According to this mechanism, ligase induces a B-to-A DNA helix transition of the enzyme-bound dsDNA motif, which results in DNA contraction, bending and unwinding.. Using DNA footprintin
Trang 1R E V I E W A R T I C L E
Dynamic mechanism of nick recognition by DNA ligase
Alexei V Cherepanov* and Simon de Vries
Kluyver Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
DNA ligases are the enzymes responsible for the repair of
single-stranded and double-stranded nicks in dsDNA DNA
ligases are structurally similar, possibly sharing a common
molecular mechanism of nick recognition and ligation
catalysis This mechanism remains unclear, in part because
the structure of ligase in complex with dsDNA has yet to be
solved DNA ligases share common structural elements with
DNA polymerases, which have been cocrystallized with
dsDNA Based on the observed DNA polymerase–dsDNA
interactions, we propose a mechanism for recognition of a
single-stranded nick by DNA ligase According to this
mechanism, ligase induces a B-to-A DNA helix transition of
the enzyme-bound dsDNA motif, which results in DNA
contraction, bending and unwinding For non-nicked
dsDNA, this transition is reversible, leading to dissociation
of the enzyme For a nicked dsDNA substrate, the con-traction of the enzyme-bound DNA motif (a) triggers an opened–closed conformational change of the enzyme, and (b) forces the motif to accommodate the strained A/B-form hybrid conformation, in which the nicked strand tends to retain a B-type helix, while the non-nicked strand tends to form a shortened A-type helix We propose that this con-formation is the catalytically competent transition state, which leads to the formation of the DNA–AMP interme-diate and to the subsequent sealing of the nick
Keywords: DNA ligase; nick recognition; A-form DNA; A/ B-form DNA hybrid; protein–DNA interactions; B-A DNA helix transition
DNA ligases are the enzymes that catalyze the joining of
single- and double-stranded nicks in dsDNA [1] These
enzymes play a pivotal role in replication, sealing the nicks
in the lagging DNA strand [2–5] They also participate in
DNA excision [6–8], double-strand break repair [9–12] and
take part in DNA recombination [10,13–15] The
mechan-ism of enzyme catalysis (Scheme 1) includes three main
steps: (1) covalent binding of the nucleoside monophos-phate, AMP or GMP, via the e-amino lysyl phosphorami-date bond, (2) transfer of the nucleotidyl moiety onto the 5¢-phosphate end of the nick, forming an inverted pyro-phosphate bridging structure, A(G)ppN and (3) formation
of the phosphodiester bond between the 3¢-OH and the 5¢-phosphate ends of the nick, releasing the nucleotide
Scheme 1 Mechanism of the ATP-dependent
end-joining activity of T4 DNA ligase
nds-DNA, dsDNA containing a 5¢-phosphorylated
nick n-MgAMP-dsDNA, nicked dsDNA
adenylylated at the 5¢-phosphate of the nick.
Correspondence to S de Vries, Kluyver Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 67, 2628 BC Delft, the Netherlands Tel.: + 31 15 2785139, Fax: + 31 15 2782355,
E-mail: S.deVries@tnw.tudelft.nl
Abbreviations: EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay.
Enzymes: DNA ligase (EC 6.5.1.1).
*Present address: Metalloprotein & Protein Engineering Group, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Gorlaeus Laboratories, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, PO Box 9502, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands.
(Received 8 July 2002, accepted 11 October 2002)
Trang 2S T R U C T U R E O F D N A L I G A S E S
The crystal structures of several ATP- and NAD+
-depend-ent DNA ligases have been solved: the bacteriophage T7
DNA ligase complex with ATP [17,18], the enzyme–AMP
covalent complexes of the eukaryotic DNA ligase from
Chlorella virus [19] and of the thermophilicbacterium
Thermus filiformis[20,21] In addition, the structure of the
adenylylation domain of the NAD+-dependent DNA ligase
from Bacillus stearothermophilus has been determined [22]
Analyses indicate that these proteins are very similar [23,24],
and that the minimal catalytic core of the ATP-dependent
DNA ligase consists of two structurally conserved domains
(Fig 1) The N-terminal domain 1 (blue and green regions,
Fig 1) contains the active site, where the adenylylation of
the enzyme takes place Within domain 1, a smaller
subdomain (1c) can be distinguished (36–159 for T7 DNA
ligase and 30–104 for the Chlorella virus DNA ligase, Fig 1,
shown in blue), which contains a mobile loop, invisible in
the crystal structure Domain 1 contains four spatially
conserved positively charged residues (Fig 1, blue) that are
proposed to interact with the 5¢-phosphate moiety of the
nick [19,25] Two of them, Lys238 and Lys240 of T7 DNA
ligase (Lys188 and to a lesser extent Lys186 of Chlorella
virus DNA ligase) were shown to be essential for the
transadenylation and nick sealing activities [25,26] Lys240
forms a photo-crosslinking adduct with the 5¢-terminal
nucleotide of the nick, implying its direct involvement in
binding of the nick phosphate [25] Domain 1 contains the
catalytic lysine residue that forms a covalent intermediate
with the nucleotide coenzyme
The C-terminal domain of DNA ligase, domain 2 (Fig 1,
yellow), is smaller and is connected to domain 1 via the
conserved motif D [25] (Fig 1, red, in alternative notation
called as motif V [27]) Domain 2 is also referred to as the
OB (oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding)-fold domain,
similar to those found in other DNA and RNA binding
proteins [28,29] Domain 2 is flexible; it was shown for the
related nucleotidyltransferase, the mRNA capping enzyme
from Chlorella virus PBCV-1, that during catalysis the
enzyme undergoes opened–closed conformational changes
upon which domain 2 moves towards domain 1 and closes
the nucleotide binding site [30] For DNA ligases it was
suggested that this motion is connected with binding of both
ATP and nicked dsDNA [25] As to ATP, closing of domain
2 was proposed to adjust the conformation of the b–c pyrophosphate of ATP to a position favorable for the in-line nucleophilic attack of the catalytic lysyl moiety [19,23] As to nicked dsDNA, closing of the domain 2 was proposed to clamp the enzyme on DNA [25]
d s D N A B I N D I N G S I T E
Studies involving limited proteolysis, mutagenesis and molecular modeling strongly suggest that dsDNA binds ligase in the cleft between domains 1 and 2 [17,21,25,31–33] Both domains of T7 DNA ligase bind dsDNA independ-ently, and, as expected, only domain 1 retains residual ligase activity [33] On the basis of modeling studies it was shown that the motifs A and B of subdomain 1c, and C and D of domain 1 (Fig 1, red) are involved in dsDNA binding [25]
It was suggested that the dsDNAÆprotein contacts traverse the whole of domain 1, and that the dsDNA binds right on top of the AMP bound in the active site [25,34] The modeling did not elucidate a possible dsDNA-binding site
of domain 2, perhaps because the opened conformation of the enzyme was used Using DNA footprinting analysis it was shown that ligase binds nicked dsDNA asymmetrically, contacting 7–12 nucleotides at the 5¢-phosphate side of the nick, and 3–8 nucleotides at the 3¢-hydroxyl side [25,32,34] With respect to the enzyme structure that would mean that motifs A and B must contact the 5¢-phosphate side of the nick of the dsDNA, because they are further away from the active site compared to motifs C and D [25]
S T R U C T U R A L S I M I L A R I T Y B E T W E E N
D N A L I G A S E A N D D N A P O L Y M E R A S E
The catalytic core of DNA polymerase responsible for the dsDNA elongation activity contains three domains Its shape resembles a half-opened hand (Fig 2, left), and the domains are named accordingly [35,36] The catalytic palm domain contains the polymerase active site, where the incorporation of the nucleotide in the nascent primer chain takes place dsDNA binds the palm domain in the cleft formed by the thumb and flexible fingers [37] Similar to DNA ligase, DNA polymerase undergoes an opened–closed conformational change in the course of catalysis, upon which the fingers and the thumb domains close on the palm domain containing bound dsDNA and dNTP [37–41]
Fig 1 Structure of T7 DNA ligase (left) and the DNA ligase–adenylylate complex from the Chlorella virus (right) Domain 1 is shown in green, subdomain 1cin blue and domain 2 in yellow Motifs A–D are shown in red Resi-dues that participate in binding of the nick phosphate are shown in blue Some hydro-phobicresidues in the putative DNA binding site are shown in red The AMP moiety of Chlorella virus DNA ligase adenylate is shown
in purple.
Trang 3Figure 2 shows that the analogy with a hand can be
extended to DNA ligase Domain 1 would be associated
with the palm, subdomain 1cwith the thumb and domain 2
with the flexible fingers Also, the dsDNA binding mode
proposed for DNA ligase in the modeling studies [25]
resembles the one of DNA polymerase (Fig 2, left)
d s D N A – P O L Y M E R A S E A N D
d s D N A – L I G A S E I N T E R A C T I O N S
The interaction of DNA polymerase with dsDNA is
relatively well understood In solution dsDNA generally
prefers the B-type helix, but in the complex with polymerase
up to 6 or 7 bp at the 3¢-end of the primer accommodate the
A-form [41–43] (Fig 2, left) One of the reasons for this is
that the polymerase bends DNA, clamping the helix
between the palm and the thumb domains [44–48]
A–B-form dsDNA hybrids are usually bent at the junction
[49,50], so the induced bending by the protein stabilizes the
A-form [42,51,52] Another reason for the relative stability
of A-form dsDNA in complex with the DNA polymerase is
related to less spec ific dsDNAÆprotein interactions They
include (a) relatively high hydrophobicity of the dsDNA
binding cleft compared to solution, which leads to a
decrease of the degree of hydration of bound dsDNA,
which stabilizes the A-type helix [53,54], and (b) replacement
and/or exclusion of water molecules, which are normally
hydrogen bonded to the dsDNA in solution, by the amino
acid residues [55–57] and/or salt bridges [42] in the
dsDNAÆprotein complex The resulting effect can be
compared with the addition of a hydrophobic solvent or
with an increase of the ionic strength, factors which induce
the B-to-A helix transition of dsDNA in solution [58,59] In
general, the induced B-to-A helix transition is a common
feature of dsDNAÆprotein interactions [52,60–62], in
par-ticular for the enzymes that catalyze sealing/cutting
oper-ations on dsDNA [42]
It seems likely that the A-B dsDNA hybrid bend at the
junction would fit DNA ligase better than the straight
dsDNA, because the cleft between domains 1 and 2 is
curved In this case motif A of subdomain 1c (thumb) would
contact the hybrid dsDNA at the A-B junction point,
similar to the thumb–helix clamp motif of HIV-1 RT
(Fig 2, left) The distance between the junction point and
the nick binding site is around 20 A˚, which corresponds to
7 bp of dsDNA There are several aromaticresidues in the active site of DNA ligase, which could stabilize the A-helix by hydrophobicand/or aromatic–aromaticinterac-tions Surprisingly, most of them are aligned parallel to each other along the putative dsDNA binding site (Fig 1, red) DNA ligase undergoes an opened–closed conformational change during catalysis, which could stabilize the A-DNA motif by water exclusion and additional protein–DNA interactions The pyrophosphate-bridging riboadenosine at the 5¢-end of the dsDNA nick might stimulate the B-to-A DNA conversion as well because of the structural influence
of ribose sugar, similar to the other cases of A-DNA duplexes that contain a single ribose residue [63–65] If the
7 bp-long fragment of bound dsDNA would adopt the A-form conformation in DNA ligase complex, it would cause an overall DNA unwinding of 20–25 degrees, because A-DNA contains roughly one more bp per turn of the helix than the B-form It was shown that both ATP- and NAD+-dependent DNA ligases unwind dsDNA at the binding site at least for 17–20 degrees per bound molecule of the enzyme [66]
Therefore, there are sufficient grounds to suggest that the 6–9 bp-long B-DNA, at the 5¢-phosphate side of the nick, changes to A-DNA after formation of the DNA–ligase complex, similarly to the motif at the 3¢-OH primer end of the dsDNA bound to DNA polymerase What could be the role of this transition in the DNA ligase catalysis?
D Y N A M I C M E C H A N I S M O F N I C K
R E C O G N I T I O N B Y D N A L I G A S E –
A H Y P O T H E S I S
According to Doherty et al [25,34], the adenylylated DNA ligase binds dsDNA forming nonspecific contacts with motifs A, B, C and D According to our hypothesis the enzyme, in addition, bends dsDNA at the point of contact with motif A Subdomain 1c, similar to the thumb domain
of DNA polymerase, clamps on dsDNA bound in the crevice formed by domain 1 (palm) and domain 2 (fingers) This could be achieved by moving the tip (motif B) of subdomain 1c(thumb) towards domains 1 (palm), 2 (fingers) and bound dsDNA (Fig 2, right, white arrow), similar to the motion of the thumb domain in DNA polymerases [35,37,41] Nonspecific interactions lead to a decrease of the degree of hydration of the bound DNA As a
Fig 2 Structures of DNA polymerase domain
of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase in complex with
dsDNA (left), and T7 DNA ligase (right) The
connection domain of HIV-1 RT is omitted
from the figure for clarity The palm domain is
shown in green, the thumb domain in blue and
the fingers domain in yellow Directions of the
catalytic movement of the thumb and fingers
domains are indicated with white arrows.
Trang 4result, the 6–9 bp dsDNA fragment between motifs A and
C changes to the A-form helix This transition is
accom-panied by a dsDNA contraction of 5–7 A˚, bec ause the
distance between the neighboring nucleotides is 2.6 A˚ in the
A-form vs 3.4 A˚ in the B-form Contraction causes dsDNA
to slip in the active site towards the clamp site (motif A)
(Fig 3) It also causes an overall DNA unwinding for 20–30
degrees (6 bp A-DNA contains 0.54 bp more per turn of
a helix compared to 6 bp B-DNA, which corresponds to
360 degrees· 0.54/10–20 degrees unwinding angle)
It is known that the 5¢-nick phosphate is essential for the
tight binding of dsDNA by the DNA ligase Several
residues (Fig 1, blue), which are located in domain 1 close
to the bound AMP, are thought to bind to this moiety
[19,25] We propose that DNA ligase makes a
two-force-point contact with nicked dsDNA – at the clamp site via
motif A and at the 5¢-phosphate of the nick via the specific
phosphate-binding residue(s) (e.g Lys238 and Lys240 for
T7 DNA ligase [19,25], or Arg42, Arg176 and Lys186 for
Chlorella virus ligase [19,26]) At the clamp site, both
DNA strands are fixed with respect to the enzyme, because
DNA bends here At the nick, however, only the
5¢-phosphate of the nicked strand is enzyme-bound
(Fig 3, ds nicked DNA) During the contraction, or
B-to-A DNA helix transition, the non-nicked strand tends
to adopt the A-DNA conformation, because it is anchored
to the enzyme only at the clamp site and is free to slip in
the active site
According to our hypothesis, the nicked strand has less
freedom of conformational changes because it is anchored
to DNA ligase at two points Two extreme cases can be
considered The first case represents an enzyme, which
would be structurally infinitely flexible between the two
force points In this case, contraction of dsDNA would drag
the residues bound to the 5¢-phosphate of the nick several
angstroms towards motif A Some of these residues (e.g
Lys238 and Lys240 for T7 DNA ligase or Lys186 and
Lys188 for Chlorella virus ligase) belong to motif D This
motif connects domains 1 and 2, and serves as a hinge
during the opened–closed conformational change So, the
nick phosphate of dsDNA could pull on this hinge during
contraction, triggering the closing of domain 2, and could
further stall the ligase in the closed conformation until the
nick is sealed
The other extreme case would be that the enzyme is structurally infinitely rigid between motif A and the nick phosphate-binding residue(s) In this case, the nicked strand would tend to retain its B-form, sinc e it is fixed both at the clamp site and at the 5¢-phosphate of the nick As a result, the DNA motif between the clamp site and the nick phosphate would adopt a strained hybrid conformation, in which the non-nicked strand is more A-like, while the nicked strand is more B-like (Fig 3, nicked dsDNA, closed enzyme) One of the options for DNA to retain the hydrogen bonding of the 3¢-terminal base pair of the nick would be to slightly rotate counterclockwise around the helical axis, so that the 3¢-OH moiety would move towards the 5¢-phosphate of the nick and forward in the 3¢-direction
of the nicked strand (Fig 3, nicked dsDNA, closed enzyme) In other words, the 5¢-phosphate would move towards the protein interface, while the 3¢-OH group would move towards the solution In this way, the 3¢-OH group would adopt the apical configuration in respect to the a-phosphorus moiety of the AMP cofactor (Fig 4) For comparison, the nicked dsDNA bound to the DNA polymerase b makes a similar motion (for structure cf [39]), only in that case the 3¢-OH side of the nick moves away from the 5¢-phosphate of the nick and backwards in the 5¢-direction of the nicked strand
Fig 3 Illustration of the proposed mechanism
of dynamic nick recognition by DNA ligase (Left) binding of the dsDNA (Right) binding
of the nicked dsDNA B-form DNA is colored yellow, A-DNA is blue and the enzyme is shown in green.
Fig 4 Illustration of the proposed mechanism of dynamic nick recog-nition by DNA ligase Positioning of the reacting groups in the active site of the enzyme for the B-DNA configuration and for the A–B strained DNA hybrid.
Trang 5Most probably, the flexibility of DNA ligase is somewhere
between these two extreme cases, so that the B-to-A helix
transition of dsDNA would cause both the closure of domain
2 and the formation of the strained A–B configuration
In summary, if our hypothesis of dynamic nick
recog-nition proves to be correct, DNA ligase would be a good
example of an enzyme that acts according to induced-fit
and strain mechanisms of catalysis in which both the
enzyme and the substrate undergo significant
conforma-tional changes to achieve the transition state configuration
[67–69]
B I N D I N G O F d s D N A T O D N A L I G A S E S
It is important to note that the binding of dsDNA to the
ligase is still a matter of some controversy The results based
on the electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) indicate
that the ligase does not bind the non-nicked dsDNA, or
dsDNA containing the nonphosphorylated nick [25,32,70]
On the other hand, other experiments that show relaxation
of supercoiled DNA in the presence of T4 DNA ligase imply
that the enzyme not only binds but also unwinds the
non-nicked DNA helix [66] In our opinion, the reason for this
paradox is that the EMSA fails to detect proteinDNA
complexes with koffvalues comparable to the apparent rate
constant for diffusion of the proteinDNA complex through
the pore of the acrylamide gel, kappdiff For a 5% gel the
apparent pore diameter is around 100–200 nm, depending
on the bisacrylamide content [71] Thus, for a 2 h separation
with an electrophoretic shift of, for example, 5 cm, the kdiff
app can be estimated as 5· 10)2m/200· 10)9m¼ 2.5 ·
105pores per 2 h, or 35–70 s)1 This implies that only the
complexes with koff of about 1–2 s)1 would be detected
using this method On the other hand, more rapidly
exchanging complexes can be detected in the assay showing
relaxation of the supercoiled DNA
B - T O - A D N A H E L I X T R A N S I T I O N – A
D Y N A M I C T E S T O F T H E S T A T E O F T H E
D N A S U B S T R A T E
We propose that the B-to-A DNA helix transition serves as
a dynamictest to determine the state of the DNA substrate,
and is used by DNA ligase to comply with its fidelity
requirements
(A) To test for the presence of mismatching nucleotide(s)
at the 3¢-hydroxyl side of the nick Even though the A-B
strained conformation can be adopted, the dangling 3¢-OH
end would not occupy the position apical towards the
leaving AMP, preventing the sealing of the nick, and,
possibly, hindering the preceding transadenylation This
agrees with the fac t that mismatc hes at the 3¢-OH side of the
nick in some cases inhibit not only the nick sealing activity
[72], but adenylylation as well [73]
(B) To lower the large sequence-dependent structural
variations at the 5¢-PO4side of the nick, and to test for the
presence of mismatching nucleotide(s) The A-form of DNA
is known to obey structural conservatism, being rather
independent of the primary sequence [74] The presence of
mismatches at the 5¢-PO4side of the nick destabilizes the
A-form helix increasing the DNA hydration, because the
water molecules tend to cluster around unusual base pairs to
compensate for the absent hydrogen bonds [75]
(C) To test for the presence of an RNA motif at the 5¢-end
of the nick This important fidelity requirement would preclude DNA ligase to join the Okazaki fragments that contain RNA primer fragments, before they are removed by the 5¢)3¢-exonuclease activity of DNA polymerase [76] or
by the action of specific RNases [77] The B-to-A helix transition would not occur in case of the nick containing 5¢-RNAÆDNA, because the RNAÆDNA hybrid already adopts the A-like form in solution As a result, the A-B strained conformation would not be achieved, the 3¢-OH group of the nick would not occupy the position apical to the leaving AMP and the nick sealing would be inhibited The latter agrees with the fact that the DNA ligase joins 5¢-RNAÆDNA to the 3¢-DNAÆDNA poorly, leading to the accumulation of the DNA-adenylate intermediate, while the opposite situation results in effective ligation [78,79] It is necessary to note, however, that in certain cases DNA ligase
is capable of joining nicks containing the RNA/DNA motif
on the 5¢-side with reduced efficiency [72,79–82] In these cases, generally, oligo-d(r)A/oligo-r(d)T sequences were ligated, which, for dsDNA, have a very low tendency to form the A-helix in solution [83–85] The A-helix is not the only possible conformation of the DNAÆRNA chimera; sometimes it rather adopts a mixed A–B-geometry [86,87],
or, under certain conditions, even the B-helical conforma-tion [88] Therefore, it is possible that the oligo-d(r)A/oligo-r(d)T DNAÆRNA hybrids in solution adopt the B-like structure, and in complex with DNA ligase undergo a B-to-A helix transition, allowing nick-joining
In summary, we propose that DNA ligase transiently probes dsDNA by bending the DNA helix, unwinding, and inducing the B-to-A helix transition A defect in the DNA helix, such as a phosphorylated nick reveals itself during the dynamictest, forcing (a) DNA ligase to form a stable complex with dsDNA by changing to a closed conforma-tion, and (b) dsDNA to adopt a conformation favorable for the transadenylation and sealing of the nick
A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T S
This work was supported by Association Of Biotechnology Centers In the Netherlands (ABON) (Project I.2.8) and by the Netherlands Research Council for Chemical Sciences (CW) with financial aid from the Netherlands Technology Foundation (STW) (grant 349–3565).
R E F E R E N C E S
1 Lehman, I.R (1974) DNA ligase: structure, mechanism, and function Science 186, 790–797.
2 Ranalli, T.A., DeMott, M.S & Bambara, R.A (2002) Mechanism underlying replication protein A stimulation of DNA Ligase I.
J Biol Chem 277, 1719–1727.
3 Mossi, R., Ferrari, E & Hubscher, U (1998) DNA ligase I selectively affects DNA synthesis by DNA polymerases delta and epsilon suggesting differential functions in DNA replication and repair J Biol Chem 273, 14322–14330.
4 Tomkinson, A.E & Mackey, Z.B (1998) Structure and function
of mammalian DNA ligases Mutation Res 407, 1–9.
5 Montecucco, A., Rossi, R., Levin, D.S., Gary, R., Park, M.S., Motycka, T.A., Ciarrocchi, G., Villa, A., Biamonti, G & Tomkinson, A.E (1998) DNA ligase I is recruited to sites of DNA replication by an interaction with proliferating cell nuclear anti-gen: identification of a common targeting mechanism for the assembly of replication factories EMBO J 17, 3786–3795.
Trang 66 Bhagwat, A.S., Sanderson, R.J & Lindahl, T (1999) Delayed
DNA joining at 3¢ mismatches by human DNA ligases Nucleic
Acids Res 27, 4028–4033.
7 Bogenhagen, D.F & Pinz, K.G (1998) The action of DNA ligase
at abasicsites in DNA J Biol Chem 273, 7888–7893.
8 Levin, D.S., McKenna, A.E., Motycka, T.A., Matsumoto, Y &
Tomkinson, A.E (2000) Interaction between PCNA and DNA
ligase I is critical for joining of Okazaki fragments and long-patch
base-excision repair Curr Biol 10, 919–922.
9 Sibanda, B.L., Critchlow, S.E., Begun, J., Pei, X.Y., Jackson, S.P.,
Blundell, T.L & Pellegrini, L (2001) Crystal structure of an
Xrcc4-DNA ligase IV complex Nat Struct Biol 8, 1015–1019.
10 Grawunder, U., Zimmer, D., Fugmann, S., Schwarz, K & Lieber,
M.R (1998) DNA ligase IV is essential for V(D)J recombination
and DNA double-strand break repair in human precursor
lym-phocytes Mol Cell 2, 477–484.
11 Riballo, E., Doherty, A.J., Dai, Y., Stiff, T., Oettinger, M.A.,
Jeggo, P.A & Kysela, B (2001) Cellular and biochemical impact
of a mutation in DNA ligase IV conferring clinical
radio-sensitivity J Biol Chem 276, 31124–31132.
12 Adachi, N., Ishino, T., Ishii, Y., Takeda, S & Koyama, H.
(2001) DNA ligase IV-deficient cells are more resistant to ionizing
radiation in the absence of Ku70: Implications for DNA
double-strand break repair Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 12109–
12113.
13 Chen, J., Tomkinson, A.E., Ramos, W., Mackey, Z.B.,
Dane-hower, S., Walter, C.A., Schultz, R.A., Besterman, J.M &
Husain, I (1995) Mammalian DNA ligase III: molecular cloning,
chromosomal localization, and expression in spermatocytes
undergoing meioticrecombination Mol Cell Biol 15, 5412–5422.
14 Jones, J.M & Gellert, M (2001) Intermediates in V(D)J
recombination: a stable RAG1/2 complex sequesters cleaved RSS
ends Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 12926–12931.
15 Kowalczykowski, S.C., Dixon, D.A., Eggleston, A.K., Lauder, S.D.
& Rehrauer, W.M (1994) Biochemistry of homologous
recombination in Escherichia coli Microbiol Rev 58, 401–465.
16.
1 Cherepanov, A.V & de Vries, S (2002) Kineticmechanism of the
Mg2+-dependent nucleotidyl transfer catalyzed by T4 DNA and
RNA ligases J Biol Chem 277, 1695–1704.
17 Subramanya, H.S., Doherty, A.J., Ashford, S.R & Wigley, D.B.
(1996) Crystal structure of an ATP-dependent DNA ligase from
bacteriophage T7 Cell 85, 607–615.
18 Doherty, A.J., Ashford, S.R., Subramanya, H.S & Wigley, D.B.
(1996) Bacteriophage T7 DNA ligase Overexpression,
purifica-tion, crystallizapurifica-tion, and characterization J Biol Chem 271,
11083–11089.
19 Odell, M., Sriskanda, V., Shuman, S & Nikolov, D.B (2000)
Crystal structure of eukaryotic DNA ligase-adenylate illuminates
the mechanism of nick sensing and strand joining Mol Cell 6,
1183–1193.
20 Lee, J.Y., Kim, H.K., Chang, C., Eom, S.H., Hwang, K.Y &
Cho, Y., Yu, Y.G., Ryu, S.E., Kwon, S.T & Suh, S.W (2000)
Crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis of
NAD + -dependent DNA ligase from Thermus filiformis Acta
Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 56, 357–358.
21 Lee, J.Y., Chang, C., Song, H.K., Moon, J., Yang, J.K.,
Kim, H.K., Kwon, S.T & Suh, S.W (2000) Crystal struc ture of
NAD+-dependent DNA ligase: modular architecture and
func-tional implications EMBO J 19, 1119–1129.
22 Singleton, M.R., Hakansson, K., Timson, D.J & Wigley, D.B.
(1999) Structure of the adenylation domain of an
NAD+-dependent DNA ligase Structure Fold Des 7, 35–42.
23 Sriskanda, V., Moyer, R.W & Shuman, S (2001)
NAD + -dependent DNA ligase encoded by a eukaryotic virus.
J Biol Chem 276, 36100–36109.
24 Timson, D.J., Singleton, M.R & Wigley, D.B (2000) DNA ligases
in the repair and replication of DNA Mutation Res 460, 301–318.
25 Doherty, A.J & Dafforn, T.R (2000) Nick recognition by DNA ligases J Mol Biol 296, 43–56.
26 Sriskanda, V & Shuman, S (2002) Role of nucleotidyl transferase motif V in strand joining by Chlorella virus DNA ligase J Biol Chem 277, 9661–9667.
27 Shuman, S (1996) Closing the gap on DNA ligase Structure 4, 653–656.
28 Suck, D (1997) Common fold, common function, common origin? Nat Struct Biol 4, 161–165.
29 Murzin, A.G (1993) OB (oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide bind-ing)-fold: common structural and functional solution for non-homologous sequences EMBO J 12, 861–867.
30 Hakansson, K., Doherty, A.J., Shuman, S & Wigley, D.B (1997) X-ray crystallography reveals a large conformational change during guanyl transfer by mRNA capping enzymes Cell 89, 545– 553.
31 Doherty, A.J., Ashford, S.R & Wigley, D.B (1996) Character-ization of proteolyticfragments of bacteriophage T7 DNA ligase Nucleic Acids Res 24, 2281–2287.
32 Odell, M & Shuman, S (1999) Footprinting of Chlorella virus DNA ligase bound at a nick in duplex DNA J Biol Chem 274, 14032–14039.
33 Doherty, A.J & Wigley, D.B (1999) Functional domains of an ATP-dependent DNA ligase J Mol Biol 285, 63–71.
34 Doherty, A.J & Suh, S.W (2000) Structural and mechanistic conservation in DNA ligases Nucleic Acids Res 28, 4051–4058.
35 Steitz, T.A (1999) DNA polymerases: structural diversity and common mechanisms J Biol Chem 274, 17395–17398.
36 Joyce, C.M & Steitz, T.A (1995) Polymerase structures and function: variations on a theme? J Bacteriol 177, 6321–6329.
37 Franklin, M.C., Wang, J & Steitz, T.A (2001) Struc ture of the replicating complex of a pol alpha family DNA polymerase Cell
105, 657–667.
38 Arndt, J.W., Gong, W., Zhong, X., Showalter, A.K., Liu, J., Dunlap, C.A., Lin, Z., Paxson, C., Tsai, M.D & Chan, M.K (2001) Insight into the catalytic mechanism of DNA polymerase beta: structures of intermediate complexes Biochemistry 40, 5368– 5375.
39 Sawaya, M.R., Prasad, R., Wilson, S.H., Kraut, J & Pelletier, H (1997) Crystal structures of human DNA polymerase beta com-plexed with gapped and nicked DNA: evidence for an induced fit mechanism Biochemistry 36, 11205–11215.
40 Pelletier, H., Sawaya, M.R., Kumar, A., Wilson, S.H & Kraut, J (1994) Structures of ternary complexes of rat DNA polymerase beta, a DNA template-primer, and ddCTP Science 264, 1891– 1903.
41 Li, Y., Korolev, S & Waksman, G (1998) Crystal structures
of open and closed forms of binary and ternary complexes of the large fragment of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase I: structural basis for nucleotide incorporation EMBO J 17, 7514–7525.
42 Lu, X.J., Shakked, Z & Olson, W.K (2000) A-form conforma-tional motifs in ligand-bound DNA structures J Mol Biol 300, 819–840.
43 Kiefer, J.R., Mao, C., Braman, J.C & Beese, L.S (1998) Visua-lizing DNA replication in a catalytically active Bacillus DNA polymerase crystal Nature 391, 304–307.
44 Wlassoff, W.A., Dymshits, G.M & Lavrik, O.I (1996) A model for DNA polymerase translocation: worm-like movement of DNA within the binding cleft FEBS Lett 390, 6–9.
45 Beese, L.S., Derbyshire, V & Steitz, T.A (1993) Structure of DNA polymerase I Klenow fragment bound to duplex DNA Science 260, 352–355.
46 Rees, W.A., Keller, R.W., Vesenka, J.P., Yang, G & Bustamante, C (1993) Evidence of DNA bending in transcription complexes imaged by scanning force microscopy Science 260, 1646–1649.
Trang 747 Doublie, S., Tabor, S., Long, A.M., Richardson, C.C &
Ellenberger, T (1998) Crystal structure of a bacteriophage T7
DNA replication complex at 2.2 A resolution Nature 391,
251–258.
48 Lin, S., Long, S., Ramirez, S.M., Cotter, R.J & Woods, A.S.
(2000) Characterization of the helix clamp motif of HIV-1 reverse
transcriptase using MALDI-TOF MS and surface plasmon
res-onance Anal Chem 72, 2635–2640.
49 Selsing, E., Wells, R.D., Alden, C.J & Arnott, S (1979) Bent
DNA: visualization of a base-paired and stacked A-B
conforma-tional junction J Biol Chem 254, 5417–5422.
50 Salazar, M., Fedoroff, O., Zhu, L & Reid, B.R (1994) The
solution structure of the r (gcg) d (TATACCC): d
(GGGTA-TACGC) Okazaki fragment contains two distinct duplex
morphologies connected by a junction J Mol Biol 241,
440–455.
51 Olson, W.K & Zhurkin, V.B (2000) Modeling DNA
deforma-tions Curr Opin Struct Biol 10, 286–297.
52 Jones, S., van Heyningen, P., Berman, H.M & Thornton, J.M.
(1999) Protein–DNA interactions: a structural analysis J Mol
Biol 287, 877–896.
53 McConnell, K.J & Beveridge, D.L (2000) DNA structure: what’s
in charge? J Mol Biol 304, 803–820.
54 Calladine, C.R & Drew, H.R (1984) A base-centred explanation
of the B-to-A transition in DNA J Mol Biol 178, 773–782.
55 Woda, J., Sc hneider, B., Patel, K., Mistry, K & Berman, H.M.
(1998) An analysis of the relationship between hydration and
protein–DNA interactions Biophys J 75, 2170–2177.
56 Seeman, N.C., Rosenberg, J.M & Rich, A (1976)
Sequence-specific recognition of double helical nucleic acids by proteins.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73, 804–808.
57 Petruska, J., Sowers, L.C & Goodman, M.F (1986) Comparison
of nucleotide interactions in water, proteins, and vacuum: model
for DNA polymerase fidelity Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83, 1559–
1562.
58 Nishimura, Y., Torigoe, C & Tsuboi, M (1986) Salt induced B-A
transition of poly (dG) poly (dC) and the stabilization of A form
by its methylation Nucleic Acids Res 14, 2737–2748.
59 Ivanov, V.I., Minchenkova, L.E., Minyat, E.E.,
Frank-Kamenetskii, M.D & Schyolkina, A.K (1974) The B to A
tran-sition of DNA in solution J Mol Biol 87, 817–833.
60 Nekludova, L & Pabo, C.O (1994) Distinc tive DNA c
onforma-tion with enlarged major groove is found in Zn-finger-DNA and
other protein-DNA complexes Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91,
6948–6952.
61 Shakked, Z., Guzikevich-Guerstein, G., Frolow, F., Rabinovich,
D., Joachimiak, A & Sigler, P.B (1994) Determinants of
repressor/operator recognition from the structure of the trp
operator binding site Nature 368, 469–473.
62 Olson, W.K., Gorin, A.A., Lu, X.J., Hock, L.M & Zhurkin, V.B.
(1998) DNA sequence-dependent deformability deduced from
protein-DNA crystal complexes Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95,
11163–11168.
63 Wahl, M.C & Sundaralingam, M (2000) B-form to A-form
conversion by a 3¢-terminal ribose: crystal structure of the chimera
d (CCACTAGTG) r (G) Nucleic Acids Res 28, 4356–4363.
64 Ban, C., Ramakrishnan, B & Sundaralingam, M (1994) Crystal
structure of the highly distorted chimeric decamer r (C)
d (CGGCGCCG) r (G) spermine complex-spermine binding to
phosphate only and minor groove tertiary base-pairing Nucleic
Acids Res 22, 5466–5476.
65 Ban, C., Ramakrishnan, B & Sundaralingam, M (1994) A single
2¢-hydroxyl group converts B-DNA to A-DNA Crystal structure
of the DNA-RNA chimeric decamer duplex d (CCGGC) r (G)
d (CCGG) with a novel intermolecular G-C base-paired
quadru-plet J Mol Biol 236, 275–285.
66 Ivanchenko, M., van Holde, K & Zlatanova, J (1996) Prokar-yoticDNA ligases unwind superhelical DNA, Biochem Biophys Res Commun 226, 498–505.
67 Pauling, L (1946) Molecular architecture and biological reactions Chem Engng news 24, 1375–1377.
68 Koshland, D.E.J (1958) Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 44, 98–104.
69 Fersht, A (1999) Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science A Guide to Enzyme Catalysis and Protein Folding W.H Freeman, New York, USA.
70 Sriskanda, V & Shuman, S (1998) Chlorella virus DNA ligase: nick recognition and mutational analysis Nucleic Acids Res 26, 525–531.
71 Stellwagen, N.C (1998) Apparent pore size of polyacrylamide gels: c omparison of gels c ast and run in Tris-ac etate-EDTA and Tris-borate-EDTA buffers Electrophoresis 19, 1542–1547.
72 Rabin, B.A., Hawley, R.S & Chase, J.W (1986) DNA ligase from Drosophila melanogaster embryos Purification and physical characterization J Biol Chem 261, 10637–10645.
73 Tong, J., Barany, F & Cao, W (2000) Ligation reaction specificities of an NAD+-dependent DNA ligase from the hyperthermophile Aquifex aeolicus Nucleic Acids Res 28, 1447–1454.
74 Timsit, Y (1999) DNA structure and polymerase fidelity J Mol Biol 293, 835–853.
75 Westhof, E (1988) Water: an integral part of nucleic acid struc-ture Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 17, 125–144.
76 Kornberg, A & Baker, T.A (1992) In DNA Replication, pp 307–
322 W.H Freeman, New York, USA.
77 Rumbaugh, J.A., Murante, R.S., Shi, S & Bambara, R.A (1997) Creation and removal of embedded ribonucleotides in chromo-somal DNA during mammalian Okazaki fragment processing.
J Biol Chem 272, 22591–22599.
78 Sekiguchi, J & Shuman, S (1997) Ligation of RNA-containing duplexes by Vaccinia DNA ligase Biochemistry 36, 9073–9079.
79 Sriskanda, V & Shuman, S (1998) Specificity and fidelity of strand joining by Chlorella virus DNA ligase Nucleic Acids Res.
26, 3536–3541.
80 Matsuda, S., Sakaguchi, K., Tsukada, K & Teraoka, H (1996) Characterization of DNA ligase from the fungus Coprinus ciner-eus Eur J Biochem 237, 691–697.
81 Robins, P & Lindahl, T (1996) DNA ligase IV from HeLa cell nuclei J Biol Chem 271, 24257–24261.
82 Tomkinson, A.E., Roberts, E., Daly, G., Totty, N.F & Lindahl,
T (1991) Three distinct DNA ligases in mammalian cells J Biol Chem 266, 21728–21735.
83 Arnott, S & Selsing, E (1974) Structures for the polynucleotide complexes poly (dA) with poly (dT) and poly (dT) with poly (dA) with poly (dT) J Mol Biol 88, 509–521.
84 Ivanov, V.I & Krylov, D (1992) A-DNA in solution as studied by diverse approaches Methods Enzymol 211, 111–127.
85 Tolstorukov, M.Y., Ivanov, V.I., Malenkov, G.G., Jernigan, R.L.
& Zhurkin, V.B (2001) Sequence-dependent B-A transition in DNA evaluated with dimericand trimericscales Biophys J 81, 3409–3421.
86 Salazar, M., Fedoroff, O.Y., Miller, J.M., Ribeiro, N.S & Reid, B.R (1993) The DNA strand in DNA.RNA hybrid duplexes is neither B-form nor A-form in solution Biochemistry 32, 4207– 4215.
87 Trantirek, L., Stefl, R., Vorlickova, M., Koca, J., Sklenar, V & Kypr, J (2000) An A-type double helix of DNA having B-type puckering of the deoxyribose rings J Mol Biol 297, 907–922.
88 Chen, X., Ramakrishnan, B & Sundaralingam, M (1995) Crystal structures of B-form DNA-RNA chimers complexed with dis-tamycin Nat Struct Biol 2, 733–735.