Intact-cell MALDI-TOF mass spectra of mycelia and spores of Trichoderma strains.. This characteristic feature of hydrophobins could therefore be used as a diagnostic tool to identify hyd
Trang 1in Trichoderma using intact-cell MALDI-TOF MS
Torsten Neuhof1, Ralf Dieckmann1,*, Irina S Druzhinina2, Christian P Kubicek2,
Tiina Nakari-Seta¨la¨3, Merja Penttila¨3 and Hans von Do¨hren1
1 TU Berlin, Institut fu¨r Chemie, FG Biochemie und Molekulare Biologie, Berlin, Germany
2 FB Gentechnik und Angewandte Biochemie, Institut fu¨r Verfahrenstechnik, Umwelttechnik und Technische Biowissenschaften, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria
3 VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland
Hydrophobins are small proteins thought to be
ubi-quitous in filamentous fungi They are usually present
on the outer surfaces of cell walls of hyphae and
coni-dia Here, they mediate interactions between the
fun-gus and the environment, such as surface recognition
during pathogenic interactions with plants, insects or
other fungi, and also in symbiosis The size of
hydro-phobins ranges from approximately 75 to 400 amino
acid residues; they contain eight positionally conserved
cysteine residues, and can be divided into two classes
according to their hydropathy profiles and spacing
between the conserved cysteines [1]
The anamorphic fungal genus Trichoderma (Hypocre-ales, Ascomycota) contains cosmopolitan soil-borne fungi with economic importance as biocontrol agents and producers of beneficial metabolites and enzymes In addition, Trichoderma spp have recently been reported
to occur as endophytes, eliciting positive plant responses against potential pathogens [2] Hydrophobins are likely
to play a role in this process, and a hydrophobin gene has in fact recently been isolated that leads to overpro-duction of hydrophobins during endophytic interactions between Trichoderma asperellum and cucumber roots [3] However, hydrophobins may also be involved in the
Keywords
fungal biomarker; hydrophobin; intact-cell
MS; MALDI-TOF MS; Trichoderma
Correspondence
H von Do¨hren, TU Berlin, Institut fu¨r
Chemie, FG Biochemie und Molekulare
Biologie, Franklinstr 29, 10587 Berlin,
Germany
Fax: +49 30 314 24783
Tel: +49 30 314 22697
E-mail: Doehren@chem.tu-berlin.de
*Present address
AnagnosTec, Gesellschaft fu¨r Analytische
Biochemie und Diagnostik mbH,
Potsdam-Golm, Germany
(Received 19 September 2006, revised 27
November 2006, accepted 6 December
2006)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05636.x
Intact-cell MS (ICMS) was applied for the direct detection of hydropho-bins in various species and strains of Hypocrea⁄ Trichoderma In both myce-lia and spores, dominating peaks were identified as hydrophobins by detecting mass shifts of 8 Da of reduced and unreduced forms, the analysis
of knockout mutants, and comparison with protein databases
Strain-speci-fic processing was observed in the case of Hypocrea jecorina (anamorph Trichoderma reesei) An analysis of 32 strains comprising 29 different spe-cies of Trichoderma and Hypocrea showed hydrophobin patterns that were specific at both at the species and isolate (subspecies) levels The method therefore permits rapid and direct detection of hydrophobin class II com-positions and may also provide a means to identify Trichoderma (and other fungal) species and strains from microgram amounts of biomass without prior cultivation
Abbreviations
HFB, hydrophobin; ICMS, intact-cell MALDI-TOF MS.
Trang 2mechanism of mycoparasitism as well as the
coloniza-tion of decaying wood
Our information about the roles of hydrophobins
in the physiology of Trichoderma, as well as in other
fungi, is mostly derived from reversed genetics Little
is known about the occurrence and processing of the
individual hydrophobins on the fungal surface As a
method for the rapid detection of hydrophobins
from a large number of small samples, we have
investigated the potential of intact-cell MALDI-TOF
MS (ICMS) Initial applications of ICMS on
fila-mentous fungi have demonstrated characteristic sets
of ions for strain identification in mycelia [4–8] and
spores [9–12] We will show here that class II
hydro-phobins account for the main characteristic peaks of
Trichoderma, as the intact-cell extraction procedure
employing a solvent mixture of acetonitrile and
methanol is suitable for dissolving these cell wall
constituents
Results
Identification of new Trichoderma hydrophobins
by EST search
In order to determine which hydrophobins could
potentially be detected in Hypocrea jecorina, we first
mined its genome database for members of class II
hydrophobins Besides the well-known HFB1 and
HFB2, the HFB3 hydrophobin has been identified by
cloning the corresponding gene [13] and further
char-acterization of the protein [14] We here identified
HFB4, HFB5, and HFB6 In addition, two
hydropho-bin-encloding EST sequences were retrieved from the TrichEST database (http://www.trichoderma.org): one encoding an ortholog of HFB3 from T longibra-chiatum (L22T11P141R12690, L14T53P137R01628, L22T11P138R12431, and L22T11P137R12300), and the other one encoding an ortholog of HFB1 of
T atroviride (L12T11P119R10608) Their sequence relationships and putative processing sites are illustra-ted in the alignment given in Fig 1
ICMS analysis of Trichoderma Several strains of Trichoderma were studied initially to examine the effectiveness of ICMS as an analytical method for distinguishing different species of
Trichoder-ma A rapid analytical procedure based on ICMS was established in order to characterize the low-molecular-weight proteometric (up to 20 000 Da) and peptidomet-ric (up to 2000 Da) profiles at the same time Thirty-two Trichoderma strains belonging to various species were subcultivated on agar plates at an incubation tem-perature of 25C and analyzed without further pre-treatments as described in Experimental procedures Vegetative mycelia or spores were transferred from the biomass growing on agar plates directly to the MALDI sample plate and mixed with an acidic matrix in an organic solvent mixture An estimated 106cells were used per spot Data obtained from triplicate samples grown for different times confirmed that the MS analy-ses were reproducible with respect to the characteristic biomarkers obtained Figure 2 shows typical MALDI-TOF mass spectra of four strains of H koningii, T long-ibrachiatum, H virens and T atroviride The spectra
Fig 1 Alignment of the six hydrophobin protein sequences of H jecorina Protein accession numbers and first amino acid of the protein after predicted signal peptide cleavage are: HFB1 (P52754; Q17), HFB2 (S62621; A16), HFB3 (trire.GWV1.31.87.1, scaffold 31: 136 622–
136 948; A17), HFB4 (estExt_fgenesh1_pg.C_50116, scaffold 5: 390 006–390 493; D25), HFB5 (trire.GWV1.11.179.1, scaffold 11: 162 998–
163 354; A17), HFB6 (trire.GWV1.3.266.1, scaffold 3: 1 189 586–1 190 177; no predicted signal peptide).
Trang 3showed a characteristic set of mass peaks in the range
of 5–10 kDa, typically including two dominating peaks
at approximately m⁄ z 7000 As mycelia and spores
largely remained intact, and the extraction solution
contained acetonitrile and methanol, the well-known
hydrophobins were suspected to be the signal source,
and some were assigned by database analysis
Identification of the class II hydrophobins
produced by H jecorina
In order to identify the already known hydrophobin
peaks and to validate the method described here, we
first performed a detailed analysis of H jecorina¼
T reesei QM 9414 To date, two major hydrophobin
(HFB) proteins have been characterized in detail: the
97-residue HFB1-precursor with a molecular mass of
9874.32 Da is processed to a 75 amino acid peptide with a molecular mass of 7540.58 Da, which is further reduced by disulfide bond formation to 7532.58 Da [15] The 86 residue HFB2 precursor with a mass of 8766.28 Da is processed to a 71 amino acid peptide with a calculated molecular mass of 7196.42 kDa, and further reduced by disulfide formation to 7188.42 Da [15] Both hydrophobins were detected as [MH]+ sig-nals of the oxidized forms (Hfb1, m⁄ z 7533; Hfb2,
m⁄ z 7189) A minor peak of m ⁄ z 7041 presumably cor-responds to the processed Hfb2 lacking the terminal Phe (7041.24 Da) (Fig 3)
The same peaks were observed in the spectra obtained from isolated reference substances of HFB1 and HFB2 proteins (Fig 3C) A second minor peak of
m⁄ z 7229 correlates with oxidized HFB2 cleaved at Ala13 lacking the N-terminal Phe This tentative
corre-Fig 2 Intact-cell MALDI-TOF mass spectra
of mycelia and spores of Trichoderma
strains The masses 7347 and 7494 of
T atroviride spores correlate with two
proc-essed products of the spore hydrophobin
SRH1 [16] cleaved at the N-terminal
MQFSI-VALFATGALA site and the C-terminal Phe,
respectively.
Fig 3 Intact-cell MALDI-TOF mass spectra
of H jecorina strain QM 9414 (D), and the
mutant strains QM 9414 Dhfb1 (B) and
QM 9414 Dhfb1Dhfb2 (A) HFB I and HFB II
indicate the processed hydrophobins.
Whereas the HFB I peak is missing in the
disruption mutant, the proportions of the
processed HFB2 hydrophobins have been
shifted The double knockout (A) has no
sig-nificant mass peaks in this region As a
con-trol spectrum, the purified hydrophobins are
shown in (C).
Trang 4lation of mass data is achieved by the calculation of
successive deletions of terminal amino acid residues of
all six hydrophobins providing this single match
A rapid means of identifying peaks corresponding to
hydrophobins in MALDI-TOF mass spectra was
elab-orated, making use of the fact that hydrophobins
con-tain eight cysteines forming four disulfide bonds
Reduction of the four disulfides with dithiothreitol
increased the masses of all peaks corresponding to
hydrophobins by 8 Da Thus, the masses of processed
HFB1 and HFB2 show shifts from m⁄ z 7533 to 7541 and from m⁄ z 7189 to 7197, respectively (supplementary Fig S1) This characteristic feature of hydrophobins could therefore be used as a diagnostic tool to identify hydrophobin peaks in intact-cell MALDI-TOF spectra
In order to prove that the peaks described above originate from HFB1 and HFB2, hfb1D and hfb1⁄ hfb2DD strains were also analyzed to confirm the peak assignments: The double mutant hfb1–⁄ hfb2– did not show HFB1 and HFB2 signals (Fig 3A), whereas
Fig 4 Intact-cell MALDI-TOF spectra of mycelia (A, C, E) and sporulating mycelia (B, D, F) of three strains of H jecorina grown on malt agar The masses displayed have an error of about 0.1%, so peaks of 7232 (A), 7237 (E) and 7234 (F) represent similar peptides Strain 618 mycelia (A) show a variety of peaks, in contrast to strains 665 and 937, shown in (C) and (E) However, there are only few similarities: 7232 and 7237 in (A) and (E), or 7509 and 7514 in (A) and (C) An obvious shift is the appearance of higher mass peaks upon sporulation, presum-ably related to the only large hydrophobin of H jecorina.
Trang 5in the knockout mutant hfbI–, only the respective mass
peak was missing (Fig 3B)
Deviating post-translational processing
of hydrophobins in H jecorina strains
To investigate strain diversity with respect to
meta-bolite production and low-mass proteomics by ICMS,
three phylogenetically described isolates of H jecorina
were studied As shown in Fig 4, spectra of mycelia
and sporulating mycelia directly taken from the
plates after 1 or 3 days, respectively, differ in peak
compositions and intensities Surprisingly, all spectra differ with respect to strain QM 9414 Strain CPK 618 mycelia show a prominent signal of
m⁄ z 7232 (Fig 4A), which disappears in the sporula-tion process, with new signals of m⁄ z 8859, 8802 and
7521 appearing (Fig 4B) To obtain a preliminary correlation of observed masses with hydrophobin data, we again calculated from the available sequence data sets of masses for each hydrophobin, succes-sively subtracting terminal residues and introducing disulfide bonds The m⁄ z 7232 peptide could thus be tentatively assigned to the hydrophobin HFB3 in the
Fig 4 (Continued).
Trang 6oxidized form, with cleavage of the N-terminal
pep-tide at Ala31 and the C-terminal dipeptide at
Pro102 The same mass is also observed in strain
CPK 937 (Fig 4E,F) as a prominent signal in
myce-lia that almost disappears in the sporulation process
Peaks of m⁄ z 8858 and 8863 were also observed in
sporulating strains CPK 618 and CPK 665,
respect-ively (Fig 4B,D) These correspond in mass to HFB5
with an N-terminal cleavage at Ala8 including
oxida-tion (8861 Da)
Comparison of the mycelial compositions of strains
CPK 665 (Fig 4C) and CPK 937 (Fig 4E) shows four
major peaks, all differing in mass, but none of them
corresponds to the QM 9414 strain (Fig 3) The main
peak of CPK 665, m⁄ z 7147, correlates with HFB1
with four disulfide bonds, cleaved N-terminally at
Arg22 and at the C-terminal tetrapeptide In
QM 9414, HFB1I is not processed C-terminally The
m⁄ z 6999 peak, the second prominent peak of strain
CPK 665, can be assigned to Hfb2 C-terminally
cleaved at Lys66 and oxidized This peak is not present
in any other strain investigated
Although they are rather speculative, the interpreted
masses agree with verified cleavage sites observed for
HFB1 and HFB2 and known sites for signal
peptidas-es and Kex2-type peptidaspeptidas-es (Table 1) Verification of
these assessments by tryptic digestion and sequencing
is in progress
Hydrophobin patterns in other T atroviride and
T longibrachiatum strains
T atroviride
A hydrophobin gene (srh1) encoding a class II
hydro-phobin with phylogenetic similarity to H jecorina
HFB2 (I S Druzhinina and C P Kubicek,
unpub-lished results) has been found in T atroviride (therein
named ‘T harzianum’ [16]) The main components of
the sporulating mycelia of the same strain (T
atrovi-rideP1) could indeed be assigned to this hydrophobin,
assuming similar post-translational processing as for
the H jecorina HFB2 (Fig 2, top spectrum) The
peaks at m⁄ z 7499 and 7352 correspond to the
proc-essed spore hydrophobin SRH1 with the cleaved signal
sequence MQFSIVALFATGALA and an additional
C-terminal Phe cleavage, respectively, including loss of
8 Da for the disulfide bonds A minor peak at
m⁄ z 7741 could be tentatively correlated with the
SRH1 hydrophobin with N-terminal cleavage of
MQFSIVA, C-terminal processing following the two
Glu residues of AAAQGTF, and four disulfide bonds
Interestingly, these peaks could not be detected in
vegetative mycelia of T atroviride P1 (Fig 2), which
displayed a similar peak pattern, but with slightly dif-ferent masses of 7181, 7339 and 7739 Da A database search in TrichoEST for the presence of other T atro-viride hydrophobins led to the identification of an HFB1-like protein, which, after N-terminal processing (MKFFTAAALFAAVAIA), C-terminal processing (AVGA) and disulfide bond formation, has a mass of
7743 Da
T longibrachiatum The main mass peak of T longibrachiatum of m⁄ z 7242 was assigned to an HFB3-type of hydrophobin identified
by searching the TrichoEST database The 10 235 Da precursor peptide would have been cleaved at the unique Arg site MQFLAVAALLFTAAFAAPSSEAHGLRRR, comprising 3 Arg residues in sequence (underlined), and this would have been followed by the formation of four disulfide bonds, leading to a mass of 7241 Da
ICMS of class II hydrophobins can distinguish Trichoderma strains at the subspecies level The results described above for H jecorina show that even under carefully controlled culture conditions, different strains of this taxon displayed different MS fingerprints Because of the ease and speed of the analysis, we investigated whether the hydrophobin class II pattern of Trichoderma could be used in strain diagnosis at the species level To this end, we selected isolates for 29 different species of Hypo-crea⁄ Trichoderma and compared their hydrophobin molecular masses Table 2 shows that, indeed, all of the species tested exhibited a unique combination of peaks with unique molecular masses It is therefore interesting to note that even phylogenetically closely related species (such as T hamatum and T asperel-lum, or T harzianum and T fulvum [17], or T fas-ciculatum and T strictipile, which were recently revised to be actually the same species [18]), could be clearly separated This is in accordance with the data
on H jecorina shown above, and implies that hydro-phobin fingerprints can in fact distinguish isolates at the subspecies level All spectra are compiled in sup-plementary Fig S2
Discussion
Hydrophobin patterns Genome sequencing of filamentous fungi has revealed the presence of multiple hydrophobin genes in filamen-tous fungi We here report the the sequences of four
Trang 7new type II hydrophobins for H jecorina, in addition
to the known HFB1 and HFB2 Likewise, we
identi-fied new hydrophobins in T atroviride in addition to
the known sporulation-specific one, and in T
longibra-chiatum Direct MS analysis of mycelia in differing
physiologic states provides evidence for differential
expression of these genes in relation to the
morpho-logic state However, there is no clear match of the
observed mass peaks to the predicted propeptides
expected to originate from cleavage of signal peptides
Instead, further processing has been observed, as has been demonstrated before from N-terminal sequence analysis of H jecorina HFB1 and HFB2 Hydrophobin patterns even suggest strain-specific multiple cleavages
of propepides
Hydrophobin processing The export of most type II hydrophobins involves both signal peptide cleavage and maturation of the
propep-Table 1 Confirmed and predicted hydrophobin cleavage sites.
H jecorina
QM 9414
protease processing, shown by N-terminal sequencing
shown by N-terminal sequencing
predicted C-terminal cleavage
predicted C-terminal cleavage
H jecorina
strains 618 and
937
peptidase and predicted C-terminal cleavage by unknown protease
within signal peptide
H jecorina
strain 665
predicted non-Kex2 sites
peptide site, predicted non-Kex2 site
peptide cleavage
peptide cleavage, predicted C-terminal cleavage
signal peptide cleavage, predicted C-terminal cleavage
peptide cleavage, predicted C-terminal cleavage
cleavage
Trang 8tides A considerable amount of information is
avail-able on eukaryotic signal peptidase specificities, and
cleavage site predictions can be performed using,
for example, signalp (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/
SignalP/) version 3.0 [19]) Owing to the limited
amount of information available on eukaryotic
pro-teins, an evaluation of version 2 reported a 78%
accu-racy [20] In this study, a selection of verified and
predicted sites for hydrophobins is reported (Table 2)
On the basis of confirmed structural data of H jecorina
HFB1, HFB2 and HFB3, we here predict the presence
and cleavage patterns of additional hydrophobins
These data are based on calculated masses, which need
to be confirmed by other experiments, such as isolation
and sequencing work, or indirect studies employing proteinase knockouts or proteinase inhibition This may indeed be speculative, but provides useful hypo-thetical data based on: (a) selective extraction leading
to a limited set of no more than six small proteins; (b) known cleavage sites of signal peptidases and fungal Kex2-like proteinases; and (c) actual structural studies
of H jecorina HFB1 and HFB2
In H jecorina, maturation of HFB1, HFB2 and HFB3 includes signal protease processing that removes peptides 15 and 16 amino acids in length This is fol-lowed by propeptide cleavage by a non-Kex2 protein-ase in the cprotein-ase of HFB1, cleaving at a monobasic site, and by Kex2 cleavage in the case of HFB3 [21],
Table 2 Biomarker masses of various Hypocrea ⁄ Trichoderma strains detected by ICMS CBS, Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, the Netherlands; DAOM, Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, Canada; ATTC, American Type Strain Culture Collection, USA The iden-tity of all strains was verified by sequencing internal transcribed spacer (ITS)1 and ITS2 and (if necessary) the long intron of tef1, and analyz-ing the sequences by TRICHOKEY [28] and TRICHOBLAST [29].
T stromaticum CBS 101875 7093
a T fasciculatum is a synonym of H strictipilis b T flavofuscum is a synonym of H virens c T croceum is a synonym of T polysporum (¼H pachybasioides) d Identified as HFB3 type with processing at the Arg site: MQFLAVAALLFTAAFAAPSSEAHGLRRR e Identified as processed HFB2 (see Fig 2).fIdentified as processed HFB1 (see Fig 2).gIdentified as processed HFB1-type hydrophobin: GPVEVRTGGG-SICPDGLFSNPQCCDTQLLGIIGLGCEVPSQTPRDGADFKNICAKTGDQALCCVLPIAGQDLLCQA h Identified as processed SRH1 (see Fig 1).
i Identified as processed SRH1: LASVSVCPNGLYSNPQCCGANVLGVAALDCHTPRVDVLTGPIFQAVCAAEGGKQPLCCVVPVAGQDLLCEE.
Trang 9whereas HFB2 is not cleaved further in the N-teminal
region Mass spectra provide evidence for a C-terminal
Phe cleavage for HFB2
The ICMS spectra presented here provide evidence
for similar cleavage patterns of hydrophobins HFBIII
of H jecorina and T longibrachiatum, and SRH1 and
HFB1 of T atroviride, involving signal peptides,
Kex2-type processing, and C-terminal amino acid cleavage
(Table 2) In addition, the recorded masses provide
evidence for alternative processing reactions One
reac-tion concerns alternative signal peptide cleavage sites
at Ala13 for H jecorina HFB2 and at Ala7 for T
atr-ovirideSRH1 The predicted sites are compatible with
the specificity profiles of signal peptidases, whereas
their length is less than the average 15–40 residues
The second type of reaction is the cleavage of
C-ter-minal peptides at Ala sites, e.g at sites + 2 from the
last conserved Cys, at Lys-Ala positions, at Glu-Ala
positions, or at Thr-Ala positions These predictions
need confirmation by further analysis
Comparing ICMS of bacteria and fungi
ICMS provides a rapid means for distinguishing
bac-teria, spores, viruses and fungi [4–12] It has the
advantages of being very rapid, using small samples
(subcolony amounts) and requiring minimal sample
preparation Bacterial intact-cell MALDI-TOF spectra
in the range 2–20 kDa are dominated by a set of
ri-bosomal proteins as highly abundant intracellular
constituents [22] This set of about 10–30 defined
masses permits the identification at the species and
subspecies⁄ strain level We here show that in
filamen-tous fungi, hydrophobins are the dominating protein
masses, whereas ribosomal proteins have not been
identified This result can be ascribed to the unique
solubility properties of these hydrophobic proteins
Although there are several hydrophobin genes
pre-sent, only a some of these might be expressed under
differing physiologic conditions Thus, it has been
reported that the expression of hydrophobins is
dependent on the morphologic state of T atroviride
(erroneously described as T harzianum [16]) It has
also been shown that expression and localization of
specific hydrophobins in Cladosporium fulvum is
dependent on the stages of the plant infection
pro-cess, the hydrophobins being either retained on
coni-dia and aerial structures or being excreted [23] In
Magnaporthe grisea, it has been demonstrated that
the formation of disulfide linkages is required for
secretion and cell wall localization [24]
Indeed, we have shown here that sporulating and
nonsporulating mycelia of several species differ in
hydrophobin composition Unexpectedly, the patterns observed indicate diverse cleavage reactions of the respective prepropeptides These patterns are unlikely
to be proteolytic artefacts of extraction, as proteases are unlikely to be active in methanol⁄ acetonitrile mix-tures As MALDI-TOF MS involves an especially gen-tle ionization process, cleavages of peptide bonds are generally not observed Differences in hydrophobin processing are thus interpreted as being dependent on the presence and concentrations of specific proteinases acting on the respective propeptides
Hydrophobins as biomarkers for ICMS
of filamentous fungi Hydrophobins are proposed to be suitable ICMS bio-markers for the following reasons: (a) fungi contain a set of hydrophobin genes, generally with developmen-tally regulated expression; (b) the hydrophobic pep-tides can be selectively dissolved and rapidly analyzed
by MALDI-TOF MS; (c) hydrophobin patterns are diverse, due to post-translational processing; (d) the presence of the characteristic four disulfide bonds can
be easily demonstrated by reduction; (e) owing to their fairly small size, sequence information for the hydro-phobins can be obtained by MS; (f) the respective genes are accessible by standard PCR methods; and (g) the variability of hydrophobins is fairly significant, and exceeds the similarities of other biomarkers pro-posed, e.g ubiquitins The sensitivity of detection employing the MALDI-TOF technique can be expec-ted to allow the identification of bacterial peptides with 100 microbial cells
Experimental procedures
Reagents and standards
2,5-Dihydroxybenzoic acid from Anagnostec (Potsdam, Germany) was used as the matrix for MALDI-TOF experi-ments Trifluoroacetic acid, ethanol, acetonitrile and meth-anol from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) were used as solvents The reference hydrophobins HFBI and HFBII were purified by two-phase separation and RP-HPLC puri-fication as described previously [25]
Microbial strains and cultivations
The strains of H jecorina used were: the wild-type strains
QM 6a, TUB F-1038 (CPK 618), TUB F-733 (CPK 665) and CBS 498.97 (CPK 937) (all described in [26]); the cellu-lase moderately overproducing mutant strain QM 9414 (ATTC 26921) [27]; and QM 9414 Dhfb1 (VTT D-99724
Trang 10[28]) and QM 9414 Dhfb1Dhfb2 (VTT D-99725 [25]) Other
Trichoderma spp strains used in this study are listed in
Table 1
Hypocrea jecorinaQM 9414 and its mutants were
cultiva-ted in liquid cultures on microtiter plates (200 lL volume)
for 4 days in buffered minimal medium [15] complemented
with 3% glucose and 0.2% peptone The other strains of
H jecorina, as well as strains of other Trichoderma spp.,
were cultivated on malt extract agar (3%) at 25C
Extraction and preparation of mycelia
for MALDI-TOF analysis
A few micrograms of fungal mycelia were suspended in
acetonitrile⁄ methanol ⁄ water (1 : 1 : 1), and 1 lL of the
sus-pension was directly spotted onto target wells of a
100-posi-tion sample plate and immediately mixed with 1 lL of
matrix solution [10 mgÆmL)1 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid in
acetonitrile⁄ methanol ⁄ water (1 : 1 : 1) and 0.3%
trifluoro-acetic acid] The sample matrix mixture was allowed to air
dry prior to analysis Alternatively, freeze-dried mycelium
obtained from shaken cultures or fungi grown on plates
was homogenized in 60% ethanol and centrifuged at
13 000 g using a Beckman Microfuge 11 (Beckman Coulter,
Unterscheissheim, Germany) One microliter of the protein
solution was spotted on a MALDI target plate and mixed
with matrix
Reduction of disulfide bonds
For reduction of proteins containing disulfide bonds, cells
were suspended in 60% methanol, vortexed, and
centri-fuged at 13 000 g using a Beckman Microfuge 11, and the
supernatant was concentrated to dryness The residual was
redissolved in 50 mm Tris⁄ HCl (pH 8) and 1 mm
dithio-threitol and incubated for 1 h at room temperature
Microbial characterization by MALDI-TOF MS
analysis
MS measurements were performed on a VOYAGER
DE-PRO TOF mass spectrometer from Applied Biosystems
(Foster City, CA, USA) Mass spectra were acquired in
lin-ear delayed extraction mode using an acceleration voltage
of 20 kV and a low mass gate of 1500 Da For desorption
of the components, a nitrogen laser beam (k¼ 337 nm)
was focused on the template The laser power was set to
just above the threshold of ionization Spectra for
individ-ual specimens were compiled, and results were averaged
from at least 100 shots taken across the width of the
speci-men for m⁄ z values of 2000–20 000 In the linear mode, the
1000 p.p.m (0.1%) Calibration was done with the H
jeco-rina HFB1 protein with the 7533 Da calculated average
atomic mass All masses determined correspond to average atomic masses
MS analysis of low-molecular-mass peptides
Measurements were performed in the delayed extraction mode, allowing the determination of monoisotopic mass values A low mass gate of 800 Da improved the measure-ment by filtering out the most intensive matrix ions The mass spectrometer was used in the positive ion detection and reflector mode
Database search and alignments ) H jecorina hydrophobins
The H jecorina genome (http://gsphere.lanl.gov/trire1/ trire1.home.html) was screened for hydrophobin-encoding genes by using the tblastn (protein versus translated nuc-leotide) program We used the hydrophobin class II protein sequences of other fungal species as queries to search the
H jecorinagenome Then, all putative hydrophobins, inclu-ding the newly identified hydrophobin from H jecorina, were used to identify further proteins with similar domains, and finally all hypothetical proteins encoding hydrophobins from the annotated genomes of the Broad Institute (http:// www.broad.mit.edu/), Neurospora crassa, Gibberella zeae (Fusarium graminearum) and Magnaporthe griseae, were also used
Calculations of monoisotopic molecular masses of hydro-phobins was performed with the expasy proteomics server (http://www.expasy.org/) or the peptide mass calculator (http://rna.rega.kuleuven.ac.be/masspec/pepcalc.htm) To correlate observed mass peak data, masses of various N- and C-terminally processed and oxidized peptides were calculated and compared
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a fellowship from the Deut-sche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Do270⁄ 10) and by the Fifth Framework program (Quality of Life and Man-agement of Living Resources; Project EUROFUNG 2; QLK3-1999-00729) of the European Community The
T reesei genome sequencing project was funded by the Department of Energy The authors thank M
Salohei-mo for helpful comments and discussions
References
1 Linder MB, Szilvay GR, Nakari-Setala T & Penttila¨
ME (2005) Hydrophobins: the protein-amphiphiles
of filamentous fungi FEMS Microbiol Rev 29, 877–896