1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Tài liệu Báo cáo khoa học: Pronounced adipogenesis and increased insulin sensitivity caused by overproduction of prostaglandin D2 in vivo pptx

10 648 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề Pronounced adipogenesis and increased insulin sensitivity caused by overproduction of prostaglandin D2 in vivo
Tác giả Yasushi Fujitani, Kosuke Aritake, Yoshihide Kanaoka, Tsuyoshi Goto, Nobuyuki Takahashi, Ko Fujimori, Teruo Kawada
Trường học Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Chuyên ngành Molecular biology
Thể loại Research article
Năm xuất bản 2010
Thành phố Takatsuki
Định dạng
Số trang 10
Dung lượng 462,1 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

PGD2 production in white adipose tissue of H-PGDS TG mice was increased approximately seven-fold as compared with that in wild-type WT mice.. Serum leptin and insulin levels were increas

Trang 1

caused by overproduction of prostaglandin D2 in vivo

Yasushi Fujitani1,*, Kosuke Aritake1, Yoshihide Kanaoka1,2, Tsuyoshi Goto3, Nobuyuki Takahashi3,

Ko Fujimori1,4and Teruo Kawada3

1 Department of Molecular Behavioral Biology, Osaka Bioscience Institute, Japan

2 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

3 Laboratory of Molecular Function of Food, Division of Food Science and Biotechnology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Japan

4 Laboratory of Biodefense and Regulation, Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Japan

Introduction

The amount of adipose tissue in the body is an

impor-tant factor in the maintenance of energy balance,

through its ability to store and release fat, and is

altered in various physiological or pathological condi-tions [1] The increased adipose tissue mass associated with obesity results from an increase in the number

Keywords

adipocytes; H-PGDS; obesity; PGD2;

transgenic mouse

Correspondence

K Fujimori, Laboratory of Biodefense and

Regulation, Osaka University of

Pharmaceutical Sciences, 4-20-1 Nasahara,

Takatsuki, Osaka 569-1094, Japan

Fax: +81 726 690 1055

Tel: +81 726 690 1055

E-mail: fujimori@gly.oups.ac.jp

*Present address

Pharmaceutical Research Division, Takeda

Pharmaceutical Co Ltd., Osaka, Japan

(Received 28 October 2009, revised 22

December 2009, accepted 4 January

2010)

doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07565.x

Lipocalin-type prostaglandin (PG) D synthase is expressed in adipose tissues and involved in the regulation of glucose tolerance and atherosclero-sis in type 2 diabetes However, the physiological roles of PGD2 in adipo-genesis in vivo are not clear, as lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase can also act as a transporter for lipophilic molecules, such as retinoids We gen-erated transgenic (TG) mice overexpressing human hematopoietic PGDS (H-PGDS) and investigated the in vivo functions of PGD2 in adipogenesis PGD2 production in white adipose tissue of H-PGDS TG mice was increased approximately seven-fold as compared with that in wild-type (WT) mice With a high-fat diet, H-PGDS TG mice gained more body weight than WT mice Serum leptin and insulin levels were increased in H-PGDS TG mice, and the triglyceride level was decreased by about 50%

as compared with WT mice Furthermore, in the white adipose tissue of H-PGDS TG mice, transcription levels of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor c, fatty acid binding protein 4 and lipoprotein lipase were increased approximately two-fold to five-fold as compared with those of

WT mice Finally, H-PGDS TG mice showed clear hypoglycemia after insulin clamp These results indicate that TG mice overexpressing H-PGDS abundantly produced PGD2in adipose tissues, resulting in pronounced adi-pogenesis and increased insulin sensitivity The present study provides the first evidence that PGD2 participates in the differentiation of adipocytes and in insulin sensitivity in vivo, and the H-PGDS TG mice could consti-tute a novel model mouse for diabetes studies

Abbreviations

15d-PGJ 2 , 15-deoxy-D12,14prostaglandin J 2 ; ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; aP2, fatty acid-binding protein 4, adipocyte; BAT, brown adipose tissue; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CT, computed tomography; DEX, dexamethasone; GST, glutathione S-transferase; HF, high-fat; H-PGDS, hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase; IBMX, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine; L-PGDS, lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase; LPL,

lipoprotein lipase; PG, prostaglandin; PGDS, prostaglandin D synthase; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; SCD, stearoyl-CoA desaturase; SEM, standard error of the mean; TG, transgenic; WAT, white adipose tissue.

Trang 2

and size of adipocytes A major role of adipocytes is

to store large amounts of triglycerides during periods

of energy excess and to mobilize these depots during

periods of nutritional deprivation The number of

adipocytes is thought to increase as a result of

differ-entiation of adipocytes Moreover, adipocytes are

highly specialized cells that secrete various

adipocyto-kines, whose release largely reflects the amounts of

stored triglyceride Insights in the molecular

mecha-nisms underlying adipogenesis may lead to the

devel-opment of strategies for reducing the prevalence of

obesity

Adipogenesis is a complex process accompanied by

various changes in hormone sensitivity and gene

expres-sion caused by many stimuli, including lipid mediators

Prostaglandins (PGs) are involved in the regulation of

adipocyte differentiation In vitro studies have shown

that PGD2 enhances adipocyte differentiation [2], but

that PGE2and PGF2asuppress adipogenesis [3–5]

PGD synthase (PGDS) consists of two types of

pro-tein [6] One is lipocalin-type PGDS (L-PGDS), and the

other is hematopoietic PGDS (H-PGDS) H-PGDS was

originally purified from rat spleen as a cytosolic,

gluta-thione-requiring enzyme [7,8], responsible for the

bio-synthesis of PGD2 in antigen-presenting cells [9], mast

cells [10,11], megakaryocytes [12,13], and type 2 helper

T-lymphocytes [14] There have been extensive

biochem-ical and genetic analyses of H-PGDS [15], and H-PGDS

was crystallized with its specific inhibitor at 1.7 A˚

reso-lution by X-ray diffraction analysis [16] H-PGDS was

shown to be a member of the sigma-class glutathione

S-transferase (GST) family, and is also called GSTS1

[17] On the other hand, L-PGDS has been purified

from rat brain [18], and is expressed in brain, heart, and

male genital organs, as well as in adipocytes and

omen-tal adipose tissues [19–22] The different types of PGDS

have no significant homology at the amino acid level,

and have different tertiary structures for catalysis

[15,23,24] Of particular note is that L-PGDS is a

bifunctional protein, having enzymatic activity with

regard to both PGD2production and transportation of

lipophilic molecules, such as retinoids [25], biliverdin,

bilirubin [26], gangliosides [27], and amyloid b-peptides

[28], with high affinities (Kd= 20–2000 nm) We

previ-ously reported that knockdown of L-PGDS inhibited

adipocyte differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells in vitro,

thereby suggesting that L-PGDS is involved in the

regu-lation of adipocyte differentiation [2] L-PGDS

knock-out mice became glucose-intolerant and

insulin-resistant, and showed increased fat deposition in the

aorta after receiving a high-fat (HF) diet [29]

Adipo-cytes of the L-PGDS knockout mice were significantly

larger than those of wild-type (WT) mice [29] Another

recent study demonstrated that L-PGDS knockout mice did not have any significant glucose or insulin tolerance, but had increased body weight and increased atheroscle-rotic lesions in the aorta [30] Thus, the role of L-PGDS

in adipogenesis and diabetes-related phenotypes is not clear Moreover, because of the dual functions of L-PGDS, whether PGD2regulates the differentiation of adipocytes in vivo remains to be elucidated

In the present study, we have generated transgenic (TG) mice, which produce abundant PGD2 by overex-pression of human H-PGDS, and used them to investi-gate the physiological significance of PGD2 in adipogenesis in vivo The H-PGDS TG mice showed obesity, pronounced adipogenesis, and increased insu-lin sensitivity when on the HF diet

Results Generation of H-PGDS TG mice Human H-PGDS cDNA under the regulatory control

of the chicken b-actin promoter and cytomegalovirus (CMV) enhancer (Fig 1A) was microinjected into the nuclei of fertilized eggs from FVB mice We established three lines of H-PGDS TG mice, termed S41, S55, and S66 Northern blot analysis for estimation of mRNA expression of the transgene revealed higher expression

in S41 and S55 mice and lower expression in S66 mice in the liver, white adipose tissue (WAT), and brown adi-pose tissue (BAT), although H-PGDS was not expressed

in each tissue of WT mice (Fig 1B) The expression of human H-PGDS in hepatocytes and adipocytes of the H-PGDS TG mice (S55) was confirmed by immunohis-tochemistry, using a specific antibody against human H-PGDS (Fig 1C) Liver homogenates from WT and

TG mice were used for PGDS activity assays As shown

in Fig 1D, the tissue homogenates of TG mice showed higher levels of PGD2 production than those of WT mice (approximately 18-fold, 25-fold and five-fold in S41, S55 and S66 mice, respectively) These results indi-cate that the H-PGDS TG mice overexpress human H-PGDS transcripts, proteins and activities in various tissues In further experiments, we decided to use S41 and S55 mice as TG mice, because these mice showed more abundant mRNA expression and enzymatic activity of human H-PGDS

HF diet study

In order to examine the effects of PGDS overexpres-sion on adipogenesis, WT and TG mice were fed a normal or HF diet for 6 weeks after delactation (Fig 2A) TG mice showed normal growth and no

Trang 3

significant differences in spontaneous locomotor

activ-ity, rectal temperature and amount of food intake

under either normal or HF diet conditions in

compari-son with WT mice (data not shown) The body weights

of WT and TG mice were almost the same at the start

of this experiment (21.2 ± 0.3 g, 20.5 ± 0.7 g and

20.2 ± 0.5 g for WT, S41 and S55 mice, respectively)

The body weights of both WT and TG mice increased

in a similar manner under normal diet conditions

(Fig 2B) In contrast, under HF diet conditions, the

body weights of both S41 and S55 mice increased

more, with statistically significant differences from WT

mice (Fig 2B) Next, we measured tissue weights of

the liver, WATs (epididymal and perirenal fat) and

BAT under HF diet condition WAT weights of TG

mice were significantly increased, by 20–30%, as

com-pared with those of WT mice The BAT mass of TG

mice was larger than that of WT mice On the other

hand, liver weights showed no difference between WT

and TG mice, under either normal or HF diet

condi-tions (Fig 2C) These results indicate that the

overex-pression of H-PGDS causes the increase in adipose

tissue mass under HF diet conditions

Body distribution of adipose tissues as

determined by computed tomography (CT) analysis

To further assess the effect of H-PGDS overexpression

on the increase in adipose tissues, the weights of

subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissues, as well as of muscle, of WT and TG (S55) mice were analyzed with a micro-CT scanner under HF diet conditions Visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue weights of TG mice were significantly increased after 1 week of the HF diet

in comparison with those of WT mice (Fig 2D) The weights of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissues of

TG mice were approximately 1.5-fold and 1.4-fold, respectively, of those of WT mice after 6 weeks of the

HF diet (Fig 2D) In contrast, the weight of muscle with organ, but without fats, showed no significant dif-ference between WT and TG mice (Fig 2D) These results confirm that both subcutaneous and visceral adi-pose tissues were increased in TG mice by the HF diet

mRNA expression of adipogenic genes in WAT of

TG mice

We measured the amounts of PGD2 in WAT after

6 weeks of the HF diet WAT of TG (S55) mice con-tained significantly more PGD2 (approximately seven-fold) than that of WT mice (Fig 3A) To examine the effects of the increased PGD2level on peroxisome pro-liferator-activated receptor (PPAR) c activation, we performed quantitative RT-PCR to measure the mRNA expression levels of adipogenic genes, including several PPARc-target genes, the transcription of which is enhanced in adipogenesis [31,32] The expres-sion levels of PPARc, fatty acid-binding protein 4,

Human H-PGDS cDNA Chicken β-actin

enhancer

Liver WAT BAT

β-globin PolyA

5

10

Liver WAT

0

5

–1 ·mg

promoter

Intron

CMV

promoter

A

B

Fig 1 Generation of human H-PGDS TG mice (A) Schematic representation of human H-PGDS transfer vector The SalI–NotI fragment was microinjected into fertilized eggs of FVB mice (B) Northern blot analysis of transgene expression in the liver, WAT, and BAT Ten micrograms of total RNA was subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis, blotted onto a nylon mem-brane, and hybridized with the 32 P-labeled full-length cDNA for human H-PGDS (C) Immunohistochemical analysis of transgene expression in the liver and WAT Paraffin sections of liver and WAT from WT and TG mice (S55) were stained with antibody against human H-PGDS Bars: 100 lm (D) PGDS activity in liver of WT and S41, S55 and S66 TG mice.

Trang 4

adipocyte (aP2), lipoprotein lipase (LPL),

stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD), CD36 and acetyl-stearoyl-CoA

carbox-ylase (ACC) in WAT of TG mice were significantly

upregulated by approximately 2.5-fold, three-fold,

five-fold, 8.6-five-fold, 1.2-fold and 22-five-fold, respectively, in

comparison with those in WT mice (Fig 3B) These

results indicate that mRNA expression of PPARc

tar-get genes is increased in WAT of TG mice, suggesting

that PPARc might be activated more in WAT of TG

mice than in WAT of WT mice

Serum levels of triglyceride, glucose, leptin and

insulin, and insulin sensitivity, in TG mice

After 6 weeks of normal or HF diet, serum levels of

triglyceride, glucose, leptin and insulin were

deter-mined (Fig 4A) Under both dietary conditions, triglyceride levels in TG (S55) mice were lower than those in WT mice by about 50%, whereas glucose levels were unchanged Interestingly, serum leptin lev-els were markedly increased in TG mice by approxi-mately 1.7-fold and 3.3-fold after the normal and HF diet, respectively, in comparison with WT mice Fur-thermore, insulin levels in TG mice were also increased as compared with those in WT mice by approximately 2.6-fold and two-fold after the normal and HF diet, respectively We next examined poten-tial alterations of insulin sensitivity in TG mice TG mice fed the HF diet for 12 weeks showed clear hypoglycemia after insulin loading as compared with

WT mice (Fig 4B) The same results were obtained

in TG mice fed a normal diet These results clearly

****

*

*

**

*

1 1·5

**

WT (n = 18) S41 (n = 8) S55 (n = 8)

*

10

15

10 15

6 4 2

Duration (week)

*

Duration (week)

0

0·5

rirenal fa

*

*

0

5

0 5

Visceral fat

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

**

**

**

**

**

**

0 1 2 3 4 5

Duration (week)

**

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

**

**

**

**

**

Subcutaneous fat

0 1 2 3 4 5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Muscle (with organs)

0 1 2 3 4 5

A

D

Fig 2 Body weight increase in mice when

on the normal and HF diets (A) After

delac-tation, WT and H-PGDS TG (S55) mice were

fed either the normal or the HF diet for

6 weeks A representative male mouse

from each group is shown (B) Body weight

was monitored every week for 6 weeks.

Closed circles (n = 61), squares (n = 22) and

triangles (n = 36) indicate WT, S41 and S55

mice, respectively Values are expressed as

means ± SEMs *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 as

compared with WT mice (C) Tissue weights

of epididymal and perirenal fat, BAT, and liver.

Values are expressed as means ± SEMs.

*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 as compared with

WT mice (D) Changes in the weights of

visceral and subcutaneous fat and muscle

with organ, but without fat, of WT and

H-PGDS TG mice (n = 6) Continuous

dissections of mouse fat and bone in the

whole body were quantified by use of a

micro-CT scanner and LATHETA software

(Aloka) Open and closed circles correspond

to WT and H-PGDS TG mice, respectively.

**P < 0.01 as compared with WT mice.

Trang 5

0 0.2

0.4

0.4 0.8 PPARγ

0 10 20 30

0

**

**

*

0

1

2

–1 tissue)

4

**

**

0 0

10 20 30

2 4 6

0

0.2 0.3 0.4

0.1

**

Fig 3 PGD2production and expression of adipogenic genes (A) Predominant produc-tion of PGD 2 in TG mice PGD 2 levels in WAT of WT and TG mice after the HF diet were measured by enzyme immunoassay (B) Transcription levels of adipogenic genes (encoding PPARc, aP2, LPL, SCD, CD36, and ACC) in WAT After being fed the HF diet for 6 weeks, mice were killed, and total RNA was isolated from WAT Expression levels of the target genes were normalized

to those of the b-actin mRNA level as an internal control, and calculated as fold inten-sity Values are expressed as means ± SEMs (n = 4–6) *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 as compared with WT mice.

Time after injection (min) 0

50

100

150

0 50 100 150

Insulin (0.75 U kg –1 ) Insulin (3.0 U kg –1 )

*

*

*

Insulin

10 20 30 40 50

0 40 80 120

0

40

80

120

0 0.5 1.0 1.5

**

*

*

**

**

Normal HF Normal HF

Normal HF Normal HF

A

sensitiv-ity test (A) After being fed a normal or HF diet for 6 weeks, mice were killed and blood was collected Values are expressed as the means ± SEMs (n = 4–6) *P < 0.05,

**P < 0.01 as compared with WT mice (B) WT (open circles) and TG (closed circles) mice were injected with 0.75 UÆkg)1and 3.0 UÆkg)1of insulin after being fed a nor-mal or HF diet, respectively The y-axis indi-cates the percentage change in blood glucose level as compared with the value before injection (100% at t = 0) Values are expressed as the means ± SEMs (n = 6–7).

*P < 0.05 as compared with WT mice.

Trang 6

indicate that overexpression of H-PGDS increases

insulin sensitivity in vivo

Adipocyte differentiation ex vivo

Finally, we examined whether the overexpression of

H-PGDS also promotes ex vivo differentiation of

adipo-cytes Preadipocytes prepared from WATs of WT or

TG (S55) mice were differentiated with 1 lm

dexa-methasone (DEX), 0.5 mm 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine

(IBMX), and insulin (10 lgÆmL)1) Ten days after

induction of differentiation, the differentiated

adipo-cytes prepared from WAT of TG mice accumulated

apparently greater amounts of lipid droplets than those

of WT mice (Fig 5A) Intracellular triglyceride

con-tents in TG mouse-derived adipocytes were

signifi-cantly larger than in WT mouse-derived cells (Fig 5B)

Moreover, the mRNA expression level of LPL in TG

mouse-derived adipocytes was increased by

approxi-mately two-fold as compared with WT mouse-derived

cells (Fig 5C) Therefore, these results suggest that the

overproduction of PGD2 promotes adipocyte

differen-tiation, thereby regulating adipogenesis

Discussion

In this study, we generated H-PGDS TG mice over-producing PGD2, and showed that PGD2 acts as an activator in adipogenesis in vivo We used H-PGDS

TG mice to elucidate the functions of PGD2 in adipo-genesis in vivo, because L-PGDS is a bifunctional pro-tein, both producing PGD2 and acting as a carrier protein for small lipophilic molecules [23], even though L-PGDS, but not H-PGDS, was detected in adipocytes [2,19] Investigations using L-PGDS knockout mice have demonstrated that L-PGDS is involved in the regulation of glucose tolerance and atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes [29,33], and showed induction of obes-ity [30] However, it is not known which functions of L-PGDS are associated with these phenotypes

15-Deoxy-D12,14PGJ2 (15d-PGJ2), which is one of the metabolites of PGD2, has been identified as a ligand for PPARc that can activate the differentiation

of adipose cells [34,35] However, the concentrations of 15d-PGJ2 used for activation of PPARc in most stud-ies are much higher (2.5–100 lm) than those of conven-tional PGs (picomolar range) Moreover, Bell-Parikh

et al.[36] demonstrated that 15d-PGJ2was present at a low level that is insufficient for activation of adipocyte differentiation Thus, the contribution of 15d-PGJ2 to

in vivoadipogenesis remains to be clarified

H-PGDS TG mice gained more body weight than

WT mice when on the HF diet (Fig 2A,B,D), and the WAT weight of TG mice was larger than that of WT mice (Fig 2C); this was accompanied by upregulation

of the expression of adipogenic genes in WAT (Fig 3B), suggesting pronounced differentiation of adipocytes and subsequent obesity in H-PGDS TG mice Furthermore, we observed a drastic increase in PGD2 levels in WAT of H-PGDS TG mice (Fig 3A), whereas PGE2 and PGF2a levels were not significantly altered in WAT in TG mice as compared with those in

WT mice (data not shown); these results are consistent with the previous result showing that, even if PGD2 production was decreased, the biosynthesis of other PGs was not significantly affected [16]

The phenotypes seen in H-PGDS TG mice are con-sistent with the findings that thiazolidinediones, PPARc agonists, enhance adipocyte differentiation and increase body weight, but act as antidiabetic drugs to improve insulin sensitivity [37] Indeed, the overexpres-sion of H-PGDS improved insulin resistance (TG mice showed clear hypoglycemia in response to insulin clamp, as shown in Fig 4B) Thus, PGD2 and⁄ or PGD2 metabolites might be involved in the regulation

of adipogenesis through PPARc in vivo Further stud-ies to investigate the precise mechanism, including the

*

*

0

10

20

0 0.1 0.2

A

Fig 5 Adipocyte differentiation ex vivo (A) Primary cultured

adipo-cytes from WAT of WT and H-PGDS TG mice were cultured in the

presence of DEX, IBMX and insulin for 7 days, and stained for lipid

droplet accumulation with Oil Red O (B) Triglyceride levels in

pri-mary cultured adipocytes Values are expressed as means ± SEMs

(n = 4) **P < 0.01 as compared with WT mice (C) The

transcrip-tion level of the LPL gene in WAT was normalized to that of b-actin

as a control, and calculated as fold intensity Values are expressed

as the means ± SEMs (n = 4–6) *P < 0.05 as compared with WT

mice.

Trang 7

changes oin uptake of fatty acids and the number of

adipocytes, are needed In addition, we need to

eluci-date the effects of GST activity in H-PGDS TG mice,

because H-PGDS also has GST activity [38]

In contrast to their increased insulin sensitivity, TG

mice showed higher insulin concentrations in blood,

whereas the basal glucose level was not different from

that of WT mice (Fig 4A) In the H-PGDS TG mice,

apart from the improvement in peripheral insulin

resis-tance through the activation of PPARc in WAT, it is

possible that PGD2 stimulates pancreatic islets to

increase insulin secretion Indeed, serum insulin levels

were increased after treatment with thiazolidinediones

in diabetic mice through regulation of insulin

produc-tion in pancreatic islet cells [39–41] Thus, the

increased insulin level seen in H-PGDS TG mice when

on the HF diet might be due to effects of PGD2 on

pancreatic islet cells The precise mechanism needs to

be elucidated in further investigations that include

analysis of pancreatic islet cells

The H-PGDS TG mouse is a novel obesity model

with which to investigate the mechanism of

adipogene-sis As is the case for obese people with overnutrition

and energy imbalance, as is common in advanced

countries, H-PGDS TG mice become obese after the

HF diet but not after the normal diet This phenotype

is distinct from that seen in the well-known obesity

model mice, such as db⁄ db and ob ⁄ ob mice, which are

deficient in the leptin receptor and leptin genes,

respec-tively [42]

In summary, H-PGDS TG mice produced

substan-tial amounts of PGD2 as compared with WT mice,

and showed obesity, pronounced adipogenesis, and

increased insulin sensitivity when on the HF diet

Thus, we show, for the first time, that PGD2 is

involved in the activation of adipogenesis and

regula-tion of insulin sensitivity in vivo Further

characteriza-tion of the role of PGD2 in adipocyte differentiation

and function is an important goal, with possible

thera-peutic implications for the treatment of metabolic

dis-orders, such as diabetes and obesity Moreover, the

TG mouse expressing PGDS is a useful model for the

study of obesity

Experimental procedures

Generation of H-PGDS TG mice

The coding region of human H-PGDS was cloned into the

downstream sites of the chicken b-actin promoter and the

CMV enhancer of the pCAGGS expression vector [43] A

3.6 kb SalI–NotI fragment from pCAGGS containing the

H-PGDS expression cassette was microinjected into

pronuclei of fertilized eggs of FVB mice (Taconic, Hudson,

NY, USA) Transgene-positive founder mice were identified

by Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA isolated from the tail Each founder was further bred with FVB mice, and transgene-positive male and female mice were used and compared with WT littermates Mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions in isolated cages with a 12 h light⁄ 12 h dark photoperiod in a humidity-con-trolled and temperature-conhumidity-con-trolled room (55% at 24C) Water and food were available ad libitum The protocols used for all animal experiments in this study were approved

by the Animal Research Committee of Osaka Bioscience Institute

HF diet

Immediately after delactation, mice were fed a normal chow diet (Oriental Yeast, Tokyo, Japan) or an HF diet contain-ing casein (20%; w⁄ w), a-cornstarch (30.2%), sucrose (10%), lard (25%), corn oil (5%), minerals (3.5%), vita-mins (1%), cellulose powder (5%), and d⁄ l-methionine (0.3%) For 6 weeks after delactation, body weight was monitored every week

CT analysis

After mice were anesthetized with intravenous sodium pentobarbital (Nembutal; 50 mgÆkg)1; Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL, USA), CT analysis was performed with

a micro-CT scanner (LaTheta LCT-100; Aloka, Tokyo, Japan) Data were analyzed using latheta software (Alo-ka) The fat and muscle weights were determined from an image at the level of the umbilicus Subcutaneous fat was defined as the extraperitoneal fat between skin and muscle The intraperitoneal part with the same density as the sub-cutaneous fat layer was defined as visceral fat The visceral and subcutaneous fat weights were determined by auto-matic planimetry All experiments were performed at least three times

Immunohistochemical analysis

Paraffin-embedded sections were treated with 0.3% (v⁄ v) hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30 min to block endo-genous peroxidase, and then 0.02 m glycine for 10 min Sections were incubated with rabbit polyclonal antibody against human H-PGDS overnight at 4C After washing, the sections were incubated with the biotinylated goat anti-(rabbit IgG) for 30 min (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame,

CA, USA), and this was followed by staining with the avidin–biotin–peroxidase complex system (Vectastain ABC Kit; Vector Laboratories) Immunohistochemical signals were visualized with peroxidase, using 3¢,3¢-diamino-benzidine hydrochloride cromogen (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA)

Trang 8

Measurement of serum levels of leptin, insulin,

triglyceride, and glucose

Blood was collected from the abdominal aorta Triglyceride

and glucose levels were determined by using Triglyceride

Test Wako (Wako Pure Chemical, Osaka, Japan) and

Antsense II (Bayer Medical, Tokyo, Japan), respectively

Plasma leptin and insulin levels were measured by using

ELISA kits (Morinaga Institute of Biological Science,

Yokohama, Japan), according to the manufacturer’s

instructions

RNA analysis

Preparation of total RNA and synthesis of first-strand

cDNAs were performed as described previously [44]

North-ern blot analysis was performed as described previously

[45]

Expression levels of PPARc, aP2 and LPL genes were

quantified by using the LightCycler system (Roche

Diag-nostics, Mannheim, Germany) with LightCycler FastStart

DNA Master SYBR Green I (Roche Diagnostics) and the

following PCR primer sets: 5¢-GGAGATCTCCAGTGA

TATCGACCA-3¢ and 5¢-ACGGCTTCTACGGATCGAA

ACT-3¢ for PPARc, 5¢-AAGACAGCTCCTCCTCGAAGG

TT-3¢ and 5¢-TGACCAAATCCCCATTTACGC-3¢ for aP2,

5¢-ATCCATGGATGGACGGTAACG-3¢ and 5¢-CTGGA

TCCCAATACTTCGACCA-3¢ for LPL, 5¢-TGGGTTGG

CTGCTTGTG-3¢ and 5¢-GCGTGGGCAGGATGAAG-3¢

for SCD, 5¢-GATGTGGAACCCATAACTGGATTCAC-3¢

and 5¢-GGTCCCAGTCTCATTTAGCCACAGTA-3¢ for

CD36, 5¢-GCGTCGGGTAGATCCAGTT-3¢ and 5¢-CTC

AGTGGGGCTTAGCTCTG-3¢ for ACC, and 5¢-AACAC

CCCAGCCATGTACGTAG-3¢ and 5¢-TGTCAAAGAAA

GGGTGTAAAACGC-3¢ for b-actin Expression levels of

the target genes were normalized to that of b-actin

Insulin sensitivity test

Mice were fed a normal or HF diet for 12 weeks after

delactation Basal blood was collected from the tail vein

(t = 0 min) and immediately measured for glucose, using

an Antsense II Porcine insulin was injected subcutaneously,

and blood was collected at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after

injection

Measurement of PGDS activity and PGD2content

PGDS activity was measured as described previously

[16,46] The PGs in tissues were extracted with ethyl

ace-tate, which was evaporated under nitrogen, and the samples

were then separated by HPLC (Gilson, Middleton, WI,

USA), as described previously [47] The amounts of PGD2

in tissues were determined by using the PGD2-MOX EIA

Kit (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), as described previously [16,46]

Preparation of primary cultured adipose cells and induction of adipogenic differentiation

Primary culture of adipose cells was performed as described previously [48], from epididymal adipose tissues collected from six WT and six TG mice (8–10 weeks of age) Cells were seeded on six-well tissue culture plates (type I colla-gen-precoated; AGC Techno Glass, Chiba, Japan) at a den-sity of 2· 105

cells per well, and incubated in the growth medium at 37C under a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 After confluence had been reached, the growth medium was replaced with the differentiation med-ium containing insulin (10 lgÆmL)1; Sigma), 1 lm DEX (Sigma) and 0.5 mm IBMX (Sigma) for 2 days as described previously [2] The cells were then cultured in the growth medium containing insulin (5 lgÆmL)1) and 200 lm ascor-bic acid for 7 days Lipid accumulation was observed by microscopy with Oil-Red O staining [2] Triglyceride con-tents in the cells were measured by the Wako triglyceride test, according to the manufacturer’s instruction

Statistics

The data are presented as means ± standard errors of the mean (SEMs), and were statistically analyzed by means of the unpaired t-test or the Welch t-test when variances were heterogeneous P-values < 0.05 considered to be significant

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Y Urade (Osaka Bioscience Institute, Osaka, Japan) for valuable discussions This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (to K Fuji-mori and K Aritake), and Research for Promoting Technological Seeds from Japan Science and Technol-ogy Agency, the Suzuken Memorial Foundation, the Sumitomo Foundation, the Gushinkai Foundation (to K Fujimori), and the Takeda Science Foundation (to K Fujimori and Y Fujitani)

References

1 Spiegelman BM & Flier JS (2001) Obesity and the regu-lation of energy balance Cell 104, 531–543

2 Fujimori K, Aritake K & Urade Y (2007) A novel path-way to enhance adipocyte differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells

by up-regulation of lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase mediated by liver X receptor-activated sterol

Trang 9

regulatory element-binding protein-1c J Biol Chem 282,

18458–18466

3 Casimir DA, Miller CW & Ntambi JM (1996)

Prea-dipocyte differentiation blocked by prostaglandin

stimu-lation of prostanoid FP2 receptor in murine 3T3-L1

cells Differentiation 60, 203–210

4 Miller CW, Casimir DA & Ntambi JM (1996) The

mecha-nism of inhibition of 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation

by prostaglandin F2alpha Endocrinology 137, 5641–

5650

5 Tsuboi H, Sugimoto Y, Kainoh T & Ichikawa A (2004)

Prostanoid EP4 receptor is involved in suppression of

3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation Biochem Biophys Res

Commun 322, 1066–1072

6 Urade Y & Hayaishi O (2000) Prostaglandin D

syn-thase: structure and function Vitam Horm 58, 89–120

7 Christ-Hazelhof E & Nugteren DH (1979) Purification

and characterisation of prostaglandin endoperoxide

D-isomerase, a cytoplasmic, glutathione-requiring enzyme

Biochim Biophys Acta 572, 43–51

8 Urade Y, Fujimoto N, Ujihara M & Hayaishi O (1987)

Biochemical and immunological characterization of rat

spleen prostaglandin D synthetase J Biol Chem 262,

3820–3825

9 Murakami M, Matsumoto R, Urade Y, Austen KF &

Arm JP (1995) c-kit ligand mediates increased

expres-sion of cytosolic phospholipase A2, prostaglandin

endo-peroxide synthase-1, and hematopoietic prostaglandin

D2 synthase and increased IgE-dependent prostaglandin

D2 generation in immature mouse mast cells J Biol

Chem 270, 3239–3246

10 Urade Y, Ujihara M, Horiguchi Y, Igarashi M, Nagata

A, Ikai K & Hayaishi O (1990) Mast cells contain

spleen-type prostaglandin D synthetase J Biol Chem

265, 371–375

11 Urade Y, Ujihara M, Horiguchi Y, Ikai K & Hayaishi

O (1989) The major source of endogenous

prostaglan-din D2 production is likely antigen-presenting cells

Localization of glutathione-requiring prostaglandin D

synthetase in histiocytes, dendritic, and Kupffer cells in

various rat tissues J Immunol 143, 2982–2989

12 Fujimori K, Kanaoka Y, Sakaguchi Y & Urade Y

(2000) Transcriptional activation of the human

hemato-poietic prostaglandin D synthase gene in

megakaryo-blastic cells Roles of the Oct-1 element in the

5¢-flanking region and the AP-2 element in the

untrans-lated exon 1 J Biol Chem 275, 40511–40516

13 Mahmud I, Ueda N, Yamaguchi H, Yamashita R,

Yamamoto S, Kanaoka Y, Urade Y & Hayaishi O

(1997) Prostaglandin D synthase in human

mega-karyoblastic cells J Biol Chem 272, 28263–28266

14 Tanaka K, Ogawa K, Sugamura K, Nakamura M,

Takano S & Nagata K (2000) Cutting edge: differential

production of prostaglandin D2 by human helper T cell

subsets J Immunol 164, 2277–2280

15 Kanaoka Y & Urade Y (2003) Hematopoietic prosta-glandin D synthase Prostaprosta-glandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 69, 163–167

16 Aritake K, Kado Y, Inoue T, Miyano M & Urade Y (2006) Structural and functional characterization of HQL-79, an orally selective inhibitor of human hemato-poietic prostaglandin D synthase J Biol Chem 281, 15277–15286

17 Hayes JD, Flanagan JU & Jowsey IR (2005) Glutathione transferases Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 45, 51–88

18 Urade Y, Fujimoto N & Hayaishi O (1985) Purification and characterization of rat brain prostaglandin D synthetase J Biol Chem 260, 12410–12415

19 Jowsey IR, Murdock PR, Moore GB, Murphy GJ, Smith SA & Hayes JD (2003) Prostaglandin D2 syn-thase enzymes and PPARgamma are co-expressed in mouse 3T3-L1 adipocytes and human tissues Prosta-glandins Other Lipid Mediat 70, 267–284

20 Quinkler M, Bujalska IJ, Tomlinson JW, Smith DM & Stewart PM (2006) Depot-specific prostaglandin synthe-sis in human adipose tissue: a novel possible mechanism

of adipogenesis Gene 380, 137–143

21 Urade Y & Hayaishi O (2000) Biochemical, structural, genetic, physiological, and pathophysiological features

of lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase Biochim Biophys Acta 1482, 259–271

22 Xie Y, Kang X, Ackerman WE, Belury MA, Koster C, Rovin BH, Landon MB & Kniss DA (2006) Differenti-ation-dependent regulation of the cyclooxygenase cascade during adipogenesis suggests a complex role for prostaglandins Diabetes Obes Metab 8, 83–93

23 Urade Y & Aritake K (2007) Multifunctional Properties

of Lipocalin-type Prostaglandin D Synthase Research Signpost, Kerala

24 Urade Y & Eguchi N (2002) Lipocalin-type and hema-topoietic prostaglandin D synthases as a novel example

of functional convergence Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat 68–69, 375–382

25 Tanaka T, Urade Y, Kimura H, Eguchi N, Nishikawa

A & Hayaishi O (1997) Lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase (beta-trace) is a newly recognized type of reti-noid transporter J Biol Chem 272, 15789–15795

26 Beuckmann CT, Aoyagi M, Okazaki I, Hiroike T, Toh

H, Hayaishi O & Urade Y (1999) Binding of biliverdin, bilirubin, and thyroid hormones to lipocalin-type pros-taglandin D synthase Biochemistry 38, 8006–8013

27 Mohri I, Taniike M, Okazaki I, Kagitani-Shimono K, Aritake K, Kanekiyo T, Yagi T, Takikita S, Kim HS, Urade Y et al (2006) Lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase is up-regulated in oligodendrocytes in lyso-somal storage diseases and binds gangliosides J Neuro-chem 97, 641–651

28 Kanekiyo T, Ban T, Aritake K, Huang ZL, Qu WM, Okazaki I, Mohri I, Murayama S, Ozono K, Taniike M

et al.(2007) Lipocalin-type prostaglandin D

Trang 10

synthase⁄ beta-trace is a major amyloid beta-chaperone

in human cerebrospinal fluid Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

104, 6412–6417

29 Ragolia L, Palaia T, Hall CE, Maesaka JK, Eguchi N &

Urade Y (2005) Accelerated glucose intolerance,

nephropathy, and atherosclerosis in prostaglandin D2

synthase knock-out mice J Biol Chem 280, 29946–

29955

30 Tanaka R, Miwa Y, Mou K, Tomikawa M, Eguchi N,

Urade Y, Takahashi-Yanaga F, Morimoto S, Wake N

& Sasaguri T (2009) Knockout of the l-pgds gene

aggra-vates obesity and atherosclerosis in mice Biochem

Biophys Res Commun 378, 851–856

31 Kang S, Bajnok L, Longo KA, Petersen RK, Hansen

JB, Kristiansen K & MacDougald OA (2005) Effects of

Wnt signaling on brown adipocyte differentiation and

metabolism mediated by PGC-1alpha Mol Cell Biol 25,

1272–1282

32 Rosen ED (2005) The transcriptional basis of adipocyte

development Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids

73, 31–34

33 Ragolia L, Hall CE & Palaia T (2008) Lipocalin-type

prostaglandin D(2) synthase stimulates glucose

trans-port via enhanced GLUT4 translocation Prostaglandins

Other Lipid Mediat 87, 34–41

34 Forman BM, Tontonoz P, Chen J, Brun RP,

Spiegelman BM & Evans RM (1995)

15-Deoxy-delta12,14-prostaglandin J2 is a ligand for the adipocyte

determination factor PPAR gamma Cell 83, 803–812

35 Kliewer SA, Lenhard JM, Willson TM, Patel I, Morris

DC & Lehmann JM (1995) A prostaglandin J2 metabolite

binds peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma

and promotes adipocyte differentiation Cell 83, 813–819

36 Bell-Parikh LC, Ide T, Lawson JA, McNamara P,

Reilly M & FitzGerald GA (2003) Biosynthesis of

15-deoxy-delta12,14-PGJ2 and the ligation of

PPAR-gamma J Clin Invest 112, 945–955

37 Yamauchi T, Kamon J, Waki H, Murakami K,

Motojima K, Komeda K, Ide T, Kubota N, Terauchi

Y, Tobe K et al (2001) The mechanisms by which both

heterozygous peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor

gamma (PPARgamma) deficiency and PPARgamma

agonist improve insulin resistance J Biol Chem 276,

41245–41254

38 Jowsey IR, Thomson AM, Flanagan JU, Murdock PR,

Moore GB, Meyer DJ, Murphy GJ, Smith SA & Hayes

JD (2001) Mammalian class Sigma glutathione

S-trans-ferases: catalytic properties and tissue-specific expression

of human and rat GSH-dependent prostaglandin D2 synthases Biochem J 359, 507–516

39 Evans-Molina C, Robbins RD, Kono T, Tersey SA, Vestermark GL, Nunemaker CS, Garmey JC, Deering

TG, Keller SR, Maier B et al (2009) Peroxisome prolif-erator-activated receptor gamma activation restores islet function in diabetic mice through reduction of endo-plasmic reticulum stress and maintenance of euchroma-tin structure Mol Cell Biol 29, 2053–2067

40 Wajchenberg BL (2007) Beta-cell failure in diabetes and preservation by clinical treatment Endocr Rev 28, 187– 218

41 Yildirim S, Bolkent S & Sundler F (2008) The role of rosiglitazone treatment in the modulation of islet hor-mones and hormone-like peptides: a combined in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical study J Mol Histol 39, 635–642

42 Speakman J, Hambly C, Mitchell S & Krol E (2008) The contribution of animal models to the study of obesity Lab Anim 42, 413–432

43 Niwa H, Yamamura K & Miyazaki J (1991) Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants with a novel eukaryotic vector Gene 108, 193–199

44 Fujimori K, Kadoyama K & Urade Y (2005) Protein kinase C activates human lipocalin-type prostaglandin

D synthase gene expression through de-repression of Notch-Hes signaling and enhancement of AP-2 beta function in brain-derived TE671 cells J Biol Chem 280, 18452–18461

45 Kanaoka Y, Fujimori K, Kikuno R, Sakaguchi Y, Urade Y & Hayaishi O (2000) Structure and chromo-somal localization of human and mouse genes for hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase Conservation

of the ancestral genomic structure of sigma-class gluta-thione S-transferase Eur J Biochem 267, 3315–3322

46 Fujitani Y, Kanaoka Y, Aritake K, Uodome N, Okazaki-Hatake K & Urade Y (2002) Pronounced eosinophilic lung inflammation and Th2 cytokine release

in human lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase trans-genic mice J Immunol 168, 443–449

47 Pinzar E, Kanaoka Y, Inui T, Eguchi N, Urade Y & Hayaishi O (2000) Prostaglandin D synthase gene is involved in the regulation of non-rapid eye movement sleep Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97, 4903–4907

48 Ohyama M, Matsuda K, Torii S, Matsui T, Yano H, Kawada T & Ishihara T (1998) The interaction between vitamin A and thiazolidinedione on bovine adipocyte differentiation in primary culture J Anim Sci 76, 61–65

Ngày đăng: 16/02/2014, 09:20

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm