Initially, stopped-flow studies of the wild-type enzyme showed a burst increase of A340 with NADP+ but not NAD+, with amplitude depending on the concentration of the coenzyme, rather than
Trang 1Re-engineering the discrimination between the oxidized
dehydrogenase and a thorough reappraisal of the
coenzyme specificity of the wild-type enzyme
Marina Capone*, David Scanlon, Joanna Griffin and Paul C Engel
School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Ireland
Introduction
The nicotinamide-nucleotide-dependent dehydrogenases
tend, in general, to be either NAD+-specific (and then
catabolic) or NADP(H)-specific (and accordingly
ana-bolic, except for those few enzymes such as glucose
6-phosphate dehydrogenase which provide NADPH
for biosynthesis) [1] Crystallographic studies of
arche-typal NAD+-specific enzymes, such as alcohol and
lactate dehydrogenases [2,3], and archetypal
NADPH-specific dehydrogenases such as glutathione reductase [4] have offered some degree of understanding of the ways in which these enzymes achieve their coenzyme specificity This has been augmented by various detailed studies of amino acid sequences [5,6], and has been both tested and applied in some notably success-ful examples of re-engineering of coenzyme specificity [7–19] As noted by Khouri et al [17], however, the
Keywords
burst kinetics; coenzyme purity; coenzyme
specificity; glutamate dehydrogenase;
site-directed mutagenesis
Correspondence
P C Engel, School of Biomolecular and
Biomedical Science, Conway Institute,
University College Dublin, Belfield,
Dublin 4, Ireland
Fax: +353 1 716 6456
Tel: +353 1 716 6764
E-mail: paul.engel@ucd.ie
Present address
*Kuros Biosurgery AG, Zu¨rich, Switzerland
Program in Neurosciences & Mental
Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto,
Canada
(Received 5 March 2011, revised 21 April
2011, accepted 9 May 2011)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08172.x
Clostridial glutamate dehydrogenase mutants, designed to accommodate the 2¢-phosphate of disfavoured NADPH, showed the expected large speci-ficity shifts with NAD(P)H Puzzlingly, similar assays with oxidized cofac-tors initially revealed little improvement with NADP+, although rates with NAD+ were markedly diminished This article reveals that the enzyme’s discrimination in favour of NAD+and against NADP+had been greatly underestimated and has indeed been abated by a factor of > 16 000 by the mutagenesis Initially, stopped-flow studies of the wild-type enzyme showed
a burst increase of A340 with NADP+ but not NAD+, with amplitude depending on the concentration of the coenzyme, rather than enzyme Amplitude also varied with the commercial source of the NADP+ FPLC, HPLC and mass spectrometry identified NAD+ contamination ranging from 0.04 to 0.37% in different commercial samples It is now clear that apparent rates of NADP+utilization mainly reflected the reduction of con-taminating NAD+, creating an entirely false view of the initial coenzyme specificity and also of the effects of mutagenesis Purification of the NADP+ eliminated the burst With freshly purified NADP+, the NAD+: NADP+activity ratio under standard conditions, previously esti-mated as 300 : 1, is 11 000 The catalytic efficiency ratio is even higher at
80 000 Retested with pure cofactor, mutants showed marked specificity shifts in the expected direction, for example, 16 200 fold change in catalytic efficiency ratio for the mutant F238S⁄ P262S, confirming that the key struc-tural determinants of specificity have been successfully identified Of wider significance, these results underline that, without purification, even the best commercial coenzyme preparations are inadequate for such studies
Trang 2lessons learned from previous attempts to modify
coenzyme specificity cannot be safely generalized to
other systems
The terms NAD+- or NADPH-specific seem to
imply absolute discrimination between the closely
simi-lar coenzymes, but discrimination is never total, and
the actual factor varies widely from enzyme to
enzyme Particularly interesting, however, are those
enzyme families that include members showing little
discrimination, so-called dual-specificity
dehydrogenas-es The glutamate dehydrogenases are such a family
[20] and, as a result, have three different EC
classifica-tions, EC 1.4.1.2, EC 1.4.1.3 and EC 1.4.1.4 for
NAD+-specific, dual-specific (particularly common in
higher animals and in Archaea), and NADP+-specific
members, respectively Most of these are evolutionarily
and structurally related, in many cases quite closely,
despite the functional and classificational division
[21,22], and thus they provide a revealing example of
the way in which a single structural scaffold can be
adapted to produce remarkably different functional
outcomes
Our own protein engineering experiments [23], based
on an analysis of the high-resolution structure of the
binary enzyme–NAD+ complex of clostridial
gluta-mate dehydrogenase [24,25], were aimed initially at
facilitating productive binding of the phosphorylated
coenzyme by enlarging the potential binding pocket
and removing the negative charge, likely to repel the
2¢-phosphate of NADP(H), and replacing it with
posi-tive charge Accordingly, mutants F238S, P262S and
F238S⁄ P262S were created to provide more space, and
D263K to offer a more favourable electrostatic
envi-ronment The kinetic behaviour of these mutant
enzymes with NADH and NADPH was compared at
different pH values [23], and, especially at the highest
pH examined (8), there were large changes in the
dis-crimination factor, so that, although none of the
mutants showed a complete reversal of specificity, the
last two of the four listed could reasonably be
described as dual-specific
When, however, we turned to the opposite direction
of reaction, there was a perplexing difference in the
results, with seemingly remarkably little change in the
strong preference for NAD+ over NADP+,
estab-lished as 300-fold under standard assay conditions by
Syed et al [26] In this article, we document these
surprising results and then analyse the source of the
discrepancy, with an outcome that not only
necessi-tates a revised view of clostridial glutamate
dehydro-genase and its specificity, but also has wider
significance for the study of coenzyme specificity in
other enzymes
Results and Discussion
Initial kinetic analysis The coenzyme specificity of the mutant enzymes was initially assessed using the best available commercial coenzymes without further purification Values of kcat,
Km and kcat⁄ Km for the oxidized coenzymes are pre-sented in Table 1 After replacement of Phe238 by serine, NAD+was less effective as a coenzyme because
of moderate decreases in kcat (36, 14 and 33% at
pH 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0, respectively) and marked increases
in apparent Km( 10 fold at pH 6.0 and 7.0, 14 fold at
pH 8.0) NAD+is evidently bound very poorly to this mutant However, surprisingly, no improvement was apparent with NADP+ as the coenzyme At pH 7.0 and 8.0, approximately five-fold decreases in kcat, and increases of approximately four- and six-fold respec-tively for Km (Table 1), appeared to indicate markedly lower overall catalytic efficiency with this coenzyme The single proline to serine mutation at position 262 likewise decreased the overall catalytic efficiency with both oxidized coenzymes Using NAD+, this mutant had values comparable with wild-type for kcat, particu-larly at pH 7.0 and 8.0 (Table 1) Decreases in cata-lytic efficiency were due to increases in Km, approximately nine-fold at pH 7.0 and seven-fold at
pH 8.0 For NADP+, the decrease in overall catalytic efficiency reflected decreases in kcatof almost three-fold
at pH 8.0, with accompanying increases in Km, approx-imately five-fold at pH 7.0 and three-fold at pH 8.0 (Table 1) Correspondingly, this mutation seemed to offer no significant shift in specificity towards NADP+
Turning to the third of the single mutants, D263K, once again, there appeared to be a decrease in catalytic efficiency with both NAD+ and NADP+ as coen-zymes, though less marked than for the other muta-tions, and at pH 8.0 with NADP+ as coenzyme there was little difference between the performance of the wild-type and mutant enzymes (Table 1)
The results for these three mutants were extremely puzzling; the mutations had been designed to facilitate binding of the phosphorylated coenzyme, and with the reduced coenzymes [23] there were indeed large shifts,
as expected, in the discrimination factor, 150 fold and
272 fold, respectively, for example, for P262S and D263K at pH 8.0 In this study, only the double-mutant F238S⁄ P262S gave a result reasonably close to expectation with the oxidized coenzymes (Table 1): at both pH 7.0 and pH 8.0 the large discrimination factor
in favour of NAD+ decreased to only 3–4 for this mutant Even in this case, however, the apparent
Trang 3improvement was entirely due to a large decrease in
catalytic efficiency with NAD+rather than an increase
with NADP+ In fact, there was a deterioration of
10 fold in the catalytic efficiency with NADP+
Thus here also, the results were in contrast to those
for the reduced coenzymes [23], which, at pH 7.0 and
8.0, showed large increases in catalytic efficiency with
NADPH, over 100-fold at pH 8.0
Rapid-reaction studies
The possibility that different rate-limiting steps in the
two reaction directions might account for the strikingly
different outcomes of the mutagenesis with reduced
[23] and oxidized coenzymes (above) prompted an
investigation of presteady-state kinetics Burst kinetics
detects rapid accumulation of product before the
steady state is reached: the presence or absence of a
burst provides information on the position of the
rate-limiting step along the reaction pathway, and the
amplitude of the burst should be proportional to the
enzyme concentration A ‘burst’ increase in A340 was
detected in the first few milliseconds of reaction with
NADP+as coenzyme, but not with NAD+ Two
dif-ferent phases were identified in the stopped-flow traces:
the first phase (Fig 1A inset) consisted of the rapid
single exponential burst in A340, reaching an apparent
plateau within a few seconds The small differences in
the height of this plateau for different concentrations
of enzyme (5–20 lm) are due to shifts in the baseline
as a result of the contribution of the enzyme itself to
A340; after correction for this baseline shift (Fig 1B), the burst amplitude was entirely independent of the enzyme concentration Over much longer periods (Fig 1A, main panel), the apparent plateau was revealed as a very slow and initially linear second phase of increase in absorbance, finally leading to the expected reaction equilibrium in over 4 h
Further analysis showed that the burst amplitude with NADP+ was dependent on the concentration of the coenzyme itself, and not only on its concentration, but also the commercial source With 1 mm NADP+from Roche Diagnostics Ltd (Burgess Hill, UK), the burst amplitude corresponded to 3.1 lm reduced coenzyme, i.e 0.31% of the NADP+ used Similarly, a burst of 1.2 lm newly formed reduced coenzyme, was observed for NADP+ from Apollo Scientific (Stockport, UK), corresponding to 0.12% of the total NADP+
Analysis and purification of NADP+ The rapid-reaction results strongly suggested that the burst might be due to trace impurities in the coenzyme Direct HPLC analysis of the same NADP+ batches (Fig 2) revealed trace contamination Despite the com-plexity of the chromatograms, the injection of NADP+
Table 1 Initial comparison of kinetic parameters between wild-type glutamate dehydrogenase, F238S, P262S, F238S ⁄ P262S and D263K mutant enzymes To determine kinetic parameters for NAD ⁄ P +
, glutamate concentration was kept constant (40 m M ) over a range of NAD ⁄ P + concentrations (0.01–1 m M ) under standard assay conditions All experiments were repeated in triplicate and the kinetic parameters and their standard errors (± SE) were calculated by a nonlinear regression method [36] with ENZPACK version 3.0 (Biosoft Ltd, Cambridge, UK) The discrimination factor in the right-hand column, a measure of the preference for NAD+over NADP+, is calculated as the ratio of the catalytic efficiency, kcat⁄ K m , for NAD + to that for NADP + ND, not determined.
pH
Discrimination factor
kcat(s)1) Km(m M )
k cat ⁄ K m
(s)1Æm M)1) kcat(s)1) Km(m M )
k cat ⁄ K m
(s)1Æm M)1)
F238S ⁄ P262S 7.0 3.31 ± 0.47 2.22 ± 0.21 1.49 0.242 ± 0.05 0.632 ± 0.27 0.382 3.9
F238S ⁄ P262S 8.0 4.49 ± 0.34 6.28 ± 0.34 0.71 0.513 ± 0.193 2.24 ± 0.77 0.229 3.1
Trang 4enriched with NAD+permitted identification of a peak
of the latter estimated at 0.37% in NADP+ from
Roche, 0.15% in NADP+from Apollo Scientific and
0.04% in NADP+from Sigma-Aldrich Ireland Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) The agreement of the rapid reaction kinetics with the HPLC analysis suggested nearly total conversion of NAD+ into NADH in the reaction observed From the equilibrium constant for the oxida-tive deamination of l-glutamate [27] it can be estimated that, under the conditions used, 97–98% of the con-taminant NAD+ should be converted into NADH These results strongly suggest that NAD+ is the con-taminant affecting the course of the enzymatic assays
Stopped-flow experiment repeated with purified NADP+
When the rapid-reaction experiment was repeated under identical conditions but using NADP+ from Apollo Scientific freshly purified in our laboratory, the absence of the ‘burst’ (Fig 3) confirmed that this phe-nomenon was due to the impurities in the commercial coenzyme In addition, when commercial NADP+was used without purification for the steady-state kinetics,
an inhibitory effect of the NADH formed in the first part of the reaction was observed on the following phase of the reaction with NADP+ This effect was confirmed by enriching the mixture with varying amounts of NADH (results not shown) The binding
of the reduced coenzymes to the active site of clostrid-ial glutamate dehydrogenase is much tighter than the binding of the oxidized coenzyme Together with the initial preference for the nonphosphorylated coenzyme, this explains the potent inhibitory effect of such a small NADH contamination
Mass spectrometric identification of NAD+peak Isolation and mass spectroscopic analysis confirmed the identity of the contaminant Comparison with the spectrum of an authentic NAD+ sample revealed total similarity of the fragmentation pattern The neg-ative portion of the spectrum displayed a fragment at
m⁄ z 540, along with a small amount of parental mol-ecule (m⁄ z 662.1) The signal at m ⁄ z 540 corresponds
to the ADP-ribose moiety of the coenzyme resulting from splitting off the nicotinamide ring, suggesting that the covalent bond between the nicotinamide and the ribose of the coenzyme is particularly labile The signal of the parental molecule is also visible at
m⁄ z 664.1 in the positive spectrum; the nicotinamide ring, counterpart fragment of the ADP-ribose (m⁄ z 540) gives a signal at m ⁄ z 123.1, whereas ade-nine is registered at m⁄ z 136.1
In view of these findings, the possibility of the reverse contamination was also tested However, the
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
A340 nm
A340 nm
Time (min)
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.040
0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2
[enzyme] (μ M )
A
B
Fig 1 Time course of the reaction of wild-type clostridial
gluta-mate dehydrogenase with NADP+ (A) The main panel shows the
reaction of 15 l M glutamate dehydrogenase with 1 m M coenzyme
and 40 m M L -glutamate (concentrations after mixing) monitored at
340 nm over 250 min The increase in absorbance was linear for
the first 30–40 min; on this basis, the value for the specific activity
was calculated as 1.84 nmolÆmin)1Æmg)1, rate 0.0015 s)1 The inset
shows stopped-flow traces observed over the first few seconds of
the forward reaction of 2.5 l M (lowest trace), 5 l M, 7.5 l M, 10 l M
and 15 l M (highest trace) wild-type clostridial glutamate
dehydroge-nase with 1 m M NADP + and 40 m M L -glutamate (all concentrations
after mixing) A burst phase was detected in all cases The almost
horizontal trace seen in each case after 2–3 s corresponds to the
slow, steady-state reaction monitored in the main panel (B)
Cor-rection applied to the burst amplitudes calculated at different
enzyme concentrations in (A) The increase of enzyme
concentra-tion causes a significant baseline shift at 340 nm A reference zero
baseline was first recorded by mixing 2 m M NADP+and 80 m M L
-glutamate with buffer in the stopped-flow; a set of individual
base-lines was recorded by mixing different enzyme concentrations with
buffer (d); finally, 2 m M NADP+ and 80 m M L -glutamate were
mixed with different enzyme concentrations, and the burst
ampli-tudes were recorded (s) The baseline recorded for each enzyme
concentration (d) was subtracted from the corresponding value
recorded for the burst amplitude (s), giving the final plot (.)
showing no dependence of the burst amplitude on the enzyme
concentration.
Trang 5contamination of NAD+ by NADP+ reported by
some other authors [28] was not observed in our
batches of NAD+
Reassessment of coenzyme specificity of
clostridial glutamate dehydrogenase
In light of the discovery of variable contamination of
the commercial NADP+samples by the preferred
coen-zyme NAD+, it was necessary to reconsider the
steady-state results First of all, the specific activity of
clostrid-ial glutamate dehydrogenase under standard assay
con-ditions (1 mm coenzyme, 40 mm l-glutamate, 0.1 m
phosphate, pH 7.0) was re-determined with freshly
purified NADP+and using three different methods of
measurement, absorbance measurements in the
stopped-flow apparatus, conventional spectrophotometry and fluorimetry These three methods, respectively, yielded values of 2.22, 2.33 and 2.78· 10)3lmolÆmin)1Æmg)1 (mean = 2.44· 10)3lmolÆmin)1Æmg)1) This figure is
11 000 times lower than the corresponding figure for the preferred coenzyme NAD+ This remarkable dis-crimination factor is nearly 40 times higher than the 300-fold factor reported by Syed et al [26] It is now also very clear how such a large overestimation of the rate with NADP+can arise If we assume the use of a commercial NADP+containing 0.3% NAD+, as in the case of the Roche sample used in this study, then in a steady-state assay, as in the rapid-reaction study, the contaminating NAD+will be used first There will not
be simple proportionality because the 1 mm NAD+in a standard assay is well above Km and the 0.3% NAD+ contamination in 1 mm NADP+ is far below Km Nevertheless, a rate 1 ⁄ 200 of the rate in a standard NAD+reaction may be anticipated
A detailed re-analysis of the steady-state properties
of wild-type glutamate dehydrogenase with freshly purified NADP+was therefore carried out The values for Km and kcat given in Table 1 are 0.26 ± 0.01 mm and 0.57 ± 0.06 s)1, respectively The redetermination with pure coenzyme gave a much higher value for the
Km of 3.2 ± 0.4 mm, 30-fold higher than the Km for NAD+ Moreover, kcat was calculated as 8.2· 10)3± 6· 10)4s)1, 2500 fold lower than the figure for NAD+ and also 70 times lower than the value obtained with unpurified coenzyme On this basis, a new ratio of the specificity constants for the oxidized coenzymes can be calculated: this ‘discrimina-tion factor’ reveals that wild-type clostridial glutamate dehydrogenase is 80 000-fold more active with NAD+than with NADP+ This factor was previously estimated as 82 at pH 7.0 (Table 1), 1000 times less
Time (min)
Fig 2 Overlap of HPLC elution profiles of NADP + batches from different suppliers The four traces show the impurity peaks in 25–30 ng samples of commercial NADP +
(black, Roche; green, Apollo Scientific; blue, Sigma; cyan, Apollo enriched with NAD+) The last sample allowed unambiguous iden-tification of the peak of NAD + in the other chromatograms (indicated by the arrow) The amounts of contaminant NAD + present
in the samples were calculated by peak integration using the MILLENNIUM software package.
Fig 3 Superposition of stopped-flow burst-kinetic traces for
wild-type clostridial glutamate dehydrogenase and different batches of
NADP+ at identical concentrations (Upper) Reaction with Grade I
NADP + from Roche (Middle) Reaction with NADP + from Apollo
Scientific (Lower) Reaction with freshly purified NADP +
Trang 6than the true value, underlining the impact of quite a
small level of contamination on these results
Reassessment of the effects of the mutations on
coenzyme specificity
In view of the dramatically altered figure for the
strin-gency of coenzyme specificity in clostridial glutamate
dehydrogenase, it now also becomes clear that the
ini-tial assessment of the effects of the mutagenesis on the
relative activities with NAD+ and NADP+ is very
likely to be misleading As a preliminary test of this,
kinetic parameters were redetermined using freshly
purified NADP+ at pH 7.0 for two mutants, F238S
which had appeared to give deterioration rather than
improvement with NADP+, and the double-mutant
which showed a 21-fold improvement from a
discrimi-nation ratio of 82 to one of 3.9 The data in Table 2
show a remarkable change in this assessment For the
wild-type enzyme with NADP+, the true values for
kcat are very much lower and those for Km much
higher than previously estimated with the commercial
coenzyme As a result, the discrimination factor for
the wild-type enzyme is underestimated by
1000-fold F238S, therefore, offers a 161-fold improvement
instead of a 1.5-fold deterioration in discrimination
factor Even more dramatically, the modest apparent
21-fold improvement in the double-mutant should be a
16 200-fold improvement, entirely vindicating the
ini-tial thinking behind the mutagenesis
Wider implications
Careful purification of nicotinamide coenzymes has
been recognized in the past as an important issue in
the study of dehydrogenases [29]: coenzymes were
often purified in research laboratories prior to use
[30,31] in order to avoid misleading kinetic anomalies,
but this routine has largely been abandoned in recent
years because the purity and stability of the best
commercial preparations have dramatically improved
Although concern and worry persist over the purity of reduced coenzymes, which are often contaminated by the oxidized form, Grade I NAD+ and NADP+ are generally utilized without further purification, even in enzymatic studies of coenzyme specificity [7,32,33] In our own laboratory, because analytical HPLC only revealed what we took to be trace, negligible contami-nation, well below 0.5%, we have frequently proceeded without further purification of the coenzyme Other authors, using sensitive detection with a dehydrogenase coupled with the reduction of INT to a coloured for-mazan, have recently reported the presence of 0.1% NAD+ in NADP+ from different suppliers [34,35] Woodyer et al [28] also mentioned coenzyme contami-nation in the context of coenzyme specificity studies of the NAD+-dependent phosphite dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas stutzeri: these authors analysed NAD+ and NADP+ from Sigma (purity grade not reported)
by HPLC, finding no contamination of NADP+ by NAD+ within the detection limits of HPLC The authors, however, point out the presence of 2% NADP+in the NAD+: this was claimed not to intro-duce a bias in their kinetic measurements, and there-fore NAD+was utilized without further purification
In this study, the extremely large effect of 0.3% contamination of the NADP+ by the favoured coen-zyme NAD+ is directly attributable to the very high level of discrimination between the two coenzymes, so that the 0.3% NAD+ produces a rate far higher than that for the 99.7% NADP+ Accordingly, with the mutants, all those in which the discrimination has not been largely abolished give grossly misleading results; only the double-mutant, which approaches dual speci-ficity status, gives a result remotely approaching the truth, because in this situation the 0.3% contamination
is at last less dominant
It may be argued that this problem is exceptional, deriving from an extraordinarily high discrimination factor of 80 000 However, because we ourselves assumed until this study that clostridial glutamate dehydrogenase, although NAD+specific, showed a far
Table 2 Summary of corrected kinetic parameters for the oxidative deamination Values of K m and k cat for NADP + were redetermined by utilizing freshly purified NADP+in the enzymatic assays, and are displayed in the table Discrimination factors are calculated as the ratio
kcat⁄ K m NAD + ⁄ k cat ⁄ K m NADP +
Enzyme
Discrimination factor
Km(m M ) kcat(s)1)
k cat ⁄ K m
(s)1Æm M)1) Km(m M ) kcat(s)1)
k cat ⁄ K m
(s)1Æm M)1)
Trang 7lower level of discrimination, one must wonder how
many other examples remain undiscovered of
dehydro-genases that are more specific than reported and of
protein engineering experiments more successful than
the experimenters think We have carried out a wider
programme of mutagenesis at several other positions
in the coenzyme binding site and it is clear that all
NADP+ kinetics will have to be reassessed with
freshly purified coenzyme
Experimental procedures
Enzymes and substrates
The methods for purifying the wild-type glutamate
dehy-drogenase and the four mutants from transformed cultures
of Escherichia coli have been described in detail elsewhere
[22,23,26]
l-Glutamate monosodium salt (99–100%), ammonium
chloride (99.5%) and 2-oxoglutarate (97%, 2.3% water) of
analytical grade were purchased from Sigma NAD+lithium
salt grade I ( 100%) was obtained from Roche Different
batches of NADP+were: NADP+disodium salt ( 98%),
from Roche; NADP+ monosodium salt 97%, from
Sigma; NADP+ monosodium salt > 98%, from Apollo
Scientific Ltd All solutions of the above compounds were
freshly prepared in 100 mm phosphate buffer at pH 7.0, and
used in enzymatic assays within a few hours Coenzyme
solutions were kept cold and their concentrations
deter-mined by measuring A260(eNADðPÞþ= 18· 10)3m)1Æcm)1)
Examination of coenzyme specificity
Kinetic parameters kcat and Km were obtained by
measur-ing initial rates of reaction for the mutant and wild-type
enzymes in 0.1 m potassium phosphate (pH 6.0, 7.0 and
8.0) with varying concentrations of coenzyme (0.01–2 mm),
and l-glutamate fixed at a high concentration (40 mm)
Activity was usually measured with a Kontron Uvikon 941
or Cary 50 recording spectrophotometer, thermostatted at
25C, by recording changes in A340, but in some cases, for
greater sensitivity, initial-rate measurements were carried
out with a Hitachi F-4500 fluorescence spectrophotometer
(Hitachi High-Tech, Tokyo, Japan) A standard curve of
the change in fluorescence versus [NAD(P)H] (0.1–1.9 lm)
was prepared and enzyme activity was determined by
mea-suring the production of NAD(P)H within the linear range
Rapid reaction kinetics
An Applied Photophysics SX18.MV-R stopped-flow
appa-ratus with a dead-time of 1.3 ms was used for
presteady-state kinetic measurements A 1 mm optical pathlength in a
20 lL cell was used for absorbance measurements at
340 nm; monochromator slit widths were set at 10 nm The indicated concentrations are final values after mixing, unless stated otherwise Where possible, l-glutamate, 2-oxogluta-rate and ammonium chloride were used at near-saturating concentrations (40, 20 and 100 mm respectively), as in the steady-state analysis, and at lower concentrations where the reaction in the above conditions was difficult to observe Coenzyme concentrations were kept at or above Km values derived by steady-state analysis A minimum of 5 lm enzyme was used for the assays
NADP+purification Coenzymes were analysed with a Waters Controller 600 HPLC system on a reverse-phase column (SUPELCOSIL LC-18-T, particle size 5 lm, 25· 4.6 cm) The samples were dissolved in 100 mm KH2PO4 and 25–30 ng of each was injected The elution protocol was as advised by the column manufacturers (Elution Protocol for nucleotides, Supelco Catalogue) Solutions were adjusted to pH 6.0 to prevent damage to the silica solid phase Data were acquired with a Waters Photodiode Array Detector 996 and chromatograms were monitored at 254 nm
Where indicated, NADP+ was purified on a preparative scale (up to 9 mg) using a BioCAD Perseptive System FPLC apparatus with a POROS 20 HQ column (4.60· 100 mm), a flow rate of 5 mLÆmin)1and monitoring at 260 and 280 nm Elution was as follows: 10 mm NaCl isocratic for 10 column volumes; 30 mm NaCl step change and then isocratic for 10 column volumes; gradient increasing to 300 mm NaCl over
50 column volumes All solutions were double-filtered through 0.2 lm filters before use
Fractions of 2 mL containing NADP+ were collected and concentrated by rotary evaporation at 30C to a volume suitable for gel filtration NaCl was separated from the concentrated coenzyme solution [30] on a column (2· 30 cm) of Bio-Gel P2 Fine (45–90 lm wet, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) at 4C Samples of up
to 20 mg NADP+were applied in a volume not exceeding 2.2 mL, and MilliQ-grade water was used for elution, fol-lowed at 254 nm with a BioRad Econo UV Monitor Des-alting was checked by conductivity measurements on each fraction The purified NADP+ solution was stored at )20 C and used within 2–3 days of the purification Impurity peaks from commercial preparations of NADP+ were analysed on a mass spectrometer Quattro micro (Waters Micromass, Manchester, UK) equipped with electrospray source
Acknowledgements
MC was supported by a postgraduate scholarship from the Irish Council for Science, Engineering and Tech-nology DS was supported through a Basic Science
Trang 8research grant (SC2002⁄ 0502) to PCE from Enterprise
Ireland PCE was supported during the writing of this
paper by a Fellowship grant (05⁄ FE1 ⁄ B857) from
Sci-ence Foundation Ireland These sources of financial
support are gratefully acknowledged We are also
grateful to Dr Dilip Rai of the School of Chemistry
and Chemical Biology at UCD who ran the mass
spec-trometric analysis of coenzyme samples and purified
contaminants
References
1 Lehninger AL, Nelson DL & Cox MM (1993)
Principles of Biochemistry, 2nd edn, pp 390–392
Worth, New York
2 Bra¨nde´n CI, Jo¨rnvall H, Eklund H & Furugren B
(1975) Alcohol dehydrogenases In The Enzymes,
Vol XI (Boyer PD, ed.), pp 103–190 Academic Press,
New York
3 Holbrook JJ, Liljas A, Steindel SJ & Rossmann MG
(1975) Lactate dehydrogenase In The Enzymes,
Vol XI (Boyer PD, ed.), pp 121–292 Academic Press,
New York
4 Thieme R, Pai EF, Schirmer RH & Schulz GE (1982)
Three-dimensional structure of glutathione reductase at
2 A˚ resolution J Mol Biol 152, 763–782
5 Hanukoglu I & Gutfinger T (1989) cDNA sequence of
adrenodoxin reductase Identification of NADP binding
sites in oxidoreductases Eur J Biochem 180, 479–484
6 Wierenga RK, Terpstra P & Hol WGJ (1986)
Predic-tion of the occurrence of the ADP-binding bab-fold in
proteins, using an amino acid sequence fingerprint
J Mol Biol 187, 101–107
7 Scrutton NS, Berry A & Perham RN (1990) Redesign
of the coenzyme specificity of a dehydrogenase by
pro-tein engineering Nature 343, 38–43
8 Bocanegra JA, Scrutton NS & Perham RN (1993)
Crea-tion of an NADP-dependent pyruvate dehydrogenase
multienzyme complex by protein engineering
Biochem-istry 32, 2737–2740
9 Chen R, Greer A & Dean AM (1995) A highly active
decarboxylating dehydrogenase with rationally inverted
coenzyme specificity Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92,
11666–11670
10 Yaoi T, Miyazaki K, Oshima T, Komukai Y & Go M
(1996) Conversion of the coenzyme specificity of
isoci-trate dehydrogenase by module replacement J Biochem
119, 1014–1018
11 Steen IH, Lien T, Madsen MS & Birkeland NK (2002)
Identification of cofactor discrimination sites in
NAD-isocitrate dehydrogenase from Pyrococcus furiosus Arch
Microbiol 178, 297–300
12 Zhang L, Ahvazi B, Szittner R, Vrielink A & Meighen
E (1999) Change of nucleotide specificity and
enhance-ment of catalytic efficiency in single point mutants of Vibrio harveyialdehyde dehydrogenase Biochemistry
38, 11440–11447
13 Chen R, Greer A & Dean AM (1996) Redesigning sec-ondary structure to invert coenzyme specificity in iso-propylmalate dehydrogenase from
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93, 12171–12176
14 Holmberg N, Ryde U & Buelow L (1999) Redesign of the coenzyme specificity in l-lactate dehydrogenase from Bacillus stearothermophilus using site-directed mutagenesis and media engineering Protein Eng 12, 851–856
15 Watanabe S, Kodaki T & Makino K (2005) Complete reversal of coenzyme specificity of xylitol dehydrogenase and increase of thermostability by the introduction of structural zinc J Biol Chem 280, 10340–10349
16 Ehrensberg AH, Elling RA & Wilson DK (2006) Struc-ture-guided engineering of xylitol dehydrogenase cosub-strate specificity Structure 14, 567–575
17 Khouri AG, Fazelinia H, Chin JW, Pantazes RJ, Cirino
PC & Maranas CD (2009) Computational design of Candida boidiniixylose reductase for altered cofactor specificity Protein Sci 18, 2125–2138
18 Petschacher B, Leitgeb S, Kavanagh KL, Wilson DK & Nidetzky B (2005) The coenzyme specificity of
Candida tenuisxylose reductase (AKR2B5) explored by site-directed mutagenesis and X-ray crystallography Biochem J 385, 75–83
19 Banta S, Swanson BA, Wu S, Jarnagin A & Anderson
S (2002) Alteration of the specificity of the cofactor-binding pocket of Corynebacterium 2,5-diketo-d-glu-conic acid reductase A Protein Eng 15, 131–140
20 Smith EL, Austen BM, Blumenthal KM & Nyc JF (1975) Glutamate dehydrogenases In The Enzymes, Vol XI (Boyer PD, ed.), pp 293–367 Academic Press, New York
21 Lilley KS, Baker PJ, Britton KL, Stillman TJ, Brown
PE, Moir AJ, Engel PC & Rice DW (1991) The partial amino acid sequence of the NAD+-dependent gluta-mate dehydrogenase of Clostridium symbiosum: implica-tions for the evolution and structural basis of coenzyme specificity Biochim Biophys Acta 1080, 191–197
22 Teller JK, Smith RJ, McPherson MJ, Engel PC & Guest JR (1992) The glutamate dehydrogenase gene of Clostridium symbiosum– cloning by polymerase chain reaction, sequence analysis and over-expression in
E coli Eur J Biochem 206, 151–159
23 Griffin J & Engel PC (2011) An examination by site-directed mutagenesis of putative key residues in the determination of coenzyme specificity in clostridial NAD+-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase Enzyme Res, in press
24 Baker PJ, Britton KL, Engel PC, Farrants GW, Lilley
KS, Rice DW & Stillman TJ (1992) Subunit assembly
Trang 9and active site location in the structure of glutamate
dehydrogenase Proteins 12, 75–86
25 Baker PJ, Britton KL, Rice DW, Rob A & Stillman TJ
(1992) Structural consequences of sequence patterns in
the fingerprint region of the nucleotide binding fold
Implications for nucleotide specificity J Mol Biol 228,
662–671
26 Syed SE-H, Engel PC & Parker DM (1991) Functional
studies of a glutamate dehydrogenase with known
three-dimensional structure: steady-state kinetics of
the forward and reverse reactions catalysed by the
NAD+-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase of
Clostridium symbiosum Biochim Biophys Acta 1115,
123–130
27 Engel PC & Dalziel K (1967) The equilibrium constants
of the glutamate dehydrogenase system Biochem J 105,
691–695
28 Woodyer R, van der Donk WA & Zhao H (2003)
Relaxing the nicotinamide cofactor specificity of
phos-phate dehydrogenase by rational design Biochemistry
42, 11604–11614
29 Dalziel K (1963) Kinetic studies of liver alcohol
dehy-drogenase and pH effects with coenzyme preparations
of high purity J Biol Chem 238, 1538–1543
30 Dickinson FM & Engel PC (1977) The preparation of salt-free nicotinamide coenzymes Anal Biochem 82, 523–531
31 Dalziel K & Dickinson FM (1966) Purification of nicotin-amide adenine dinucleotide In Biochemical Preparations, Vol XI (Maehly AC, ed.), pp 84–88 Wiley, New York
32 Feeney R, Clarke AR & Holbrook JJ (1990) A single amino acid substitution in lactate dehydrogenase improves the catalytic efficiency with an alternative coenzyme Biochem Biophys Res Commun 166, 667–672
33 Nishiyama M, Birktoft JJ & Beppu T (1993) Alteration
of coenzyme specificity of malate dehydrogenase from Thermus flavusby site-directed mutagenesis J Biol Chem 268, 4656–4660
34 Valero E, Varo´n R & Garcı´a-Carmona F (1995) Kinetic study of an enzymic cycling system coupled to an enzy-mic step: determination of alkaline phosphatase activity Biochem J 309, 181–185
35 Inouye K, Ueno I, Yokoyama S & Sakaki T (2002) Development of a synchronous enzyme-reaction system for a sensitive enzyme immunoassay J Biochem 131, 97–105
36 Wilkinson GN (1961) Statistical estimations in enzyme kinetics Biochem J 80, 324–332