A disulfide bridge close to the S2 site in the Serratia and Vibrio pep-tidases, an extensive hydrogen bond network in a tight loop close to the substrate binding site in the Serratia pept
Trang 1from a psychrotroph Serratia species
Ronny Helland1, Atle Noralf Larsen2, Arne Oskar Smala˚s1,3and Nils Peder Willassen1,2
1 Norwegian Structural Biology Centre, Faculty of Science, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
2 Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
3 Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
Peptidases are enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of
peptide bonds in other proteins, and are often used in
biotechnology and other industries About 60% of the
industrial enzymes sold are peptidases [1] Neutral
pep-tidases are active within a relatively narrow range
(pH 5–8) and are often used in the food industry
Alkaline peptidases are generally highly active around
pH 10, have broad substrate specificity and are active
at high temperatures (around 60C) Due to the vast
amount of sequence, structure and kinetic data,
peptid-ases are excellent model systems for studying factors
important for protein stability, substrate specificity and
catalytic efficiency Knowledge about these factors can
be further exploited in the redesign of proteins in order
to give enzymes with altered specificity and⁄ or bio-physical properties ([2–5] for redesign of subtilases and [6–8] for rational redesign in general)
Enzymes from microorganisms adapted to low tem-peratures (0C to 4 C), so-called psychrophiles, are often characterized by higher catalytic efficiency and lower temperature stability than their homologues from more temperate species The increased efficiency appears
to be at the expense of the stability, and is believed to be caused by a more flexible structure [9,10] Increased
Keywords
proteinase K; psychrophilic; S’ binding;
substrate specificity; subtilase; subtilisin
Correspondence
R Helland, Norwegian Structural Biology
Centre, Faculty of Science, University of
Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
Fax: +47 77644765
Tel: +47 77646474
E-mail: ronny.helland@chem.uit.no
Website: http://norstruct.uit.no
Enzymes
Serratia sp peptidase (EC 3.4.21.-);
protein-ase K (EC 3.4.21.64); Vibrio sp peptidprotein-ase
(EC 3.4.21.-).
(Received 7 September 2005, revised 25
October 2005, accepted 31 October 2005)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.05040.x
Proteins from organisms living in extreme conditions are of particular interest because of their potential for being templates for redesign of enzymes both in biotechnological and other industries The crystal struc-ture of a proteinase K-like enzyme from a psychrotroph Serratia species has been solved to 1.8 A˚ The structure has been compared with the struc-tures of proteinase K from Tritirachium album Limber and Vibrio sp PA44
in order to reveal structural explanations for differences in biophysical properties The Serratia peptidase shares around 40 and 64% identity with the Tritirachium and Vibrio peptidases, respectively The fold of the three enzymes is essentially identical, with minor exceptions in surface loops One calcium binding site is found in the Serratia peptidase, in contrast to the Tritirachium and Vibrio peptidases which have two and three, respect-ively A disulfide bridge close to the S2 site in the Serratia and Vibrio pep-tidases, an extensive hydrogen bond network in a tight loop close to the substrate binding site in the Serratia peptidase and different amino acid sequences in the S4 sites are expected to cause different substrate specificity
in the three enzymes The more negative surface potential of the Serratia peptidase, along with a disulfide bridge close to the S2 binding site of a substrate, is also expected to contribute to the overall lower binding affinity observed for the Serratia peptidase Clear electron density for a tripeptide, probably a proteolysis product, was found in the S’ sites of the substrate binding cleft
Abbreviations
PRK, proteinase K; SPRK, Serratia proteinase K; Suc-XXXX-pNa, succinyl-(amino acid)4-p-nitroanilide where X represent the one letter code of the amino acid; VPRK, Vibrio sp PA44 proteinase K.
Trang 2flexibility of the molecule reduces the activation energy
for formation of reaction intermediates, and results in
a more efficient turnover of the substrates The low
temperature optimum and temperature stability makes
psychrophilic enzymes particularly useful in reactions
performed at low temperatures and in reactions that
needs an easy inactivation
In a quest for finding peptidases with properties
which could be further evolved into biotechnological
or industrial use proteinase K, a serine peptidase of
the subtilisin superfamily, or subtilases, was chosen as
a model enzyme Proteinase K is a very stable enzyme
with broad substrate specificity which previously has
been used primarily for removal of RNase activity
[11], but has found other applications such as
identi-fication and decontamination of the prion protein
responsible for scrapie [12,13] The binding region in
the subtilases is capable of accommodating at least six
amino acid residues (P4–P2¢; notation according to
Schechter and Berger [14]) of a polypeptide substrate
or inhibitor [15], and both main chain and side chain
interactions contribute to binding Although several
subsites contribute to specificity in the subtilases, the
most important interactions are those between the
sub-strate and the S1 and S4 binding sites [16], where
favo-rable P4–S4 interactions seem to eliminate or reduce
unfavorable effects introduced at other subsites [17]
A new proteinase K-like enzyme isolated from a
psychrotroph Serratia species (SPRK), sharing about
40% sequence identity with proteinase K from fungus
Tritirachium album Limber (PRK), has been identified,
cloned and expressed [18] The biophysical
characteri-zation of SPRK did not reveal the classical cold
adap-ted features [19], but still initial comparative studies
showed that the catalytic turnover was at least twice
that of PRK, but substrate affinity was reduced SPRK
was compared with PRK and was found to be
remark-able stremark-able against SDS denaturation while being
con-siderable more labile towards the presence of EDTA
In this paper, the 3D structure of SPRK is described
and compared to the structures of PRK (PDB 1ic6 [20]),
and Vibrio sp PA44 (VPRK; PDB 1sh7 [21]), and an
attempt is made to give structural explanations for some
of the differences observed in biophysical properties In
addition, the presence of a tripeptide bound to the prime
side (S¢) of the active site is reported
Results and discussion
Crystallization, data collection and refinement
Crystals of the catalytic domain of the Serratia
prote-inase K (SPRK) grew within a few days to thin
hexa-gonal plates growing in bundles, and were up to 0.2· 0.1 · 0.02 mm3 A complete data set to 1.8 A˚ was collected Data collection and refinement charac-teristics are listed in Table 1 The crystals belonged to space group C2 with unit cell of 86 · 42 · 74 mm3 and b¼ 110.2 and with one molecule in the asymmet-ric unit Rsym(Rsym¼ R ŒI) <I>Œ ⁄ RI, where I is the observed intensity and <I> is the average intensity) was about 11%, I⁄ rI was about 6 and multiplicity was about 3.7 The final R-factors are 16.0% (Rwork) and 19.3% (Rfree)
The refined structure contains about 3900 protein atoms, including a tripeptide found in the active site binding cleft, and 225 solvent atoms including two
SO42–ions and one Ca2+ion The average B-factor is 8.86 A˚2 for all enzyme atoms and 10.05 A˚2 for all atoms The electron density is well defined for the whole molecule and only a small number of side chains
on the molecular surface could not be fitted into elec-tron density One residue was refined with alternate conformations
The structure of the Serratia peptidase Overall fold
The sequence (Fig 1) identity between SPRK and the two other peptidases is about 40 and 64% (PRK and VPRK, respectively), but still the fold of SPRK is virtu-ally identical to PRK and VPRK (Fig 2) The struc-tures of the two bacterial peptidases are more similar to each other than to PRK SPRK superimposes on PRK and VPRK with an root mean square deviation (rmsd) value of 1.47 and 0.66 A˚, respectively, for all main chain atoms, excluding the inserted or deleted regions
Table 1 Data collection and refinement statistics for SPRK.
Cell parameters
Number of observations (24 – maximum resolution) 108140
R sym 15.0 A ˚ – resolution limit (%) 11.4 (38.1*)
*Outer shell: 1.9–1.8 A˚
Trang 3Eight regions in the three proteinase K structures
can be considered to display differences in the fold of
the main chains None of these includes any of the
binding sites, but some are located in the vicinity
Three of the regions with different conformation
involve calcium binding and four of them involve
insertion or deletion of amino acids This can probably
influence the flexibility and stability of the enzymes
SPRK and VPRK have an insertion of three dues in the loop comprising residues 58–65 after resi-due 60 At the end of this loop SPRK and VPRK have a cysteine residue, Cys66, which forms a disulfide bridge to residue 98, which is in the proximity of the S2 binding site Cys66 is also close to the catalytic triad residue His69 The potential effect of the disulfide bridges will be discussed further below The region
Fig 1 Structural alignment of SPRK, PRK and VPRK Helices (red tubes) and sheets (yellow arrows) are according to SPRK Residues belonging to the S1 site are shaded blue and residues belonging to the S4 site are shaded light blue *represents residues that are involved both in the S1 and S4 sites Residues forming the calcium binding site found in SPRK (and VPRK) are shaded green, residues forming the
‘strong’ calcium binding site in PRK (and in VPRK) are shaded khaki, and residues forming the calcium sites unique for either PRK or VPRK are shaded pale green.
Fig 2 Stereo plot of SPRK (red), PRK (green) and VPRK (blue) The catalytic triad residues of SPRK are represented as ball-and-stick models, and calcium ions are represented as spheres and follow the coloring of enzymes Sulfate ions found in SPRK are drawn as yellow spheres Cyan and magenta ball-and-stick models represent disulfide bridges in SPRK and VPRK, and yellow represent disulfide bridges in PRK Selec-ted loop legions with significant structural differences are labeled.
Trang 4comprising residues 58–63 (56–63 in VPRK) also binds
a calcium ion in VPRK and this will be further
dis-cussed below Five residues are deleted in the loop
comprising the residues 120–127 in SPRK and VPRK
PRK has one of its two disulfide bridges (Cys123–
Cys34) located in this region The loop formed by
resi-dues 240–245 in the bacterial species has conformation
slightly different from PRK due to an insertion of one
residue The only region where SPRK is different from
both of the other two enzymes is after residue 213,
where two residues are inserted The length of the loop
comprising residues 16–29 is identical in the three
enzymes, but the conformation is slightly different A
calcium ion is present in SPRK and VPRK in this
loop, but is absent in PRK This will be discussed
fur-ther below The helix from residues 140–151 is slightly
translated in SPRK and VPRK relative to PRK,
poss-ibly due to Val and Asn at positions 145 and 146 in
SPRK (both Ala in PRK) and Val and Glu in VPRK
Small differences are also observed for residues 175–
177 These are two of the residues comprising the
‘strong’ calcium binding site in PRK and will be
dis-cussed below Position 178 in PRK is occupied by a
cysteine which forms a disulfide bridge to residue 249
Minor differences are observed in the region 263–270
This is a region where VPRK has a deletion of one
residue
Calcium binding site
Binding of calcium ions in subtilases has been shown to
be essential for correct folding and stability [15] A total
of four calcium binding sites have been reported for the proteinase K-like enzymes, and we define the sites as fol-lows Ca1 constitute the new binding site reported by [21] and is formed by residues Asp11, Asp14, Gln15, Asp21 and Asp23 (SPRK numbering), and is involved
in stabilizing the N-terminal region of the enzyme Ca2
is the site observed in VPRK and thermitase [22] which
is formed by residues Asp58, Asp60D and Asp62 (SPRK numbering) This site stabilizes the loop between strand b4 and helix a2 where VPRK and SPRK have an insert of three residues Ca3 is the so-called strong bind-ing site found in PRK and formed by the side chain of Asp200 and the carbonyl oxygen atoms of residues 175 and 177 and is involved in stabilizing strands b8 and b9 Ca4 is the weak binding site in PRK, which is formed by the side chain of Asp260 and the carbonyl oxygen of Thr16, and stabilizes the N- and C-terminal regions of the molecule
Only one calcium binding site is found in SPRK, in contrast to PRK which has two and VPRK which has three The Ca2+ ion in SPRK binds at the Ca1 site, and it is coordinated to the carboxyl oxygen atoms of the side chains of Asp11, Asp14 and Asp21, the amide oxygen atom of Gln15 and the carbonyl oxygen atoms
of Asp11 and Asn23 (Fig 3) in an arrangement similar
to what is observed in VPRK Both PRK and VPRK have calcium bound at Ca3 SPRK also has an aspar-tic acid residue at position at 200, and with the same conformation as in the two other structures, but Asp200 forms a salt bridge to Lys253 (Ala253 and Asn250 in PRK and VPRK, respectively), and prob-ably loses some of its potential as calcium ligand The
Fig 3 Stereo plot of the calcium binding site in SPRK.
Trang 5amine group of the lysine side chain is about 4.6–4.8
A˚ from the position of calcium in PRK and VPRK
Position 260 at the second calcium binding site in
PRK, Ca4, is occupied by an aspartic acid This
posi-tion is a lysine in SPRK and VPRK, and thus prevents
binding of calcium The side chain of this lysine forms
a hydrogen bond to Asn17 in SPRK (15 in VPRK) In
addition, Arg16 in SPRK forms hydrogen bonds to
residues 255 and 257, thus stabilizing the N- and
C-ter-minal regions which are stabilized by calcium in PRK
The residues forming the second calcium binding site
in VPRK, Ca2, are identical in SPRK and VPRK, so
there is no obvious explanation to why calcium is
absent in this site in SPRK Calcium binding in SPRK
could be prevented by the side chain of Arg94 which is
about 4.0 A˚ from the position occupied by calcium in
VPRK However, both VPRK and thermitase also
have an arginine at position 94
SPRK loses about 40% of its activity when
incuba-ted at 37C for 2 h in the presence of EDTA [18],
while PRK is essentially unaffected At 50C SPRK
was totally inactivated, while PRK still had
approxi-mately 50% activity remaining The crystal structure
of SPRK shows that the calcium ion is tightly bound
with six protein atom binding partners, while the two
calcium ions are bound weaker to the protein in PRK,
with four and three protein ligands for binding sites
Ca1 and Ca2, respectively This could probably explain
why SPRK is less stable than PRK towards EDTA,
and suggests that the calcium ion is more crucial for
stability in SPRK VPRK has two binding sites that
bind calcium stronger than PRK, and this could
prob-ably explain why also the stability of VPRK depends
strongly on calcium [21]
Disulfide bridges
Two disulfide bridges are found in the crystal structure
of SPRK, as in PRK, whereas VPRK has three The
disulfide bridges in SPRK occupy the same positions
as two of the bridges in VPRK (Figs 1 and 2), and
sequence alignment [18] suggests that the third
disul-fide bridge found at the C-terminal in VPRK could in
principle be present in SPRK too if the C-terminal was
not cleaved off The bridges are formed by residues
66–98 and 167–198 in SPRK, 67–99, 163–194 and 277–
281 in VPRK (VPRK numbering) and 34–123 and
178–249 in PRK One of the disulfide bridges in SPRK
and VPRK is close to the S2 binding site It anchors a
tight loop (see below) which is part of the S2 site, to
the rest of the molecule, and may therefore affect the
catalytic activity of the enzyme by reducing the
flexibil-ity of the protein Reduced flexibilflexibil-ity may prevent
effi-cient binding of a substrate, something which can be illustrated by the lower binding affinity SPRK has for Suc-AAPF-pNA than PRK does [18] Docking this substrate into the active site of SPRK shows that the
Cd atom of the P2 residue (here Pro) would be only 2.4 A˚ away from the carbonyl oxygen atom of residue
100 (data not shown) The structure of proteinase K in complex with the inhibitor methoxysuccinyl-AAPA-chlorometylketone (PDB 3prk [23]) shows that the main chain atoms of the residues forming the S2 site (residues 96 and 100) move more than 1 A˚ to accom-modate a proline residue at the P2 position The sec-ond disulfide in SPRK (167–198) and VPRK (163–194)
is located in a region close to the bottom of the S1 pocket This bridge can be considered to be involved
in the stabilization of the region which is stabilized by calcium (Ca3) in PRK (residues 200 and 175–177) Both disulfide bridges in PRK are further away from the active site than in SPRK and VPRK, and are expected to influence the activity to a lesser degree They could, however, influence stability
Salt bridges The three enzymes have 18, 19 and 15 residues forming
24, 23 and 18 interactions less than 4 A˚ (SPRK, PRK and VPRK, respectively) between atoms of positively and negatively charged residues, of which 6, 3 and 5 include histidine The average length is quite similar in the three enzymes, 3.15 A˚ in SPRK and 3.21 A˚ in PRK and VPRK None of enzymes have extended salt bridge networks but both SPRK and PRK have salt bridges involving three residues [Lys265–Asp263– Arg189 in SPRK (Pro, Asn, Arg in PRK, Arg, Asp, Arg in VPRK) and Asp187–Arg12–Asp260 in PRK (Asp, Arg, Lys in SPRK and VPRK)] The three-resi-due network observed in PRK is not possible in SPRK and VPRK due to the Lysine residue in position 260
A reduced number of salt bridges are generally accep-ted to be one of the properties of enzymes adapaccep-ted to cold environments The reduced number is believed to increase the flexibility of an enzyme, and hence, the catalytic efficiency, but at the expense of the stability towards temperature (for reviews see [19,24,25]) SPRK from the psychrotrophic Serratia sp is not found to
be considerable less stable than PRK [18], but VPRK
is [26,27] This could possibly in part be related to the number of salt bridges in the three enzymes
Position 98 close to the S2 site is involved in a disul-fide bridge in SPRK and VPRK The Asp residue in this position in PRK forms a salt bridge to Lys94 It is not yet clear to what extent this interaction would affect PRK specificity at the S2 site
Trang 6Structure in the binding region
The electrostatic surface calculated by icm (Fig 4 [28])
shows that the bacterial peptidases have a more
ani-onic character than the fungal species The amino acid
sequence in the binding region is very similar in the
three enzymes, and so is the conformation of the side
chains, but some differences exist The amino acid
sequence in the S1 site is conserved, except at positions
162 and 169 located at the bottom of the pocket The
neutral Asn162 in PRK is replaced by the polar and
smaller Ser residue in VPRK, and by the acidic Asp in
SPRK The conformation of Asn162 and Asp162 is
practically identical in the two enzymes, but the acidic
residue would contribute to the more anionic character
of the S1 site in SPRK Asn or Asp at position 162
would be about 5 A˚ from the position occupied by a
docked P1 Phe residue (data not shown) Position 169
is occupied by Tyr in SPRK and PRK and Thr in
VPRK The residue at this position in subtilisin BPN
has been subjected to extensive mutational studies in
order to modify specificity [4,5] Tyr169 in SPRK and
PRK is not likely to interact directly with a P1 residue
of a substrate For such interactions to take place, the
side chain will have to rotate, and hence, cause steric
clashes with the enzyme main chain that will require
energy to resolve The most obvious difference between
the binding sites of the three enzymes is found in the
S4 site at residues 103, 104, 107 and 141 where all
three enzymes have different amino acid sequence
This segment is Gln, Tyr, Ile and Val in PRK, Thr,
Thr, Val and Leu in VPRK and Ser, Asn, Val and Thr
in SPRK The fungal enzyme thus has a smaller and
more hydrophobic binding site than the two other
enzymes One of the most interesting differences
between the bacterial and fungal enzymes is located at
the periphery of the S2 site As mentioned above,
Asp98 in PRK is replaced by a cysteine in the other
two proteins, but the residues on both sides of this
position are also of interest because the region 97–101
forms a tight loop which is stabilized differently in the
three enzymes The side chains of residues Asn97,
Ser99 and Ser101 in SPRK (Asp, Asn, Ser and Ser,
Ser, Ser in PRK and VPRK, respectively) form a
strong hydrogen bond network which brings the
con-formation of the loop almost into a ‘hub and spokes’
arrangement (Fig 5) The side chain of Asn99 in PRK
is too long to participate efficiently in a similar
arrangement, and the side chain of Ser97 in VPRK is
too short One side of the loop is involved in the
bind-ing of the P2–P4 residues of a substrate The other side
of the loop is close to Arg94 (Lys in PRK), which in
SPRK and VPRK are further stabilized by salt bridges
to residues in the 58–65 loop Hence, the region con-taining residues 97–101 is likely to be more rigid in SPRK than in the other two enzymes It is therefore
Fig 4 Electrostatic surface potential of SPRK (A), PRK (B) and VPRK (C) The surfaces are contoured at 5.0 kcalÆe.u.)1 charge where red regions represent negative potential and blue regions represent positive potential.
Trang 7not unreasonable to believe that the three enzymes will
have a different specificity profile not only for the S4
site, but possibly also in the S2 site
Tripeptide in the active site cleft
Extra electron difference density was observed in the
prime site of the substrate binding region of SPRK
This was initially interpreted as a Pro-Ser dipeptide, but was after a few cycles of refinement interpreted as
an Ala-Pro-Thr tripeptide (Fig 6) Attempts were made to fit the ligand into the initial difference density
as a buffer or cryprotectant (glycerol) molecule, but it did not fit the electron density maps as well as a pep-tide Average B-factors for the peptide is about 20 A˚2, which is higher than the average for the enzyme (about
Fig 5 Stereo plot illustrating the tight loop forming the S2 binding site Red is SPRK, green is PRK and blue is VPRK Labels and distances
in the loop refer to SPRK The stabilizing hydrogen bonding network formed by residues Asn97, Ser99 and Ser101 in SPRK is displayed as ball-and-stick models A similar network is not as strong in PRK and VPRK due to a shorter Ser97 in VPRK and a too-long Asn99 in PRK The loop is anchored to the rest of the molecule in SPRK and VPRK by a disulfide bridge between Cys98 and Cys66 (Asp98 in PRK) The cata-lytic His69 is displayed as ball-and-stick model in order to illustrate the orientation of the loop relative to the binding site.
Fig 6 Stereo plot illustrating the electron density surrounding the Ala-Pro-Thr tripeptide found in the S1¢ and S2¢ binding site of SPRK The 2fofc electron density is contoured at 1.0 r.
Trang 89 A˚2), indicating reduced occupancy The B-factor is,
however, in the same order as the average of the
solvent molecules The tripeptide is most likely a
pro-teolysis product from the expression or purification
process The gene for SPRK codes for a pre-pro
enzyme including an N-terminal chaperone like
domain, the catalytic domain and two similar
C-ter-minal domains with unknown structure and function
The N-terminal pro domain is autocatalytically cleaved
off when the enzyme has obtained its active
conforma-tion, and the two C-terminal domains are cleaved off
by heat treatment at 50C An Ala-Pro-Thr sequence
is located in the first C-terminal domain
The tripeptide is not located in the primary binding
site (the S1 site), where most inhibitors, substrates and
substrate analogues are observed in the structures of
serine peptidase complexes Instead it is located in the
S1¢ and S2¢ sites, and Thr3 and Pro2 occupy the same
space as P1¢ and P2¢ residues found for naturally
occurring protein inhibitors in complex with other
sub-tilases (Fig 7); subtilisin BPN in complex with
chymo-trypsin inhibitor 2 (CI2; PDB 1lw6, 1tm1 and 2sni
[29–31]) or eglinC (PDB 1sbn [32]) and subtilisin
Carls-berg in complex with eglinC (PDB 1cse [33]),
ovomu-coid turkey inhibitor 3 (OMTKY3; PDB 1r0r [34]) or
the double-headed tomato inhibitor II (TI2; PDB 1oyv
[35])
The tripeptide is hydrogen bonded to the enzyme by
interactions only through Thr3 The amine atom
(Thr3 N) forms a hydrogen bond to Ser221 O
(2.75 A˚) One of the terminal carboxyl oxygen atoms
of Thr3 is hydrogen bonded to the catalytic His69 Ne2 (2.88 A˚) and Ser224 Oc (2.68 A˚) and the second ter-minal carboxyl oxygen atom occupy a position in the so-called oxyanion hole, with hydrogen bonds to Asn161 Od1 (2.90 A˚) and Ser224 Oc (3.16 A˚) The position of the second terminal oxygen atom of Thr3 atom is about 0.8–1.5 A˚ from the position occupied by the carbonyl oxygen atom of the scissile bond in other subtilase–inhibitor complexes (data not shown) The
Capositions of the tripeptide occupy almost the same positions as the Ca positions of the inhibitors Intro-duction of the tripeptide causes a slight rotation of Ser224, such that the hydroxyl group of the side chain weakens its catalytic triad interaction with His69 Ne2 and instead forms hydrogen bonds to both terminal oxygen atoms of Thr3
Another interesting feature is that the direction of the main chain of the tripeptide is antiparallel to the naturally occurring inhibitors It was first speculated whether the C-terminal domain in an uncleaved state could fold back into its own active site, or alternatively into the active site of a neighboring molecule, some-thing which could explain the antiparallel binding However, this can not be verified here since the C-ter-minal is cleaved off
The tripeptide has a conformation most similar to OMTKY3, CI2 and the second binding region of TI2 (Fig 7) The first binding region of TI2 and eglinC have slightly different orientation from the P2¢ resi-due, probably resulting from different scaffolds of the inhibitors Structures of PRK with inhibitors or
sub-Fig 7 Stereo plot illustrating inhibitor binding in subtilases The binding loop of chymotrypsin inhibitor II (CI2) in complex with subtilisin BPN (cyan, PDB 2sni), the inhibitor fragment of lactoferrin in complex with PRK (green, PDB 1bjr), a hepta-peptide in complex with PRK (yellow, PDB 1p7v) are docked on the ribbon figure of SPRK The tripeptide found in SPRK is illustrated as red ball and sticks.
Trang 9strate analogues at the prime side of the binding
region do exist, e.g hepta- or octapeptide substrate
analogues or an inhibiting decapeptide fragment of
lactoferrin However, these peptides have a completely
different binding mode compared to the naturally
occurring inhibitors They bind in the S1–S1¢ region,
but not always at the other subsites of the enzymes
It is therefore not clear as yet whether there are two
distinct S’ binding sites in the proteinase K family or
whether the different binding modes can be related,
i.e to d-amino acids in the P1¢ position of the
pep-tide inhibitors, thus forcing the amino acids on the
prime side of the binding site into a different
confor-mation
Conclusion
The structure of a proteinase K-like enzyme of a
psy-chrotroph Serratia species has been solved to 1.8 A˚
The fold of the protein reported here is practically
identical to the two other enzymes of this family with
known 3D structure, with only minor differences in
the surface loops In addition, an Ala-Pro-Thr
tripep-tide is observed at the prime side of the active site,
and the direction of the tripeptide is antiparallel to
what would be expected of a naturally occurring
pro-teinaceous inhibitor The protein presented in this
paper is more similar to the bacterial species (VPRK)
than the fungal species (PRK) with respect to
disul-fide bridges, calcium binding and surface loops This
also coincides with the sequence identity, which is
about 64% to VPRK and about 40% to PRK Only
one calcium binding site is observed in the structure
presented here, in contrast to the other proteinase K
structures where two or more calcium binding sites
are observed The calcium ion in this structure,
sim-ilar to Ca1 in VPRK, is coordinated to six protein
atoms, indicating a very strong binding, whereas the
calcium ions in PRK are coordinated to not more
than four protein atoms We therefore suggest that
the calcium binding site observed in this structure is
more crucial for the stabilization of the enzyme than
the calcium binding sites observed in PRK This
assumption is supported by the observation that
SPRK loses about 40% of its activity when incubated
in the presence of 10 mm EDTA whereas PRK
remains essentially unaffected [18] SPRK should have
the ability to bind one more calcium ion since it has
the same amino acid sequence as VPRK in the loop
comprising residues 58–62, but there is no obvious
structural explanation why this does not occur The
two disulfide bridges in SPRK are found in the same
positions as VPRK, and they are completely different
from the positions found in PRK One of the disul-fide bridges (including Cys98) in SPRK and VPRK is located next to a residue forming a part of the S2 site
of the enzyme The disulfide bridge restricts the flexi-bility of a tight loop which is part of the S2 site The tight loop is further stabilized by a tight hydrogen bond pattern This could confer more rigidity to the active site of the enzyme and may explain the much lower binding affinity (higher KM value) SPRK has towards the synthetic suc-AAPF-nitroanilide substrate than PRK has [18] The volume of the S4 site in the bacterial enzymes is larger than in PRK It is there-fore reasonable to believe that larger residues will be favored at this site in SPRK and VPRK and more kinetic data should therefore be obtained in order to verify this assumption
The electrostatic potential of SPRK is significantly more negative than PRK Since the N-terminal protective succinyl group is negatively charged, one cannot rule out that differences in activity towards suc-AAPF-pNA when comparing SPRK and PRK [18], at least partly, are due to electrostatic effects
Methods and materials
Crystallization and data collection
Expression and purification of the peptidase from the Ser-ratia sp (SPRK) is described by Larsen and coworkers [18] Crystals of the catalytic domain of SPRK were obtained from 0.1 m Bis⁄ Tris and Tris buffer pH 6.5–7.5 and 45–47.5% ammonium sulfate at 4C by the hanging drop vapor diffusion method Protein concentration was
5 mgÆmL)1in 25 mm Tris pH 7.5 and 10 mm CaCl2 X-ray data to 1.8 A˚ were collected at 100 K at Swiss Norwegian Beamlines (BM01) at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) using reservoir solution containing 25% glycerol as cryoprotectant Data were integrated using denzo [36], scaling and merging was carried out using Scalepack[36] and scala of the CCP4 program suite [37]
Molecular replacement, model building and refinement
The structure was solved using MolRep [38] in CCP4i, using proteinase K (PRK; PDB 1ic6 [20]), as search model The structure was built using a combination of auto build-ing in ARP⁄ wARP [39] and manual refitting of side chains using O [40] based on 2FoFc and FoFc electron density maps Refinement was carried out in Refmac5 [41] of the CCP4 suite Solvent molecules were automatically added to the structure using ARP⁄ wARP Solvent molecules that did not fit into electron density, had no hydrogen binding
Trang 10partners or where the temperature factor exceeded 50 A˚2
were excluded from further refinement One calcium and
two sulfate ions were added based on the electron density
and hydrogen binding partners
Numbering of SPRK follows that of PRK, and inserted
residues get a letter extension after the number (i.e 60B,
60C, etc.)
Structure analysis and comparison
Software for structure analysis and comparison was chosen
from the CCP4 suite and O Numbering in the comparisons
refers to SPRK unless stated otherwise
The alignment figure is generated using alscript [42]
Figures represented as cartoons are generated using
mol-script [43] and bobscript [44] Electrostatic surfaces are
generated using ICM [28]
Acknowledgement
The authors thank the organizers at the
Swiss-Nor-wegian Beamlines (SNBL) at the European Synchrotron
Radiation Facilities (ESRF) for provision of beam time
The present study was supported by the national
Func-tional Genomics Programme (FUGE) in The Research
Council of Norway and Biotec Pharmacon ASA
References
1 Rao MB, Tanksale AM, Ghatge MS & Deshpande VV
(1998) Molecular and biotechnological aspects of
micro-bial proteases Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62, 597–635
2 Rheinnecker M, Baker G, Eder J & Fersht AR (1993)
Engineering a novel specificity in subtilisin BPN¢
Biochemistry 32, 1199–1203
3 Rheinnecker M, Eder J, Pandey PS & Fersht AR (1994)
Variants of subtilisin BPN¢ with altered specificity
pro-files Biochemistry 33, 221–225
4 Wells JA, Powers DB, Bott RR, Graycar TP & Estell
DA (1987) Designing substrate specificity by protein
engineering of electrostatic interactions Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA 84, 1219–1223
5 Estell DA, Graycar TP, Miller JV, Powers DB, Burnier
JP, Ng PG & Wells JA (1986) Probing steric and
hydro-phobic effects on enzyme interactions by protein
engi-neering Science 233, 659–663
6 Cedrone F, Menez A & Quemeneur E (2000) Tailoring
new enzyme functions by rational redesign Curr Opin
Struct Biol 10, 405–410
7 Chen RD (2001) Enzyme engineering: rational redesign
versus directed evolution Trends Biotechnol 19, 13–14
8 Hult K & Berglund P (2003) Engineered enzymes for
improved organic synthesis Curr Opin Biotechnol 14,
395–400
9 Somero GN (1975) Temperature as a selective factor in protein evolution – adaptational strategy of compro-mise J Exp Zool 194, 175–188
10 Hochancha PW & Somero GN (1984) Temperature Adaptation in Biochemical Adaptation, pp 377–388 New Jersey, USA, Princeton University Press
11 Sweeney PJ & Walker JM (1993) Proteinase K Methods Mol Biol 16, 305–311
12 Shaked GM, Shaked Y, Kariv-Inbal Z, Halimi M, Avraham I & Gabizon R (2001) A protease-resistant prion protein isoform is present in urine of animals and humans affected with prion diseases J Biol Chem 276, 31479–31482
13 Jackson GS, McKintosh E, Flechsig E, Prodromidou
K, Hirsch P, Linehan J, Brandner S, Clarke AR, Weiss-mann C & Collinge J (2005) An enzyme-detergent method for effective prion decontamination of surgical steel J General Virol 86, 869–878
14 Schechter I & Berger A (1967) On the size of the active site in proteases I Papain Biochem Biophys Res Com-mun 27, 157–162
15 Siezen RJ & Leunissen JA (1997) Subtilases: the super-family of subtilisin-like serine proteases Protein Sci 6, 501–523
16 Gron H, Meldal M & Breddam K (1992) Extensive comparison of the substrate preferences of two subtili-sins as determined with peptide substrates which are based on the principle of intramolecular quenching Biochemistry 31, 6011–6018
17 Gron H & Breddam K (1992) Interdependency of the binding subsites in subtilisin Biochemistry 31, 8967–8971
18 Larsen AN, Moe E, Helland R, Gjellesvik DR & Will-assen NP (2006) Characterization of a recombinant expressed proteinase K-like enzyme from a psychro-trophic Serratia sp FEBS J 273, 47–60
19 Smalas AO, Leiros HK, Os V & Willassen NP (2000) Cold adapted enzymes Biotechnol Annu Rev 6, 1–57
20 Betzel C, Gourinath S, Kumar P, Kaur P, Perbandt M, Eschenburg S & Singh TP (2001) Structure of a serine protease proteinase K from Tritirachium album limber
at 0.98 A resolution Biochemistry 40, 3080–3088
21 Arnorsdottir J, Kristjansson MM & Ficner R (2005) Crystal structure of a subtilisin-like serine proteinase from a psychrotrophic Vibrio species reveals structural aspects of cold adaptation FEBS J 272, 832–845
22 Teplyakov AV, Kuranova IP, Harutyunyan EH, Vainshtein BK, Frommel C, Hohne WE & Wilson KS (1990) Crystal structure of thermitase at 1.4 A˚ resolu-tion J Mol Biol 214, 261–279
23 Wolf WM, Bajorath J, Muller A, Raghunathan S, Singh
TP, Hinrichs W & Saenger W (1991) Inhibition of pro-teinase K by methoxysuccinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Ala-chloro-methyl ketone: an x-ray study at 2.2-A˚ resolution
J Biol Chem 266, 17695–17699