These findings suggest that CLGAT can effectively participate in the biosynthesis of citrulline in wild watermelon leaves during drought⁄ strong-light stress.. In addition to citruline, c
Trang 1N-acetyltransferase involved in citrulline accumulation
in wild watermelon
Kentaro Takahara, Kinya Akashi and Akiho Yokota
Graduate School of Biological Sciences, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Japan
Drought in the presence of strong light is a major
environmental stress that reduces plant productivity
[1] To adapt to this adverse condition, numerous
bio-chemical and physiological tolerance mechanisms are
expressed in plant cells [2] One such response involves
accumulation of small organic metabolites, such as
mannitol, proline and glycine betaine, which are
collec-tively referred to as compatible solutes [3] Compatible
solutes are thought to play important roles in drought
tolerance in plants, acting as mediators of osmotic
adjustment, stabilizers of subcellular structures, and scavengers of active oxygen radicals [4] The mecha-nisms of proline, mannitol, and glycine betaine accu-mulation are highly regulated through activation of biosynthesis and⁄ or suppression of catabolism [3–5] Wild watermelon plants, which inhabit the Kalahari Desert, Botswana, exhibit high drought⁄ strong-light stress tolerance [6] They are able to maintain their photosynthetic apparatus during prolonged periods of drought in strong light, suggesting the presence of
Keywords
citrulline; drought/strong-light stress;
glutamate N-acetyltransferase;
thermostability; wild watermelon
Correspondence
A Yokota, Nara Institute of Science and
Technology, Graduate School of Biological
Sciences, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma,
Nara 630-0101, Japan
Fax: +81 743 72 5569
Tel: +81 743 72 5560
E-mail: yokota@bs.naist.jp
(Received 12 July 2005, revised 18 August
2005, accepted 23 August 2005)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04933.x
Citrulline is an efficient hydroxyl radical scavenger that can accumulate at concentrations of up to 30 mm in the leaves of wild watermelon during drought in the presence of strong light; however, the mechanism of this accumulation remains unclear In this study, we characterized wild water-melon glutamate N-acetyltransferase (CLGAT) that catalyses the trans-acetylation reaction between acetylornithine and glutamate to form acetylglutamate and ornithine, thereby functioning in the first and fifth steps in citrulline biosynthesis CLGAT enzyme purified 7000-fold from leaves was composed of two subunits with different N-terminal amino acid sequences Analysis of the corresponding cDNA revealed that these two subunits have molecular masses of 21.3 and 23.5 kDa and are derived from
a single precursor polypeptide, suggesting that the CLGAT precursor is cleaved autocatalytically at the conserved ATML motif, as in other glutam-ate N-acetyltransferases of microorganisms A green fluorescence protein assay revealed that the first 26-amino acid sequence at the N-terminus of the precursor functions as a chloroplast transit peptide The CLGAT exhibited thermostability up to 70C, suggesting an increase in enzyme activity under high leaf temperature conditions during drought⁄ strong-light stresses Moreover, CLGAT was not inhibited by citrulline or arginine at physiologically relevant high concentrations These findings suggest that CLGAT can effectively participate in the biosynthesis of citrulline in wild watermelon leaves during drought⁄ strong-light stress
Abbreviations
AOD, acetylornithine deacetylase; CLGAT, Citrullus lanatus glutamate N-acetyltransferase; DRIP-1, drought-induced polypeptide 1;
DTT, dithiothreitol; GAT, glutamate N-acetyltransfease; GFP, green fluorescence protein.
Trang 2mechanisms that allow them to tolerate oxidative stress
arising from excess light energy absorbed by the leaves
Drought⁄ strong-light stresses result in an accumulation
of a novel compatible solute, citrulline, in the leaves
[6] The concentration of citrulline in the stressed
leaves reaches up to 30 mm, compared to only 0.6 mm
in unstressed leaves [6] Among known compatible
sol-utes, citrulline is one of the most efficient scavengers
for hydroxyl radicals [7] These findings suggest that
citrulline functions as a hydroxyl radical scavenger in
the presence of strong light
In addition to citruline, concentration of arginine
increases from 0.3 mm in unstressed conditions to
7 mm under drought⁄ strong-light stress in the leaves of
wild watermelon [6] Although arginine is the final
product of the arginine biosynthetic pathway, wild
watermelon plants accumulate larger quantities of
citrulline, an intermediate in this pathway, during
drought⁄ strong-light stress Arginine is a key
meta-bolite in regulation of this pathway in plants [8]
How-ever, the mechanism of accumulation for these
metabolites in wild watermelon remains unclear
Regulation of citrulline and arginine synthesis has
been studied extensively in prokaryotes and
Saccharo-myces cerevisiae [9,10] The pathway starts with
acety-lation of glutamate into N-acetylglutamate, which is
then converted into N-acetylornithine by three
con-secutive enzymatic steps, namely, phosphorylation,
reduction, and transamination (Fig 1) In the fifth
step, N-acetylornithine is converted into ornithine,
which is used for synthesis of citrulline and arginine in
the urea cycle Two different enzymes are known to be
required for catalysis of this fifth step; one is
acetylorni-thine deacetylase (AOD, EC 3.5.1.16), which catalyses
deacetylation of N-acetylornithine yielding ornithine
and acetate [11] This linear pathway is regulated
by arginine-induced feedback-inhibition of
N-acetyl-glutamate synthase, the first-step enzyme in the
pathway [12] AOD is found in Enterobacteriaceae such
as Escherichia coli [9,13] The second enzyme is
glutamate N-acetyltransferase (GAT, EC 2.3.1.35),
which catalyses transfer of the acetyl group from
N-acetylornithine into glutamate yielding ornithine
and N-acetylglutamate Glutamate N-acetyltransferase
therefore recycles the acetyl moiety of
N-acetyl-ornithine, regenerating N-acetylglutamate in citrulline
and arginine biosynthesis This enzyme is functional in
all other microorganisms characterized so far, such as
Bacillus subtilis and S cerevisiae [14,15] In this
acetyl-recycling pathway, both the first- and the second-step
enzymes, N-acetylglutamate synthase and
N-acetylglut-amate kinase, respectively, are inhibited by arginine
Glutamate N-acetyltransferase is also weakly inhibited
by arginine [16,17] As a result, the concentration of cit-rulline and arginine is kept low through these feedback inhibitions in the microorganisms examined so far How wild watermelon is able to accumulate high levels
of citrulline is therefore an intriguing question
In plants, knowledge on the pathway of citrulline and arginine biosynthesis is still fragmentary [8,18] The genome project revealed that both GAT and AOD-homologous genes exist in Arabidopsis thaliana [19] Our previous study showed that a novel protein, drought-induced polypeptide 1 (DRIP-1), which shares sequence homology with bacterial AOD, is strongly induced by drought⁄ strong-light stress in wild water-melon [6] However, the catalytic property of DRIP-1 remains to be determined, and it is not known whether DRIP-1 contributes to massive accumulation of citrul-line in wild watermelon
As a first step to understand the mechanism of citrul-line and arginine accumulation in wild watermelon, we focused on the fifth step of citrulline biosynthesis, at which point DRIP-1 was expected to function as AOD However, GAT activity, not AOD activity, was detected in wild watermelon leaves in which DRIP-1
Fig 1 The pathway of citrulline and arginine biosynthesis AGS, N-acetylglutamate synthase; AGK, N-acetylglutamate kinase; AGPR, N-acetylglutamate 5-phosphate reductase; AOAT, N-acetylornithine transaminase; GAT, glutamate N-acetyltransferase; AOD, N-acetyl-ornithine deacetylase; OCT, N-acetyl-ornithine carbamoyltransferase; ASS, argininosuccinate synthase and ASL, argininosuccinate lyase.
Trang 3had been strongly induced This paper reports the
purification and characterization of GAT from wild
watermelon leaves, and discusses its function during
drought⁄ strong-light stress on the basis of its two
unique enzymatic properties; thermotolerance and
insensitivity to inhibition by downstream products,
cit-rulline and arginine
Results
The enzyme involved in catalysis of the fifth step
of citrulline biosynthesis in wild watermelon
leaves
During citrulline biosynthesis, N-acetylornithine is
con-verted into ornithine by AOD and⁄ or GAT (Fig 1)
To examine contribution of these two enzymes to
cit-rulline synthesis in wild watermelon leaves, we assayed
their activities in extracts of wild watermelon leaves
during progression of drought⁄ strong-light stress At
each time point investigated, AOD activity was below
the detection limit (< 0.02 nmolÆmin)1Æmg protein)1;
Fig 2A) Although bacterial AODs are activated by a
divalent metal ion such as Co2+ or Zn2+ [20], no
AOD activity was detected in extracts from wild
watermelon leaves even if these metal ions were inclu-ded in the reaction mixture (data not shown) In a pos-itive control experiment, we could detect similar AOD activity in the extract of E coli to that reported in the literature [11], demonstrating that the assay procedures were valid for detecting AOD activity The undetect-able AOD activity in extracts from wild watermelon leaves is in contrast to the strong expression of
DRIP-1 during stress (Fig 2)
On the contrary, GAT activity was detected in leaves of wild watermelon (Fig 2A) The specific activ-ity of GAT in unstressed leaves was approximately 3.2 nmolÆmin)1mg protein)1, and this did not change significantly during stress This constant GAT activity did not correlate with the induction of DRIP-1 protein during drought⁄ strong-light stress (Fig 2B)
Purification of GAT from wild watermelon leaves
To characterize the GAT in detail, it was purified from wild watermelon leaves (Table 1) The purification procedure was developed by taking advantage of the thermal stability of the GAT activity in crude extracts After centrifugation of the total leaf extract to remove cell debris, the supernatant was heated at 70C for
10 min and centrifuged Negligible loss of enzymatic activity and 24-fold purification were achieved Heat treatment was followed by six chromatography steps comprising hydrophobic interaction, anion and cation exchange, gel filtration, and hydroxyapatite chromato-graphies, resulting in more than a 7000-fold purifica-tion of GAT When analysed by SDS⁄ PAGE, two polypeptides of 27 kDa were detected in the sample (Fig 3A) Protein sequencing analysis revealed that the N-terminal amino acid sequences of the small (a) and large (b) polypeptide were XATNEAANYLPEAP and XMLGVVTTDAVVACDVWRKMVQISVDRSFNQI TVD, respectively; X represents unidentified amino
A
B
Fig 2 Enzymatic activities of AOD and GAT and accumulation of
DRIP-1 protein during the progressing drought ⁄ strong-light stress in
wild watermelon leaves (A) Changes in AOD (j) and GAT (h)
activity Data points represent means from three independent
experiments and vertical bars are SD (B) Immunoblot analysis of
DRIP-1 in the total soluble proteins (20 lg per lane) isolated from
plants before (0 day) and after 1, 2, 3 and 5 days of drought⁄
strong-light treatment.
Table 1 Purification of GAT from wild watermelon leaves.
Step
Protein (mg)
Total activity (U)
Specific activity (UÆmg)1)
Purification (fold)
Hydroxyapatite < 0.02 0.94 > 4.7 > 7000
Trang 4acids The N-terminal amino acid sequence of the a
peptide was identical to a portion of the amino acid
sequence predicted from a watermelon EST clone
(accession number AI563351)
Cloning of watermelon GAT cDNA
To isolate a full-length cDNA clone of the GAT,
gene-specific primers were designed from the sequence of
watermelon EST AI563351 and used for 5¢- and
3¢-RACE The cloned cDNA encoded a protein
composed of 460 amino acids The amino acid sequence had homology to At2g37500 from A thaliana (70% identity), B subtilis GAT (38%) and S cerevisiae GAT (26%) Two regions of the deduced sequence (residues 27–42 and 239–273) were identical to the N-terminal amino acid sequences of the a and b pep-tides determined by Edman sequencing, respectively (Fig 4); the enzyme was designated CLGAT (Citrullus lanatus glutamate acetyltransferase) The first 26-amino acid sequence at the N-terminus of CLGAT was pre-dicted to function as a chloroplast transit peptide using the chlorop program [21]
Genomic Southern blot analysis indicated that there are two copies of the GAT gene in wild watermelon (data not shown) To confirm that the cDNA cloned above was that of the GAT purified in this study, we screened a cDNA library (5· 106primary plaques) pre-pared from the mixture of stressed and unstressed leaves using the EST clone mentioned above as a probe Sequences of all nine clones isolated from the library were identical with the EST and the RACE-derived clone described above, indicating that only one type of GAT mRNA is transcribed in wild watermelon leaves Citrullus lanatus glutamate acetyltransferase (CLGAT) possessed the conserved AT(M⁄ L)L motif for the GAT family, where the precursor polypeptide
is self-cleaved between alanine and threonine residues (Fig 4, asterisk [22,23]); In fact, the N-terminal resi-due of the b peptide from purified CLGAT matched the second residue of this conserved motif These results strongly suggest that the precursor peptide of CLGAT in wild watermelon is also self-cleaved at the ATML sequence in a manner similar to those in other GATs reported so far The molecular masses of the a and b peptides calculated from the cDNA were 21.3 and 23.5 kDa, respectively – lower than those deter-mined by SDS⁄ PAGE (Fig 3A) However,
MALDI-MS analysis of CLGAT detected two major peaks at
m⁄ z 21.3 and 23.5 kDa, which corresponded to the masses deduced from the cDNA (data not shown) The molecular mass of native GAT was determined by gel filtration chromatography as 90 kDa (Fig 3B), suggesting that CLGAT is a heterotetramer composed
of two each of the a and b subunits
Analysis of the N-terminal transit peptide of CLGAT
Analysis of the CLGAT cDNA predicted a chloroplast transit peptide upstream from the N-terminus of CLGAT To examine whether the precursor of CLGAT is imported into the chloroplasts, we prepared
a plasmid in which the first 26 codons of the CLGAT
A
B
Fig 3 Molecular mass of GAT purified from leaves of wild
water-melon (A) SDS ⁄ PAGE of GAT The peak fraction obtained after
hydroxylapatite chromatography was analysed by PAGE (12% w ⁄ v,
polyaclylamide) and detected by silver staining (B) Molecular mass
of the native form of wild watermelon GAT was determined from
the plot between the elution volumes of the enzyme and marker
proteins in Superdex 200 gel chromatography Thy, thyroglobulin;
Fer, ferritin; Ald, aldolase; Ova, ovalbumin.
Trang 5cDNA were fused in-frame to the coding sequence of
green fluorescent protein (GFP) This fusion protein
was transiently expressed in tobacco leaves and the
pattern of GFP fluorescence was analysed by confocal
microscopy Chlorophyll autofluorescence was used
as the chloroplast marker When the putative GAT
transit sequence–GFP fusion protein was expressed in
the leaves, green fluorescence was superimposed on the chlorophyll autofluorescence giving yellow tint, but this was undetectable in the cytoplasm (Fig 5A) In contrast, when nonfusion GFP was introduced into the cells, the fluorescence was detected both in the cyto-sol and nucleus but was excluded from chloroplasts (Fig 5B) These observations strongly suggest that the
Fig 4 Comparison of the amino acid sequence of CLGAT (C; accession no AB212224) with those from At2g37500 from A thaliana (A),
B subtilis GAT (B) and S cerevisiae GAT(S) (accession nos AAC98066, NP389002, and NP012464, respectively) Consensus identical (black) and similar (grey) amino acids are shaded The sequences of the two N-terminal sequences of the purified CLGAT subunits determined by Edman sequencing are indicated by lines above the alignment The conserved motif involved in self-catalysed cleavage is marked by aster-isks Filled and open arrows indicate the predicted cleavage sites of the watermelon GAT precursor polypeptide that occur as a result of stromal processing peptidase and self-catalysed cleavage, respectively.
Trang 6precursor of CLGAT can be targeted to the
chloro-plasts, by the N-terminal transit sequence
Kinetic analysis of GAT purified from wild
watermelon
The enzyme activity of CLGAT was maximal at pH 7.0
(Fig 6A) The Km for the forward reaction at pH 7.0
was 3.4 mm for N-acetylornithine and 17.8 mm for
glutamate (Fig 6B,C) To examine the regulation of
CLGAT by downstream products, activity was
meas-ured at a physiologically relevant concentration of
citrulline or arginine Citrullus lanatus glutamate
acetyl-transferase activities in the presence of 30 mm citrulline
or 7 mm arginine were 100 and 98% of the original
activities, respectively, showing that CLGAT is not
inhibited by these downstream products In this study,
the effect of ornithine was not determined because the
concentration of ornithine in wild watermelon leaves is
very low and constant before or after drought⁄ strong
light stress, whereas concentrations of citrulline and
arginine in the leaves increased greatly during the
stress [6]
Surprisingly, CLGAT activity was maximum at
70C (Fig 6D) To determine its thermostability, the
enzyme was incubated for 30 min at various
tempera-tures between 30 and 90C and residual activity was
determined (Fig 6E) Citrullus lanatus glutamate
acetyl-transferase retained 98% of the original activity after
incubation at 70C, and still showed about 15% of the
original activity after incubation at 80C
The thermotolerance of CLGAT observed above prompted us to examine the leaf temperature under drought conditions in the presence of strong light at
an atmospheric temperature of 35C Under unstressed conditions, the rate of leaf transpiration was about 450 mmol H2OÆm)2Æs)1, and the leaf tem-perature was about 30C (Fig 7) In contrast, drought⁄ strong-light stress for five days decreased the rate of transpiration to 15 mmol H2OÆm)2Æs)1, and raised the leaf temperature to 44 C
Discussion
Citrulline is the most efficient hydroxyl radical scaven-ger among all known compatible solutes, and its role
in oxidative stress resistance in wild watermelon has been suggested [7] In microorganisms examined so far, the concentration of citrulline is kept low as a result of rigid regulations such as feedback inhibition and tran-scriptional regulation [8,9,24] In contrast, wild water-melon is unique for the massive accumulation of citrulline in the leaves in response to drought⁄ strong-light stress However, knowledge of the mechanism of this accumulation is limited It was previously sugges-ted that the stress-induced AOD homologue, DRIP-1,
is involved in citrulline accumulation [25], but its func-tion remains unclear Unexpectedly, it is revealed in this study that AOD activity was not detected in stressed leaves where DRIP-1 was expressed at a high level Instead, GAT activity was detected in leaves, suggesting that the fifth step of the citrulline pathway
A
import of which depends on its N-terminal transit peptide Fluorescence microscopy pictures of tobacco leaf cell transiently expressing a CLGAT-GFP fusion (A) or GFP alone as a control (B).
Trang 7is mainly catalysed by GAT in wild watermelon.
CLGAT was subsequently purified and identified from
wild watermelon This is the first report dealing with
GAT purified from plant sources
Under drought⁄ strong-light conditions, plants close
their stomata to avoid loss of water, thereby increasing
leaf temperature [26] In this study, the temperature of
wild watermelon leaves increased from 30 to 44C
under experimental stress conditions (Fig 7) Under
natural desert conditions, leaf temperature of stressed
wild watermelon plants rises up to 60C [27] In
this study, the optimum temperature of CLGAT was
revealed to be 70C, which was comparable to that
reported from the thermophilic microorganism B
stearo-thermophilus (Table 2) Moreover, CLGAT retained
about 15% of its original activity after incubation at
80C for 30 min, whereas GAT from B
stearothermo-philus completely lost its activity after incubation at
75C for 30 min [28] These results suggest that CLGAT
has adapted to the thermogenic condition of leaf tissue under drought in the presence of strong light
In stressed leaves of watermelon, citrulline and arginine accumulate massively to about 30 and 7 mm, respectively [6], raising the question as to what extent biosynthetic enzymes are inhibited by the downstream products The present results revealed that CLGAT was not inhibited by either citrulline or arginine This
is in contrast to GATs from other organisms: GAT from Thermus aquaticus ZO5 is strongly inhibited (Ki ¼ 1.75 mm [29]); and that from S cerevisiae is moderately inhibited by arginine (10% inhibition with
5 mm arginine [30]) Therefore, CLGAT can function without a loss of activity in the presence of high con-centrations of citrulline and arginine We did not examine whether CLGAT is inhibited by ornithine, another downstream product in the pathway Although several microbial GATs have been shown to
be inhibited by ornithine [28], the Ki for ornithine in
Fig 6 Kinetic analysis of CLGAT (A) The
pH dependency of CLGAT activity Enzyme
activity was determined between pH 4.2
and 7.8 in citrate ⁄ sodium phosphate buffer
(j) and Tris ⁄ HCl buffer (n) Activity is
expressed as a percentage of the maximal
activity (B and C) Saturation kinetics of
CLGAT for N-acetylornithine (B) and
glutam-ate (C) The concentration of
N-acetyl-ornithine was varied from 0.5 to 15 m M
with glutamate fixed at 10 m M in (B), and in
(C) that of glutamate was changed between
0.5 and 30 m M with N-acetylornithine fixed
at 10 m M Double reciprocal plot of CLGAT
activity against the concentration of
sub-strates are shown in the insets The fitted
linear regression lines and parameters are
also presented The K m was estimated
based on these parameters (D)
Tempera-ture dependency of CLGAT activity Enzyme
activity was measured by incubating the
reaction mixtures at 20–90 C Activity is
expressed as percentage of the maximal
activity (E) Thermostability of CLGAT The
enzyme was incubated for 30 min at the
indicated temperatures and residual enzyme
activity was measured at 30 C Values
represent the mean ± SE from three
independent measurements.
Trang 8these GATs is between 1 and 3 mm, much higher than the physiological concentration of ornithine (approxi-mately 0.1 mm) in the leaves of wild watermelon under drought and strong light stress [6]
The kinetics parameters obtained in this study enabled us to discuss the role of CLGAT in citrulline
unchanged during drought stress in the presence of strong light, an elevated leaf temperature from 30 to
44C would enhance the CLGAT reaction by about two times that under unstressed conditions as shown
in Fig 6D Moreover, an increased concentration of glutamate, a substrate for CLGAT, from 2.5 to 7.5 mm under drought⁄ strong-light conditions [6] would further elevate the CLGAT reaction by about 2.6-fold As CLGAT catalyses not only the fifth step, but also the first step of citrulline biosynthesis, these estimations suggest that the influx of glutamate carbon skeletons into the urea cycle is increased about fivefold during drought⁄ strong-light stress Thus, CLGAT can effectively participate in the citrulline biosynthesis under drought conditions through its unique proper-ties, namely, high thermostability and insensitivity to inhibitions induced by the downstream products such
as citrulline and arginine
A GFP-localization assay (Fig 5) suggested that CLGAT is a chloroplastic enzyme In S cerevisiae, ornithine biosynthetic enzymes including GAT are localized in mitochondria [15,30,31], and ornithine is exported to the cytosol to be converted into citrulline and arginine [31,32] In plants, information on the localization of citrulline and arginine biosynthetic enzymes is scarce, but it has been reported that ornith-ine carbamoyltransferase, an enzyme required for the sixth step in the citrulline and arginine pathway, is localized in chloroplasts in Canavalia lineate [33], rais-ing the possibility that citrulline biosynthesis in plants
is catalysed in chloroplasts In fact, cDNAs for all six citrulline biosynthetic enzymes in Arabidopsis were predicted as having chloroplast-targeting sequences using the various programs [18]
A
B
Fig 7 (A) Change in the stomatal conductance (h) and leaf
tem-perature (d) of wild watermelon plants during drought Data
points represent the means from three independent experiments
and vertical bars are the SD (B) Visualization of the thermal
distri-bution in wild watermelon plants Images 1 and 2 represent
photographs of wild watermelon plants watered daily and
subjec-ted to drought for 5 days, respectively, and images 3 and 4 show
their thermal distributions analysed using an infrared thermal
camera, respectively.
Table 2 Comparison of the kinetic parameters for GAT from wild watermelon, S cerevisiae and B stearothermophilus ND, not deter-mined.
Wild watermelon S cerevisiae a B stearothermophilus b
a
[15, 30].b[28].cExpressed as a percentage of the maximum activity.
Trang 9The CLGAT enzyme was composed of two
subunits, a and b, derived from a single precursor
polypeptide (Fig 3) The N-terminal amino acid
sequence of the b subunit from purified CLGAT
coin-cided with the cleavage site of the conserved motif,
ATML, in the sequence predicted from its cDNA
This suggests that the CLGAT precursor is
self-cleaved as proposed for other GATs generating two
subunits that assemble as an a2b2 heterotetramer
[22,23,28] Although such self-cleavage has been
sug-gested in several proteins other than GAT in plants
[34], CLGAT is the first example of the self-cleavage
for a chloroplastic protein
The function of DRIP-1 remains to be determined
In this study, no AOD activity was detected in wild
watermelon leaves in which abundant DRIP-1
accumu-lation was seen (Fig 2) Moreover, recombinant
DRIP-1 expressed in E coli had no detectable AOD
activity (data not shown) One possible explanation for
this discrepancy is that DRIP-1 requires a cofactor or
activator for its catalysis, although we tested Co2+
and Zn2+in the present enzymatic assays The second
possibility is that DRIP-1 possesses a different
func-tion unrelated to AOD
In this study, we demonstrated that CLGAT,
which catalyses the first and fifth steps of the
citrul-line biosynthetic pathway, can contribute effectively
to citrulline biosynthesis under drought conditions
owing to its high thermostability and insensitivity to
the inhibition induced by citrulline and arginine
However, many different enzymes are involved in the
metabolism of citrulline (Fig 1), and their kinetic
properties and⁄ or expression pattern remain to be
examined Comprehensive analysis of the citrulline
biosynthesis pathway is required to fully understand
the mechanism of citrulline accumulation in wild
watermelon
Experimental procedures
Materials
N-Acetylornithine was purchased from Sigma (St Louis,
MO, USA) Other chemicals and reagents were purchased
from Nakalai (Kyoto, Japan)
Plant material
Wild watermelon (C lanatus L sp no 101117-1) was
grown in a growth chamber (16⁄ 8 h light ⁄ dark regime at
temperatures of 35⁄ 25 C, 50 ⁄ 60% humidity and 800 lmol
photonsÆm)2Æs)1) in 500-mL paper pots Soil for
horti-culture was purchased from PROTOLEAF (Tokyo, Japan)
Plants were watered daily at 9 a.m (1 h after the start of the light period) Two-week-old plants with fully expanded fourth leaves were used in the experiments Drought treat-ment was started by stopping watering For GAT purifica-tion, the plants were grown in a greenhouse at a temperature between 25 and 35C for 2 months from June
to August in 2002
Analysis of leaf transpiration and temperature Transpiration of attached fourth leaves was measured at a light intensity of 800 lmol photonsÆm)2Æs)1at 35C using a porometer (type AP4; AT delta-T device, Cambridge, UK) Leaf temperature was measured using a thermometer (model AP-320, 0.25K-J1M1, Anritu meter, Tokyo), and thermal images were obtained using an infrared camera (TVS-8500, Nippon Avionics Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) Data were collected around 15:00 (7 h after the start of the light period)
Enzyme assays Acetylornithine deacetylase and GAT activity were measured by quantifying the production of ornithine from N-acetylornithine using the colorimetric ninhydrin procedure as described previously [11,15] The AOD assay mixture (200 lL) contained 100 mm potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.0, 6 mm N-acetylornithine, 0.5 mm metal salt (CoCl2 or ZnCl2) and the enzyme The GAT assay mixture (200 lL) contained 100 mm potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 6 mm N-acetylorni-thine, 6 mm glutamate and the enzyme The reaction was started by adding N-acetylornithine and stopped by adding 600 lL of ninhydrin reagent (0.4 m citric acid⁄ 1% ninhydrin in 2-methoxyethanol, 1 : 2 v⁄ v) After boiling for
10 min, 200 lL 4 m NaOH was added to the mixture and light absorbance at 470 nm was measured One unit
is defined as the amount of enzyme that forms 1 lmol ornithineÆmin)1
Purification of GAT from wild watermelon leaves All purification steps were carried out at 0–4C, and col-umn chromatographies were performed with FPLC system (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) Wild water-melon leaves (300 g) were homogenized with a blender in
300 mL extraction medium containing 100 mm potassium phosphate buffer pH 8.0, 1 mm EDTA, 10 mm 2-mercapto-ethanol, 1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 1% (w⁄ v) polyvinylpolypyrrolidone After filtering through six layers
of gauze, the resulting homogenate was centrifuged at
12 000 g for 30 min Unless stated otherwise the
centrifuga-tion described below was carried out in the same way N-Acetylornithine was added to the supernatant to give a
Trang 10final concentration of 10 mm The mixture was then
warmed in a water bath at 70C for 10 min with gentle
stirring The mixture was promptly cooled in an ice bath
until the temperature dropped below 4C and centrifuged
The supernatant was brought to 20% saturation by adding
(NH4)2SO4 powder, incubated on ice with gentle stirring
for 30 min and centrifuged The supernatant was applied to
a Butyl-Sepharose Fast Flow column (1.6 cm i.d.· 10 cm;
Amersham Bioscience) equilibrated with buffer A
contain-ing 20 mm potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.0, 1 mm
EDTA, 10 mm 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mm dithiothreitol
(DTT) and 20% (v⁄ v) glycerol, and 20% saturation of
(NH4)2SO4 The enzyme was eluted with a linear gradient
of 30–0% saturation of (NH4)2SO4 in buffer A Active
fractions were collected and applied to a Sephadex G-25
column (5 cm i.d.· 20 cm) equilibrated with buffer B
con-taining 5 mm potassium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0), 1 mm
EDTA, 10 mm b-mercaptoethanol, 1 mm DTT, and 20%
(v⁄ v) glycerol Active fractions were pooled and applied
to a Mono Q HR column (0.5 cm i.d.· 5 cm; Amersham
Bioscience) equilibrated with buffer B The column was
developed with a 0–200 mm linear gradient of KCl in buffer
B Active fractions were pooled and concentrated with
Centriplus YM-10 (Amicon, Bevery, MA, USA) The
enzyme solution was applied to a Sephadex 200 column
(1.6 cm i.d.· 60 cm; Amersham Bioscience) equilibrated
with 20 mm potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.0, 1 mm
EDTA, 10 mm 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mm DTT, 150 mm
KCl and 20% (v⁄ v) glycerol and developed with the same
buffer Active fractions were loaded onto a Mono Q HR
column (0.5 cm i.d.· 5 cm; Amersham Bioscience) then a
Mono S HR column (0.5 cm i.d.· 5 cm; Amersham
Bio-science) In these chromatographies GAT activity was
recovered in the flow-through fractions Active fractions
were applied to a Sephadex G-25 column (1.6 cm
i.d.· 10 cm) equilibrated with buffer C containing 5 mm
potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.0, 10 mm
2-mercapto-ethanol, 1 mm DTT, and 20% (v⁄ v) glycerol Active
frac-tions were applied to a hydroxyapatite column (0.7 cm
i.d.· 5.2 cm; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) equilibrated
with buffer C The column was developed with a 5–100 mm
linear gradient of potassium phosphate in buffer C
Aliqu-ots from the active fractions were used for SDS⁄ PAGE
on a 12.5% polyacrylamide gel, and proteins were
visualized by silver staining with a commercial kit
(Daiichikagaku Chemical, Osaka, Japan) Proteins were
measured according to the Bradford method [35], using
BSA as a standard
For analysis of the N-terminal amino acid sequence,
CLGAT subunits were separated by SDS⁄ PAGE and
electroblotted onto polyvinyldene difluoride membranes
Blotted proteins were stained with Coomassie Brilliant
R-250 Stained regions were cut from the membrane and
used for sequencing with an automated protein sequencer
(Model 492, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA)
For analysis of MALDI-TOF MS data 10 lL of purified CLGAT ( 0.5 mgÆmL)1) were mixed with 1 lL matrix solution containing 10 mgÆmL)1a-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid and 50% (v⁄ v) acetonitrile The mixture was loaded onto a sample plate and the solvent was removed by evapor-ation The molecular mass of CLGAT was determined by MALDI-TOF MS (Autoflex II, Bruker Daltonics, Billerica,
MA, USA), calibrated with insulin (5734 Da), cyto-chrome c (12361 Da), myoglobin (16952 and 8476 Da) and ubiquitin (8566 Da; all Sigma) as standard proteins
Western blotting Proteins from SDS⁄ PAGE were transferred to polyvinyl-dene difluoride membranes (Sequi-Blot PVDF membrane; Bio-Rad) using a semidry blotting apparatus (NA-1512, Ni-hon-Eido, Tokyo, Japan) The specific antibody for
DRIP-1 [25] was used at a dilution of DRIP-1 : 500 in buffer containing
30 mm Tris⁄ HCl buffer pH 7.5, 200 mm NaCl and 5% (w⁄ v) skim milk Immunoreactive proteins were detected with an Immunostaining HRP-1000 kit (Konica, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions
cDNA cloning Total RNA was prepared from 3 g wild watermelon leaves subjected to drought stress for 1 day using TRIzol (Invitro-gen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) Poly(A)+ RNA was isolated from the total RNA using a mRNA purification kit (Amer-sham Bioscience) according to the manufacturer’s instruc-tions The sequence of the watermelon EST clone (accession number AI563351) was used to design four GAT-specific primers; CLGAT5a (5¢-GGCATCAACAT-CACAAGCAACAAGTGCAAG-3¢), CLGAT5b (5¢-TCCT-CCATCAATCTGCTTCCATGGACCATC-3¢), CLGAT3a (5¢-GCTGTGGCTACGAATGAGGCCGCC-3) and CLGAT3b (5¢-AAGGGAGAGAAACCTGACCTTGCACTTG-3¢) The 5¢-RACE was performed using Marathon cDNA Amplification Kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, using CLGAT5a for the first PCR and CLGAT5b for the second PCR For 3¢-RACE, single-stranded cDNA was synthesized using First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Amersham Bioscience) with a NotI-d(T)18 bifunctional primer (5¢-TAA-CTGGAAGAATTCGCGGCCGCAGGAAT(18)-3¢) The single-stranded cDNA was used for PCR with the primers Not1 (5¢-AACTGGAAGAATTCGCGGCCGC-3¢) and CLGAT3a
An aliquot from the first PCR products was subjected to the second round of PCR using primers Not2 (5¢-GAAGAAT-TCGCGGCCGCAGG-3¢) and CLGAT5b Amplified products were cloned into the plasmid vector pBC (Stratagene, La Jolla,
CA, USA)
Sequencing was carried out using the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) with a DNA sequencer (model 3100, Applied Biosystems)