Tài liệu Corporate Reputations, Branding and People Management 32 ppt

Corporate strategy, corporate leadership, corporate identity and CSR 9 Introduction In this penultimate chapter, we focus on the corporate-level drivers of people management, reputation

This page intentionally left blank

Corporate strategy, corporate leadership,

corporate identity

and CSR

9

Introduction

In this penultimate chapter, we focus on the corporate-level drivers of people management, reputations and brands in our

introductory model from Chapter 1 These are corporate

strat-egy, leadership and governance, and corporate identity Although we

have touched on these drivers throughout the book, there are

a number of important points still to be considered since HR strategy does not and cannot be constructed in a vacuum

HR strategies are often portrayed as second- or even third-order strategies that follow rather than drive business or corporate strategies though, as we have seen in Chapter 2, the resource-based view of strategy (the RBV) and the importance of intan-gible assets such as knowledge, reputations and brands, have changed that picture a little

So, first, we will examine in more depth the RBV to show its value to our central thesis that reputations and brands are driven from the inside out This is especially so in knowledge-based and creative industries While many senior managers espouse such sentiments in claiming that ‘people are our most import-ant assets’, only those that act on such rhetoric will place faith

in the practices of HR and good people management to deliver quality reputations and brands This relationship between rhet-oric and action in strategy sometimes requires an act of faith on

their part Thus, we will examine that idea of strategy as a

perspec-tive or world-view, since it is often what goes on in senior leaders’

heads that is all-important in shaping the future direction of organizations, which we hope to influence We will also look at developments in strategy-making in creative and knowledge-based industries, which rest on building core competencies and leveraging partnerships and networks to produce innovation (Hagel and Seely-Brown, 2005), as it is in such industries that reputations and talent probably matter more than in trad-itional ones It is also in these industries that we are likely to find most difficulty in pursuing a corporate agenda This is because they are more likely to be populated by new forms of organiza-tions, such as networks and virtual forms, which are, by definition, fragmented and thus pose new problems for HR, reputation management and branding

Second, we need to engage in a deeper discussion about cor-porate governance and leadership, which we have so far only touched on Increasingly, these issues are shaping the reputa-tion management and branding agendas In particular, we examine three different models of governance: shareholder value, stewardship and stakeholder approaches This discus-sion provides a necessary backdrop to the third of our themes

in the chapter – creating a corporate identity as a social respon-sible corporation Reputation management and the CSR (cor-porate social responsibility) agenda have become intertwined over the past decade because CSR is one of the fastest growing areas of interest in business and the basis on which a large num-ber of organizations are beginning to construct corporate iden-tities and compete in product and labour markets We analyse the notion of CSR and the claims made for it, including the business case; we also look at the attempts to create measurable

296 Corporate Reputations, Branding and People Management

standards for CSR, including the so-called ‘triple bottom line’ (3BL) The CSR agenda, however, is not without its critics These critics come from the right in the shape of neo-classical econo-mists and proponents of shareholder value, supported by writ-ers on business ethics They are also from the left, who regard CSR as nothing more than a public relations fig leaf, which does little to alter fundamental power relations in society Some of the most interesting criticisms, however, come from within, including critics of the ‘doing well by doing good’ busi-ness case and the idea of a measurable bottom line

A key theme of this chapter is that the basis on which the leadership of an organization constructs its governance model will ultimately determine its approach to people management, reputation management, CSR and brand-building Increasingly,

it is to responsible leadership that we will look for more socially responsible policies Leaders, however, will need advice from a broader-based and more knowledgeable HR function, schooled

in the debates over strategy, governance and CSR, since it is on the basis of effective people management that strategic success, governance, CSR, reputations and brands ultimately depend

We begin the chapter by examining the UK Financial Services Industry, which is experiencing problems with its reputation, along with many of its member companies These reputation problems are rooted in assumptions about strategy, leadership and governance and the values of its key opinion leaders and employees Though the industry is vital to the future of the British economy and to all savers and investors, including the rapidly growing population that will rely on pensions and invest-ment income for a living, it is among the least respected by its

UK consumers Expectations of it are high, but customers’ per-ceptions of delivery against these expectations are low This poor reputation among the general public hurts it financially because

of a lack of trust in its products and services Furthermore, it has negative consequences for its ability to attract talented people

to apply for jobs, with the insurance sub-sector being a good example (Goldsmith, 2005) As a consequence, it relies more than any other industry on high levels of financial incentives to attract and retain staff (Sung and Ashton, 2005) Such an approach to talent management is arguably unsustainable in

the long run (Groysberg et al., 2004), though the principle of

tying pay to performance is one of the classic dictums of neo-classical economists and many US HR specialists We end the chapter with an example of a firm that may be getting it right because they have treated CSR seriously as a main board issue and because of the benefits of CSR in building social capital among employees and improving employee engagement

298 Corporate Reputations, Branding and People Management

Box 9.1 Unfit for the future?:The UK financial services

industry

On 8 November 2005, we took part in a major conference in London on the future of the financial services industry, comprising firms providing products and services for savings, loans and investments, including banks, insurance companies, asset managers, securities companies, mortgage lenders, intermediary brokers, finance companies, financial consultants, etc This conference provided an excellent illustration of the problems

of an industry facing up to a poor reputation among consumers, gov-ernment, the media and the general public The questions addressed by speakers and in the group discussions focused on what could be done as

an industry and by its individual companies to make it fit for the future

by improving its reputation Two keynote presentations highlighted the general problems faced by the industry We summarize these, and some

of the discussions with senior marketing, communications and HR managers that ensued

According to one principal speaker, Anna Bradley, formerly a member

of the regulatory body, Financial Services Authority (FSA), the industry was ‘unfit for future challenges’ unless it offered customers greater value by changing its business model from one that prioritized new cus-tomer sales to one that provided expert advice and value for money to existing, as well as new, customers Her main argument was that the legacy of past strategies had resulted in a poor industry image, a view sup-ported by the other keynote speaker, Ian Stewart Bradley evidenced the history of mis-selling of pensions, payment-protection insurance on loans and individual mortgages, which she argued still continues, along with contemporary problems concerning equity release schemes, individual savings schemes and long-term care insurance as evidence of uncom-petitive products and poor customer value She also flagged the rela-tively lack-lustre performance of many financial services companies in

providing returns to shareholders, a point supported by recent evi-dence on the financial performance of some of the largest UK banks For example, during 2005, the UK banking sector was the ‘least loved’ of

the three big sectors dominating The Financial Times top 100 companies –

banking, pharmaceutical and oil – performing poorly, especially the

big four banks (Scotland on Sunday, 11 December 2005) The net result of

these problems was a lack of confidence and trust among consumers, and a perception that many companies in the industry ‘fleeced cus-tomers’ over savings and investments products and services Moreover, there seemed to be a lack of understanding by company managers that problems existed: in one survey 75% of customers expressed a lack of trust in the industry and failure to do a good job, while 75% of man-agers in the industry thought they were doing a good job

Further evidence for poor image was provided by Ian Stewart, Research Director for Mintel, a market research agency, and a former senior man-ager in the industry Drawing on a Mintel survey conducted in 2004, he pointed out that only 15% of customers claimed their banks understood their needs, despite one-third regularly visiting their branch This situa-tion was not helped by a challenging social and economic environment, comprising: (a) an ageing population and potential pensions crisis; (b) an increased emphasis by government on individual responsibility for healthcare and education; and (c) a generally poor financial under-standing and capability among the population at large, which had resulted in high borrowing and an over-reliance on property for invest-ment Stewart cited the Mintel survey evidence in which only 27% of cus-tomers rated themselves as having a good understanding of financial products and 74% claimed to learn about them through trial and error

To balance the picture a little, both presenters argued that some of these criticisms applied only to certain sectors of the industry Evidence

supporting this was provided by an Economist article in December 2005,

showing the mortgage market in the UK seemed to be working well, according to an independent study carried out for the UK Office of Fair Trading However, the same article pointed to evidence of market failure

in the retail banking sector, especially in respect of consumers and small businesses, where despite banking charges being generally low in European terms, other evidence pointed to excessive fees being charged

to individuals and small firms by the larger banks (Economist, 2005a).

As a result of numerous UK government reviews and reports from the Office of Fair Trading of market failure, the FSA had attempted to

300 Corporate Reputations, Branding and People Management

regulate the industry through a number of interventions over enhanced disclosure, new responsibilities in insurance, changes in advice and

an enhanced complaints procedure However, according to Bradley, changes had been ‘largely piecemeal and slow’, which was not likely to help the industry or consumers, especially given the opening up of cross-border markets in Europe

The analysis of both keynote presenters pointed to long-term and fundamental causes, the most important of which was the ‘myopic’ industry focus on short-term sales and profits Bradley focused on the lack of connection between producers and consumers; the industry over-emphasized sales of products to new customers, supported by extremely high levels of incentives to customers and sales staff that rewarded the acquisition of new business, rather than servicing exist-ing customers This situation was most noticeable in the insurance and credit sectors in which competition among wholesalers, resellers and retailers for customers had resulted in the practice of offering ‘golden hellos’ She also highlighted advice that was confused with sales: sales

of new business were rewarded by high levels of fee-based incentives, which resulted in brokers and sales staff masking the sales of particular products as neutral advice; however, she did recognize the unwilling-ness of customers to pay for advice as a ‘plea in mitigation’

Stewart continued with this theme by focusing on the changing nature

of consumers He pointed out there were many more customer segments today than previously and that customers were more demanding His argument was that customers were ‘growing old disgracefully’, in com-parison to previous savings-oriented, more careful generations, because they had to pay for increased mortgages, higher education for children, weddings, increased leisure and more varied lifestyles As a consequence, old certainties no longer existed Yet the industry continued to sell old products in old ways, despite the widespread dislike among consumers of high pressure selling through financial advertising and continuous direct mailing Again, this was redolent of an old-fashioned sales-dominated strategy based on products rather than on solutions, which are based on customer wants and needs, and in offering high value services through expert, committed and trustworthy employees

Coincidentally, two days after this conference, a report was carried in

the London Evening Standard on figures newly published by the Office

of National Statistics on the average earnings in London postcodes The headlines pointed out the average earnings of males living in the

This case reveals some of the problems of strategy, govern-ance and social responsibility in an industry and many of the firms in it When reading the rest of this chapter, you should think about the financial services case to ground your thoughts Also, you may wish to reflect on how an understanding of the following concepts might be applied to the case Financial ser-vices is not unique, but is at the forefront in using financial incentives to motivate people (Sung and Ashton, 2005), which,

postcode of Poplar and Canning Town, once one of the poorest areas of London, was £101 032, nearly 40% more than the City and Westminster

at £ 66 969, the nearest London postcode to it in terms of earnings, and nearly three times the London average male earnings of £361 442 Nowadays, however, Poplar and Canning Town boasts Canary Wharf as part of its constituency, home of many of the UK’s largest financial ser-vices companies (the City and Westminster is another area dominated

by financial services companies) According to this newspaper article, these earnings in Poplar and Canning Town reflected the high levels of bonuses being paid to staff in the financial services industry The nega-tive consequences on high house prices in London were, according to the article, a potential cause of social conflict in the capital

The conference was asked to tackle the problems of the industry in a series of facilitated group discussions and feedback sessions End-of-conference summaries of these discussions and general conclusions were characterized by blaming government and the FSA for over-regulation and consumers for their lack of understanding and ‘failure to acknow-ledge’ the benefits provided by the industry as a whole High on the list of solutions were the need for more effective communications and public relations, highlighting the benefits of the industry to the economy and customers, the need to charge for advice, and educating customers and society at large on the needs for savings and investment Low on the list of solutions was the need to address corporate governance in the industry, the need to examine incentives and rewards strategies and the need for more sustainable, socially responsible policies Even lower on the list of solutions was the willingness of any of the marketing directors present in the room to suggest their own company would be willing to break with the industry recipe of going for sales growth and changing the nature of incentives to sales staff and other key managers, though a number recog-nized that these were fundamental (but intractable) problems

as we shall see, is a critical issue in governance and responsible leadership

302 Corporate Reputations, Branding and People Management

Corporate strategy: the importance

of an inside-out perspective

As we noted in Chapter 2, the RBV has provided an impor-tant source of justification for the focus on strategic human resource management, on the management of people as a source

of competitive advantage, and for expenditure on attracting, retaining, developing, rewarding and motivating talented people

To recap on the RBV, it came about because of the changing emphasis in competitive strategy away from external factors, such as the attractiveness of an industry and how firms should position themselves in an industry, to a concern with

capitaliz-ing on internal resources that were rare, valuable, inimitable (not easily copied) and non-substitutable High on anyone’s list of such

resources are people; but these also include reputations, brands and knowledge Indeed John Kay, a leading British economist, has questioned the relevance of the joint stock company and a shareholder value-model of corporate governance in the 21st century:

The distinction between the role of shareholders and employees was clear when shareholders had bought the plant and employees worked in it But the principal assets

of the modern company are knowledge, brands and reputation, which are in the heads and hands of employees What can it mean to say the shareholders ‘own’ these things? (2004, p 58)

This quotation calls into question one of the main premises of outside-in approaches to strategy, which is that it is easier to re-arrange and fit assets and complementary resources to match a choice of strategy than to change strategy to match the

inher-ent assets and resources of the company (Dunford et al., 2001).

Although this matching of people to strategy is a core assump-tion underlying the design school of strategy, it is also one of its

greatest failings, since strategy unconnected to implementation

is a major problem facing many organizations (Pettigrew and

Whipp, 1991; Joyce et al., 2003).

Early work on links between the RBV and strategic HRM sug-gested that it was how firms put together bundles of HR prac-tices that were a source of competitive advantage We discussed this view in relation to best practice and bundles of practices in Chapter 5 However, later writers saw the flaw in this argument because best practice could be easily copied; instead they

sug-gested that it was systems of HR practices, including their

com-plementarities and interdependencies (internal and external fit), that were a more significant source of advantage

Yet, at least according to some writers, even these are not enough to create unique, valuable, rare and inimitable resources What was more important is how these practices relate to individuals – their identities, attitudes and behaviours – which has been one of the main arguments of this book Perhaps the best case for this argument is the distinction made between a

firm’s human capital pool (its stocks and flows of people in, through and out of the organization) and its human resource

practices, which we have discussed previously The main point is

that it is probably more important to focus on how the human capital pool – skilled and potentially willing people – are

man-aged by line managers to produce key behaviours that create value

than to focus on systems of HR practices This distinction is at the heart of SHRM models and provides the basis for the architec-tural and segmentation models discussed in Chapter 6

Returning to the quote from John Kay, a basic premise of this human capital approach is that firms do not own human resources in the same sense that they own financial or material resources; people possess an important degree of free will in how they engage with an organization, often summed up in the phrase ‘discretionary behaviour’ So it is how strategists face up

to the unpredictable problem of engaging people, individually and collectively, to behave beneficially for an organization that

is their principal focus, and is one of the main issues for leaders’ and senior managers’ day-to-day attention It is in this sense we

can talk about people management (of the human capital pool)

being important rather than human resource management, since, as we have shown in this book, it is factors beyond the