Similar to intact F-actin, both cleaved F-actins were significantly stabilized by phalloidin and aluminum fluoride; however, in all cases, the thermal stability of the cleaved F-actins was
Trang 1decreases the thermal stability of actin
Anastasia V Pivovarova1, Sofia Yu Khaitlina2and Dmitrii I Levitsky1,3
1 A N Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
2 Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, St Petersburg, Russia
3 A N Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
Introduction
Actin is one of the most abundant and highly conserved
cell proteins It is involved in many different cellular
processes that are essential for growth, differentiation
and motility Actin is found in two main states: as
monomers (G-actin) and as a helical polymer (F-actin)
Polymerization of G-actin into F-actin is accompanied
by hydrolysis of tightly bound ATP followed by a
slower release of Pi; as a result, protomers of F-actin
contain tightly bound ATP, ADP or ADP-Pi
The atomic resolution structures of G-actin revealed that it is divided into two easily distinguishable domains by a deep cleft containing the tightly bound nucleotide and cation [1] The nucleotide-binding cleft was suggested to exist in two main states, closed and open [2,3], and solution studies on nucleotide exchange and susceptibility of the cleft to limited proteolysis appear to be consistent with the opening of the cleft upon the transition from the ATP- to ADP-G-actin
Keywords
actin; differential scanning calorimetry;
DNase-I binding loop; proteolytic cleavage;
thermal unfolding
Correspondence
D I Levitsky, A N Bach Institute of
Biochemistry, Russian Academy of
Sciences, Leninsky Prospect 33, 119071
Moscow, Russia
Fax: +7 495 954 2732;
Tel: +7 495 952 1384
E-mail: levitsky@inbi.ras.ru.
(Received 10 June 2010, revised 14 July
2010, accepted 16 July 2010)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07782.x
Differential scanning calorimetry was used to investigate the thermal unfolding of actin specifically cleaved within the DNaseI-binding loop between residues Met47-Gly48 or Gly42-Val43 by two bacterial proteases, subtilisin or ECP32⁄ grimelysin (ECP), respectively The results obtained show that both cleavages strongly decreased the thermal stability of mono-meric actin with either ATP or ADP as a bound nucleotide An even more pronounced difference in the thermal stability between the cleaved and intact actin was observed when both actins were polymerized into fila-ments Similar to intact F-actin, both cleaved F-actins were significantly stabilized by phalloidin and aluminum fluoride; however, in all cases, the thermal stability of the cleaved F-actins was much lower than that of intact F-actin, and the stability of ECP-cleaved F-actin was lower than that of subtilisin-cleaved F-actin These results confirm that the DNaseI-binding loop is involved in the stabilization of the actin structure, both in mono-mers and in the filament subunits, and suggest that the thermal stability of actin depends, at least partially, on the conformation of the nucleotide-binding cleft Moreover, an additional destabilization of the unstable cleaved actin upon ATP⁄ ADP replacement provides experimental evidence for the highly dynamic actin structure that cannot be simply open or closed, but rather should be considered as being able to adopt multiple conformations
Structured digital abstract
l MINT-7980274 : Actin (uniprotkb: P68135 ) and Actin (uniprotkb: P68135 ) bind ( MI:0407 ) by biophysical ( MI:0013 )
Abbreviations
D-loop, DNase I-binding loop; DSC, differential scanning calorimetry; DHcal,calorimetric enthalpy; Tm,thermal transition temperature.
Trang 2[4–6] By contrast, in the numerous crystal structures
published to date, including those of ADP-G-actin
[7,8], the open nucleotide-binding cleft has been
observed only in profilin-bound actin crystals [9] Only
the closed conformation was also revealed by
molecu-lar dynamics simulations of the crystal actin structures
[10–12], whereas metadynamics simulations have
dem-onstrated that the closed conformation of the
nucleo-tide-binding cleft is the most stable state only when
ATP is bound, and the ADP-bound state favors a
more open conformation of the cleft [13] It is possible
therefore that crystallization favors a closed state for
G-actin even though the state of the cleft in solution
may vary [14,15]
The other nucleotide-dependent conformational
transitions in actin crystals involve so-called DNase
I-binding loop (D-loop) in subdomain 2 of the actin
molecule [7] In tetramethylrhodamine-modified
ADP-G-actin, the D-loop was found to be in an a-helical
conformation, whereas this region was disordered in
the ATP-bound actin, suggesting that the D-loop folds
on ATP hydrolysis [7,16] This transition within the
D-loop was supported by the results of metadynamic
simulations demonstrating a distinct allosteric
relation-ship between the conformation of the D-loop (ordered
or disordered) and the state of the nucleotide-binding
cleft (open or closed) [13] These data are consistent
with the results of the biochemical observations
indi-cating that proteolytic modifications of the D-loop
affect the state of the interdomain cleft [5,17]
The D-loop of actin can be specifically cleaved with
two bacterial proteases One of them is subtilisin,
which cleaves the D-loop between Met47 and Gly48
[18] The other protease, which specifically cleaves
actin at the only site between Gly42 and Val43
(Fig 1), was initially isolated and characterized as a
minor protein of lactose-negative Escherichia coli A2 strain and referred to as protease ECP32 [19,20] More recently, it was found that the A2 strain producing protease ECP32 is identical to Serratia grimesii, and therefore this enzyme was named grimelysin [21] Although ECP32 and grimelysin were suggested to be identical enzymes [21], both names are used in the lit-erature In accordance with previous studies [5,17], we refer to this protease as ECP in the present study The nucleotide-binding cleft in both subtilisin-cleaved and ECP-cleaved G-actin is clearly in a more open confor-mation compared to intact actin, as demonstrated by the increased nucleotide exchange rate in solution [17,22] and their higher susceptibility to limited prote-olysis [5,17] By contrast, the crystal structure of ECP-cleaved G-actin showed the nucleotide-binding cleft to
be in a typical closed conformation, probably as a result of crystallization preferentially trapping actin in only one of its possible conformations [14]
Taking into account the ambiguity of the nucleo-tide-binding cleft conformation and its relationship with the D-loop, the present study aimed to determine whether the specific cleavage of the D-loop affects the structural properties of the entire actin molecule and,
in particular, conformational transitions of the nucleo-tide-binding cleft For this purpose, we studied the effects of the D-loop cleavage on the thermal ing of G- and F-actin Previously, the thermal unfold-ing of G-actin containunfold-ing different nucleotides was indirectly studied with the DNase-I inhibition assay [23] and by monitoring the change in absorbance of tetramethylrhodamine-actin [24] The results obtained showed that replacement of the tightly bound ATP by ADP led to a significant decrease in the thermal stabil-ity of G-actin [23,24] In the present study, we applied differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), which is the most direct and effective method for studying the ther-mal unfolding of proteins Previous studies have shown that DSC can be successfully used to reveal the changes in the thermal unfolding of actin induced by interaction of G-actin with actin-binding proteins [25– 27], G–F transformation of actin, and stabilization of F-actin by phalloidin and Pi analogs [28] Moreover, the effects of nucleotides on the thermal unfolding of F-actin have been studied by this method and a ‘disso-ciative’ mechanism for the thermal denaturation of F-actin has been proposed [28,29]
In the present study, we used DSC to characterize the thermal unfolding of actin specifically cleaved within the D-loop by ECP or subtilisin The results obtained show for the first time that the cleavage strongly decreases the thermal stability of G-actin and especially that of F-actin, both in the absence and the
Fig 1 3D atomic structure of G-actin The four subdomains are
indicated by the encircled numbers Arrows show the cleavage
sites in the D-loop, between Gly42 and Val43 by ECP32⁄ grimelysin,
and between Met47 and Gly48 by subtilisin.
Trang 3presence of phalloidin and Pi analogs These results
are discussed with regard to a more open
conforma-tion of the interdomain cleft in the cleaved actin
com-pared to intact actin, both in the monomers and in the
filament subunits
Results
Effects of the D-loop cleavage on the thermal
unfolding of G-actin
The excess heat capacity curves obtained for intact,
ECP-cleaved, and subtilisin-cleaved ATP-Ca-G-actins
are presented inFig 2 It is seen that the G-actin
spe-cies cleaved within the D-loop are clearly less
thermo-stable than noncleaved G-actin The thermal
transitions of both ECP-cleaved and subtilisin-cleaved
G-actin are shifted to a lower temperature, by 4–5C,
compared to that of intact G-actin, and the values
of calorimetric enthalpy, DHcal, determined for the
cleaved G-actins are 57–63% of those for
nonc-leaved G-actin (Table 1) Thus, both cleavages within
the D-loop strongly decrease the thermal stability of
ATP-Ca-G-actin, with no significant difference
between the effects of ECP and subtilisin It is
important to note that heating cleaved G-actins in the
calorimeter cell did not lead to any further proteolysis
of the proteins (Fig 2, inset)
We also compared the thermal unfolding of intact and ECP-cleaved G-actins in the different states, with the tightly bound Ca2+ replaced by Mg2+ and with the tightly bound ATP replaced by ADP (Fig 3) The replacement of Ca2+by Mg2+in ATP-G-actin had no appreciable effect on the thermal unfolding of either intact or ECP-cleaved G-actin: in both cases, it only slightly decreased the maximum thermal transition temperature (Tm), by 1–2C, with no effect on the
DHcalvalue (Table 1)
By contrast, the replacement of bound ATP by ADP caused a dramatic decrease in the thermal stabil-ity of G-actin Intact ADP-Mg-G-actin demonstrated the thermal transition with Tm of 48.8C (Fig 3A) (i.e 11C less than that of ATP-Mg-G-actin) and its calorimetric enthalpy (340 kJÆmol)1) was much less than that of ATP-Mg-G-actin (570 kJÆmol)1) (Table 1) Figure 3A shows that the sample contains only ADP-actin because no peak at 60C (correspond-ing to the thermal transition of ATP-Mg-actin) was seen on the thermogram A similar effect was observed
on ECP-cleaved Mg-G-actin with ATP replaced by ADP (Fig 3B) In this case, the nucleotide replace-ment decreased the Tmby 9C and led to a more than two-fold decrease in the DHcalvalue (Table 1)
Thermal unfolding of F-actin with the cleaved D-loop
Previous studies have shown that ECP-cleaved actin is unable to polymerize unless its tightly bound Ca2+ is replaced with Mg2+, and that the Mg2+-bound form has higher critical concentration and polymerizes more slowly than Mg-G-actin cleaved with subtilisin [17,20,30] In agreement with these data, in the present study, ECP-cleaved Mg-G-actin polymerized more
Fig 2 Temperature dependences of the excess heat capacity (C p )
of intact (curve 1), ECP-cleaved (curve 2) and subtilisin-cleaved
(curve 3) ATP-Ca-G-actins The actin concentration was 24 l M
Other conditions: 2 m M Hepes (pH 7.6), 0.2 m M CaCl2and 0.2 m M
ATP The inset shows representative SDS ⁄ PAGE patterns of intact
(lanes 1 and 1¢), ECP-cleaved (lanes 2 and 2¢) and subtilisin-cleaved
(lanes 3 and 3¢) G-actin before (lanes 1, 2 and 3) and after heating
in the calorimetric cell up to 80 C (lanes 1¢, 2¢ and 3¢) Note that
the positions of actin (lanes 1 and 1¢) and its C-terminal fragments
produced by ECP (36 kDa) (lanes 2, 2¢) or by subtilisin (35 kDa)
(lanes 3 and 3¢) remain unchanged after the heating–cooling
procedure.
Table 1 Calorimetric parameters obtained from the DSC data for intact, ECP-cleaved and subtilisin-cleaved G-actins The parameters were extracted from Figs 2 and 3 The error of the given values of
Tmdid not exceed ±0.2 C The relative error of the given values of
DH cal did not exceed ±10%.
G-actin Nucleotide Cation T m (C) DH cal (kJÆmol)1)
Trang 4slowly than subtilisin-cleaved Mg-G-actin, which, in
turn, demonstrated slower polymerization than intact,
noncleaved Mg-G-actin Nevertheless, light-scattering
measurements showed complete polymerization of all
the Mg-G-actin species to Mg-F-actin after 1.5 h of
incubation with 100 mm KCl and 1 mm MgCl2 in the
presence of 1 mm ATP (Fig 4, inset)
Figure 4 shows that Mg-F-actin obtained from the
cleaved Mg-G-actin is much less thermostable than
noncleaved Mg-F-actin, and a decrease in the thermal
stability is even more pronounced than in the case of
G-actin The thermal transitions of ECP-cleaved and
subtilisin-cleaved F-actin are shifted to a lower
temper-ature, by 11.3 and 8.8C, respectively, compared to
that of intact F-actin (Table 2) Importantly, a
pro-nounced difference is observed between the thermal
transitions of ECP-cleaved and subtilisin-cleaved
F-actin (Fig 4) ECP-cleaved F-actin unfolds not only
at lower temperature (58.6 versus 61.1C), but also with a much lower cooperativity The width at the half-height of the thermal transition, which can serve
as a relative measure for cooperativity of the transi-tion, was equal to 8.5 C for ECP-cleaved Mg-F-actin and 4.3C for subtilisin-cleaved Mg-F-actin Thus,
Fig 4 DSC curves of Mg-F-actin assembled from intact (curve 1), ECP-cleaved (curve 2) and subtilisin-cleaved (curve 3) ATP-Mg-G-actin The actin concentration was 24 l M Other conditions: 20 m M
Hepes (pH 7.3), 0.1 M KCl, 1 m M MgCl 2 and 0.7 m M ADP The inset shows time courses of polymerization of intact (curve 1), ECP-cleaved (curve 2) and subtilisin-cleaved (curve 3) actins Poly-merization was monitored by recording light-scattering intensity at
350 nm upon the addition of 0.1 M KCl and 1 m M MgCl 2 to ATP-Mg-G-actins.
Fig 3 DSC curves of intact G-actin (A) and ECP-cleaved G-actin
(B) with different tightly bound nucleotide and cation:
ATP-Ca-G-actin, ATP-Mg-G-actin and ADP-Mg-G-actin The actin concentration
was 24 l M Other conditions: 2 m M Hepes (pH 7.6), 0.2 m M CaCl2
or MgCl 2 , and 0.2 m M ATP or ADP.
Table 2 Calorimetric parameters obtained from the DSC data for Mg-F-actin assembled from intact, ECP-cleaved and subtilisin-cleaved Mg-G-actin The parameters were extracted from Figs 4 and 5 The error of the given values of Tmdid not exceed ± 0.2 C The relative error of the given values of DH cal did not exceed
±10%.
Mg-F-actin Stabilizer Tm(C) DH cal (kJÆmol)1)
ECP-cleaved Phalloidin + AlF 4 81.7 690
Subtilisin-cleaved Phalloidin + AlF 4 84.4 780
Trang 5although both cleaved G-actins unfold similarly
(Fig 2), a pronounced difference in the thermal
unfolding between ECP-cleaved and subtilisin-cleaved
actin is revealed when these actins are polymerized into
filaments
Stabilization of the cleaved F-actin by phalloidin
and aluminum fluoride
It is well known that cyclic heptapeptide phalloidin
binds to F-actin with very high affinity at the interface
of three adjacent actin protomers [31,32] and stabilizes
actin filaments (i.e it significantly increases the thermal
stability of F-actin) [25,28,33–35] A very similar
stabi-lizing effect was observed in the presence of Pianalogs,
aluminum fluoride (AlF4) or beryllium fluoride (BeFx)
[25,28,34,36], which form complexes with F-actin
subunits that mimic their ADP-Pistate The stabilizing
effects of phalloidin and AlF4 (or BeFx) were similar
but independent of each other because simultaneous
addition of both stabilizers caused an additional
increase in the thermal stability of F-actin [28,34]
The subsequent experiments were designed to
inves-tigate the effects of the two F-actin stabilizers,
phalloi-din and AlF4 , on the thermal unfolding of F-actin
specifically cleaved within the D-loop In agreement
with previous studies [25,28,29,34], the binding of
phalloidin or AlF4 significantly increased the thermal
stability of Mg-F-actin Both stabilizers shifted the
maximum of the F-actin thermal transition from
69.9C to 82–83 C (Table 2), and their simultaneous
addition increased the Tm up to 91 C (Fig 5A)
Similar to intact F-actin, both cleaved F-actin species
are significantly stabilized by phalloidin and AlF4
(Fig 5B,C) Each of these stabilizers increased the Tm
of the cleaved F-actin, by 10–12C for ECP-cleaved
F-actin and by 15 C for subtilisin-cleaved F-actin
(Table 2), and their simultaneous addition resulted in
an additive effect that is expressed in the further
increase of the Tm value by 12–13 C (Fig 5B) or
8C (Fig 5C) However, in all these stabilized states,
the Tm value for the cleaved F-actin was significantly
lower than that of intact F-actin, by 9–14C for
ECP-cleaved F-actin and by 6–7C for subtilisin-cleaved
F-actin (Table 2) This means that ECP-cleaved F-actin
is less thermostable than subtilisin-cleaved F-actin not
only in the absence of stabilizers (Fig 4), but also in
the presence of phalloidin and AlF4 (Fig 5B,C)
There are also other distinct differences between
ECP-cleaved F-actin and subtilisin-cleaved F-actin,
whose thermal denaturation is more similar to that of
intact F-actin First, along with the main transition at
68.5C, the DSC profile of the phalloidin-stabilized
ECP-cleaved F-actin demonstrated a pronounced shoulder at 60 C (Fig 5B) Second, in the presence
of AlF4 , this cleaved F-actin demonstrated, along with the main thermal transition at 70C, a clear peak at
57 C corresponding to the thermal unfolding of this protein in the absence of AlF4 (Fig 5B) This suggests
a much lower affinity of ECP-cleaved F-actin for phalloidin and AlF4 than that in intact and subtilisin-cleaved F-actin To test this assumption, we investi-gated the thermal unfolding of ECP-cleaved F-actin in the presence of different concentrations of phalloidin and AlF4 (Fig 6)
At relatively low phalloidin⁄ actin molar ratio of
1 : 4, two peaks are observed on the DSC profile
Fig 5 DSC curves of intact actin (A), ECP-cleaved Mg-F-actin (B) and subtilisin-cleaved Mg-F-Mg-F-actin (C) stabilized by phalloidin
or AlF 4 , or simultaneously by both stabilizers Concentrations of stabilizers: 24 l M phalloidin and 1 m M AlF 4 (5 m M NaF and 1 m M
AlCl 3 ) Other conditions were as described in Fig 4.
Trang 6(Fig 6A), and the large peak with Tmat 58.6C
corre-sponds to the nonstabilized ECP-cleaved F-actin (i.e it
reflects the thermal unfolding of those actin protomers,
which are not affected by phalloidin) This means that
effect of phalloidin on the thermal stability of
ECP-cleaved F-actin is much less cooperative than in the
case of intact F-actin, when one bound phalloidin was
shown to stabilize up to seven neighboring protomers
in the actin filament [37] The peak of nonstabilized
actin disappeared with an increase in the
phalloi-din⁄ actin molar ratio (Figs 5B and 6A) However, the
pronounced shoulder at 61–65 C was observed on
the DSC profile of ECP-cleaved F-actin even in the
presence of a three-fold molar excess of phalloidin
(Fig 6A), thus suggesting that protomers of
phalloi-din-stabilized F-actin exist in two structural states with
different thermal stability
At a low concentration of AlF4 (0.1 mm), we again
observed a pronounced peak at 58.6C corresponding
to the nonstabilized ECP-cleaved F-actin (Fig 6B)
Thus, a much higher concentration of AlF4 (more than 1 mm) is required to achieve complete thermal stabilization of ECP-cleaved F-actin compared to intact F-actin, for which full stabilization was observed even in the presence of 50 lm AlF4 [36] This reflects
at least an order of magnitude lower affinity of the cleaved F-actin to AlF4
Importantly, upon simultaneous addition of AlF4 and phalloidin, we observed neither the peak of nonstabilized actin protomers, nor the shoulder char-acteristic of phalloidin-stabilized ECP-cleaved F-actin (Fig 6B) These results suggest that the binding of AlF4 to ADP-F-actin substantially modifies the struc-tural state of cleaved actin subunits stabilized by phal-loidin or phalphal-loidin increases the affinity of the cleaved actin subunits to AlF4
Discussion
The data reported in the present study show that cleavage of actin between Gly42-Val43 or Met47-Gly48 within the D-loop strongly decreases the thermal stability both of monomers and polymers According to previous studies, these cleavages increased the rate of the nucleotide exchange on the cleaved G-actin and its susceptibility to limited proteolysis, probably as a result
of the transition of the nucleotide-binding cleft to a more open conformation [5,17,22] The relationship between the conformation of the D-loop and the nucleo-tide-binding cleft was recently demonstrated in metady-namic simulations experiments [13] We assume therefore that the decrease in the thermal stability observed by DSC on actin species cleaved within the D-loop is associated with opening of the cleft
Does the thermal stability of G-actin reflect the conformational state of the nucleotide-binding cleft?
An intact actin structure is maintained by the presence
of high-affinity cation and nucleotide tightly bound in the interdomain cleft; removal of the nucleotide or cat-ion results in actin denaturatcat-ion Therefore, the stabil-ity of actin depends on the affinstabil-ity of the tightly bound cation and nucleotide that involves both pro-tein–ligand interaction and conformation of the inter-domain cleft Upon heating, irreversible unfolding of G-actin is preceded by reversible loss of the nucleo-tide–cation complex [23] Obviously, the more tightly nucleotide and cation are bound in the interdomain cleft and the more ‘closed’ is the cleft, the higher the temperature needed to remove them from the cleft and
to induce thermal unfolding of G-actin The relative
Fig 6 DSC curves for ECP-cleaved Mg-F-actin (24 l M ) either in
the presence of phalloidin (Ph) at different concentrations (6, 12 or
72 l M ) (A), or in the presence of 0.1 m M AlF 4 in the absence or in
the presence of 24 l M Ph, and in the presence of 0.5 m M
AlF 4 + 24 l M Ph (B) Other conditions were as described in Fig 4.
Trang 7affinity of G-actin for ATP is much higher than for
ADP [4], and the interdomain cleft is suggested to be
in a more open conformation in the ADP-bound state
than in the ATP-bound state [5,12,13] In agreement
with this and with previous studies [23,24], the results
obtained in the present study show that ADP-G-actin
is much less thermostable than ATP-G-actin (Fig 3A
and Table 1) ATP-G-actin is less thermostable with
bound Mg2+ than with Ca2+ [23] (Table 1), and this
reduction in stability may be explained by the lower
affinity of ATP-G-actin for Mg2+ than for Ca2+
[4,38] Thus, the ligand-dependent thermal stability of
actin monomer can be accounted for by the different
affinity of these ligands to actin However, the thermal
stability of the cleaved actins is lower than the
corre-sponding stability of non-modified actin both in the
ATP- and ADP-states This cannot be explained by
the different affinity but suggests that the thermal
sta-bility of G-actin may depend on the conformation of
the nucleotide-binding cleft This suggestion is
sup-ported by the studies on the effects of actin-binding
proteins on actin structure
Actin-binding proteins profilin and cofilin, when
bound to G-actin between subdomains 1 and 3, have
antagonistic effects on the conformation of the
nucleo-tide-binding cleft Profilin stabilizes the ‘open’
confor-mation of the cleft [7,39,40], whereas cofilin appears to
lock the cleft in its ‘closed’ conformation [39–42]
Pre-vious studies on the thermal unfolding of G-actin
showed that profilin binding decreased the actin
ther-mal stability [23], whereas significant stabilization of
G-actin was observed in its complexes with cofilin
[25,26] Stabilization of G-actin was also observed in
the complexes of G-actin with thymosin b4 [27] and
gelsolin segment 1 [24], which appear to induce
confor-mational transitions closing the nucleotide-binding
cleft [6,27,43,44]
Thus, the increased thermal stability of G-actin
appears to correspond to the closed conformation of
the nucleotide-binding cleft, whereas the decreased
thermal stability is a feature of the actin with the open
cleft conformation The cleavage within the D-loop
enhances the nucleotide exchange [17] and increases
accessibility of the cleft to limited proteolysis [5], which
characterizes the cleft opening It is therefore likely
that the decreased thermal stability of G-actin cleaved
within the D-loop also results from the opening of the
nucleotide-binding cleft in these actin species
It is noteworthy that the replacement of tightly
bound ATP by ADP in ECP-cleaved G-actin induces
an additional decrease in the thermal stability of this
actin species already destabilized by the cleavage
within the D-loop (Fig 3B and Table 1) This suggests
that the nucleotide-binding cleft is highly dynamic and cannot be simply open or closed but rather should be considered as being more open or more closed In these terms, by analogy with the ‘superclosed’ state recently revealed in ATP-G-actin by molecular dynam-ics simulations [12], the nucleotide-binding cleft of ADP-G-actin cleaved within the D-loop appears to adopt the extra open conformation
Comparison of the effects produced by the cleavage of the D-loop with ECP and subtilisin Although the cleavages of the D-loop between Gly42-Val43 and Met47-Gly48 decreased the thermal stability
of G-actin to a similar extent (Fig 2), the effects of the cleavages became quite different when the cleaved actins were polymerized into filaments The thermal stability of F-actin assembled from ECP-cleaved actin was noticeably less than that of subtilisin-cleaved F-actin (Fig 4) These results are consistent with the earlier observed effects of these cleavages on the sus-ceptibility of the nucleotide-binding cleft to limited proteolysis with trypsin [5,17] In the cleaved G-actins, susceptibility of trypsin cleavage sites at Arg62 and Lys68 in the nucleotide-binding cleft was increased similarly [17] After polymerization, these sites became almost inaccessible for trypsin in intact F-actin and only slightly accessible for trypsin in subtilisin-cleaved F-actin By contrast, F-actin assembled from ECP-cleaved G-actin was easily fragmented by trypsin These observations indicate that the open conforma-tion of ECP-cleaved actin was preserved upon poly-merization, whereas F-actin assembled from subtilisin-cleaved monomers more closely resembled intact F-actin than ECP-cleaved F-actin [17] Thus, the lower thermal stability of ECP-cleaved versus subtilisin-cleaved F-actin corresponds to a more open nucleo-tide-binding cleft
According to the recent model of actin filament [45], the N-terminal part of the D-loop is located at the inter-monomer interface, participating both in the intra-strand contacts between actin subunits along the filament and in the lateral contacts stabilizing the inter-strand interaction, whereas the C-terminal part of the loop is not involved in the inter-strand contacts Recently, this structural difference was supported in mutational cross-linking experiments showing that the N-terminal part of the D-loop (residues 41–45) is in close proximity to residue 265 of the actin subunit in the opposite strand and can be easily cross-linked to this residue, whereas the rate and extent of the cross-linking reaction strongly declined for the C-terminal residues of the D-loop [46] Therefore, the inter-strand
Trang 8contacts of the N-terminal part of the D-loop appear
to play a crucial role in stabilization of the actin
fila-ment [17,30,47] The cleavage of the D-loop between
Gly42 and Val43 impairs these contacts [47], and this
may explain why the cleavage of the D-loop in its
N-terminal part with ECP more strongly destabilizes
F-actin than cleavage by subtilisin between Met47 and
Gly48 in the C-terminal part of the loop It is also
important that the cleavage with ECP did not affect
the filament length but more strongly enhanced the
turnover rate of polymer subunits than the cleavage
with subtilisin [17,30] Thus, the low thermal stability
of F-actin assembled from ECP-cleaved monomers
strongly correlates with the high dynamics of this actin
species [17], supporting the idea of the monomer
disso-ciation being the first step of thermal inactivation of
F-actin [28,29]
Although both cleaved actins are stabilized with
phalloidin and AlF4 , stabilization of ECP-cleaved
F-actin demonstrates specific features that are not
characteristic of subtilisin-cleaved or intact actin The
most interesting features are the extremely low affinity
of ECP-cleaved F-actin to AlF4 and the pronounced
shoulder observed on the DSC profile of this actin
spe-cies even in the presence of a three-fold molar excess
of phalloidin (Figs 5B and 6) This suggests that
pro-tomers of phalloidin-stabilized cleaved F-actin exist in
two different structural states Phalloidin binds to
F-actin at the interface of three adjacent actin
protom-ers [31] and appears to stabilize actin filament in two
inter-related ways: by stabilizing lateral interactions
between the two filament strands and by inducing
con-formational changes in actin subunits resulting in the
state of the nucleotide-binding cleft being similar to
that in ATP-actin filaments without phalloidin [32] It
is plausible that the shoulder on the DSC profile of
phalloidin-stabilized ECP-cleaved F-actin belongs to a
population of the protomers in which the
conforma-tional effect of phalloidin is not completed This
expla-nation, although requiring further examination with
independent approaches, is supported by the
disap-pearance of the shoulder after the addition of AlF4
(Fig 6B) This Pi analog (as well as another analog,
BeFx) is known to bind to Pi site in the
nucleotide-binding cleft and mimic ADP-Pi or ATP actin
fila-ments [48], thus stabilizing the filament by closing the
cleft in actin subunits [49,50] Hence, the increase in
the thermal stability of ECP-cleaved F-actin and the
disappearance of the shoulder on the DSC profile can
be accounted for by the combined effect of phalloidin
and AlF4 on the nucleotide-containing cleft
Accord-ingly, the phalloidin-induced effect may increase the
affinity of AlF4 to actin, whereas AlF4 -induced
clo-sure of the cleft diminishes the population of the su-bunits remaining nonstabilized by phalloidin via its effect on the cleft conformation This interpretation is consistent with recently published DSC data showing that cooperative effect of phalloidin on the thermal stability of F-actin becomes noncooperative in the presence of AlF4 [51]
Phalloidin can stabilize F-actin with a very high coo-perativity, with the half-maximal effect being observed
at a phalloidin⁄ actin molar ratio of 1 : 20 [52] In the DSC experiments on intact actin [37], only 10–15% of actin protomers remained unaffected by phalloidin at a phalloidin⁄ actin molar ratio of 1 : 4 By contrast, more than half of subunits of ECP-cleaved F-actin remained nonstabilized by phalloidin under the same conditions (Fig 6A), consistent with a reduced cooperativity in the effect of phalloidin on the steady-state ATPase activity of ECP-cleaved actin [17] Taken together with the evidence concerning the critical role of the lateral contacts for stabilization of filaments assembled from ECP-actin monomers [47], these data allow us to assume that only the effect of phalloidin on the con-formation of the nucleotide-binding cleft is coopera-tive; it is propagated along the filament by allosteric interactions between phalloidin-bound and free pro-tomers By contrast, the stabilizing effect of phalloidin
on the lateral inter-strand interactions is noncoopera-tive; it requires direct binding of phalloidin to actin protomers
According to this interpretation, an explanation for the appearance of the pronounced shoulder on the DSC profile of the ECP-cleaved F-actin stabilized by phalloidin (Fig 6A) can be proposed This shoulder appears to reflect the thermal unfolding of the actin protomers whose cleft remains open, and therefore they are stabilized only by lateral inter-strand interac-tions induced by the direct binding of phalloidin On the other hand, the main transition at 68.5C (Fig 6A) most likely corresponds to the thermal unfolding of actin subunits that are stabilized not only
by the inter-strand interactions, but also by phalloidin-induced closing of the nucleotide-binding cleft
In conclusion, the results obtained in the present study suggest that the thermal stability of actin, regard-less of whether it is modified by limited proteolysis or
by stabilizers, depends on the conformation of the interdomain nucleotide-binding cleft Accordingly, the lower thermal stability of subtilisin- or ECP-cleaved actin compared to intact actin supports the idea [5,13] and also provides additional experimental evidence for
a distinct allosteric relationship between conformation
of the D-loop and the state of the nucleotide-binding cleft
Trang 9Experimental procedures
Reagents
Subtilisin (type VIII bacterial protease), ATP, ADP,
EGTA, Hepes, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, KCl, CaCl2,
MgCl2, AlCl3, NaF and phalloidin were purchased from
Sigma Chemical Co (St Louis, MO, USA); hexokinase was
kindly provided by Dr N Yu Goncharova (Department of
Biochemistry, School of Biology, Moscow State University,
Russia)
Protein preparations
Rabbit skeletal muscle actin was prepared from
acetone-dried muscle powder according to the method of Spudich
and Watt [53] G-actin was stored in buffer containing
The actin molar concentration was determined by
monitor-ing A290 using an E1% of 6.3 cm)1 [54] and a molecular
mass of 42.3 kDa ECP-cleaved G-actin was obtained as
described previously [17,30] Ca-G-actin (3.0 mgÆmL)1) was
digested at an enzyme⁄ protein mass ratio of 1 : 100 for
cleaved with ECP between Gly42 and Val43 is fairly
resis-tant to further proteolysis by this protease, it was not
nec-essary to use any protease inhibitor The cleaved actin was
used within 8–10 h Subtilisin-cleaved actin was prepared
essentially as described by Schwyter et al [18] Ca-G-actin
(3 mgÆmL)1) was digested for 1 h at an enzyme⁄ protein
stopped with 2 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride The
[55] Usually, more than 85% of actin was cleaved It is
important that the main part of the noncleaved actin
appears to correspond to small aggregates of unfolded
(so-called ‘inactivated’) G-actin [56], in which the D-loop
becomes almost inaccessible to proteolytic cleavage [57]
ATP-Ca-G-actin was transformed into ATP-Mg-G-actin
actin-bound ATP was converted into ADP by incubation of
ATP-Mg-G-actin with 0.8 mm ADP, 1 mm glucose and
hexokinase (8 UÆmL)1) for 2 h at 4C [5] It is known that,
deter-mined in the actin samples after 1 h of incubation with
glu-cose and hexokinase [58]
Intact, ECP-cleaved and subtilisin-cleaved Mg-G-actins
(3 mgÆmL)1) were polymerized by the addition of 100 mm
Poly-merization was monitored by an increase in intensity of
light scattering at 90 measured at 350 nm on a Cary
Eclipse fluorescence spectrophotometer (Varian Australia
Pty Ltd, Mulgrave, Victoria, Australia)
Stabilization of F-actin (24 lm) by phalloidin or by alu-minum fluoride (AlF4 ) was performed as described previ-ously [25,28], by the addition of 6–72 lm phalloidin or 0.1–
ADP
DSC
DSC experiments were performed on a DASM-4M differen-tial scanning microcalorimeter (Institute for Biological Instrumentation, Pushchino, Russia) as described previously [25,28,29,36] All measurements were carried out at a scan-ning rate of 1 KÆmin)1 The experiments with G-actin were performed in 2 mm Hepes, pH 7.6, containing 0.2 mm CaCl2
ADP-Mg-G-actin), whereas the thermal unfolding of F-actin was studied in 20 mm Hepes (pH 7.3), 0.1 m KCl, 1 mm
was 24 lm The reversibility of the thermal transitions was assessed by reheating of the sample immediately after cool-ing from the previous scan The thermal denaturation of all actin samples was fully irreversible Calorimetric traces were corrected for instrumental background and possible aggre-gation artifacts by subtracting the scans obtained from the reheating of the samples The temperature dependence of the excess heat capacity was further analyzed and plotted using Origin software (MicroCal, Northampton, MA, USA) The thermal stability of actin was described by the
Tm, and DHcal was calculated as the area under the excess heat capacity function DSC experiments with different actin species were performed at least twice with very good repro-ducibility, and the representative curves are shown
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr Alevtina Morozova for provid-ing us with protease ECP32⁄ grimelysin This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grants 09-04-00266 to D.I.L and
08-04-00408 to S.Yu.Kh), the Program ‘Molecular and Cell Biology’ of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and by the grant from the President of Russian Federation (grant MK 2965.2009.4 to A.V.P.)
References
1 Kabsch W & Holmes KC (1995) The actin fold FASEB
J 9, 167–174
2 Tirion MM & ben-Avraham D (1993) Normal mode analysis of G-actin J Mol Biol 230, 186–195
3 Page R, Lindberg U & Schtt CE (1998) Domain motions in actin J Mol Biol 280, 463–474
4 Kinosian HJ, Selden LA, Estes JE & Gershman LC (1993) Nucleotide binding to actin Cation dependence
Trang 10of nucleotide dissociation and exchange rates J Biol
Chem 268, 8683–8691
5 Strzelecka-Golaszewska H, Moraczewska J, Khaitlina
SYu & Mossakowska M (1993) Localization of the
tightly bound divalent-cation-dependent and
nucleotide-dependent conformational changes in G-actin using
lim-ited proteolytic digestion Eur J Biochem 211, 731–742
6 Kudryashov DS & Reisler E (2003) Solution properties
of tetramethylrhodamine-modified G-actin Biophys J
85, 2466–2475
7 Otterbein LR, Graceffa P & Dominguez R (2001) The
crystal structure of uncomplexed actin in the ADP state
Science 293, 708–711
8 Rould MA, Wan Q, Joel PB, Lowey S & Trybus KM
(2006) Crystal structures of expressed
non-polymeriz-able monomeric actin in the ADP and ATP states
J Biol Chem 281, 31909–31919
9 Chik JK, Lindberg U & Schutt CE (1996) The structure
of an open state of b-actin at 2.65 A˚ resolution J Mol
Biol 263, 607–623
10 Zheng X, Diraviyam K & Sept D (2007) Nucleotide
effects on the structure and dynamics of actin Biophys
J 93, 1277–1283
11 Dalhaimer P, Pollard TD & Nolen BJ (2008)
Nucleo-tide-mediated conformational changes of monomeric
actin and Arp3 studied by molecular dynamics
simula-tions J Mol Biol 376, 166–183
12 Splettstoesser T, Noe´ F, Oda T & Smith JC (2009)
Nucleotide-dependence of G-actin conformation from
multiple molecular dynamics simulations and
observa-tion of a putatively polymerizaobserva-tion-competent
super-closed state Proteins 76, 353–364
13 Pfaendtner J, Branduardi D, Parrinello M, Pollard TD
& Voth GA (2009) Nucleotide-dependent
conforma-tional states of actin Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106,
12723–12728
14 Klenchin VA, Khaitlina SYu & Rayment I (2006)
Crys-tal structure of polymerization-competent actin J Mol
Biol 362, 140–150
15 Reisler E & Egelman EH (2007) Actin structure and
function: what we still do not understand J Biol Chem
282, 36133–36137
16 Graceffa P & Dominguez R (2003) Crystal structure of
monomeric actin in the ATP state Structural basis of
nucleotide-dependent actin dynamics J Biol Chem 278,
34172–34180
17 Khaitlina SYu & Strzelecka-Goaszewska H (2002) Role
of the DNase-I-binding loop in dynamic properties of
actin filament Biophys J 82, 321–334
18 Schwyter D, Phillips M & Reisler E (1989)
Subtilisin-cleaved actin: polymerization and interaction with
myo-sin subfragment 1 Biochemistry 28, 5889–5895
19 Khaitlina SYu, Smirnova TD & Usmanova AM (1988)
Limited proteolysis of actin by a specific bacterial
prote-ase FEBS Lett 228, 172–174
20 Khaitlina SYu, Collins JH, Kuznetsova IM, Pershina
VP, Synakevich IG, Turoverov KK & Usmanova AM (1991) Physicochemical properties of actin cleaved with bacterial protease from E coli A2 strain FEBS Lett
279, 49–51
21 Bozhokina E, Khaitlina S & Adam T (2008) Grimely-sin, a novel metalloprotease from Serratia grimesii, is similar to ECP32 Biochem Biophys Res Commun 367, 888–892
22 Ooi A & Mihashi K (1996) Effects of subtilisin cleavage
of monomeric actin on its nucleotide binding J Bio-chem 120, 1104–1110
23 Schuler H, Lindberg U, Schutt CE & Karlsson R (2000) Thermal unfolding of G-actin monitored with the DNase I-inhibition assay stabilities of actin isoforms Eur J Biochem 267, 476–486
24 Perieteanu AA & Dawson JF (2008) The real-time mon-itoring of the thermal unfolding of tetramethylrhod-amine-labeled actin Biochemistry 47, 9688–9696
25 Dedova IV, Nikolaeva OP, Mikhailova VV, dos Remedios CG & Levitsky DI (2004) Two opposite effects of cofilin on the thermal unfolding of F-actin: a differential scanning calorimetric study Biophys Chem
110, 119–128
26 Bobkov AA, Muhlrad A, Pavlov DA, Kokabi K, Yilmaz A & Reisler E (2006) Cooperative effects of cofilin (ADF) on actin structure suggest allosteric mech-anism of cofilin function J Mol Biol 356, 325–334
27 Dedova IV, Nikolaeva OP, Safer D, De La Cruz EM & dos Remedios CG (2006) Thymosin b4 induces a con-formational change in actin monomers Biophys J 90, 985–992
28 Levitsky DI, Pivovarova AV, Mikhailova VV & Nikolaeva OP (2008) Thermal unfolding and aggre-gation of actin Stabilization and destabilization of actin filaments FEBS J 275, 4280–4295
29 Mikhailova VV, Kurganov BI, Pivovarova AV & Levitsky DI (2006) Dissociative mechanism of F-actin thermal denaturation Biochemistry (Mosc) 71, 1261–1269
30 Khaitlina SYu, Moraczewska J & Strzelecka-Goas-zewska H (1993) The actin⁄ actin interactions involving the N-terminus of the DNase-I binding loop are crucial for stabilization of the actin filament Eur J Biochem
218, 911–920
31 Oda T, Namba K & Maeda Y (2005) Position and ori-entation of phalloidin in F-actin determined by X-ray fiber diffraction analysis Biophys J 88, 2727–2736
32 Pfaendtner J, Lyman E, Pollard TD & Voth GA (2010) Structure and dynamics of the actin filament J Mol Biol 396, 252–263
33 Le Bihan T & Gicquaud C (1991) Stabilization of actin
by phalloidin: a differential scanning calorimetric study Biochem Biophys Res Commun 181, 542–547