TLPs from plant species and from two alphaproteo-bacteria: Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Magnetospiril-lum magnetotacticum Motif E is homologous to the proteins of cluster of orthologous groups (COG)
3195, a group of bacterial proteins where the entire protein is made up of this single domain Motif E has been subsequently identified as a unique protein, 2-oxo-4-hydroxy-4-carboxy-5-ureidoimadolazine (OHCU) decarboxylase, whose function relative to TLP will be discussed later in this review
A combined set of TLP and transthyretin sequences was also probed for motifs to determine whether there were any motifs in common between the two protein families Three motifs (A’–C’), which highlighted regions of similarity between TLP and transthyretin sequences, were identified and found in the arrange-ment B’-C’-A’ (see Fig 1B) These motifs were shown
Trang 3to correspond to regions of structural significance in
the transthyretin molecule (see Fig 1C) Motif A’
cor-responds to residues that line the hydrophobic core of
the transthyretin tetramer Motif B’ corresponds to
residues forming the dimer–dimer interface and
resi-dues in motif C’ are involved in monomer–monomer
interactions (see Fig 1C) Based on these observations,
it was hypothesized that TLP probably has a tertiary
structure similar to that of transthyretin [11] The
motifs identified in this study also provided a more
accurate means of differentiating between TLP and
transthyretin sequences and for the identification of
novel TLP⁄ transthyretin sequences through Hidden
Markov searches in protein databases [11]
Interestingly, whilst motifs A’–C’ represent the
regions of greatest sequence similarity between TLP
and transthyretin, they also contain specific amino acid
substitutions that enabled the distinction of one group
from the other For instance, at their C-termini (motif
A’ region), nearly all TLP sequences possess a
Tyr-Arg-Gly-Ser tetrapeptide Specifically, the tyrosine and
glycine residues were found to be 100% conserved
among TLP sequences Upon sequence alignment with
TLP, the residues at the same positions in transthyretin are threonine and valine, respectively At the N-termini
of TLP sequences (the motif B’ region) a conserved his-tidine residue was found The equivalent residue in transthyretin sequences is lysine (also 100% conserved) Interestingly, the residues involved in TH binding in transthyretin are not conserved in TLP sequences Rather, it appears that residues involved in the struc-tural integrity of the TLP⁄ transthyretin molecule have been conserved The alignment of representative trans-thyretin and TLP sequences in Fig 2 demonstrates the distribution of residues that are 100% conserved in both TLP and transthyretin sequences as well as those that are 100% conserved solely within the set of TLP sequences
Distribution of TLPs and transthyretins
in nature
The distribution of TLP in nature and its evolutionary relationship to transthyretin have been studied exten-sively in recent years [10,11] To date, TLP genes have been identified in over 200 organisms across all
king-A
B
C
Motif A′
A′
A C D B
C′
~ 127 amino acids
~ 114 amino acids
B′
Motif B′
Motif C′
Fig 1 Motifs common between TLP and
transthyretin indicate conservation of the
TLP ⁄ TTR structure through evolution Motifs
identified in (A) TLP sequences and (B)
transthyretin+TLP sequences (A) In the set
of TLP sequences, four motifs were
identi-fied (A–D) The motifs are found in the order
B-D-C-A, with A being the most highly
con-served (B) In the set of transthyretin+TLP
sequences, three motifs were identified,
A’–C’ Motif A’ is equivalent to motif A from
the TLP motif set Motif B’ is similar but
extended in the N-terminal and C-terminal
regions to motif B Motif C’ is shorter than
motif C and its location is shifted towards
the N-terminus Motif D is specific to the
TLP set of proteins (C) Motifs A’–C’ were
superimposed on the tertiary structure of
sea bream transthyretin Motif A’ lines the
hydrophobic core Motif B’ forms the
dimer–dimer interface and the opening of
the central channel of the TTR molecule.
Residues in motif C’ are involved in
mono-mer–monomer interactions (Modified from
[11]).
Trang 4doms By contrast, the transthyretin gene is only found
in vertebrates Whilst the TLP gene is widely distributed
in nature, there are some notable absences or apparent
‘losses’ of the TLP gene For instance, no protozoans to
date have been found to have a TLP gene, even though
related organisms such as the slime mold
Dictyosteli-um discoideDictyosteli-um and the jakobite Jakoba bahemiensis
both express the TLP gene A TLP gene is absent from
the cnidarian and ascidian phyla, despite the fact that
organisms before and after these branch points in
evo-lution express the TLP gene This evidence suggests that
whilst TLP might have been conserved throughout
evo-lution because they have an important functional role,
it is by no means essential to all organisms
Subcellular localization of TLP in
bacteria
In most instances, the TLP gene is present as a single
copy in the organisms in which it has been identified
The gene typically encodes a cytoplasmic protein and,
in the case of bacteria, is typically located in purine
metabolism operons, neighbouring the gene which
encodes OHCU decarboxylase [11] This is consistent
with the recently determined role of TLP in this
meta-bolic pathway (to be discussed later) A notable
excep-tion to this is the case of the enterobacterial TLP genes and a handful of TLP genes from other Gram-negative bacteria The TLPs from these bacteria have been found to possess an N-terminal extension, namely
a periplasmic localization sequence [11] Interestingly, these TLP genes are not found to be associated with purine metabolism operons [11], and it is therefore tempting to speculate that their primary function is not purine metabolism
Some organisms have multiple copies of a TLP gene (see Table 1) [11] In these cases, one gene encodes a cytoplasmic TLP and the ‘additional’ TLP gene encodes a periplasmic protein that, similarly to entero-bacterial TLP genes, is not associated on the entero-bacterial chromosome with genes encoding proteins involved in purine metabolism Indeed, phylogenetic analyses of all periplasmic TLP sequences (S.C Hennebry, unpub-lished results) suggests that the genes encoding these TLPs were probably obtained through horizontal gene transfer from an enterobacterial ancestor
Subcellular localization of TLPs in eukaryotes
In most nonfungal eukaryotic TLP sequences exam-ined to date, an N-terminal extension has also been
Fig 2 Alignment of representative transthyretin and TLP sequences Mature amino acid sequences for transthyretin and TLP from selected organisms are shown (i.e with signal peptides removed) The shared secondary structure characteristics of transthyretins and TLPs are indi-cated above the alignment: motifs A’–C’ are indiindi-cated with straight lines and are labelled; b-strands are indiindi-cated with arrows and are labelled A–H A single a-helix is indicated with a rectangle The residues that are strongly conserved between transthyretins and TLPs are indicated with an asterisk (*) Residues 100% conserved among all TLP sequences are indicated with a hash (#) Numbering for human transthyretin is shown directly beneath the alignment.
Trang 5identified This N-terminal extension contains a
nona-peptide, which is predicted to encode a type-two
peroxisomal sequence (PTS2) [11,12] Recently, a
proteomic analysis of leaf peroxisomes confirmed the
peroxisomal localization of the Arabidopsis thaliana
TLP [13] Found in all eukaryotic cells, peroxisomes
are specialized organelles in which oxidative reactions,
such as those associated with purine metabolism, are
compartmentalized The co-localization of
purine-metabolism enzymes (e.g uricase) with TLP in
peroxi-somes is therefore in keeping with the function of the
A thalianaTLP hydrolysis of the purine 5-HIU (S C
Hennebry, unpublished results) These observations
contradict those made by Nam and Li [14], where the
A thaliana TLP was reported to be localized only in
the cytosol and was unlikely to have a function in
pur-ine metabolism In this study, the authors failed to
take into account that the A thaliana gene At5g58220
encoded two distinct proteins: OHCU decarboxylase
and TLP Therefore, conclusions drawn from yeast
two-hybrid studies were based on interactions of the
N-terminal region of OHCU decarboxylase with the
receptor kinase brassinosteroid-insenitive-1, rather than
interactions made by TLP Furthermore, their
conclu-sion that the TLP could not be peroxisomal was
largely based on the observation that the TLP did not
possess a C-terminal peroxisomal targeting sequence
Splice variants have been detected for most
eukary-otic TLP genes and some of these variants result in the
truncation of the TLP at the N-terminus This
trunca-tion has no effect on amino acid residues known to be
involved in the function of the protein, but result in
the deletion of the PTS2 nona-peptide In the case of
Mus musculus, transcript data available at RIKEN
Mouse Encyclopedia (genome.gsc.riken.go.jp) suggest
that over 90% of TLP gene transcripts possess the region encoding the PTS2 and were isolated from hepatocytes A small proportion of TLP transcripts (< 10%) do not encode the PTS2 and appear not to
be under tissue-specific regulation Splice variations resulting in deletion of the PTS2 have also been described for plant TLPs [11]
All TLP sequences identified in the Viridiplantae kingdom are encoded by multiple exons [11] For example, the TLP gene from A thaliana is encoded by four exons, the last of which encodes the TLP As pre-viously mentioned, exons 1–3 (motif E) encode a pro-tein from COG 3195, which was recently identified as the enzyme OHCU decarboxylase [12,15] The functional relationship between TLP and OHCU decarboxylase will be discussed below
Evidence for gene duplication
The most primitive organisms found to have a trans-thyretin sequence are the lampreys Petromyzon marinus and Lampetra appendix [16] By contrast, TLP genes have been identified in all kingdoms Given their high degree of sequence similarity, it has been hypothesized that the transthyretin gene arose as a result of a dupli-cation of the TLP gene at some stage in early verte-brate evolution [11] Initial phylogenetic analyses of TLP and transthyretin sequences showed a branching
of transthyretin slightly before the separation of the chordates [17] Subsequent analyses using the recently determined transthyretin sequences from lamprey and recent additions to echinoderm expressed sequence tag (EST) databases, suggest that the TLP gene duplica-tion probably occurred just after the separaduplica-tion of echinoderms (S C Hennebry, unpublished results)
Table 1 Bacteria with multiple copies of TLP genes.
Genes encoding cytoplasmic TLP
Genes encoding periplasmic TLP
Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf5 ATCC BAA-477 Proteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria 1 2
Trang 6Following the gene-duplication event, profound
modifications to the duplicated TLP occurred, leading
to the development of a deep channel into which the
THs 3¢,3,5-triiodo-L-thyronine (T3) and
3¢,5¢,3,5-tetra-iodo-L-thyronine (thyroxine, T4) could bind The
nature of this structural modification will be discussed
below
The function of TLP in purine
metabolism
To date, three studies have been performed examining
the role of TLP in vivo In a study of the A thaliana
TLP, no phenotype was observed when an insertional
mutation was introduced into the TLP gene [14]
How-ever, the lack of phenotype observed may be attributed
to the presence of an additional 5-HIU hydrolase in
plants (see later discussion regarding TLP functional
redundancy) In 2003, Eneqvist et al [10] performed
RNA interference (RNAi) studies in C elegans to
determine a loss-of-function phenotype for R09H10.3
and ZK697.8 TLP genes RNAi-treated worms were
scored for embryonic lethality and for postembryonic
phenotypes (sterility, aberrant morphology,
uncoordi-nated movements, egg-laying defects or slow growth)
No obvious phenotype was detected upon examination
of the gross phenotype of the worms using a dissecting
microscope [10] However, more in-depth examination
into a possible phenotype was not performed For
example, the worms were not subjected to any type of
environmental stress In addition, RNAi was
per-formed using dsRNA for a single TLP gene at a time
As such, the RNAi studies in C elegans may have
been more informative had double-knockdown studies
been performed
A role for TLP in purine metabolism was first
pro-posed in 2001 In an effort to develop a greater
under-standing of purine metabolism in the Gram-positive
bacterium, Bacillus subtilis, Schultz et al [18] generated
a series of insertion mutants One of these mutations
was made in the TLP gene (pucM), which is located
immediately downstream of the gene encoding uricase
The bacteria harbouring this mutation were
character-ized as having a reduced rate of proliferation
(com-pared with wild-type bacteria) on media containing
uric acid as the principal source of nitrogen [18]
Purines are major components of nucleic acids and
nucleotides Subsequently, de novo and salvage
path-ways for purine biosynthesis are important
compo-nents in the metabolism of all organisms The ability
to degrade purine compounds, either aerobically or
anaerobically, has been identified in all kingdoms [19]
The aerobic degradation of purines is dependent on
the oxidation of hypoxanthine and xanthine to uric acid via xanthine dehydrogenase⁄ oxidase (E.C 1.1.1.204 ⁄ E.C 1.1.3.22) In humans, anthropoid apes, birds, uricotelic reptiles and most insects, uric acid is the end product of purine metabolism and is thus excreted [20,21] Most mammals and gastropods fur-ther degrade uric acid to allantoin [20,22], fish and amphibians completely degrade purines to urea, ammonia and carbon dioxide [20,23,24], whilst most plants degrade purines to carbon dioxide and ammonia [25]
Purine oxidation, in particular that of uric acid, is the major route of ureide biogenesis in nature Conse-quently, the enzymes involved in the various stages of purine metabolism have been the focus of much inves-tigation Recently, however, the degradation of uric acid to allantoin has been shown to be more complex than originally thought Previously, it had been assumed that uricase (EC 1.7.3.3) was the sole enzyme responsible for the oxidation of uric acid to allantoin However, Tipton’s group [26] showed that the oxida-tion of uric acid by uricase in fact yields the metastable compound, 5-HIU They observed the spontaneous decomposition of 5-HIU to OHCU within 20 min at neutral pH, followed by the spontaneous decarboxyl-ation of OHCU to racemic allantoin The spontaneous decomposition of 5-HIU results in the generation of numerous free-radical species, which ultimately con-tribute to lipid oxidation [27] Given this fact and the observation that only (S)-allantoin is found in nature, Kahn and Tipton [26] proposed the existence of addi-tional enzymes in the uric acid degradation pathway – first to hydrolyse 5-HIU and second to decarboxylate OHCU to (S)-allantoin
As previously discussed, bacterial TLP genes are fre-quently found in close proximity to the uricase gene and
to another gene encoding proteins belonging to COG
3195 In 2005, Lee et al [28] revealed the ability of recombinant TLP from B subtilis and E coli to specifi-cally hydrolyse 5-HIU Importantly, they demonstrated the inability of human transthyretin to hydrolyse the same compound Ramazzina et al [12] subsequently showed that mouse TLP hydrolysed 5-HIU and that the COG 3195 proteins were responsible for the decarboxyl-ation of OHCU to (S)-allantoin Thus, the pathway of the conversion of uric acid to (S)-allantoin via the three enzymes uricase, TLP (5-HIUase) and OHCU decar-boxylase was revealed (see Fig 3) Whether the three proteins are able to form a multi-enzyme complex remains to be determined One could speculate that the ability to do so would be favourable given the rapid kinetics of spontaneous decomposition of both 5-HIU and OHCU
Trang 7To date, the TLP from three bacteria [28–30], one
plant (A thaliana; S C Hennebry, unpublished
results) and two vertebrate species [12,17], have been
analysed for 5-HIU hydrolytic activity and have all
been shown to be 5-HIU hydrolases Thus, a role for
TLP in this purine degradation pathway is evident
throughout evolution In addition, the expression of
the TLP gene in some organisms may be uric
acid-dependent For example, in the Gram-positive
bacte-rium Deinococcus radiodurans, both the uricase and
TLP genes are regulated by a novel uric
acid-respon-sive transcriptional regulator of the MarR family [31]
Given the similarities in the structures of purine
metabolism operons among Gram-positive bacteria, it
is likely that both uricase and TLP genes are similarly
regulated in other bacteria
Interestingly, periplasmic TLPs (those from the
Enterobacteria) have also been demonstrated to have
5-HIU hydrolase activity [28,30] Given that in bacteria,
purine metabolism is localized in the cytosol, it is
pos-sible that the TLP from these organisms acts
indepen-dently of the classical purine catabolism pathway In
addition, no enterobacteria have been found to possess
homologs of OHCU decarboxylase or uricase genes
Therefore, the question arises as to the in vivo role of
periplasmic TLP and whether it is capable of
hydroly-sing compounds other than 5-HIU
The fact that TLP has been demonstrated to
hydro-lyse 5-HIU results in its inclusion in the superfamily of
cyclic amidohydrolases (E.C 3.5.2) Other cyclic
amidohydrolases include hydantoinase, allantoinase
and dihydrooratase [32] Cyclic amidohydrolases share
a number of physicochemical characteristics These
characteristics include quaternary, tertiary, secondary
and primary structure as well as the reliance on a
diva-lent metal cofactor via a conserved metal-binding
motif [33] Studies have also shown the inhibitory
action of some divalent cations on cyclic
amidohydro-lase activity as well as the ability of many enzymes
within this group to bind a variety of cyclic amides
with varying affinities [32] TLP does not appear to
share the classic sequence characteristics of cyclic
amidohydrolases (S C Hennebry, unpublished results) Whilst the E coli TLP was crystallized in the presence of Zn2+, it has been shown that TLP is not a zinc-dependent hydrolase [17]
Structural comparison of Transthyretin and TLP
The 3D structures of transthyretin from various organ-isms have been well characterized The first transthyre-tin crystal structure to be solved (that of human) was published in 1978 [34] The Protein Database (http:// www.pdb.org) contains multiple crystal structure coor-dinates for human transthyretin (including multiple amyloidogenic forms and with various ligands bound) The crystal structures of transthyretin from rat [35], chicken [36] and sea bream [37,38] have also been solved All of these structures demonstrate the remark-able conservation of the prealbumin-like fold (as described by SCOP, http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk), which consists of an eight-stranded b-sandwich (strands A-H) with each sheet adopting a greek-key topology A two-turn a-helix usually (with the exception of chicken transthyretin) exists between strands E and F in trans-thyretin The two transthyretin dimers associate, via nonpolar interactions, between the loops joining stands
G and H with the loops joining strands A and B, mak-ing the transthyretin tetramer a ‘dimer of dimers.’ Recently, the first crystal structures of TLP from various organisms were solved Within a short period
of 3 months, the crystal structures for the TLP from
S dublin (pdb: 2GPZ; [30]), E coli (pdb: 2G2N; [39]),
B subtilis (pdb: 2H0E; [29]) and Danio rerio (zebrafish; pdb: 2H6U; [17]) were solved Remarkably, the struc-tures of these proteins, all tetrameric, showed signifi-cant similarity to the published structures of transthyretin By way of example, a comparison of the structure of S dublin TLP with the structures of trans-thyretin from various organisms is shown in Figure 4 Generally, the structural deviation between TLPs and transthyretins from various organisms is of the same order of magnitude to that within the set of
transthyre-Fig 3 Schematic of the oxidation of uric acid Uric acid is oxidized by uricase to 5-HIU, which is subsequently hydrolysed by TLP (5-HIU hydrolase) to OHCU The enzyme OHCU decarboxylase generates (S)-allantoin (Adapted from [26]).
Trang 8tin For instance, the rmsd between equivalent Ca
atoms in the structures of TLPs and human
transthy-retin are 1.0 A˚ and 1.2 A˚ for the monomer and dimer
respectively [17] The rmsd between equivalent Ca
atoms in the structures of transthyretin from various
vertebrates is between 0.34 A˚ and 1.59 A˚ [30]
The main differences between the structures of TLP
and transthyretins are found in the loop connecting
b-strands B and C, which is highly exposed to the
solvent in TLP [17] Interruptions in the b-strands A, G
and H are also observed in TLP structures as a result
of alterations to the formation of hydrogen bonds
between strands The carbonyls of residues V104 and
P105 (zebrafish TLP numbering), in the middle of
b-strand G, do not form hydrogen bonds with the
nitro-gen atoms of H12 and Y116 of b-strand H in TLP
The P105 residue, mainly responsible for the b-strand
irregularities, is invariant in TLP sequences, suggesting
a crucial role for the particular conformation observed
in b-strands A, G and H [17]
Structural nature of the TLP and
transthyretin active sites
One of the striking features of transthyretin is the
cen-tral channel of the protein into which the THs bind
This central channel traverses the entire tetramer It
has previously been postulated [40] and demonstrated
[7,41] that the characteristics of the N-termini of
trans-thyretin from different organisms account for
differ-ences in the affinity of the two main THs (T3 and T4)
to the channel by hindering or allowing greater
accessi-bility
The central channel is also present in TLP, albeit
with quite different structural properties Previously, it
was demonstrated that the regions of greatest
similar-ity between TLP and transthyretin were those forming this central channel, namely motifs A’ and B’ (see Fig 1C) Interestingly, differences between TLP and transthyretin within these motifs also account for sig-nificant physicochemical alterations to the central channel of the protein and provide a structural basis for the differing function compared with transthyretin The presence of a conserved, bulky tyrosine residue at the C-termini of TLP (part of the Tyr-Arg-Gly-Ser tet-rapeptide) causes the central channel to become blocked (see Fig 5A) As a result, the dimer–dimer interface of TLP is characterized by two ‘grooves’ on either side of the protein rather than a central channel [30]
Other key residues at the dimer–dimer interface of TLP include H14, R49 and H106 (B subtilis TLP numbering) [29] An examination of the active site of
B subtilis TLP with the uric acid analogue 8-azaxan-thine bound, reveals that these residues form impor-tant interactions with the ligand (see Fig 5B) Indeed, site-directed mutagenesis studies targeting these resi-dues show that substitution at these sites has profound consequences for the 5-HIU hydrolase activity of the TLP [17,29,30] (and see Table 2)
Mutagenesis of H14 and R49 showed that these resi-dues are the most sensitive to mutation, with H14A, H14N and R49E substitutions abolishing enzyme activity (B subtilis numbering) [29,30] However, the conservative substitution at residue 49 from arginine
to lysine had no effect on activity This suggests the need for a positively charged residue at this site Sub-stitution of H105 and Y118 also significantly reduced enzyme activity, by approximately 90% [30] Deletion
of the C-terminus tetrapeptide Tyr-Arg-Gly-Ser signifi-cantly affected enzyme activity, but it has been sug-gested that S121 does not influence the reaction [29]
Fig 4 Comparison of the tertiary structure
of TLP with transthyretin Stereo diagram showing a superimposition of tetramers of Salmonella dublin TLP (magenta) with trans-thyretin from human (1F41, cyan), rat (1KGI, yellow), chicken (1TFP, orange) and sea bream (1SNO, green) Tetramers were superimposed using the A chain only (Adapted from [30]).
Trang 9Interestingly, those residues playing a role in enzyme
activity are 100% conserved in all TLP sequences and
100% substituted in transthyretin (see Table 2)
How-ever, substitutions at position 121 (to threonine or glu-tamate) have been observed None of the mutations affected the tetrameric assembly of the TLP molecule [30] Furthermore, the surface charge of the TLP active site is considerably different from the equivalent region
in transthyretin [29,30] An electrostatically positive groove in TLP contrasts the negatively charged TH-binding site in transthyretin (see Fig 5C)
In summary, a comparison of the catalytic cavity of TLP with the equivalent region of transthyretin (the TH-binding channel) revealed that the TLP cavity is significantly shallower and ‘groove-like’ compared with the deep, hollow channel of transthyretin [30] In par-ticular, the substitution of the C-terminal tyrosine (118) with the much less bulky threonine residue fol-lowing duplication, had a profound effect on the shape
of the channel Loss of the tyrosine residue opened up
A
B
C
Fig 5 The active site of TLP (A)
Compari-son of the ligand-binding cleft at the dimer–
dimer interface in (i) human transthyretin
with (ii) Salmonella dublin TLP Residues
that contribute to the active site are shown.
Hydrogen bonds are shown as broken cyan
lines Thyroxine is shown in stick
represen-tation in yellow For clarity, some elements
of secondary structure are not shown
Resi-dues His6, His95 and Y108 (S dublin TLP
numbering) are equivalent, upon structural
alignment, to Lys15, Thr106 and Thr119 of
human TTR (Adapted from [30].) (B) The
active site of B subtilis TLP with (i) the uric
acid analog, 8-azaxanthine bound and (ii)
showing interacting residues (from [29]).
Note that the active site of the B subtilis
TLP is depicted at 90 to those depicted for
transthyretin and TLP in part A (C) (i)
Elec-trostatic surface potential of human
trans-thyretin with thyroxine bound inside the
negatively charged and deep channel at the
dimer–dimer interface of the protein (ii) The
equivalent region in TLP is shallow and
positively charged (Adapted from [30]).
Table 2 Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved residues in TLP.
Transthyretin
residue
Equivalent
residue in TLP
(S dublin TLP
numbering)
Effect of mutation
on TLP activity Publication
Trang 10the central channel of the transthyretin molecule,
allowing for the binding of bulkier ligands such as
THs Superimposition of the dimer–dimer interface of
TLP with that of transthyretin illustrates the
evolu-tionary changes that resulted in the functional
transi-tion of the enzyme into a transport protein
Comparison of structures of TLPs from
various organisms
A comparison of the TLP from three species of
bacte-ria with a vertebrate TLP (zebrafish) shows little
struc-tural divergence Major differences between the
S dublinTLP and zebrafish TLP are found in the
flex-ible portions of strands B and C that protrude towards
the solvent and in the conformation of the long loop
connecting strands D and E [17] Greater differences
are observed between the structures of B subtilis and
zebrafish TLPs: loop B-C is significantly shorter in
B subtilis TLP whilst the loop connecting the short
a-helix to strand F is extended
The active sites of TLPs from prokaryotes and
eukaryotes are nearly identical The location and
ori-entation of the residues present in the catalytic pockets
are well maintained, including the putative main
cata-lytic residues H12 and R52 (zebrafish TLP numbering)
The only significant difference is found in the
C-termi-nal serine residue, which assumed different orientations
in the three structures However, the role of this
resi-due in catalysis has been shown to be negligible [29]
Evolution of TLP function in the
context of urate metabolism
Ramazzina et al [12] eloquently demonstrated the
co-evolution of the three proteins [uricase, TLP
(5-HIUase) and OHCU decarboxylase] involved in the
oxidation of uric acid to allantoin Certainly, the
co-localization of these proteins in the peroxisomes of
metazoan and plant species, and the co-regulation of
TLP genes in some bacteria, suggests a concerted
effort in the rapid generation of allantoin The
co-dis-tribution of uricase, TLP and OHCU decarboxylase
genes in nature reveals that whenever an organism is
found to have a uricase gene, it always has both TLP
and OHCU decarboxylase genes [12] In vertebrates,
the loss of these three genes through evolution is
mir-rored For instance, hominoids lost their ability to
degrade uric acid as the result of the inactivation of
the uricase gene in a primate ancestor, some 15 Ma
[42] In humans, the TLP gene has several inactivating
mutations and the OHCU decarboxylase gene does
not appear to be expressed [12]
Uric acid is a potent antioxidant in biological sys-tems Despite uric acid being the end point of purine metabolism in humans and birds, high levels of allan-toin have been detected in their plasma [43,44] Uric acid chelates transition metal ions (minimizing metal-catalysed oxidation), scavenges hypochlorous acid, is a potent quencher of peroxynitrite and reduces haemo-globin oxidation by nitrite (for a review, see [45]) It has been suggested that in humans and birds, the allantoin generated in these organisms could be a mea-sure of the levels of oxidative stress [44]
The nonenzymatic oxidation of uric acid generates 5-HIU, just as in the uricase reaction As previously discussed, 5-HIU is a highly reactive compound, which, if left to spontaneously decompose, is capable
of forming numerous free-radical species, which ulti-mately contribute to lipid peroxidation [27] Therefore, the rapid elimination of 5-HIU would be advantageous
to the organism Whilst birds have lost functional uri-case and OHCU decarboxylase gene products, TLP transcripts have been detected It is tempting to specu-late that the role of TLP in birds might be to rapidly
‘mop-up’ 5-HIU generated through the nonenzymatic oxidation of uric acid, thereby reducing the potential free-radicals generated when 5-HIU is left to spontane-ously decompose The role of TLP in scavenging 5-HIU clearly warrants further investigation
Purine metabolism occurs in the cytosol of bacteria (for a review, see [46]) The fact that most bacteria possess a cytosolic TLP is consistent with this How-ever, it is not clear what the functional role of a TLP localized to the periplasm might be It is possible that the source of 5-HIU to the periplasm could be from the external environment Interestingly, all bacteria which possess a periplasmic TLP are found to colonize various animals Uric acid is secreted on the surface of mucosal epithelial tissues of all animals as part of the innate immune system [47] and is also thought to act
as a microbicidal agent in these instances Because uric acid can easily permeate the outer membrane of these bacteria, it might be that the TLP located in the peri-plasm acts as a primary defence for the bacterium against oxidized uric acid Alternatively, it could be that 5-HIU is generated in small quantities by the non-specific oxidation of the uric acid by other periplasmic enzymes, such as cytochrome c or peroxidase [48,49]
TLP: an enzyme with functional redundancy?
TLP was not the first protein to be identified as having 5-HIU hydrolytic activity Having hypothesized the need for additional enzymes to contribute to the