Fetal growth restriction in association with particulate air pollution before and during pregnancy... • To assess the shape of the association • To compare the effects on birth weight w
Trang 1Fetal growth restriction in association with particulate air pollution before and during
pregnancy
Trang 2What is the clinical meaning of fetal
growth restriction
Why should we study it?
Trang 3Circulation 2005;112:1414-1418
Trang 4Lancet 2005;365:1484-1486
Trang 5Blood pressure and birth weight
Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:413–420
Trang 6• To study the risk of fetal growth restriction in associaotin with outdoor PM10 concentrations at the mothers’
residence
• To study potential effect modification by gestational
duration
• To assess the shape of the association
• To compare the effects on birth weight with biomass
exposure (develomental countries), ETS and maternal smoking during pregnancy
Trang 7Methods (1)
• SPE data on 345,081 singleton newborns
• Interpolation method and population weighted
on the level of municipality.
• Calculation of exposure for each trimester,
period (14 days) around conception and 80 days before conception
• Polynomial models to study the shape of the
association
• Systematic comparison with ETS, smoking,
biomass
Trang 8Exposure interpolation and weigthing
Trang 9Methods (2)
Based on meta-analytic data comparison
estimates for biomass, ETS exposure and maternal smoking were plotted against
estimated average daily dose of fine
particulate matter from these exposures.
Trang 10Characteristic Mean birth weight (g)
Gender
Male
Female
3267 3397
Season
Cold
Warm
3328 3338
SES
Low
Medium
High
3323 3340 3360
Parity
1
2
3
≥ 4
3263 3392 3408 3382
Gestation age (weeks)
< 32
32-36
> 36
1296 2332 3371
Maternal age (years)
< 20
20-24
25-29
3149 3243 3326
Trang 11Birth weight changes calculated for a 10 µg/m³
increase
Adjusted for maternal age, infant gender, parity, season, socioeconomic status, gestational age, time
Period Estimate (95% CI) Gestation Estimate (95% CI)
Conception
(14 days)
-5.74 -7.27 -4.22 <32
32-36
>36
0.11 -13.1 -5.59
-16.2 -23.3 -7.14
16.5 -2.83 -4.04 Trimester 1 -12.6 -15.0 -10.3 <32
32-36
>36
21.2 -38.6 -12.3
-6.49 -54.5 -14.7
48.8 -22.8 -10.0 Trimester 2 -14.2 -16.6 -11.9 <32
32-36
>36
16.5 -33.0 -14.1
-11.4 -49.4 -16.5
44.5 -16.5 -11.7 Trimester 3 -13.0 -15.5 -10.5 <32
32-36
>36
8.30 -18.7 -13.4
-11.1 -33.9 -15.9
27.7 -3.46 -10.9 Overal
Pregnancy
-17.8 -20.6 -15.1 <32
32-36
>36
21.4 -17.8 -17.7
-8.7 -20.6 -20.6
51.5 -15.1 -15.0
Trang 12Adjusted for maternal age, infant gender, parity, season, socioeconomic status, gestational age, time trend
Odds ratio for small for gestational age calculated for a 10 µg/m³ increase in exposure around conception and during pregancy
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
<32 w
32-36 w
> 36 w
p for interaction air pollution by gestation < 0.0001
14 d 3 m 6 m 9 m Conception Pregnancy
Trang 130.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
<32 w
32-36 w
> 36 w
p for interaction air pollution by gestation < 0.0001
Independent odds ratios for small for gestational age calculated for a
10 µg/m³ increase in exposure around conception and during pregancy
Adjusted for maternal age, infant gender, parity, season, socioeconomic status, gestational age, time trend and exposure during conception / pregnancy.
14 d 3 m 6 m 9 m Conception Pregnancy
Trang 14Does PM exposure during conception or pregncancy the risk of preterm delivery?
No significant association (also no trend)
Trang 15Perspective: comparison with other
exposures
Trang 16Systematic review of other smoke related
exposures
2008;22:162-71.
daily dose of fine particulate matter from air pollution along with comparison estimates of ETS, biomass and cigarette smoke.
Circulation 2009;120:941-948)
Trang 17-1 0 1 2 -250
-200 -150 -100 -50
0 air pollution
ETS
biomass <5 cig
5-9 cig
>9 cig
0.21-0.40 mg/d
0.36-0.48 mg/d
4.5 mg/d
70 mg/d
20 mg/d
130 mg/d
estimated daily dose of PM 10, mg/day
The baseline estimated dialy dose assumes an inhalation rate of 18 m³/day and a dose of 12 mg per cigarette.
Comparison with smoking, ETS and biomass
exposure
Trang 18• We noted associatons between fetal growth restrictions and particulate air pollution
• Especially in preterm born infants
• Effects not explained by preterm delivery
• Assuming causality; lowering PM10 exposure by 10
µg/m³ would avoid 19% of SGA neonates born between 32-36 weeks of pregnancy and 5% of SGA children born
ad term
• Effects in highest exposure group in the range of ETS