PART I - INTRODUCTION1 Introduction and rationale of the study The 21st century has witnessed the rapid development of information technology and its impacts on every aspect of our socia
Trang 1AN EVALUATION OF THE APPLICATION OF PHONICS SOFTWARE
IN AN ENGLISH COURSE FOR CHILDREN AT THINH QUANG
PRIMARY SCHOOL
Đánh giá việc ứng dụng phần mềm tiếng Anh Phonics đối với khóa học tiếng Anh
của học sinh tại trường tiểu học Thịnh Quang
M A MINOR THESIS
Field: English Teaching Methodology
Code: 601410
Hanoi – 2010
Trang 2AN EVALUATION OF THE APPLICATION OF PHONICS SOFTWARE
IN AN ENGLISH COURSE FOR CHILDREN AT THINH QUANG
PRIMARY SCHOOL
Đánh giá việc ứng dụng phần mềm tiếng Anh Phonics đối với khóa học tiếng Anh
của học sinh tại trường tiểu học Thịnh Quang
M A MINOR THESIS
Field: English Teaching Methodology
Code: 601410 Supervisor: Phùng Hà Thanh, M Ed
Hanoi - 2010
Trang 31 Introduction and rationale for the study
2 Aims and objectives of the study
3 Research questions
4 Scope of the study
5 Methods of the study
5 Significance of the study
6 Organization of the study
PART II - DEVELOPMENT
CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW
1 1 CALL Models in Language teaching and learning
1 2 Motivation and the Young – Learner
1 2 1 Definiton of Motivation
1 2 2 The Young-Learner
1 3 Instructional design
1 3 1 Instructional design and Motivation
1 3 2 Keller's ARCS Model
1122334
5
5678991010111212
Trang 42 1 2 Guided teaching techniques
2 2 An overview of the use of Phonics at Thinh Quang primary school
2 2 1 The origin of Phonics
2 3 2 The context of Thinh Quang school
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY
3 1 Research design
3 2 Participants of the study
3 3 Data collection
3 3 1 Data collection instrument
3 3 2 Data collection procedure
16
161619202020
21
212222222324
26
2626
262832343839
40
4040
42
Trang 5Instructional System DesignCourse Interest SurveyInstructional Materials Motivation Survey
Trang 6LIST OF TABLES AND CHARTS
Table 1 – 1 Summary of ARCS Components 13Table 4 – 1 Frequencies of Participants Concerning their Ages 26Table 4 - 2 Statistics of the ARCS Sub-Scores on IMMS 27Table 4 - 3 Statistics for the “Attention” Sub-scores on the IMMS 28Table 4 - 4 Statistics for the “Relevance” Sub-Scores on the IMMS 32Table 4 - 5 Statistics for the “Confidence” Sub-Scores on the IMMS 35Table 4 - 6 Statistics for the “Satisfaction” Sub-Scores on the IMMS 38Chart 4 - 1 Percentage and Number of respondents – Item #7 29Chart 4 - 2 Percentage and Number of respondents – Item #9 30Chart 4 - 3 Percentage and Number of respondents – Item #18 31Chart 4 - 4 Percentage and Number of respondents – Item #27 33Chart 4 - 5 Percentage and Number of respondents – Item #5 34Chart 4 - 6 Percentage and Number of respondents – Item #3 36Chart 4 - 7 Percentage and Number of respondents – Item #6 37Chart 4 - 8 Percentage and Number of respondents – Item #28 37
Trang 7PART I - INTRODUCTION
1 Introduction and rationale of the study
The 21st century has witnessed the rapid development of information technology and its
impacts on every aspect of our social life in which education in general and foreign languageteaching and learning in particular have been strongly affected It can be said that ICT hasbeen applied in many teachers‟ lectures to bring fun and interest to students in English classes
Ahead the trend of integration and development of technology, recognizing the benefit of ICT,
at the beginning of the year 2009, Thinh Quang primary school started using Phonics – anEnglish software - in English teaching and learning with the belief that Phonics would lay thefoundation to improve English language learning among children and create the environmentfor children practice English from the early age
It lies in the fact that Phonics is a newborn English program applied in some schools in
Vietnam including Thinh Quang primary school This program is also the novel practice ofPhonics at Thinh Quang It is partly for this deep-rooted reason that the researcher decided to
conduct the study to the extent the application of Phonics software brings about children’s motivation The researcher hold the belief that through the evaluation of the application of
Phonics there would bring insights into the changes of teaching practices among teachers tobetter it, and basic premise for the administrators in considering using this software
Specifically, the study is of: “An evaluation of the application of Phonics software in anEnglish course for children at Thinh Quang primary school ”
2 Aims and objectives of the Study
The study aims to evaluate the application of Phonics software based on the motivation
created on the part of children in an English course at Thinh Quang primary school
Hence, it is expected to achieve the four following objectives:
Trang 8
First, to investigate whether Phonics holds children attention
Second, to find out the relevance of the application of Phonics to the children level Third, to investigate if the application of Phonics brings children‟s confidence inlearning English at class
Last, to reveal children‟s satisfaction to the application of Phonics in the Englishcourse
3 Research questions
In order to achieve the aims of the study, the following research questions were raised:
(1) To what extent does Phonics hold children attention?
(2) To what extent is the application relevant to the children?
(3) To what extent does Phonics bring about children‟s confidence?
(4) To what extent are the children satisfied with the application?
4 Scope of the Study
The present study operates within the following scopes:
children in an English course at Thinh Quang primary school
This study is a case study since the instructional design is restricted by the children Regarding to the monitoring of the software, (Galavis, 1998) pointed out that
„Instead of being a simple holder and provider of knowledge, the teacher willbecome the guide of students ‟ The teacher, in this case, does play the role as theguider who controls the software leading children through every activity withoutintervening the content of the software
Trang 95 Methods of the Study
Case study was chosen as a research method applying for this study
A questionnaire was used as a main instrument on 141 children of 4 classes including grade 1and 2 at Thinh Quang primary school who have just finished the first level of the program –Phonics, i e , level starter, to investigate whether the instructional design brings about
motivation on children based on ARCS model of Keller (1993), including Attention,
Relevance, Confidence and Satisfaction
An interview is then conducted on some students for clarifying problems arising from the data
6 Significance of the Study
The research, first of all, would provide the researcher herself with further information tovalidate the new software for the children, to see whether it is a good one in term of the
motivational factors positively affected through its instructional design
The second significance of the study is for the improvement of English teaching and learning
at Thinh Quang primary school The research is of great value for the teachers by providingthem a deep overview from the extent that the instructional design brings about children‟smotivation The teachers then would have better adapting in their teaching to better children‟slearning
Last but not least significance of the study lies in the fact that it can bring the teachers, thestudents and the administrators the beliefs of using IT in language teaching and learning Theresearcher hopes that it would bring them positive beliefs on the use of information technology
in their class and school
Finally, the study then informs to the designers of the children‟s perception of their software Accordingly, they would aware of the strong and weak points of their product
Trang 107 Organization of the Study
This study consists of three main parts: introduction, development, and conclusion
The introduction presents the rationale, the aims and objectives, research questions, scope,method, significance and design of the study
The development comprises three chapters:
description of Keller‟s ARCS Model of Motivation and some prominent recent
researches on ARCS of Keller
Chapter two details the setting of the study in which all the language items displayed inthe software are specifically defined and the context of the study are also described Chapter three presents the methodology of the study
Chapter four is where the data are presented, the findings come up with and the
implications built upon the basis of the evaluation in the previous chapters
The conclusion, apart from summarizing the main issues so far touched upon in the study,proposes recommendation for future research
Trang 11PART II – DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW
This chapter reviews selected literature reflective the potential impact of instructional design
on learner motivation The chapter considers the popular models of CALL in language
teaching and learning and then reviews the relationship between motivation and the learner Next the chapter looks at the principles of instructional design system, including Keller’s ARCS Model of Motivation and its Motivation Instrumentation that support the theory of improving learner motivation It then ends by summarizing some prominent ARCS researches laying the foundation for the present study
young-1 young-1 CALL Models in Language teaching and learning
According to Taylor (1980, cited in Warschaure (1996), the first model of CALL is computer
as a tutor, adopting the role of the teacher He explained that the computer serves as a vehiclefor delivering instructional materials to the student Many of the early CALL exercises weredrill and practice activities, often focusing on accuracy and fluency The rationale for drill andpractice is as follows:
* Repeated exposure to the same material is beneficial or even essential to learning
* A computer is ideal for carrying out repeated drills, since the machine does not get boredwith presenting the same material and since it can provide immediate non-judgmental
feedback
* A computer can present such material on an individualized basis, allowing students toproceed at their own pace and freeing up class time for other activities
Based on these notions, a number of CALL tutoring systems were developed for the
mainframe computers One of the most sophisticated of these was the PLATO system, which
Trang 12included vocabulary drills, brief grammar explanations and drills, and translations tests atvarious intervals
In addition to computer as tutor, according to Taylor & Perez (1989) “another CALL modelused for communicative activities involves the computer as stimulus” (p 63) In this case, thepurpose of the CALL activity is not so much as a tutorial itself but to generate analysis, criticalthinking, discussion, and writing Software used for these purposes include various programswhich may not have been specifically designed for language learners, programs such as SimCity, Sleuth, or Where in the World is San Diego?
The third model of computers involves the computer as a tool (Taylor, 1980) or, as sometimes
called, the computer as workhorse (Taylor & Perez, 1989) In this role, the programs
empower the learner to use or understand language Wordstore, for example, allows users torecord vocabulary in a categorized dictionary, giving users both the opportunity to organizevocabulary effectively and to retrieve words or phrases with greater ease when completing atranslation or other similar text (Jones 1986, p 176, cited in Barr, 2004) Some more examples
of computer as tool include word processors, spelling and grammar checkers, desk-top
publishing programs, and concordancers
Of course the distinction between these models is not absolute A skill practice program can beused as a conversational stimulus, as a paragraph written by a student on a word processor Likewise, there are a number of drill and practice programs which could be used in a morecommunicative fashion - if, for example, students were assigned to work in pairs or smallgroups and then compare and discuss their answers
Among the three models offered by Taylor (1980), Phonics software embraced all
characteristics as of a tutor This means that it rejects the role of the teacher in class by
providing the instructional materials itself
1 2 Motivation and the Young - Learner
Trang 13(1) motivational intensity
(2) desire to learn the language
(3) attitude towards learning the language
Gardner argued that these three components belong together because truly motivated
individual displays all three The orientation helps to arouse motivation and then directs ittowards a set of goals, either with a strong interpersonal quality or a strong practical quality
From Keller‟s point of view, motivation “refers to the magnitude and direction of behavior…
it refers to the choices people make as to what experience or goals they will approach or avoid,and to the degree of effort they will exert in that respect” (Keller, 1983, p 369) He then addsthree underlying assumptions for systematic motivational design as (a) people‟s motivationscan be influenced by external events; (b) motivation, in relation to performance, is a meansand not an end; and (c) systematic design and implementation can predictably and measurablyinfluence motivation Put it another way, motivation based on Keller‟s definition, is measured
by the amount of effort the student makes in order to attain the instructional goal
As can be inferred from the two definitions of motivation, the core elements in both are theattitude, the effort and experience Since the study focus on instructional design of the
software that bring about students‟ motivation, the definition of Keller is specific and ofreferable
Trang 141 2 2 The Young-Learner
As the study deals with the subject of motivation, and more specifically, motivation in
instructional design, it is useful to consider the subject of young learners
Foreign language instruction must take into the needs and characteristics of young learners inorder to be successful Teaching objectives and approaches should be geared to the learners‟cognitive level and interests Young learners at the transition level (ages 5–8) generally havethe following characteristics They are:
imaginative and creativeactive and like to move aroundinterested in explorationlearn by doing/hands-on experienceholistic, natural learners searching for meaningful messages (Málfríđur, 2007:27)
For although they are broad in context, these characteristics provide a basic framework aroundwhich the e-courses can be developed that will enhance young learner motivation to engageand continue in the courses
Young children are sensitive to the sounds and the rhythm of new languages and they enjoycopying new sounds and patterns of intonation In addition, younger learners are usually lessanxious and less inhibited than older learners (Pinter, 2006, cited in Málfríđur, 2007)
The above needs and characteristics of young learners have implications for language
instruction The instructional designs should provide a wide range of opportunities for hearingand using the language and play should be an active part of the learning Tasks should be
Trang 15meaningful and help children to make sense of new experiences by relating them to what theyalready know The use of routine and repetition should be emphasized along with
opportunities for interaction and cooperation Finally, encouragement is necessary to maintainchildren‟s positive attitudes, motivation, and self-confidence
1 3 Instructional design
1 3 1 Instructional design and Motivation
An important characteristic of instructional design highlighted in the literature is the systemsapproach or Instructional Systems Design (ISD) "Instructional design is concerned withunderstanding, improving, and applying methods of instruction" (Reigeluth, 1983, p 7) Johnson and Johnson (1985), writing on the subject of instructional design, warn againstsubscribing to the technology fallacy in which the designer focuses on the technology to beused in delivering learning as the mechanism for exciting students to learn, rather than
focusing on overall design strategies intended to motivate learners The methodology
prescribed by the different ISD processes follow many of the same patterns There is an
analysis phase normally included at the outset of the process during which the need for alearning intervention is determined During this stage, learner attributes are also assessed as ameans of determining the most appropriate instructional process for the learning style of thosesubjected to the learning intervention This phase is often referred to as a needs assessment oranalysis Rothwell and Kasanas (1992) refer to this phase as that which identifies, documents,and justifies gaps between what is valid now and what should be valid for any gaps in
knowledge to be closed The next phase normally focuses on a design function through whichthe intended instructional piece is sculpted This is perhaps the most critical phase of theprocess because the eventual shape and format of the instructional product is created duringthe design phase Keller (1983) points out that during the design phase, consequences related
to motivation are identified and combined with cognitive techniques to influence the eventualoutcome of the instructional process The blending of these two design considerations iscritical to both the delivery methodology and to the educational value of the instruction Keller
Trang 16emphasizes the need to keep motivational and cognitive aspects of the design process in mind
at all times and not allow influences of efficiency and effectiveness to subsume the overallprocess
1 3 2 Keller's ARCS Model
Prominently, John Keller is perhaps the most well-known and often quoted author of theoriesdirectly related to motivation through instructional design He especially addressed the
motivational issues within the instructional context Keller's research resulted in the
determination of four design categories for which he developed strategies aimed at ensuringthe inclusion of motivation in the ISD process As he claimed „the ARCS model includes asystematic design process that can be used within typical instructional design and developmentmodels (Keller, 1987, p 6) Research applying the model will be discussed in more detail later
in this part, but first it is necessary to describe the four dimensions of Keller‟s ARCS model,beginning with learner attention
1 3 2 1 Attention
Attention refers to the ability to capture the interest of learners, to pique their curiosity tolearn, and to hold their attention (Keller, 1992) Keller (1992) differentiates three types ofattention: (1) Perceptual Arousal; (2) Inquiry Arousal, and; (3) Variability
Through Perceptual Arousal (A1), curiosity is piqued to gain the attention of learners (Keller,1992) Methods of gaining attention include providing visually appealing graphics or
unexpected actions to capture learner interest Through Inquiry Arousal (A2), this initialperceptual attention can be maintained for greater lengths of time Methods of sustainingattention include asking challenging or stimulating questions and integrating inductive andproblem-solving approaches With either of these types of attention, Variability (A3) is
important to prevent learner boredom (with too little variation) or frustration (with too muchvariation)
Trang 17Gagne and Driscoll (1988) detail three actions that can be used to enhance learner attention These are:
vary the appearance or sound of instructional materials;
use concrete examples for every abstraction that is presented; andsurprise the learner with novelty and incongruity (p 72)
Keller (1999) added more by noticing that rich graphics, color, and animation, when usedappropriately, can help improve learner motivation and performance
1 3 2 2 Relevance
Relevance refers to the connection of the instructional content to things that are meaningful tothe learners One aspect of relevance is concerned with ensuring that learners see the
connection between what they need to know and what new learning opportunities are
presented to them Keller (1992) identifies three categories of tactics dealing with relevance:(1) Goal Orientation; (2) Motive Matching, and (3) Familiarity
Through Goal Orientation (R1), the instruction is related to learners‟ goals (Keller, 1992) With Motive Matching (R2), tactics could include encouraging learners to visualize achieving
a goal, or appealing to personal interests and learning styles The third of Keller‟s (1992)categories of relevance tactics is Familiarity (R3) The premise of this construct is to connectthe instruction to the learner‟s own experiences
Strategies suggested by Gagné and Driscoll (1988) for assuring instructional relevance includethe following:
Trang 18 taking steps to convince the learner of the value of what is learned for futureactivities that are valued (p 73)
1 3 2 3 Confidence
Bandura (1997) notes that people who believe they have control over their capacity to affectchange in their lives are more effective and successful Confidence refers to these positiveexpectancies for success by learners Keller (1992) presents three methods of instilling
confidence in learners: (1) Learning Requirements; (2) Positive Consequences, and (3)
Personal Responsibility
Learners are informed of the expectations through Learning Requirements (C1) (Keller, 1992)
An obvious tactic is to provide learners with clear learning objectives and expected outcomes
of the instruction Positive Consequences (C2) occur when learners are challenged an
appropriate amount Finally, Personal Responsibility (C3) involves ensuring that learners feelthat they succeeded due to their ability rather than because the task was too easy, they werelucky, or other external factors played a role (Keller, 1992)
Gagné and Driscoll (1988) suggest the following strategies to promote learner confidence:
communicate clear and definite learning objectives;
sequence successive lessons or learning tasks so that each can be readilymastered; and
permit learners to take an increasing degree of control over the sequence oflearning and over (p 74)
1 3 2 4 Satisfaction
Satisfaction refers to learners‟ positive feelings about their learning experiences, and it
includes affirmation to learners that the instructional content was relevant and that they had
Trang 19the ability to learn the material Keller (1992) identifies three kinds of tactics to improvelearner satisfaction: (1) Intrinsic Reinforcement; (2) Extrinsic Rewards, and (3) Equity
Intrinsic Reinforcement (S1), or an internal desire to learn, is most aligned with
self-directedness Through Extrinsic Rewards (S2), learners are recognized for their
accomplishments, either verbally or through actual rewards Equity (S3) includes learnerperceptions of fair and equal treatment, which are essential to motivation regardless of thecontext
Gagné and Driscoll (1988) suggest that attainment of learner satisfaction is perhaps the easiest
of the ARCS components to achieve Satisfaction is attained using feedback to bring aboutreinforcement By using a thorough feedback process with many learning iterations,
satisfaction with a single learning experience "develops into a self management skill (actually,
a cognitive strategy) that gives support to learner confidence, maintains attention, and therelation of learning activities to long-term goals" (Gagné & Driscoll, 1988, p 77)
In summary, components of the ARCS model (see Table 1-1) can be addressed with variousinstructional strategies Sound instructional design tactics with clear and attainable objectivesthrough chunking of information help direct learners through technology-mediated instruction Opportunities for reality-based practice, games, and simulations help learners remain engagedthroughout the process Customized feedback on practice items helps learners improve theirconfidence and knowledge while giving them opportunities to review areas that need
clarification All of these components enable an instructional designer to conduct a requisitemotivational analysis of learners
A1 Perceptual Arousal R1 Goal
Orientation
C1 LearningRequirements
S1 IntrinsicReinforcementA2 Inquiry Arousal R2 Motive
Matching
C2 PositiveConsequences
S2 Extrinsic Rewards
Trang 20A3 Variability R3 Familiarity C3 Personal S3 Equity
Responsibility
Table 1 – 1: Summary of ARCS Components
1 3 3 Motivation Instrument
Keller developed two instruments that measure ARCS components of motivation, the
Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) and the Course Interest Survey (CIS) TheIMMS is a situational measure to identify motivation with specific instructional materials, andthe CIS is a situational measure to identify motivation in a specific course The IMMS hasbeen tested extensively for reliability, primarily on undergraduate and graduate students, while
a handful of studies have used the CIS This study, therefore, employs the IMMS as the tool toidentify motivation with specific instructional materials of Phonics in an English course forchildren at Thinh Quang primary school
The Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) is a 36-item survey with a Likert-typescale (Keller, 1993) It has been validated in a number of studies, primarily with
undergraduate students Participants are asked to think about each statement in relation to theinstructional materials they have just studied, and to indicate how true each statement is Theresponse scale ranges from 1 (Not True) to 5 (Very True) Thus, the minimum score on the 36item survey is 36, and the maximum is 180 with a midpoint of 108 The minimums,
maximums, and midpoints for each subscale vary because they do not all have the samenumber of items There are 5 subscales: one for each of the ARCS components (Attention,Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction) and one for the ARCS total score Ten of the 36 itemsare reversed
1 3 4 Researches on ARCS
ARCS has been studied in many different environments, including traditional classroom-basedinstruction, distance learning environments, computer aided instruction, and with multimediaapplications (Visser & Keller, 1990)
Trang 21In recent years, motivation studies have been undertaken in Turkey that focuses on the ARCSMotivational Design Model In her study, Çetin (2007, cited in Gabrielle, 2003) examinesstudent achievement and permanence of learning using a computer assisted education softwarebased on ARCS
In one study, Song (1998) used Keller‟s ARCS motivational design model to develop
computer-based instruction for middle school students The study involved one control andtwo experimental groups; all groups received different levels of motivation during instruction The study revealed that the group that received motivationally adaptive instructions hadsignificantly higher levels of attention, relevance, motivation, and effectiveness than thosestudents in the control group
A review of the literature reveals that most of the studies related to ARCS are about using themodel in the design and development of motivation in the learning process Provided theempirical reports on the power of ARCS employing measuring upon students' motivation arecorrect The present study aims to help fill this gap by conducting research to evaluate theextent to which the application of Phonics software brings about motivation to the children in
an English course at Thinh Quang primary school Obviously, the study employs the ARCS asthe instrument to collect data
Trang 22CHAPTER 2: THE DESIGN OF PHONICS AND AN OVERVIEW OF THE USE OF
PHONICS at THINH QUANG PRIMARY SCHOOL
2 1 The design of Phonics
2 1 1 Phonics structure
Phonics consists of 6 levels, including Starter, Level 1, Level 2, Level 3, Level 4 and Level 5
It was designed with the aim of providing a Standard English environment for children inwhich they can shape their habit of using English in natural ways At the outset, only children
of 6 and 7 (grade 1 and 2) at Thinh Quang primary school are involved in the course Thus, theresearcher would like to focus on the detail description of the first level for those of grade 1and 2: Starter Level
Starter level consists of 26 lessons written on the basis of themes with rich and lively
characters for a more powerful delivery and effective learning Each lesson is made up of ten
Trang 23lesson activities which enable children to learn, understand, and apply what is learnt
effectively Each lesson is delivered in 5 periods (35 minutes for each) The children meettwice a week
These ten activities are as stated below with their respective details of purpose
Learn to Sound
This comprises three subcomponents: Letter, Sound and Song Children will be introduced tothe basic sounds of the letters in the alphabet, accompanied by the object which would then belearnt in the story A sing-along session is introduced to serve to reinforce the sounds andpronunciation learnt earlier
Learn to Listen
Children will be introduced to the speech patterns and story in this simple conversation
between the characters in the scene The object introduced in the earlier segment is alsodiscussed in this part
Learn to Answer
A simple comprehension segment here makes for interesting question and answer sessionbetween children and the teacher, or among children themselves
Learn New Words
New words together with the object introduced in the Sound segment are introduced here toenhance and expose children to a wider scope of vocabulary An Action Song is introducedhere to encourage children to participate and enjoy themselves while learning as well asreinforcing what is learnt
Learn to Talk About …
Trang 24A simple dialogue between the characters in the scene on the object introduced earlier In thissegment, children will be exposed to the ways of conversations as well as methods and wordsused in describing things Creativity and thinking skills are also nurtured here with a simpleintroduction of some general knowledge elements
This is a simple and fun reader for children to indulge in for fun reading Simple descriptions
of the object introduced makes for a better understanding towards the object
Learn to Speak
Having listened and learned the ways of conversation in the earlier segments, children areencouraged to speak in this segment Beginning with short sentences, children progress fromjust speaking and answering to asking simple questions as well, to ensure an effective two –way communication
Learn to Write
Children will be taught the correct way of writing each letter of the alphabet Guide strokes areprovided to ensure the correct sequence and proper way of writing Children will also have funcoloring the objects for each letter
Learn to Remember
This is a fun session to test and gauge if children have fully understood what the have learnt,
Trang 25with simple animated flash cards
Apart from ten sessions, Phonics has a system of songs using for warm up and revising newwords The aim of these is to enhance children‟s sense of music, the ability to rememberwords, pronunciation and to build up their long-term memory work Besides, Phonics songsused in the program are to create a joyful and harmony environment for the class which can, tosome extent, attract children and reduce their stress in learning
2 1 2 Guided teaching techniques
Listen and repeat: Children listen to model and repeat in chorus, groups and individuals
Listen for wanted information: Children listen to a story (i e Learn to Listen) and then learn
to read again, retell the story and then answer questions related to the content of the story
Questions and answers: Children practice listen and answer the questions in chorus, groups
and individuals
Description: Children imagine that they are the character and then do the typical actions of
that character in the lesson
Role – play: Children play the role of the character and sound like the character or act out the
scene of the story
Back chaining: Use for the long reading sentences to help children practice reading and
sounding from the back up
Sing to learn: Children learn news words or words with songs and actions together
Write and draw: Children learn to write by remembering the symbols of the letters and draw
them
2 2 An overview of the use of Phonics at Thinh Quang primary school
Trang 262 2 1 The origin of Phonics
Phonics is an English program applying Standard English (Received Pronunciation) to teachchildren from different countries in the world It was studied and designed by a first – leadingcompany providing online learning methods in Education (United Kingdom) The father of thePhonics is Prof Dr Gerry Knowles who is a linguist, a phonetician and also the author ofmany English books like Longmans (1987)
Since 2006, advocating the Policy from Ministry of Education, the extensive English program
is open to all primary schools in Vietnam As the result, the Phonics program is welcomed andapplied in many schools around the country so far
2 2 2 The context of Thinh Quang school
Thinh Quang is one of the pioneers in applying this software in English teaching and learning
at primary level
The program is first delivered to 4 classes which encourage volunteer children from grade oneand two at school The total number of children joined in Phonics classes is 141 divided into 4small classes with the average of 35 students each Each class was equipped with a largescreen connected to a CPU (computer) that would present the content of the lesson Thechildren in U shape-seated will follow the guiding from teacher from the screen went throughlesson by lesson The teacher just works as a guider instructs students through activities notintervene the content of the lessons on screen
Trang 27CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY
This section begins with a description of the research design and then provides a description
of the subjects involved in the study It then examines the instrumentation, procedures, and data analysis methods used to conduct the study
3 1 Research design
Altman (1976) describes a case study as an "instance in action" (in Nunan 1992, p 75) wherethe researcher usually observes particular characteristics of an individual unit in the context inwhich it occurs The main aim of case studies is to explore what constitutes the life cycle ofthis unit with a view to establishing generalizations about the wider population to which itbelongs In the same vein, this study is to evaluate the instructional design of the software tothe extent of its possibility to motivate children in an English course in context of ThinhQuang primary school
Altman (1976), then suggests that case studies are strong in reality and consequently likely toappeal to practitioners because one can generalize from a case or from an instance to a class, avariety of view points can be made which may offer support to a wealth of diverse
interpretations, and lastly, case study data are usually more accessible than conventionalresearch accounts, and therefore capable of serving multiple audiences (in Nunan, 1992) As inthis study, the case is carried out at the context of a primary school with the participation of
141 children from four Phonics classes in the school year of 2009 to 2010
This is a case but not an action research because in this study the role of the teacher is notimportant The teacher just takes the role of guiding children through each segment or activitywithout intervening in the content of the lessons at all Furthermore, the researcher herselfdesires to know and understand the instructional design of the course that takes effects onchildren‟s motivation at different groups of children in context of Thinh Quang
This study also cannot be a survey since the researcher just would like to focus on
Trang 28instructional design of the software not something else Consequently, the study is conducted
in the context of only Thinh Quang primary school
3 2 Participants of the Study
The population of the study is 141 children from four Phonics classes; including two classes ofgrade 1 and 2 classes of grade two that started to learn English with Phonics from school year
of 2009 to 2010 All of the children from grade 1 and 2 did not learning English before sincethe primary level has not been required to study English by Ministry of Education so far English is just obligatory subject to grade 3 upwards This is the first time the school
integrated using computer - software program to teach English to children The study wascarried out at the time the children have just finished the first level of starter of the softwareprogram and are going to move to next level next year
In order to have enough quantity of children participate in the study, the researcher chose thewhole population The sample in the present study was representative of the population in alldemographic areas
3 3 Data collection
3 3 1 Data collection instrument
Phase one: Questionnaire
Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS)
Reason for choosing the instrument: The instrument is to find out how motivated students are,were, or expect to be, by a particular course using particular instructional material The
expectation is that the survey can be used with undergraduate and graduate students, adults innon-collegiate settings, and with secondary students They can also be used with youngerstudents who have appropriate reading levels With younger students or ones who are not
Trang 29sufficiently literate in English, some of the items may have to be read aloud and paraphrased
to relate them to the classroom experiences of the audience (Keller, 1993)
The questionnaire for the children slightly adapted from Keller (1993) consisting of 30 closedquestions (Likert scale) to result in the exact number and the specific information about thematter studied It comprises of four categories of Keller (Attention, Relevance, Confidence,and Satisfaction)
The questionnaire contained an introductory section addressing children demographics
followed by second section containing 30 questions that used a Likert-type scale to measurelearner motivation Eight of the 30 questions were negatively worded to increase the strength
of the questionnaire
The questionnaire format was developed by Keller (1993) as the Instructional MaterialsMotivation Survey (IMMS) The questions in each questionnaire were altered only to theextent needed to fit the lesson structure used in this research There are two versions of thequestionnaires of both English and Vietnamese For children fully understand the questions,the questionnaire was translated into Vietnamese and given to them after the course
Phase two: A follow – up interview
A follow-up interview was done to clarify children‟s individual comments or explanations onsome the reversed items These reveal their thoughts and feelings concerning the statementsthat convey the contradict opinions The interview was done in Vietnamese so they could fullyexplain even their abstract thoughts without any difficulties The translation was then checkedfor accuracy
3 3 2 Data collection procedure
Phase one:
Trang 30The questionnaire delivered to 141 children at grade 1 and 2 at Thinh Quang primary school,including 65 from grade 1 and 76 from grade 2 Collecting data from children presents
particular difficulties There may be greater variation in comprehension and interpretation ofitems than with adults, and there may be lapses in concentration in responding to a long
questionnaire (the instrument had 3 pages of scale items) The administration of the
questionnaire was led by the researcher in class The items were read aloud by the researcher,who monitored the children‟ progress in completing the questionnaire, but without influencing
in any way the responses marked She used the black board to ensure clear shared
understanding of how to respond by marking scale responses This approach provided forflexibility in the time taken to complete the instrument, and for some explanations to be
provided where children had queries The researcher administering the questionnaire includedobservations on individual items of children‟s reactions to them when they returned the
completed questionnaire
The questionnaire was processed by using the descriptive statistics, finding out the sub-scoresand total scores, mean, and standard deviation The data for the evaluation was collected andanalyzed by the researcher After the children finished answering all the questions during 30minutes, she collected them to analyze
Phase two:
The data was processed with the aid of eight students‟ interview: 2 from each class based ontheir opinions in the survey questionnaire: A transcript was done first After that, it was alsointegrated into the topics and quoted This is aimed at triangulating the data
3 4 Data analysis
The questionnaire was scored according to the scoring procedure detailed by Keller (1993) inthe guiding score (Appendix C) (some questions were reverse scored) to compute totals foreach of the ARCS components and the total score for the questionnaire For example, eachquestion had five possible responses If the respondent selected a (2) for a particular question,
Trang 31the question received a score of two If the question was reversed scored, the (2) would receive
a score of four and a (4) would receive a score or two All questions representing Attention forindividual questionnaire were added together and divided by 11, which is the number ofquestions associated with Attention in each questionnaire to arrive at an average Attentionscore for that questionnaire This process was repeated for the other ARCS components for thequestionnaire total The result was the scores for each ARCS motivational element As theresult, the software is of practical significance if the total point is greater than midpoints oftotal
For deeper understanding the subscore items of ARCS, the research used SPSS to calculatemean, standard deviation of each item in each subscale in ARCS The standard of each
criterion was set before hand as followings: